Tamara Villaverde
Pablo de Olavide University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Tamara Villaverde.
Systematic Botany | 2016
Pedro Jiménez-Mejías; Marlene Hahn; Kate Lueders; Julian R. Starr; Bethany H. Brown; Brianna N. Chouinard; Kyong Sook Chung; Marcial Escudero; Bruce A. Ford; Kerry A. Ford; Sebastian Gebauer; Berit Gehrke; Matthias H. Hoffmann; Xiao Feng Jin; Jongduk Jung; Sangtae Kim; Modesto Luceño; Enrique Maguilla; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Mónica Míguez; Ana Molina; Robert F. C. Naczi; Jocelyn E. Pender; Anton A. Reznicek; Tamara Villaverde; Marcia J. Waterway; Karen L. Wilson; Jong Cheol Yang; Shuren Zhang; Andrew L. Hipp
Abstract We present the first large-scale phylogenetic hypothesis for the genus Carex based on 996 of the 1983 accepted species (50.23%). We used a supermatrix approach using three DNA regions: ETS, ITS and matK. Every concatenated sequence was derived from a single specimen. The topology of our phylogenetic reconstruction largely agreed with previous studies. We also gained new insights into the early divergence structure of the two largest clades, core Carex and Vignea clades, challenging some previous evolutionary hypotheses about inflorescence structure. Most sections were recovered as non-monophyletic. Homoplasy of characters traditionally selected as relevant for classification, historical misunderstanding of how morphology varies across Carex, and regional rather than global views of Carex diversity seem to be the main reasons for the high levels of polyphyly and paraphyly in the current infrageneric classification.
American Journal of Botany | 2017
Tamara Villaverde; Pablo González-Moreno; Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez; Marcial Escudero
PREMISE OF THE STUDY Bipolar species represent the greatest biogeographical disjunction on Earth, raising many questions about the colonization and adaptive processes behind such striking distribution. We investigated climatic niche differences of five Carex bipolar species in North and South America to assess niche shifts between these two regions. Moreover, we assessed potential distribution changes with future climate change. METHODS We used 1202 presence data points from herbarium specimens and 19 bioclimatic variables to assess climatic niche differences and potential distributions among the five species using ordination methods and Maxent. KEY RESULTS The niche overlap analyses showed low levels of niche filling and high climatic niche expansion between North and South America. Carex macloviana and C. maritima showed the greatest niche expansion (60% and 96%, respectively), followed by C. magellanica (45%) and C. microglochin (39%). Only C. canescens did not colonize new environments (niche expansion = 0.2%). In contrast, all species but C. magellanica had niche filling that was <40%; hence, they are absent in the south from many environments they inhabit in North America. Climate change will push all species toward higher latitudes and elevation, reducing the availability of suitable environments. CONCLUSIONS The colonization of South America seems to have involved frequent climatic niche shifts. Most species have colonized new environments from those occupied in the North. Observed niche shifts appear congruent with time since colonization and with current genetic structure within species. In these cold-dwelling species, climate change will most likely decrease their suitable environments in the future.
American Journal of Botany | 2017
Tamara Villaverde; Marcial Escudero; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Pedro Jiménez-Mejías; Isabel Sanmartín; Pablo Vargas; Modesto Luceño
Bipolar disjunct distributions are a fascinating biogeographic pattern exhibited by about 30 vascular plants, whose populations reach very high latitudes in the northern and southern hemispheres. In this review, we first propose a new framework for the definition of bipolar disjunctions and then reformulate a list of guiding principles to consider how to study bipolar species. Vicariance and convergent evolution hypotheses have been argued to explain the origin of this fragmented distribution pattern, but we show here that they can be rejected for all bipolar species, except for Carex microglochin. Instead, human introduction and dispersal (either direct or by mountain-hopping)-facilitated by standard and nonstandard vectors-are the most likely explanations for the origin of bipolar plant disjunctions. Successful establishment after dispersal is key for colonization of the disjunct areas and appear to be related to both intrinsic (e.g., self-compatibility) and extrinsic (mutualistic and antagonistic interactions) characteristics. Most studies on plant bipolar disjunctions have been conducted in Carex (Cyperaceae), the genus of vascular plants with the largest number of bipolar species. We found a predominant north-to-south direction of dispersal, with an estimated time of diversification in agreement with major cooling events during the Pliocene and Pleistocene. Bipolar Carex species do not seem to depend on specialized traits for long-distance dispersal and could have dispersed through one or multiple stochastic events, with birds as the most likely dispersal vector.
Systematic Botany | 2016
Kasey K. Pham; Marlene Hahn; Kate Lueders; Bethany H. Brown; Leo P. Bruederle; Jeremy J. Bruhl; Kyong Sook Chung; Nathan J. Derieg; Marcial Escudero; Bruce A. Ford; Sebastian Gebauer; Berit Gehrke; Matthias H. Hoffmann; Takuji Hoshino; Pedro Jiménez-Mejías; Jongduk Jung; Sangtae Kim; Modesto Luceño; Enrique Maguilla; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Robert F. C. Naczi; Anton A. Reznicek; Eric H. Roalson; David Simpson; Julian R. Starr; Tamara Villaverde; Marcia J. Waterway; Karen L. Wilson; Okihito Yano; Shuren Zhang
Abstract Major public DNA databases — NCBI GenBank, the DNA DataBank of Japan (DDBJ), and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) — are invaluable biodiversity libraries. Systematists and other biodiversity scientists commonly mine these databases for sequence data to use in phylogenetic studies, but such studies generally use only the taxonomic identity of the sequenced tissue, not the specimen identity. Thus studies that use DNA supermatrices to construct phylogenetic trees with species at the tips typically do not take advantage of the fact that for many individuals in the public DNA databases, several DNA regions have been sampled; and for many species, two or more individuals have been sampled. Thus these studies typically do not make full use of the multigene datasets in public DNA databases to test species coherence and select optimal sequences to represent a species. In this study, we introduce a set of tools developed in the R programming language to construct individual-based trees from NCBI GenBank data and present a set of trees for the genus Carex (Cyperaceae) constructed using these methods. For the more than 770 species for which we found sequence data, our approach recovered an average of 1.85 gene regions per specimen, up to seven for some specimens, and more than 450 species represented by two or more specimens. Depending on the subset of genes analyzed, we found up to 42% of species monophyletic. We introduce a simple tree statistic—the Taxonomic Disparity Index (TDI)—to assist in curating specimen-level datasets and provide code for selecting maximally informative (or, conversely, minimally misleading) sequences as species exemplars. While tailored to the Carex dataset, the approach and code presented in this paper can readily be generalized to constructing individual-level trees from large amounts of data for any species group.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | 2015
Marcia J. Waterway; Karen L. Wilson; Bruce A. Ford; Julian R. Starr; Xiao‐Feng Jin; Shuren Zhang; Sebastian Gebauer; Matthias H. Hoffmann; Berit Gehrke; Okihito Yano; Takuji Hoshino; Tomomi Masaki; Kerry A. Ford; Kyong Sook Chung; J. Jung; Sangtae Kim; M. Escudero; Modesto Luceño; Enrique Maguilla; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Mónica Míguez; Tamara Villaverde; Ana Molina; David Simpson; Leo P. Bruederle; Marlene Hahn; Andrew L. Hipp; P. E. Rothrock; Anton A. Reznicek; Robert F. C. Naczi
Journal of Biogeography | 2015
Tamara Villaverde; Marcial Escudero; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Leo P. Bruederle; Modesto Luceño; Julian R. Starr
Journal of Biogeography | 2015
Tamara Villaverde; Marcial Escudero; Modesto Luceño; Santiago Martín-Bravo
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | 2017
Tamara Villaverde; Marcial Escudero; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Modesto Luceño
Acta Botanica Malacitana 40. 2015 | 2017
Modesto Luceño; Enrique Maguilla; Marcial Escudero; Alexandre Silva; Samuel Guerra-Cárdenas; Andreas Hipold; Mónica Míguez; Íñigo Pulgar; Tamara Villaverde; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Pedro Jiménez-Mejías
Phytotaxa | 2017
José Ignacio Márquez-Corro; Enrique Maguilla; Tamara Villaverde; Santiago Martín-Bravo; Modesto Luceño