Eric Brassinne

Functional and outcome evaluation of the hand and wrist

The first evaluation of the upper extremity and hand, performed by the surgeon at the outpatient clinic, is fundamental to understanding the patients problem, determining the best treatment options, and, in the case of a surgical indication, assessing the preoperative status. In addition to recording the patients symptoms and complaints, the surgeon evaluates anatomic integrity, stability, mobility, trophicity, strength, and sensibility. In many patients, especially patients with severe handicaps or those who anticipate long delays in rehabilitation, in litigation problems, or as part of prospective clinical research, this classic evaluation is not sufficient. The authors recommend that to accommodate these patients, a laboratory of functional evaluation of the hand should be established. The evaluation, performed by independent reviewers, ideally includes techniques allowing objective measurements of kinematics, strength, sensibility, and global hand function and dexterity. Pain assessment using the VAS is indispensable. The results may be presented as scores based on to the patients problem. The researchers should analyze precisely how the scores were constructed. Questionnaires are part of the evaluation armamentarium. As with other tools, questionnaires allow us to understand better what our patients experience. They do not replace physical examination. Questionnaires also could be used for routine screening in a general upper limb practice, even before the patient sees the hand surgeon. The choice of the questionnaire is important; the reviewer should make sure that the patient understands all questions, that the questions are not redundant, and that they do apply to the patient. Generic health status instruments such as the SF-36 allow comparison across a variety of health problems, including mental and physical conditions, but are not sensitive to upper extremity disability. The DASH questionnaire seems a better choice, allowing a standardized outcome evaluation. Dedicated questionnaires have been developed for specific conditions (eg, carpal tunnel syndrome). As discussed by Amadio, questionnaires are easier to perform than physical testing, can be self-administered, and require no special equipment, saving the cost of an examiner, avoiding the complexities of scheduling a follow-up examination, and eliminating the possibility of observer bias. The patient is less likely to offer polite but incorrect responses. Questionnaires are especially useful when patients perceptions are important to assess. Questionnaires also could be used in longitudinal studies to assess improvement or aggravation. The use of questionnaires is therefore especially indicated in studies involving a large number of patients, when observer bias and costs are concerns, and when the main outcome measurements are satisfaction, symptoms, or functional status. Amadio has pointed out that questionnaires are not the best tool to measure anatomic or physiologic impairments.

3D augmented reality mirror visual feedback therapy applied to the treatment of persistent, unilateral upper extremity neuropathic pain: a preliminary study

Objective: We assessed whether or not pain relief could be achieved with a new system that combines 3D augmented reality system (3DARS) and the principles of mirror visual feedback. Methods: Twenty-two patients between 18 and 75 years of age who suffered of chronic neuropathic pain. Each patient performed five 3DARS sessions treatment of 20 mins spread over a period of one week. The following pain parameters were assessed: (1) visual analogic scale after each treatment session (2) McGill pain scale and DN4 questionnaire were completed before the first session and 24 h after the last session. Results: The mean improvement of VAS per session was 29% (p < 0.001). There was an immediate session effect demonstrating a systematic improvement in pain between the beginning and the end of each session. We noted that this pain reduction was partially preserved until the next session. If we compare the pain level at baseline and 24 h after the last session, there was a significant decrease (p < 0.001) of pain of 37%. There was a significant decrease (p < 0.001) on the McGill Pain Questionnaire and DN4 questionnaire (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Our results indicate that 3DARS induced a significant pain decrease for patients who presented chronic neuropathic pain in a unilateral upper extremity. While further research is necessary before definitive conclusions can be drawn, clinicians could implement the approach as a preparatory adjunct for providing temporary pain relief aimed at enhancing chronic pain patients’ tolerance of manual therapy and exercise intervention. Level of Evidence: 4.

OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF ELBOW FLEXION STRENGTH AND FATIGABILITY AFTER NERVE TRANSFER IN ADULT TRAUMATIC UPPER BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURIES

Nerve transfers Oberlin-type are currently used in upper brachial plexus lesions to recover elbow flexion. Is the regained active motion sufficient to resume heavy manual activities? Five adult patients (mean age 37 years) operated of a nerve transfer to recover elbow flexion (transfer of a motor fascicle of the ulnar nerve to the motor branch of the biceps; in three patients, additional transfer from the median to the motor nerve of the brachialis) were clinically and isokinetically evaluated, after a mean follow-up of 47 months. The median Constant-Murley score was 22/100, the DASH 56/100 and the MEPI 60/100. For isokinetic tests the most significant finding was a severe deficit of elbow strength, of about 80%. No patient was able to maintain an isometric contraction during sufficient time to evaluate fatigability. This preliminary study suggests that major functional impairments persist despite early recovery of elbow flexion. These results should be confirmed in a study on a larger group of patients.

The Role of the Muscle Brachioradialis in Elbow Flexion: An Electromyographic Study

BACKGROUND In the classical conception, the brachioradialis is a forearm supinator. The hypothesis of this study was that, at least in certain positions of elbow flexion and forearm rotation, the brachioradialis is, along with the biceps and brachialis, one of the main elbow flexors. METHODS Fifteen young healthy male volunteers participated in this research. The activities of the biceps, brachialis and brachioradialis muscles were studied using surface electromyography, while the subjects were performing elbow flexions/extensions with as much strength as possible, forearm in neutral position, then in full pronation, then in full supination. The elbow flexion torques were isokinetically measured at 60°/sec for an arc of 120°. RESULTS The biceps, brachialis and brachioradialis muscles were electromyographically very active throughout resisted elbow flexion, in all three investigated positions of forearm rotation. At certain positions, the electromyographic activities were much higher than the maximal voluntary contraction signal. For what concerns specifically the brachioradialis, in all three forearm rotation investigated positions, the activity curve demonstrated a slow increase during the first part of elbow flexion, reaching in 73.3% of subjects its peak at the end of flexion; in the remaining 26.7%, the brachioradialis had a flat activity without significant peak. The activity was slightly higher in supination. CONCLUSIONS This study indirectly supports the idea that the brachioradialis is one of the main elbow flexors, especially when the elbow flexion is done with the forearm in supination. This observation could be important in clinical elbow and wrist surgical practice.