Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eric E. Richman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eric E. Richman.


Archive | 2011

Achieving the 30% Goal: Energy and Cost Savings Analysis of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010

Brian A. Thornton; Michael I. Rosenberg; Eric E. Richman; Weimin Wang; YuLong Xie; Jian Zhang; Heejin Cho; Vrushali V. Mendon; Rahul A. Athalye; Bing Liu

This Technical Support Document presents the energy and cost savings analysis that PNNL conducted to measure the potential energy savings of 90.1-2010 relative to 90.1-2004. PNNL conducted this analysis with inputs from many other contributors and source of information. In particular, guidance and direction was provided by the Simulation Working Group under the auspices of the SSPC90.1. This report documents the approach and methodologies that PNNL developed to evaluate the energy saving achieved from use of ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010. Specifically, this report provides PNNL’s Progress Indicator process and methodology, EnergyPlus simulation framework, prototype model descriptions. This report covers the combined upgrades from 90.1-2004 to 90.1-2010, resulting in a total of 153 addenda. PNNL has reviewed and considered all 153 addenda for quantitative analysis in the Progress Indicator process. 53 of those are included in the quantitative analysis. This report provides information on the categorization of all of the addenda, a summary of the content, and deeper explanation of the impact and modeling of 53 identified addenda with quantitative savings.


Archive | 2005

Analysis of Potential Benefits and Costs of Adopting a Commercial Building Energy Standard in South Dakota

David B. Belzer; Katherine A. Cort; David W. Winiarski; Eric E. Richman

The state of South Dakota is considering adopting a commercial building energy standard. This report evaluates the potential costs and benefits to South Dakota residents from requiring compliance with the most recent edition of the ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1-2001 Energy Standard for Buildings except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. These standards were developed in an effort to set minimum requirements for the energy efficient design and construction of new commercial buildings. The quantitative benefits and costs of adopting a commercial building energy code are modeled by comparing the characteristics of assumed current building practices with the most recent edition of the ASHRAE Standard, 90.1-2001. Both qualitative and quantitative benefits and costs are assessed in this analysis. Energy and economic impacts are estimated using results from a detailed building simulation tool (Building Loads Analysis and System Thermodynamics [BLAST] model) combined with a Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) approach to assess corresponding economic costs and benefits.


Archive | 2002

Analysis of Potential Benefits and Costs of Adopting ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 as a Commercial Building Energy Code in Michigan

Katherine A. Cort; David B. Belzer; Mark A. Halverson; Eric E. Richman; David W. Winiarski

The state of Michigan is considering adpoting ASHRAE 90.1-1999 as its commercial building energy code. In an effort to evaluate whether or not this is an appropraite code for the state, the potential benefits and costs of adopting this standard are considered. Both qualitative and quantitative benefits are assessed. The energy simulation and economic results suggest that adopting ASHRAE 90.1-1999 would provide postitive net benefits to the state relative to the building and design requirements currently in place.


Archive | 2011

ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 Final Qualitative Determination

Mark A. Halverson; Bing Liu; Eric E. Richman; David W. Winiarski

A final qualitative analysis of all addenda to American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)/Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Standard 90.1-2004 that were included in ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 was conducted. All 44 addenda processed by ASHRAE in the creation of Standard 90.1-2007 from Standard 90.1-2004 were evaluated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for their impact on energy efficiency. DOE preliminarily determined whether that addenda would have a positive, neutral, or negative impact on overall building efficiency. Table S.1 shows the number of positive and negative changes for each section of Standard 90.1.


Archive | 2007

Analysis of Energy Saving Impacts of ASHRAE 90.1-2004 for New York

Krishnan Gowri; Mark A. Halverson; Eric E. Richman

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and New York State Department of State (DOS) requested the help of DOE’s Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) in estimating the annual building energy savings and cost impacts of adopting ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 (ASHRAE 2004) requirements. This report summarizes the analysis methodology and results of energy simulation in response to that request.


Archive | 2006

Analysis of Energy Saving Impacts of New Commercial Energy Codes for the Gulf Coast

Mark A. Halverson; Krishnan Gowri; Eric E. Richman

Report on an analysis of the energy savings and cost impacts associated with the use of newer and more efficiently commercial building energy codes in the states of Louisiana and Mississippi.


Archive | 2002

Analysis of Potential Benefits and Costs of Adopting ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 as a Commercial Building Energy Code in Illinois Jurisdictions

David B. Belzer; Katherine A. Cort; David W. Winiarski; Eric E. Richman; Michele Friedrich

ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 was developed in an effort to set minimum requirements for energy efficienty design and construction of new commercial buildings. This report assesses the benefits and costs of adopting this standard as the building energy code in Illinois. Energy and economic impacts are estimated using BLAST combined with a Life-Cycle Cost approach to assess corresponding economic costs and benefits.


Archive | 2005

Texas State Building Energy Code: Analysis of Potential Benefits and Costs of Commercial Lighting Requirements

Eric E. Richman; David B. Belzer; David W. Winiarski

The State Energy Conservation Office of Texas has asked the U.S. Department of Energy to analyze the potential energy effect and cost-effectiveness of the lighting requirements in the 2003 IECC as they consider adoption of this energy code. The new provisions of interest in the lighting section of IECC 2003 include new lighting power densities (LPD) and requirements for automatic lighting shutoff controls. The potential effect of the new LPD values is analyzed as a comparison with previous values in the nationally available IECC codes and ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1. The basis for the analysis is a set of lighting models developed as part of the ASHRAE/IES code process, which is the basis for IECC 2003 LPD values. The use of the models allows for an effective comparison of values for various building types of interest to Texas state. Potential effects from control requirements are discussed, and available case study analysis results are provided but no comprehensive numerical evaluation is provided in this limited analysis effort.


Archive | 2012

Technical Support Document for Version 3.9.1 of the COMcheck Software

Rosemarie Bartlett; Linda M. Connell; Krishnan Gowri; Mark A. Halverson; Robert G. Lucas; Eric E. Richman; Robert W. Schultz; David W. Winiarski

COMcheck provides an optional way to demonstrate compliance with commercial and high-rise residential building energy codes. Commercial buildings include all use groups except single family and multifamily not over three stories in height. COMcheck was originally based on ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-1989 (Standard 90.1-1989) requirements and is intended for use with various codes based on Standard 90.1, including the Codification of ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-1989 (90.1-1989 Code) (ASHRAE 1989a, 1993b) and ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-1999 (Standard 90.1-1999). This includes jurisdictions that have adopted the 90.1-1989 Code, Standard 90.1-1989, Standard 90.1-1999, or their own code based on one of these. We view Standard 90.1-1989 and the 90.1-1989 Code as having equivalent technical content and have used both as source documents in developing COMcheck. This technical support document (TSD) is designed to explain the technical basis for the COMcheck software as originally developed based on the ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-1989 (Standard 90.1-1989). Documentation for other national model codes and standards and specific state energy codes supported in COMcheck has been added to this report as appendices. These appendices are intended to provide technical documentation for features specific to the supported codes and for any changes made for state-specific codes that differ from the standard features that support compliance with the national model codes and standards. Beginning with COMcheck version 3.8.0, support for 90.1-1989, 90.1-1999, and the 1998 IECC and version 3.9.0 support for 2000 and 2001 IECC are no longer included, but those sections remain in this document for reference purposes.


Archive | 2011

ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 Final Determination Quantitative Analysis

Mark A. Halverson; Bing Liu; Eric E. Richman; David W. Winiarski

The United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) conducted a final quantitative analysis to assess whether buildings constructed according to the requirements of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)/Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Standard 90.1-2007 would result in energy savings compared with buildings constructed to ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004. The final analysis considered each of the 44 addenda to ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 that were included in ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007. All 44 addenda processed by ASHRAE in the creation of Standard 90.1-2007 from Standard 90.1-2004 were reviewed by DOE, and their combined impact on a suite of 15 building prototype models in 15 ASHRAE climate zones was considered. Most addenda were deemed to have little quantifiable impact on building efficiency for the purpose of DOE’s final determination. However, out of the 44 addenda, 9 were preliminarily determined to have measureable and quantifiable impact.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eric E. Richman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David W. Winiarski

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark A. Halverson

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bing Liu

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katherine A. Cort

Battelle Memorial Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Krishnan Gowri

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David B. Belzer

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael I. Rosenberg

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rosemarie Bartlett

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vrushali V. Mendon

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

YuLong Xie

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge