Enrique Maguilla
Pablo de Olavide University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Enrique Maguilla.
Systematic Botany | 2016
Pedro Jiménez-Mejías; Marlene Hahn; Kate Lueders; Julian R. Starr; Bethany H. Brown; Brianna N. Chouinard; Kyong Sook Chung; Marcial Escudero; Bruce A. Ford; Kerry A. Ford; Sebastian Gebauer; Berit Gehrke; Matthias H. Hoffmann; Xiao Feng Jin; Jongduk Jung; Sangtae Kim; Modesto Luceño; Enrique Maguilla; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Mónica Míguez; Ana Molina; Robert F. C. Naczi; Jocelyn E. Pender; Anton A. Reznicek; Tamara Villaverde; Marcia J. Waterway; Karen L. Wilson; Jong Cheol Yang; Shuren Zhang; Andrew L. Hipp
Abstract We present the first large-scale phylogenetic hypothesis for the genus Carex based on 996 of the 1983 accepted species (50.23%). We used a supermatrix approach using three DNA regions: ETS, ITS and matK. Every concatenated sequence was derived from a single specimen. The topology of our phylogenetic reconstruction largely agreed with previous studies. We also gained new insights into the early divergence structure of the two largest clades, core Carex and Vignea clades, challenging some previous evolutionary hypotheses about inflorescence structure. Most sections were recovered as non-monophyletic. Homoplasy of characters traditionally selected as relevant for classification, historical misunderstanding of how morphology varies across Carex, and regional rather than global views of Carex diversity seem to be the main reasons for the high levels of polyphyly and paraphyly in the current infrageneric classification.
American Journal of Botany | 2015
Marcial Escudero; Enrique Maguilla; João Loureiro; Mariana Castro; Sílvia Castro; Modesto Luceño
PREMISE OF THE STUDY In organisms with holocentric chromosomes like Carex species, chromosome number evolution has been hypothesized to be a result of fission, fusion, and/or translocation events. Negative, positive, or the absence of correlations have been found between chromosome number and genome size in Carex. METHODS Using the inferred diploid chromosome number and 80 genome size measurements from 26 individuals and 20 populations of Carex gr. laevigata, we tested the null hypothesis of chromosome number evolution by duplication and deletion of whole chromosomes. KEY RESULTS Our results show a significant positive correlation between genome size and chromosome number, but the slope of such correlation supports the hypothesis of proliferation and removal of repetitive DNA fragments to explain genome size variation rather than duplication and deletion of whole chromosomes. CONCLUSIONS Our results refine the theory of the holokinetic drive: this mechanism is proposed to facilitate repetitive DNA removal (or any segmental deletion) when smaller homologous chromosomes are preferentially inherited, or repetitive DNA proliferation (or any segmental duplication) when larger homologs are preferred. This study sheds light on how karyotype evolution plays an important role in the diversification of the species of the genus Carex.
American Journal of Botany | 2015
Enrique Maguilla; Marcial Escudero; Marcia J. Waterway; Andrew L. Hipp; Modesto Luceño
UNLABELLED • PREMISE OF THE STUDY The circumboreal Carex section Glareosae comprises 20-25 currently accepted species. High variability in geographic distribution, ecology, cytogenetics, and morphology has led to historical problems both in species delimitation and in circumscribing the limits of the section, which is one of the major tasks facing caricologists today.• METHODS We performed phylogenetic reconstructions based on ETS, ITS, G3PDH, and matK DNA sequences from 204 samples. Concatenation of gene regions in a supermatrix approach to phylogenetic reconstruction was compared to coalescent-based species-tree estimation. Ancestral state reconstructions were performed for eight morphological characters to evaluate correspondence between phylogeny and traits used in traditional classification within the section.• KEY RESULTS The results confirm the existence of a core Glareosae comprising 23-25 species. Most species constitute exclusive lineages, and relationships among species are highly resolved with both the supermatrix and coalescent-based species-tree approaches. We used ancestral state reconstruction to investigate sources of homoplasy underlying traditional taxonomy and species circumscription. We found that even species apparently not constituting exclusive lineages are morphologically homogeneous, raising the question of whether paraphyly of species is a phylogenetic artifact in our study or evidence of widespread homoplasy in characters used to define species.• CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the monophyly of Carex section Glareosae and establishes a phylogenetic framework for the section. Homoplasy makes many of morphological characters difficult to apply for taxon delimitation. The strong concordance between supermatrix and species-tree approaches to phylogenetic reconstructions suggests that even in the face of incongruence among molecular markers, section-level or species-level phylogenies in Carex are tractable.
Molecular Ecology | 2017
Enrique Maguilla; Marcial Escudero; Andrew L. Hipp; Modesto Luceño
Gene flow among incipient species can act as a creative or destructive force in the speciation process, generating variation on which natural selection can act while, potentially, undermining population divergence. The flowering plant genus Carex exhibits a rapid and relatively recent radiation with many species limits still unclear. This is the case with the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal)‐endemic C. lucennoiberica, which lay unrecognized within Carex furva until its recent description as a new species. In this study, we test how these species were impacted by interspecific gene flow during speciation. We sampled the full range of distribution of C. furva (15 individuals sampled) and C. lucennoiberica (88 individuals), sequenced two cpDNA regions (atpI‐atpH, psbA‐trnH) and performed genomic sequencing of 45,100 SNPs using restriction site‐associated DNA sequencing (RAD‐seq). We utilized a set of partitioned D‐statistic tests and demographic analyses to study the degree and direction of introgression. Additionally, we modelled species distributions to reconstruct changes in range distribution during glacial and interglacial periods. Plastid, nuclear and morphological data strongly support divergence between species with subsequent gene flow. Combined with species distribution modelling, these data support a scenario of allopatry leading to species divergence, followed by secondary contact and gene flow due to long‐distance dispersal and/or range expansions and contractions in response to Quaternary glacial cycles. We conclude that this is a case of allopatric speciation despite historical secondary contacts, which could have temporally influenced the speciation process, contributing to the knowledge of forces that are driving or counteracting speciation.
Systematic Botany | 2016
Kasey K. Pham; Marlene Hahn; Kate Lueders; Bethany H. Brown; Leo P. Bruederle; Jeremy J. Bruhl; Kyong Sook Chung; Nathan J. Derieg; Marcial Escudero; Bruce A. Ford; Sebastian Gebauer; Berit Gehrke; Matthias H. Hoffmann; Takuji Hoshino; Pedro Jiménez-Mejías; Jongduk Jung; Sangtae Kim; Modesto Luceño; Enrique Maguilla; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Robert F. C. Naczi; Anton A. Reznicek; Eric H. Roalson; David Simpson; Julian R. Starr; Tamara Villaverde; Marcia J. Waterway; Karen L. Wilson; Okihito Yano; Shuren Zhang
Abstract Major public DNA databases — NCBI GenBank, the DNA DataBank of Japan (DDBJ), and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) — are invaluable biodiversity libraries. Systematists and other biodiversity scientists commonly mine these databases for sequence data to use in phylogenetic studies, but such studies generally use only the taxonomic identity of the sequenced tissue, not the specimen identity. Thus studies that use DNA supermatrices to construct phylogenetic trees with species at the tips typically do not take advantage of the fact that for many individuals in the public DNA databases, several DNA regions have been sampled; and for many species, two or more individuals have been sampled. Thus these studies typically do not make full use of the multigene datasets in public DNA databases to test species coherence and select optimal sequences to represent a species. In this study, we introduce a set of tools developed in the R programming language to construct individual-based trees from NCBI GenBank data and present a set of trees for the genus Carex (Cyperaceae) constructed using these methods. For the more than 770 species for which we found sequence data, our approach recovered an average of 1.85 gene regions per specimen, up to seven for some specimens, and more than 450 species represented by two or more specimens. Depending on the subset of genes analyzed, we found up to 42% of species monophyletic. We introduce a simple tree statistic—the Taxonomic Disparity Index (TDI)—to assist in curating specimen-level datasets and provide code for selecting maximally informative (or, conversely, minimally misleading) sequences as species exemplars. While tailored to the Carex dataset, the approach and code presented in this paper can readily be generalized to constructing individual-level trees from large amounts of data for any species group.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | 2015
Marcia J. Waterway; Karen L. Wilson; Bruce A. Ford; Julian R. Starr; Xiao‐Feng Jin; Shuren Zhang; Sebastian Gebauer; Matthias H. Hoffmann; Berit Gehrke; Okihito Yano; Takuji Hoshino; Tomomi Masaki; Kerry A. Ford; Kyong Sook Chung; J. Jung; Sangtae Kim; M. Escudero; Modesto Luceño; Enrique Maguilla; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Mónica Míguez; Tamara Villaverde; Ana Molina; David Simpson; Leo P. Bruederle; Marlene Hahn; Andrew L. Hipp; P. E. Rothrock; Anton A. Reznicek; Robert F. C. Naczi
Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics | 2013
Marcial Escudero; Enrique Maguilla; Modesto Luceño
Journal of Biogeography | 2017
Mónica Míguez; Berit Gehrke; Enrique Maguilla; Pedro Jiménez-Mejías; Santiago Martín-Bravo
Acta Botanica Malacitana 40. 2015 | 2017
Modesto Luceño; Enrique Maguilla; Marcial Escudero; Alexandre Silva; Samuel Guerra-Cárdenas; Andreas Hipold; Mónica Míguez; Íñigo Pulgar; Tamara Villaverde; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Pedro Jiménez-Mejías
Phytotaxa | 2018
Carlos Cerrejón; Enrique Maguilla; Dietmar Quandt; Jesús Muñoz; Modesto Luceño