Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mark A. Halverson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mark A. Halverson.


Archive | 2011

U.S. Department of Energy commercial reference building models of the national building stock

Michael Deru; Kristin Field; Daniel Studer; Kyle Benne; Brent Griffith; Paul Torcellini; Bing Liu; Mark A. Halverson; Dave Winiarski; Michael I. Rosenberg; Mehry Yazdanian; Joe Huang; Drury B. Crawley

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Building Technologies Program has set the aggressive goal of producing marketable net-zero energy buildings by 2025. This goal will require collaboration between the DOE laboratories and the building industry. We developed standard or reference energy models for the most common commercial buildings to serve as starting points for energy efficiency research. These models represent fairly realistic buildings and typical construction practices. Fifteen commercial building types and one multifamily residential building were determined by consensus between DOE, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and represent approximately two-thirds of the commercial building stock.


Archive | 2015

National Cost-effectiveness of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013

Philip R. Hart; Rahul A. Athalye; Mark A. Halverson; Susan A. Loper; Michael I. Rosenberg; YuLong Xie; Eric E. Richman

The purpose of this analysis is to examine the cost-effectiveness of the 2013 edition of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES1 Standard 90.1 (ANSI/ASHRAE/IES 2013).


Archive | 2003

Understanding Building Energy Codes and Standards

Rosemarie Bartlett; Mark A. Halverson; Diana L. Shankle

Energy codes and standards play a vital role by setting minimum requirements for energy-efficient design and construction. They outline uniform requirements for new buildings as well as additions and renovations. The Difference Between Energy Codes, Energy Standards and the Model Energy Code Energy codes--specify how buildings must be constructed or perform, and are written in mandatory, enforceable language. States or local governments adopt and enforce energy codes for their jurisdictions. Energy standards--describe how buildings should be constructed to save energy cost-effectively. They are published by national organizations such as the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). They are not mandatory, but serve as national recommendations, with some variation for regional climate. States and local governments frequently use energy standards as the technical basis for developing their energy codes. Some energy standards are written in mandatory, enforceable language, making it easy for jurisdictions to incorporate the provisions of the energy standards directly into their laws or regulations.


Archive | 2006

Review of Pre- and Post-1980 Buildings in CBECS - HVAC Equipment

David W. Winiarski; Wei Jiang; Mark A. Halverson

PNNL was tasked by DOE to look at HVAC systems and equipment for Benchmark buildings based on 2003 CBECS data. This white paper summarizes the results of PNNL’s analysis of 2003 CBECS data and provides PNNL’s recommendations for HVAC systems and equipment for use in the Benchmark buildings.


Archive | 2014

ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013 Determination of Energy Savings: Qualitative Analysis

Mark A. Halverson; Rahul A. Athalye; Michael I. Rosenberg; YuLong Xie; Weimin Wang; Philip R. Hart; Jian Zhang; Supriya Goel; Vrushali V. Mendon

This report provides a final quantitative analysis to assess whether buildings constructed according to the requirements of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013 would result in improved energy efficiency in commercial buildings. The final analysis considered each of the 110 addenda to Standard 90.1-2010 that were included in Standard 90.1-2013. PNNL reviewed all addenda included by ASHRAE in creating Standard 90.1-2013 from Standard 90.1-2010, and considered their combined impact on a suite of prototype building models across all U.S. climate zones. Most addenda were deemed to have little quantifiable impact on building efficiency for the purpose of DOE’s final determination. However, out of the 110 total addenda, 30 were identified as having a measureable and quantifiable impact.


Archive | 2002

Analysis of Potential Benefits and Costs of Adopting ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 as a Commercial Building Energy Code in Michigan

Katherine A. Cort; David B. Belzer; Mark A. Halverson; Eric E. Richman; David W. Winiarski

The state of Michigan is considering adpoting ASHRAE 90.1-1999 as its commercial building energy code. In an effort to evaluate whether or not this is an appropraite code for the state, the potential benefits and costs of adopting this standard are considered. Both qualitative and quantitative benefits are assessed. The energy simulation and economic results suggest that adopting ASHRAE 90.1-1999 would provide postitive net benefits to the state relative to the building and design requirements currently in place.


Archive | 2011

ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 Final Determination Quantitative Analysis

Mark A. Halverson; Michael I. Rosenberg; Bing Liu

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) conducted a final quantitative analysis to assess whether buildings constructed according to the requirements of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)/Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Standard 90.1-2010 (ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010, Standard 90.1-2010, or 2010 edition) would result in energy savings compared with buildings constructed to ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007(ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007, Standard 90.1-2007, or 2007 edition). The final analysis considered each of the 109 addenda to ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 that were included in ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010. All 109 addenda processed by ASHRAE in the creation of Standard 90.1-2010 from Standard 90.1-2007 were reviewed by DOE, and their combined impact on a suite of 16 building prototype models in 15 ASHRAE climate zones was considered. Most addenda were deemed to have little quantifiable impact on building efficiency for the purpose of DOEs final determination. However, out of the 109 addenda, 34 were preliminarily determined to have a measureable and quantifiable impact. A suite of 240 computer energy simulations for building prototypes complying with ASHRAE 90.1-2007 was developed. These prototypes were then modified in accordance with these 34 addenda to create a second suite of corresponding building simulations reflecting the same buildings compliant with Standard 90.1-2010. The building simulations were conducted using the DOE EnergyPlus building simulation software. The resulting energy use from the complete suite of 480 simulation runs was then converted to energy use intensity (EUI, or energy use per unit floor area) metrics (Site EUI, Primary EUI, and energy cost intensity [ECI]) results for each simulation. For each edition of the standard, these EUIs were then aggregated to a national basis for each prototype using weighting factors based on construction floor area developed for each of the 15 U.S. climate zones using commercial construction data. When compared, the resulting weighted EUIs indicated that each of the 16 building prototypes used less energy under Standard 90.1-2010 than under Standard 90.1-2007 on a national basis when considering site energy, primary energy, or energy cost. The EUIs were also aggregated across building types to a national commercial building basis using the same weighting data. On a national basis, the final quantitative analysis estimated a floor-space-weighted national average reduction in new building energy consumption of 18.2 percent for source energy and 18.5 percent when considering site energy. An 18.2 percent savings in energy cost, based on national average commercial energy costs for electricity and natural gas, was also estimated.


Archive | 2011

ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 Final Qualitative Determination

Mark A. Halverson; Bing Liu; Eric E. Richman; David W. Winiarski

A final qualitative analysis of all addenda to American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)/Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) Standard 90.1-2004 that were included in ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 was conducted. All 44 addenda processed by ASHRAE in the creation of Standard 90.1-2007 from Standard 90.1-2004 were evaluated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for their impact on energy efficiency. DOE preliminarily determined whether that addenda would have a positive, neutral, or negative impact on overall building efficiency. Table S.1 shows the number of positive and negative changes for each section of Standard 90.1.


Archive | 2010

A Retrospective Analysis of Commercial Building Energy Codes: 1990 – 2008

David B. Belzer; Sean C. McDonald; Mark A. Halverson

Building Energy Codes Programs efforts are designed to result in increased stringency in national model energy codes, more rapid and broader adoption by states and localities of updated codes, and increased compliance and enforcement. Report estimates the historical impact of Building Energy Codes Program in terms of energy savings achieved that are based upon various editions of ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1 (ASHRAE Standard 90.1).


Archive | 2007

Analysis of Energy Saving Impacts of ASHRAE 90.1-2004 for New York

Krishnan Gowri; Mark A. Halverson; Eric E. Richman

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and New York State Department of State (DOS) requested the help of DOE’s Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) in estimating the annual building energy savings and cost impacts of adopting ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004 (ASHRAE 2004) requirements. This report summarizes the analysis methodology and results of energy simulation in response to that request.

Collaboration


Dive into the Mark A. Halverson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael I. Rosenberg

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

YuLong Xie

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric E. Richman

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rosemarie Bartlett

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David W. Winiarski

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vrushali V. Mendon

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bing Liu

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John E. Hathaway

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Krishnan Gowri

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mingjie Zhao

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge