Eric E. Klein

Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical acceleratorsa)

The task group (TG) for quality assurance of medical accelerators was constituted by the American Association of Physicists in Medicines Science Council under the direction of the Radiation Therapy Committee and the Quality Assurance and Outcome Improvement Subcommittee. The task group (TG-142) had two main charges. First to update, as needed, recommendations of Table II of the AAPM TG-40 report on quality assurance and second, to add recommendations for asymmetric jaws, multileaf collimation (MLC), and dynamic/virtual wedges. The TG accomplished the update to TG-40, specifying new test and tolerances, and has added recommendations for not only the new ancillary delivery technologies but also for imaging devices that are part of the linear accelerator. The imaging devices include x-ray imaging, photon portal imaging, and cone-beam CT. The TG report was designed to account for the types of treatments delivered with the particular machine. For example, machines that are used for radiosurgery treatments or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) require different tests and/or tolerances. There are specific recommendations for MLC quality assurance for machines performing IMRT. The report also gives recommendations as to action levels for the physicists to implement particular actions, whether they are inspection, scheduled action, or immediate and corrective action. The report is geared to be flexible for the physicist to customize the QA program depending on clinical utility. There are specific tables according to daily, monthly, and annual reviews, along with unique tables for wedge systems, MLC, and imaging checks. The report also gives specific recommendations regarding setup of a QA program by the physicist in regards to building a QA team, establishing procedures, training of personnel, documentation, and end-to-end system checks. The tabulated items of this report have been considerably expanded as compared with the original TG-40 report and the recommended tolerances accommodate differences in the intended use of the machine functionality (non-IMRT, IMRT, and stereotactic delivery).

Clinical implementation of a commercial multileaf collimator: Dosimetry, networking, simulation, and quality assurance

PURPOSE Clinical implementation of multileaf collimation (MLC) includes commissioning (including leaf calibration), dosimetric measurements (penumbra, transmission, calculation parameters), shaping methods, networking for file transfer, verification simulation, and development of a quality assurance (QA) program. Differences of MLC and alloy shaping in terms of penumbra and stair-step effects must be analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS Leaf positions are calibrated to light field. The resultant decrement line, penumbras, leaf transmission data, and isodoses in various planes were measured with film. Penumbra was measured for straight edges and corners, in various media. Ion chambers were used to measure effects of MLC on output, scatter, and depth dose. We maintain midleaf intersection criteria. MLC fields are set 7 mm beyond planning target volumes. After shaping by vendor software or by our three-dimensional planning system, files are transferred to the MLC workstation by means of sharing software, interface cards, and cabling. A MLC emulator was constructed for simulation. Our QA program includes file checks, monthly checks (leaf position accuracy and interlock tests), and annual review. RESULTS We found the MLC leaf position (light field) corresponds to decrement lines ranging from 50 to 59%. Transmission through MLC (1.5-2.5%) is less than alloy (3.5%). Multileaf penumbra is slightly wider than for alloy. Relative penumbra did not increase in the lung, and composite field dosimetry exhibited negligible differences compared with alloy. Verification simulations provide diagnostic image quality hard copies of the MLC fields. Monitor unit parameters used for alloy held for MLC. DISCUSSION Clinical implementation for MLC as a block replacement was conducted on a site-by-site basis. Time studies indicate significant (25%) in-room time reductions. Through imaging and dosimetric analysis, the accuracy of field delivery has increased with MLC. The most significant impact of MLC is the ability to increase the number of daily treatment fields, thereby reducing normal tissue dosing, which is vital for dose escalation.

Characterization of a commercial multileaf collimator used for intensity modulated radiation therapy.

The characteristics of a commercial multileaf collimator (MLC) to deliver static and dynamic multileaf collimation (SMLC and DMLC, respectively) were investigated to determine their influence on intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning and quality assurance. The influence of MLC leaf positioning accuracy on sequentially abutted SMLC fields was measured by creating abutting fields with selected gaps and overlaps. These data were also used to measure static leaf positioning precision. The characteristics of high leaf-velocity DMLC delivery were measured with constant velocity leaf sequences starting with an open field and closing a single leaf bank. A range of 1-72 monitor units (MU) was used providing a range of leaf velocities. The field abutment measurements yielded dose errors (as a percentage of the open field max dose) of 16.7+/-0.7% mm(-1) and 12.8+/-0.7% mm(-1) for 6 MV and 18 MV photon beams, respectively. The MLC leaf positioning precision was 0.080+/-0.018 mm (single standard deviation) highlighting the excellent delivery hardware tolerances for the tested beam delivery geometry. The high leaf-velocity DMLC measurements showed delivery artifacts when the leaf sequence and selected monitor units caused the linear accelerator to move the leaves at their maximum velocity while modulating the accelerator dose rate to deliver the desired leaf and MU sequence (termed leaf-velocity limited delivery). According to the vendor, a unique feature to their linear accelerator and MLC is that the dose rate is reduced to provide the correct cm MU(-1) leaf velocity when the delivery is leaf-velocity limited. However, it was found that the system delivered roughly 1 MU per pulse when the delivery was leaf-velocity limited causing dose profiles to exhibit discrete steps rather than a smooth dose gradient. The root mean square difference between the steps and desired linear gradient was less than 3% when more than 4 MU were used. The average dose per MU was greater and less than desired for closing and opening leaf patterns, respectively, when the delivery was leaf-velocity limited. The results indicated that the dose delivery artifacts should be minor for most clinical cases, but limit the assumption of dose linearity when significantly reducing the delivered dose for dosimeter characterization studies or QA measurements.

Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: clinical results and dosimetry

Immediate or delayed reconstruction using implants or autologous tissue transfer is increasingly offered to women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Some patients require radiotherapy for prevention of local/regional relapse, and some for post-surgical local/regional recurrence. Others with augmented breasts may opt for conservative surgery and irradiation. At Washington University, 70 breast cancers were irradiated in 66 patients following mastectomy with reconstruction (N = 61) or wide local excision of an augmented breast (N = 5). Two patients elected to have a second reconstruction after an unsatisfactory initial result. Thus, 72 breasts were evaluated after radiotherapy for tumor control, complications, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction. Locoregional failure occurred in only five patients, one following adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy with reconstruction and four following radiotherapy for recurrent breast cancer within a reconstructed breast. Grade 2 or 3 complications occurred in 34 patients (51%). The complication rate was highest in autologous tissue transfer reconstructions. Cosmetic results were evaluated good/excellent in 49% by physicians and 67% by patients. Immediate reconstructions had fewer good/excellent physician evaluations (32%) compared with reconstructions performed at least 6 weeks after radiotherapy (55%). Transverse rectus abdominis flaps had the best cosmesis scores, followed by permanent silicone prostheses, tissue expanders, latissimus dorsi, and gluteal flaps. Only 48% of patients would choose to have the same reconstructive procedure again. Phantom interface dosimetry with a parallel plate chamber and TLD measurements was performed. Radiotherapy and reconstruction are not incompatible, but careful consideration of their relative timing and technique appear to be important in optimizing cosmesis while minimizing complications.

The incidence of breast cancer following mantle field radiation therapy as a function of dose and technique

BACKGROUND There is an increased incidence of breast cancer following mantle field radiation therapy for Hodgkins disease (HD). We reviewed the experience at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (MIR) for radiation factors related to the development of breast cancer after mantle field radiation therapy for HD. METHODS The radiation therapy records of 152 women treated with mantle field irradiation for HD at MIR between 1966-1985 were reviewed for the development of breast cancer and treatment-related factors. All patients had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. The treatment era (1966-1974 vs. 1975-1985), stage of HD, mediastinal dose, axillary dose, maximum dose from the anterior field (anterior d(max) dose), the anterior-posterior:posterior-anterior (AP:PA) ratio, age at the time of treatment, length of follow-up, and history of splenectomy were analyzed as possible contributing factors for the development of breast cancer. The observed number of breast cancers was compared to the expected number based on age-adjusted incidences from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. RESULTS Ten breast cancers occurred in the population. Eight involved an upper outer quadrant. In a multivariate analysis, the development of breast cancer was significantly associated with axillary dose. Patients in the early treatment era were at an increased risk for the development of breast cancer due to high anterior d(max) and breast doses from weighting the fields anteriorly on a low energy linear accelerator. The use of current radiation therapy techniques was not related to an increased risk of breast cancer with a median follow-up of 13 years. CONCLUSIONS A high dose to the axilla and the anterior d(max) point is significantly associated with the development of breast cancer after mantle field irradiation for HD. Efforts to protect the breast from high doses will likely lessen the increased risk of breast cancer in women treated with radiation therapy for HD.

The influence of air cavities on interface doses for photon beams

PURPOSE As the quantification of dose in homogeneous media is now better understood, it is necessary to further quantify effects from heterogeneous media. The most extreme case is related to air cavities. Although dose corrections at large distances beyond a cavity are accountable by attenuation differences, perturbations at air-tissue interfaces are complex to measure or calculate. These measurements helps understand the physical processes that govern these perturbations. METHODS AND MATERIALS A thin window parallel-plate chamber and a special diode were used for measurements with various air cavity geometries (layer, channel, cubic cavity, triangle) in x-ray beams of 4 and 15 MV. RESULTS Underdosing effects occur at both the distal and proximal air cavity interfaces. The magnitude depends on geometry, energy, and field sizes. As the cavity thickness increases, the central axis dose at the distal interface decreases. Increasing field size remedied the underdosing, as did the introduction of lateral walls. Following a 2.0 cm wide air channel for a 4 MV, 4 x 4 cm2 field there was an 11% underdose at the distal interface, while a 2.0 cm cubic cavity yielded only a 3% loss. Measurements at the proximal interface showed losses of 5% to 8%. For a 4 MV parallel opposed beam irradiation the losses at the interfaces were 10% for a channel cavity (in comparison with the homogeneous case) and 1% for a cube. The losses were slightly larger for the 15 MV beam. Underdosage at the lateral interface was 4% and 8% for the 4 MV and 15 MV beams, respectively. CONCLUSION Although reports suggest better clinical results using lower photon energies with the presence of air cavities, there is no reliable dose calculation algorithm to predict interface doses accurately. The measurements reported here can be used to guide the development of new calculation models under nonequilibrium conditions. This situation is of clinical concern when lesions such as larynx carcinoma beyond air cavities are irradiated.

Dosimetry and clinical implementation of dynamic wedge

PURPOSE Wedge-shaped isodoses are desired in a number of clinical situations. Physical wedge filters have provided nominal angled isodoses with dosimetric consequences of beam hardening, increased peripheral dosing, nonidealized gradients at deep depths, along with the practical consequences of filter handling and placement problems. Dynamic wedging uses a combination of a moving jaw and changing dose rate to achieve angled isodoses. The clinical implementation of dynamic wedge and an accompanying quality assurance program are discussed in detail. METHODS AND MATERIALS The accelerator at our facility has two photon energies (6 MV and 18 MV), currently with dynamic wedge angles of 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees. The segmented treatment tables (STT) that drive the jaw in concert with a changing dose rate are unique for field sizes ranging from 4.0 cm to 20.0 cm in 0.5 cm steps, resulting in 256 STTs. Transmission wedge factors were measured for each STT with an ion chamber. Isodose profiles were accumulated with film after dose conversion. For treatment-planning purposes, dmax orthogonal dose profiles were measured for open and dynamic fields. Physical filters were assigned empirically via the ratio of open and wedge profiles. RESULTS A nonlinear relationship with wedge factor and field size was found. The factors were found to be independent of the stationary field setting or second order blocking. Dynamic wedging provided more consistent gradients across the field compared with physical filters. Percent depth doses were found to be closer to open field. The created physical filters provided planned isodoses that closely resembled measured isodoses. Comparative isodose plans show improvement with dynamic wedging. CONCLUSIONS Dynamic wedging has practical and dosimetric advantages over physical filters. Table collisions with physical filters are alleviated. Treatment planning has been solved with an empirical solution. Dynamic wedge is a positive replacement for physical filters, and a first step for commercial introduction of dynamic conformal therapy.

THE IMPACT OF CENTRAL LUNG DISTANCE, MAXIMAL HEART DISTANCE, AND RADIATION TECHNIQUE ON THE VOLUMETRIC DOSE OF THE LUNG AND HEART FOR INTACT BREAST RADIATION

PURPOSE To investigate the impact of radiographic parameter and radiation technique on the volumetric dose of lung and heart for intact breast radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty patients with both two-dimensional (2D) and computed tomographic (CT) simulations were enrolled in the study. Central lung distance (CLD), maximal heart distance (MHD), and maximal heart length (MHL) were measured under virtual simulation. Four plans were compared for each patient. Plan A used a traditional 2D tangential setup. Plan B used clinical target volume (CTV) based three-dimensional (3D) planning. Both plans C and D used a combination of a medial breast field with shallow tangents. Plan D is a further modification of plan C. RESULTS Under the traditional tangential setup, the mean ipsilateral lung dose and volume at 20, 30, and 40 Gy correlated linearly with CLD (R = 0.85 approximately 0.91). The mean ipsilateral lung dose (Gy) approximated 4 times the CLD value (cm), whereas the percentage volume (%) of ipsilateral lung at 20, 30, and 40 Gy was about 10 times the CLD (cm). The mean heart dose and percentage volume at 20, 30, and 40 Gy correlated with MHD (R = 0.76 approximately 0.80) and MHL (R = 0.65 approximately 0.75). The mean heart dose (Gy) approximated 3 times the MHD value (cm), and the percentage volume (%) of the heart at 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy was about 6 times MHD (cm). Radiation technique impacted lung and heart dose. The 3D tangential plan (plan B) failed to reduce the volumetric dose of lung and heart from that of the 2D plan (plan A). The medial breast techniques (plans C and D) significantly decreased the volume of lung and heart receiving high doses (30 and 40 Gy). Plan D further decreased the 20 Gy volumes. By use of the medial breast technique, the lung and heart dose were not impacted by original CLD and MHD/MHL. Therefore, the improvement from the tangential technique was more remarkable for patients with CLD >or= 3.0 cm (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The CLD and MHD impact the volumetric dose of lung and heart. The application of 3D planning for tangential breast irradiation does not decrease heart and lung dose. Adding a medial breast port significantly decreases percentage volume (PV) of lung and heart receiving high doses, especially when the CLD is excessive.

A mono isocentric technique for breast and regional nodal therapy using dual asymmetric jaws

PURPOSE Definitive radiation therapy for breast cancer with regional nodal involvement often introduces treatment of adjacent abutted regions. Many methods describe techniques to achieve an effective transverse plane match. Our facility recently adopted a matching technique using asymmetric jaws to beam-split all portals along the central axis plane. Our technique uses one isocenter to treat the opposed tangential breast fields, the supraclavicular port and the posterior axillary field. METHODS AND MATERIALS Our linear accelerator has four collimator jaws capable of being set independently. The longitudinal (Y) jaws beam-split all the portals at the match plane, namely the upper border of the tangential beams and the bottom border of the nodal fields. The transverse (X) jaws define the lateral borders of the nodal fields, and in a near beam-split fashion in conjunction with customized Cerrobend, block the lung for the tangential beams. The unique isocenter is chosen along the mid-bridge through the tangential match plane. Dosimetric qualities and calculational techniques of the asymmetric beams were analyzed with ionimetric water scans, ion chamber studies, and film. The match-line is clinically confirmed with composite port films. RESULTS Our dosimetric studies show asymmetric jaws provide nearly equivalent field edge definition and superior absorption in comparison with Cerrobend blocks. The use of one isocenter results in a reduction of in-room treatment time by a factor of two. The burden of lifting heavy Cerrobend blocks has been removed. A composite port film, which includes the medial tangential and supraclavicular ports, shows a perfect match-line in all cases. Similar composite port films taken with our previous technique of geometric matching with collimator and table angulation exhibit slight overlap or underdose regions in many cases. CONCLUSION Our treatment technique takes full advantage of dual asymmetric jaws to achieve a perfect match-line, necessitates only one isocenter and set-up point, and supplies more absorption in reference to lung and contralateral breast dose. The pure match-line is accompanied by the fact that the patient does not have to move in any direction.

Three-dimensional treatment planning and conformal radiation therapy: preliminary evaluation *

Preliminary clinical results are presented for 209 patients with cancer who had treatment planned on our three-dimensional radiation treatment planning (3-D RTP) system and were treated with external beam conformal radiation therapy. Average times (min) for CT volumetric simulation were: 74 without or 84 with contrast material; 36 for contouring of tumor/target volume and 44 for normal anatomy; 78 for treatment planning; 53 for plan evaluation/optimization; and 58 for verification simulation. Average time of daily treatment sessions with 3-D conformal therapy or standard techniques was comparable for brain, head and neck, thoracic, and hepatobiliary tumors (11.8-14 min and 11.5-12.1, respectively). For prostate cancer patients treated with 3-D conformal technique and Cerrobend blocks, mean treatment time was 19 min; with multileaf collimation it was 14 min and with bilateral arc rotation, 9.8 min. Acute toxicity was comparable to or lower than with standard techniques. Sophisticated 3-D RTP and conformal irradiation can be performed in a significant number of patients at a reasonable cost. Further efforts, including dose-escalation studies, are necessary to develop more versatile and efficient 3-D RTP systems and to enhance the cost benefit of this technology in treatment of patients with cancer.