Erik Gotfredsen
Aarhus University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Erik Gotfredsen.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology | 2008
Francisco Haiter-Neto; A Wenzel; Erik Gotfredsen
OBJECTIVES The aim was to compare the caries diagnostic accuracy of two cone beam CT systems (CBCT) with two intraoral receptors, one digital and one film. METHODS 100 non-cavitated extracted human teeth were placed with approximal contacts: each row of teeth comprised 1 canine, 1 first and second premolar, and 1 first and second molar. Radiographs of each tooth were recorded using two intraoral modalities: Digora-fmx (Soredex) and film (Kodak Insight), and two CBCT systems: NewTom 3G (Quantitative Radiology) in three fields of view (FOVs): pixel size of 0.36 mm (FOV 12 inches), pixel size of 0.25 mm (FOV 9 inches), pixel size of 0.16 mm (FOV 6 inches); and 3DX Accuitomo (Morita), pixel size of 0.125 (FOV 4 cm). The volumetric data from the CBCT systems were reconstructed and sectioned (0.5 mm) in the mesiodistal tooth plane. Six observers scored approximal and occlusal surfaces for the detection of caries lesions. The teeth were clinically sectioned and microscopy served as the validation tool. Two-way ANOVA tested differences in sensitivity, specificity and overall true score (true positives plus true negatives) between the modalities. RESULTS Microscopy of approximal surfaces found 63% sound, 31% enamel and 6% dentin lesions; of occlusal surfaces, 6% sound, 59% enamel, 19% dentin lesions and 16% had fillings. For approximal surfaces, NewTom 12 inch and 9 inch images had significantly lower sensitivities than Accuitomo (P < 0.02); and NewTom 9 inch and 6 inch had significantly lower specificities than film and Digora-fmx (P < 0.04). Accuitomo images were not significantly different from film or Digora-fmx images for any of the tested variables (P > 0.2). For occlusal surfaces, the Accuitomo presented a higher sensitivity than the other systems. Specificity and overall true score did not differ (P > 0.06) among the modalities. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the NewTom 3G CBCT had a lower diagnostic accuracy for detection of caries lesions than intraoral modalities and the 3DX Accuitomo CBCT. The Accuitomo CBCT had a higher sensitivity than the intraoral systems for detection of lesions in dentin, but the overall true score was not higher.
Journal of Digital Imaging | 2013
Rubens Spin-Neto; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
The objective of this study was to make a systematic review on the impact of voxel size in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image acquisition, retrieving evidence regarding the diagnostic outcome of those images. The MEDLINE bibliographic database was searched from 1950 to June 2012 for reports comparing diverse CBCT voxel sizes. The search strategy was limited to English-language publications using the following combined terms in the search strategy: (voxel or FOV or field of view or resolution) and (CBCT or cone beam CT). The results from the review identified 20 publications that qualitatively or quantitatively assessed the influence of voxel size on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome, and in which the methodology/results comprised at least one of the expected parameters (image acquisition, reconstruction protocols, type of diagnostic task, and presence of a gold standard). The diagnostic task assessed in the studies was diverse, including the detection of root fractures, the detection of caries lesions, and accuracy of 3D surface reconstruction and of bony measurements, among others. From the studies assessed, it is clear that no general protocol can be yet defined for CBCT examination of specific diagnostic tasks in dentistry. Rationale in this direction is an important step to define the utility of CBCT imaging.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology | 2013
Rubens Spin-Neto; J Mudrak; Louise Hauge Matzen; J Christensen; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess artefacts and their impact on cone beam CT (CBCT) image quality (IQ) after head motion simulated by a robot skull. METHODS A fully dentate human skull incorporated into a robot simulated pre-determined patient movements. Ten head motion patterns were selected based on the movement of the C-arm of the CBCT units (no motion as reference). Three CBCT units were used [a three-dimensional eXam (K) (KaVo Dental GmbH, Biberach, Germany), a Promax 3D MAX (P) (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and a Scanora(®) 3D (S) (Soredex Oy, Tuusula, Finland)]. Axial images were qualitatively assessed at three levels: mental foramen (MF), infraorbital foramen and supraorbital foramen, and artefacts characterized as stripe-like, double contours, unsharpness or ring-like. A 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to quantitatively assess IQ. Cross-sectional images of the lower third molar and MF bilaterally were also evaluated by VAS. Four blinded examiners assessed the images. RESULTS For all units and motion patterns, stripe-like artefacts were the most common. The four observers agreed on the presence of at least one artefact type in 90% of the images. Axial images showed lower overall IQ after motion (VAS = 72.4 ± 24.0 mm) than reference images (VAS = 97.3 ± 2.6 mm). The most severe artefacts were seen at the MF level. For cross-sectional images, IQ was lowest after tremor. The mean IQ range was 74-89 and 57-90 for isolated (tilting, rotation and nodding) and combined (nodding + tilting and rotation + tilting) movements, respectively. IQ for MF was lower than for third molar for any movement except tremor. CONCLUSIONS Head motion of any type resulted in artefacts in CBCT images. The impact on IQ depended on the region and level in the skull.
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology | 1996
Ann Wenzel; Erik Gotfredsen; Eva Borg; Hans-Göran Gröndahl
Image compression may reduce storage needs whether in the lossless (reversible) or lossy (irreversible) form. The aims of the study were to evaluate (1) storage needs, (2) subjective image quality, and (3) accuracy of caries detection in digital radiographs compressed to various levels by a lossy compression method. The material consisted of 116 extracted human premolars and molars. The teeth were mounted three in a line and radiographed by the Digora system (Sorodex Medical Systems, Helsinki, Finland). The images were exported in tagged image file format and compressed with the Lempel-Ziv-Welch reversible and the Joint Photographic Experts Group irreversible compression algorithm on four levels. The total of 580 images were assessed by five observers on a 5-rank confidence scale for caries diagnosis. The observers subjectively judged image quality on an 11-point rank scale. With the reversible compression, images could be compressed to less than 50% of the original storage needs whereas the four irreversible compression factors compressed to 20%, 8%, 5%, and 3%, respectively. For occlusal surfaces, when receiver operating characteristic curve areas were increasingly smaller and the compression rate was higher. The difference between the original and the most compressed images was 14% (p = 0.1). The median quality score was above middle on the 11-point rank scale for all except the most compressed images (median score = 1). In conclusion, for caries diagnosis, compression ratio rates of 1:12 can be justified before accuracy and image quality is significantly affected.
Journal of Digital Imaging | 2011
Rubens Spin-Neto; Elcio Marcantonio; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Previous studies suggests that cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images could provide reliable information regarding the fate of bone grafts in the maxillofacial region, but no systematic information regarding the standardization of CBCT settings and properties is available, i.e., there is a lack of information on how the images were generated, exported, and analyzed when bone grafts were evaluated. The aim of this study was to (1) do a systematic review on which type of CBCT-based DICOM images have been used for the evaluation of the fate of bone grafts in humans and (2) use a software suggested in the literature to test DICOM-based data sets, exemplifying the effect of variation in selected parameters (windowing/contrast control, plane definition, slice thickness, and number of measured slices) on the final image characteristics. The results from review identified three publications that used CBCT to evaluate maxillofacial bone grafts in humans, and in which the methodology/results comprised at least one of the expected outcomes (image acquisition protocol, image reconstruction, and image generation information). The experimental shows how the influence of information that was missing in the retrieved papers, can influence the reproducibility and the validity of image measurements. Although the use of CBCT-based images for the evaluation of bone grafts in humans has become more common, this does not reflect on a better standardization of the developed studies. Parameters regarding image acquisition and reconstruction, while important, are not addressed in the proper way in the literature, compromising the reproducibility and scientific impact of the studies.
Clinical Oral Investigations | 2009
Lars Schropp; Andreas Stavropoulos; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
The aim was to evaluate the impact of a reference ball for calibration of periapical and panoramic radiographs on preoperative selection of implant size for three implant systems. Presurgical digital radiographs (70 panoramic, 43 periapical) from 70 patients scheduled for single-tooth implant treatment, recorded with a metal ball placed in the edentulous area, were evaluated by three observers with the intent to select the appropriate implant size. Four reference marks corresponding to the margins of the metal ball were manually placed on the digital image by means of computer software. Additionally, an implant with proper dimensions for the respective site was outlined by manually placing four reference marks. The diameter of the metal ball and the unadjusted length and width of the implant were calculated. Implant size was adjusted according to a “standard” calibration method (SCM; magnification factor 1.25 in panoramic images and 1.05 in periapical images) and according to a reference ball calibration method (RCM; true magnification). Based on the unadjusted as well as the adjusted implant dimensions, the implant size was selected among those available in a given implant system. For periapical radiographs, when comparing SCM and RCM with unadjusted implant dimensions, implant size changed in 42% and 58%, respectively. When comparing SCM and RCM, implant size changed in 24%. For panoramic radiographs, comparing SCM and RCM changed implant size in 48%. The use of a reference metal ball for calibration of periapical and panoramic radiographs when selecting implant size during treatment planning might be advantageous.
Caries Research | 2007
Ann Wenzel; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Erik Gotfredsen
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of image modality and observer characteristics on radiographic caries diagnosis with particular emphasis on the false positive (FP) test outcome. Eighty human teeth were radiographed by eight digital modalities and film. Eight observers scored caries lesions in each approximal tooth surface. Their use of image enhancement and time spent in assessing an image was recorded. Microscopy served as validation for the presence/absence of a lesion. Of 160 approximal surfaces, 63% were sound and 37% had lesions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with the FP test outcome as the dependent variable and the radiographic modality and observer’s gender, experience, employment, image enhancement, and time use as the independent variables. The significant risk factors for an FP test outcome were: (1) gender: males scored fewer FP than females (OR 0.26, CI 0.18–0.36); (2) experience: observers with no experience with digital radiography had a six times higher risk for an FP (OR 6.09, CI 4.9–8.1); (3) radiographic modality: two of the digital systems had a significantly lower risk for an FP [a phosphor plate system (OR 0.55, CI 0.37–0.73) and a sensor-based system (OR 0.65, CI 0.46–0.93)] and one phosphor plate system had a higher risk (OR 1.57, CI 1.17–2.13) than film; (4) time use: more time was spent when scoring an FP (OR 1.05, CI 1.03–1.05) than for any other test outcome. Type of employment and the use of image enhancement had no significant impact on the risk for an FP diagnosis.
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology | 2015
Rubens Spin-Neto; Louise Hauge Matzen; Lars Schropp; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
OBJECTIVE To assess operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors, affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination. STUDY DESIGN The sample consisted of 248 CBCT examinations in 190 patients video-recorded during examination. Three observers scored the videos; the patient moved or did not move. Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors were evaluated separately (chi-square test) and by multivariate regression analyses (patient movement and re-exposure as separate outcomes). RESULTS The prevalence of movement was 21%. Cotton roll stabilizing patients jaws, CBCT unit touching patients hair, and patients age 15 years or greater were related to movement. Age 15 years or greater had a significant impact on movement (P < .001; odds ratio [OR] 11.0). There were 16 re-exposures (6.4%). Age 15 years or greater, presence of a cotton roll, and field of view (FOV) were related to re-exposure. Use of a large FOV had significant impact on re-exposure (P = .04; OR 5.8). CONCLUSIONS Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors may affect patient movement and re-exposure in CBCT examination.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology | 2016
Rubens Spin-Neto; Louise Hauge Matzen; Lars Schropp; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
OBJECTIVES To assess patient movement characteristics in children and young adults and the impact on CBCT image quality. METHODS During 33 CBCT examinations, the patients (age: average, 14 years; range, 9-25 years) who had moved were identified by video observation [movement group (MG)]. The CBCT data sets were matched with those of 33 non-moving patients according to age, diagnostic task, examined region, field of view and voxel resolution [non-movement group (N-MG)]. Three observers scored the videos of MG, regarding motional state second by second (moving/non-moving), and movement characteristics: duration (in seconds), complexity (uniplanar or multiplanar) and distance (<3/≥3 ≤ 10/>10 mm). The observers blindly assessed axial sections of the 66 examinations individually, categorizing the image quality (appropriate/acceptable/inappropriate). Next, the observers blindly assessed axial sections of the matched-pairs images simultaneously, deciding which image in the pair had the highest image quality or if it was impossible to decide. The relationship between image quality and movement/movement characteristics was evaluated. RESULTS When the 66 CBCT images were evaluated individually, no relationship between image quality and movement was found. However, based on the matched-pairs assessment, accumulated number (≤2 vs ≥3, p = 0.039), duration (≤5 s vs ≥6 s, p = 0.024) and complexity (uniplanar vs multiplanar, p = 0.046) of movements had an impact on image quality; the more severe the movement, the more often the image quality was assessed lower in the MG. CONCLUSIONS Axial CBCT images of young patients who moved during examination did not always present lower quality than images originating from non-moving patients. Image quality was, however, significantly lower in the moving patients when movement occurred several times, had a long duration or was multiplanar.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology | 1996
Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel; H G Gröndahl