Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eric M. Black is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eric M. Black.


Journal of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons | 2011

Dupuytren Disease: An Evolving Understanding of an Age-old Disease

Eric M. Black; Philip E. Blazar

&NA; Dupuytren disease, a clinical entity originally described more than 400 years ago, is a progressive disease of genetic origin. Excessive myofibroblast proliferation and altered collagen matrix composition lead to thickened and contracted palmar fascia; the resultant digital flexion contractures may severely limit function. The pathophysiology is multifactorial and remains a topic of research and debate. Genetic predisposition, trauma, inflammatory response, ischemia, and environment, as well as variable expression of proteins and growth factors within the local tissue, all play a role in the disease process. Common treatments of severe disease include open fasciectomy or fasciotomy. These procedures may be complicated by the complex anatomic relationships between cords (pathologic contracted fascia) and adjacent neurovascular structures. Recent advances in the management of Dupuytren disease involve less invasive treatments, such as percutaneous needle fasciotomy and injectable collagenase Clostridium histolyticum. Postoperative management focuses on minimizing the cellular response of cord disruption and maximizing range of motion through static or dynamic extension splinting.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2013

Outcomes of open carpal tunnel release at a minimum of ten years.

Dexter Louie; Brandon E. Earp; Jamie E. Collins; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N. Katz; Eric M. Black; Barry P. Simmons; Philip E. Blazar

BACKGROUND There is little research on the long-term outcomes of open carpal tunnel release. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the functional and symptomatic outcomes of patients at a minimum of ten years postoperatively. METHODS Two hundred and eleven patients underwent open carpal tunnel release from 1996 to 2000 performed by the same hand fellowship-trained surgeon. Follow-up with validated self-administered questionnaire instruments was conducted an average of thirteen years after surgery. The principal outcomes included the Levine-Katz symptom and function scores, ranging from 1 point (best) to 5 points (worst), and satisfaction with the results of surgery. The patients self-reported current comorbidities. RESULTS After a mean follow-up of thirteen years (range, eleven to seventeen years), 92% (194) of 211 patients were located. They included 140 who were still living and fifty-four who had died. Seventy-two percent (113) of the 157 located, surviving patients responded to the questionnaire. The mean Levine-Katz symptom score (and standard deviation) was 1.3 ± 0.5 points, and 13% of patients had a poor symptom score (≥2 points). The mean Levine-Katz function score was 1.6 ± 0.8 points, and 26% had a poor function score (≥2 points). The most common symptom-related complaint was weakness in the hand, followed by diurnal pain, numbness, and tingling. The least common symptoms were nocturnal pain and tenderness at the incision. Eighty-eight percent of the patients were either completely satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery. Seventy-four percent reported their symptoms to be completely resolved. Thirty-three percent of men were classified as having poor function compared with 23% of women. Two (1.8%) of 113 patients underwent repeat surgery. CONCLUSIONS At an average of thirteen years after open carpal tunnel release, the majority of patients are satisfied and free of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2013

Value-based shoulder surgery: practicing outcomes-driven, cost-conscious care

Eric M. Black; Laurence D. Higgins; Jon J.P. Warner

BACKGROUND Pathology of the shoulder contributes significantly to the increasing burden of musculoskeletal disease. Currently, there exists high variability in the nature and quality of shoulder care, and outcomes and cost reporting are not uniform. Value-based practice aims to simultaneously maximize outcomes and minimize costs for given disease processes. METHODS The current state of the shoulder care literature was examined with regards to cost and outcomes data, initiatives in streamlining care delivery, and evidence-based practice improvements. This was synthesized with value-based care theory to propose new avenues to improve shoulder care in the future. CONCLUSION The treatment of shoulder disorders is ideal for the value-based model but has been slow to adopt its principles thus far. We can begin to advance value-based practices through (1) the universal reporting of outcomes and costs, (2) integrating shoulder care across provider specialties, and (3) critically analyzing data to formulate best practices.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2014

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as salvage for failed prior arthroplasty in patients 65 years of age or younger.

Eric M. Black; Susanne M. Roberts; Elana J. Siegel; Paul Yannopoulos; Laurence D. Higgins; Jon J.P. Warner

BACKGROUND This study examined outcomes and complications in young patients undergoing revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for failed prior total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty and compared them with those of an age-matched cohort undergoing primary RTSA. METHODS RTSA as a revision for failed shoulder arthroplasty was performed on 36 patients younger than 65 years. Follow-up was available for 32 patients at an average of 55.3 months. Results were compared with those of an age-matched cohort of 37 patients (33 available for follow-up; average, 54.7 months) undergoing primary RTSA. Average age for both groups was 59.3 years. Outcomes were compared before and after revision surgery and between cohorts. RESULTS Preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores were similar in both groups, 7.3 of 10 and 24%, respectively, before revision, and 7.0 of 10 and 19% before primary RTSA (P = .3). Postrevision VAS and SSV scores improved to 1.4 of 10 and 60% (P < .0001). Average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test scores after revision were 69.7 and 58.8, with 9 complications (28.1%; 6 major and 3 minor). VAS and SSV scores improved to 2.1 of 10 and 76% after primary RTSA (P < .0001). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Simple Shoulder Test scores after primary RTSA were 74 and 67.3, with 6 complications (18.2%; 5 major and 1 minor). Only the postoperative SSV score was statistically different in comparing primary and revision RTSA (P < .05). CONCLUSION RTSA is effective in reducing pain and improving function after failed arthroplasty in young patients, but complication rates are high and expectations should be managed appropriately. Subjective outcome scores are worse than those for age-matched patients undergoing primary RTSA, but pain, functional scores, and complication rates are similar.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2016

Comparison of implant cost and surgical time in arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair

Eric M. Black; Luke Austin; Alexa Narzikul; Adam J. Seidl; Kelly Martens; Mark D. Lazarus

BACKGROUND We investigated the cost savings associated with arthroscopic transosseous (anchorless) double-row rotator cuff repair compared with double-row anchored (transosseous-equivalent [TOE]) repair. METHODS All patients undergoing double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2009 to 2012 by a single surgeon were eligible for inclusion. The study included 2 consecutive series of patients undergoing anchorless or TOE repair. Excluded from the study were revision repairs, subscapularis repairs, patients with poor tendon quality or excursion requiring medialized repair, and partial repairs. Rotator cuff implant costs (paid by the institution) and surgical times were compared between the 2 groups, controlling for rotator cuff tear size and additional procedures performed. RESULTS The study included 344 patients, 178 with TOE repairs and 166 with anchorless repairs. Average implant cost for TOE repairs was


Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | 2015

Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Study on Cost Savings, Surgical Time, and Outcomes

Luke Austin; Eric M. Black; Nicholas J. Lombardi; Matthew D. Pepe; Mark D. Lazarus

1014.10 (


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2014

Arthroscopic repair of an avulsed latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tear: a report of two cases

Eric M. Black; E. Scott Paxton; Gerald R. Williams; Hyun Seok Song

813.00 for small,


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2016

Heterotopic ossification of the long head of the triceps after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Jia-Wei Kevin Ko; Jeffrey D. Tompson; Daniel Sholder; Eric M. Black; Joseph A. Abboud

946.67 for medium,


Orthopedics | 2015

Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair: technical note, outcomes, and complications.

Eric M. Black; Albert Lin; Uma Srikumaran; Nitin B. Jain; Michael T. Freehill

1104.56 for large, and


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2015

Failure after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: what is the success of component revision?

Eric M. Black; Susanne M. Roberts; Elana J. Siegel; Paul Yannopoulos; Laurence D. Higgins; Jon J.P. Warner

1507.29 for massive tears). This was significantly more expensive compared with anchorless repairs, which averaged

Collaboration


Dive into the Eric M. Black's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark D. Lazarus

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph A. Abboud

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laurence D. Higgins

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elana J. Siegel

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerald R. Williams

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luke Austin

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip E. Blazar

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge