Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eric Gilleland is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eric Gilleland.


Weather and Forecasting | 2009

Intercomparison of Spatial Forecast Verification Methods

Eric Gilleland; David Ahijevych; Barbara G. Brown; Barbara Casati; Elizabeth E. Ebert

Abstract Advancements in weather forecast models and their enhanced resolution have led to substantially improved and more realistic-appearing forecasts for some variables. However, traditional verification scores often indicate poor performance because of the increased small-scale variability so that the true quality of the forecasts is not always characterized well. As a result, numerous new methods for verifying these forecasts have been proposed. These new methods can mostly be classified into two overall categories: filtering methods and displacement methods. The filtering methods can be further delineated into neighborhood and scale separation, and the displacement methods can be divided into features based and field deformation. Each method gives considerably more information than the traditional scores, but it is not clear which method(s) should be used for which purpose. A verification methods intercomparison project has been established in order to glean a better understanding of the proposed me...


Climatic Change | 2014

Non-stationary extreme value analysis in a changing climate

Linyin Cheng; Amir AghaKouchak; Eric Gilleland; Richard W. Katz

This paper introduces a framework for estimating stationary and non-stationary return levels, return periods, and risks of climatic extremes using Bayesian inference. This framework is implemented in the Non-stationary Extreme Value Analysis (NEVA) software package, explicitly designed to facilitate analysis of extremes in the geosciences. In a Bayesian approach, NEVA estimates the extreme value parameters with a Differential Evolution Markov Chain (DE-MC) approach for global optimization over the parameter space. NEVA includes posterior probability intervals (uncertainty bounds) of estimated return levels through Bayesian inference, with its inherent advantages in uncertainty quantification. The software presents the results of non-stationary extreme value analysis using various exceedance probability methods. We evaluate both stationary and non-stationary components of the package for a case study consisting of annual temperature maxima for a gridded global temperature dataset. The results show that NEVA can reliably describe extremes and their return levels.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2010

Verifying Forecasts Spatially

Eric Gilleland; David Ahijevych; Barbara G. Brown; Elizabeth E. Ebert

Numerous new methods have been proposed for using spatial information to better quantify and diagnose forecast performance when forecasts and observations are both available on the same grid. The majority of the new spatial verification methods can be classified into four broad categories (neighborhood, scale separation, features based, and field deformation), which themselves can be further generalized into two categories of filter and displacement. Because the methods make use of spatial information in widely different ways, users may be uncertain about what types of information each provides, and which methods may be most beneficial for particular applications. As an international project, the Spatial Forecast Verification Methods Inter-Comparison Project (ICP; www.ral.ucar.edu/projects/icp) was formed to address these questions. This project was coordinated by NCAR and facilitated by the WMO/World Weather Research Programme (WWRP) Joint Working Group on Forecast Verification Research. An overview of t...


Weather and Forecasting | 2009

Application of Spatial Verification Methods to Idealized and NWP-Gridded Precipitation Forecasts

David Ahijevych; Eric Gilleland; Barbara G. Brown; Elizabeth E. Ebert

Abstract Several spatial forecast verification methods have been developed that are suited for high-resolution precipitation forecasts. They can account for the spatial coherence of precipitation and give credit to a forecast that does not necessarily match the observation at any particular grid point. The methods were grouped into four broad categories (neighborhood, scale separation, features based, and field deformation) for the Spatial Forecast Verification Methods Intercomparison Project (ICP). Participants were asked to apply their new methods to a set of artificial geometric and perturbed forecasts with prescribed errors, and a set of real forecasts of convective precipitation on a 4-km grid. This paper describes the intercomparison test cases, summarizes results from the geometric cases, and presents subjective scores and traditional scores from the real cases. All the new methods could detect bias error, and the features-based and field deformation methods were also able to diagnose displacement ...


Monthly Weather Review | 2013

Testing Competing Precipitation Forecasts Accurately and Efficiently: The Spatial Prediction Comparison Test

Eric Gilleland

AbstractWhich model is best? Many challenges exist when testing competing forecast models, especially for those with high spatial resolution. Spatial correlation, double penalties, and small-scale errors are just a few such challenges. Many new methods have been developed in recent decades to tackle these issues. The spatial prediction comparison test (SPCT), which was developed for general spatial fields and applied to wind speed, is applied here to precipitation fields; which pose many unique challenges in that they are not normally distributed, are marked by numerous zero-valued grid points, and verification results are particularly sensitive to small-scale errors and double penalties. The SPCT yields a statistical test that solves one important issue for verifying forecasts spatially by accounting for spatial correlation. Important for precipitation forecasts is that the test requires no distributional assumptions, is easy to perform, and can be applied efficiently to either gridded or nongridded spat...


Weather and Forecasting | 2010

Analyzing the Image Warp Forecast Verification Method on Precipitation Fields from the ICP

Eric Gilleland; Johan Lindström; Finn Lindgren

Image warping for spatial forecast verification is applied to the test cases employed by the Spatial Forecast Verification Intercomparison Project (ICP), which includes both real and contrived cases. A larger set of cases is also used to investigate aggregating results for summarizing forecast performance over a long record of forecasts. The technique handles the geometric and perturbed cases with nearly exact precision, as would be expected. A statistic, dubbed here the IWS for image warp statistic, is proposed for ranking multiple forecasts and tested on the perturbed cases. IWS rankings for perturbed and real test cases are found to be sensible and physically interpretable. A powerful result of this study is that the image warp can be employed using a relatively sparse, preset regular grid without having to first identify features.


Atmosphere-ocean | 2009

Extreme wind regime responses to climate variability and change in the inner south coast of British Columbia, Canada

Dilumie S. Abeysirigunawardena; Eric Gilleland; David Bronaugh; Pat Wong

Abstract This study shows how information about climate variability can be valuable to the understanding of wind regime responses and improvement of wind forecasting skill. To this end we demonstrate the use and value of climate information in accurately determining extreme wind recurrences at three locations on the inner south coast of British Columbia (48°‐49°N, 123°W). The methodology is primarily based on approximating a Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) to extreme winds in the presence of climate variability covariates. The long‐term hourly wind speed data maintained by the Meteorological Service of Canada are used to evaluate the possible influence of climate variability on extreme wind response. Preliminary results suggest that there are significantly different extreme wind responses to warm and cold El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) modes, with a tendency for high extreme winds to occur during the negative (i.e., cold) ENSO phase.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2016

Impact of increasing heat waves on U.S. ozone episodes in the 2050s: Results from a multimodel analysis using extreme value theory

Lu L. Shen; Loretta J. Mickley; Eric Gilleland

We develop a statistical model using extreme value theory to estimate the 2000-2050 changes in ozone episodes across the United States. We model the relationships between daily maximum temperature (Tmax) and maximum daily 8-hour average (MDA8) ozone in May-September over 2003-2012 using a Point Process (PP) model. At ~20% of the sites, a marked decrease in the ozone-temperature slope occurs at high temperatures, defined as ozone suppression. The PP model sometimes fails to capture ozone-Tmax relationships, and so we refit the ozone-Tmax slope using logistic regression and a Generalized Pareto Distribution model. We then apply the resulting hybrid-EVT model to projections of Tmax from an ensemble of downscaled climate models. Assuming constant anthropogenic emissions at the present level, we find an average increase of 2.3 days a-1 in ozone episodes (> 75 ppbv) across the United States by the 2050s, with a change of +3-9 days a-1 at many sites.


Archive | 2010

Confidence Intervals for Forecast Verification

Eric Gilleland

The Technical Notes series provides an outlet for a variety of NCAR Manuscripts that contribute in specialized ways to the body of scientific knowledge but that are not suitable for journal, monograph, or book publication. Reports in this series are issued by the NCAR scientific divisions. Designation symbols for the series include: under the sponsorship of the National Science Foundation. Any opinions , findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


Monthly Weather Review | 2008

Computationally Efficient Spatial Forecast Verification Using Baddeley's Delta Image Metric

Eric Gilleland; Thomas C. M. Lee; John Halley Gotway; Randy Bullock; Barbara G. Brown

Abstract An important focus of research in the forecast verification community is the development of alternative verification approaches for quantitative precipitation forecasts, as well as for other spatial forecasts. The need for information that is meaningful in an operational context and the importance of capturing the specific sources of forecast error at varying spatial scales are two primary motivating factors. In this paper, features of precipitation as identified by a convolution threshold technique are merged within fields and matched across fields in an automatic and computationally efficient manner using Baddeley’s metric for binary images. The method is carried out on 100 test cases, and 4 representative cases are shown in detail. Results of merging and matching objects are generally positive in that they are consistent with how a subjective observer might merge and match features. The results further suggest that the Baddeley metric may be useful as a computationally efficient summary metric...

Collaboration


Dive into the Eric Gilleland's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara G. Brown

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Ahijevych

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Caspar M. Ammann

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard W. Katz

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher Williams

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge