Louise Hauge Matzen

Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess artefacts and their impact on cone beam CT (CBCT) image quality (IQ) after head motion simulated by a robot skull. METHODS A fully dentate human skull incorporated into a robot simulated pre-determined patient movements. Ten head motion patterns were selected based on the movement of the C-arm of the CBCT units (no motion as reference). Three CBCT units were used [a three-dimensional eXam (K) (KaVo Dental GmbH, Biberach, Germany), a Promax 3D MAX (P) (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and a Scanora(®) 3D (S) (Soredex Oy, Tuusula, Finland)]. Axial images were qualitatively assessed at three levels: mental foramen (MF), infraorbital foramen and supraorbital foramen, and artefacts characterized as stripe-like, double contours, unsharpness or ring-like. A 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to quantitatively assess IQ. Cross-sectional images of the lower third molar and MF bilaterally were also evaluated by VAS. Four blinded examiners assessed the images. RESULTS For all units and motion patterns, stripe-like artefacts were the most common. The four observers agreed on the presence of at least one artefact type in 90% of the images. Axial images showed lower overall IQ after motion (VAS = 72.4 ± 24.0 mm) than reference images (VAS = 97.3 ± 2.6 mm). The most severe artefacts were seen at the MF level. For cross-sectional images, IQ was lowest after tremor. The mean IQ range was 74-89 and 57-90 for isolated (tilting, rotation and nodding) and combined (nodding + tilting and rotation + tilting) movements, respectively. IQ for MF was lower than for third molar for any movement except tremor. CONCLUSIONS Head motion of any type resulted in artefacts in CBCT images. The impact on IQ depended on the region and level in the skull.

Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal

OBJECTIVES To assess the influence of cone beam CT (CBCT) on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and to identify radiographic factors with an impact on deciding on coronectomy. METHODS 186 mandibular third molars with an indication for surgical intervention underwent a radiographic examination with two methods: (1) panoramic imaging in combination with stereo-scanography and (2) CBCT. After the radiographic examination a treatment plan (TP) was established: either surgical removal (Sr) or coronectomy (Co). The first TP was based on the panoramic image and stereo-scanogram, while the second TP was established after CBCT was available. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors predisposing for Co after CBCT. RESULTS Treatment was performed according to the second TP. Agreement between the first and second TP was seen in 164 cases (88%), while the TP changed for 22 teeth (12%) after CBCT. Direct contact between the third molar and the mandibular canal had the highest impact on deciding on Co [odds ratio (OR) = 101.8, p < 0.001]. Direct contact was not a sufficient factor, however; thus, lumen narrowing of the canal (OR = 38.9-147.2, p < 0.001) and canal positioned in a bending or a groove in the root complex (OR = 32.8, p = 0.016) were additional canal-related factors for deciding on Co. CONCLUSION CBCT influenced the treatment plan for 12%. Direct contact in combination with narrowing of the canal lumen and canal positioned in a bending or a groove in the root complex observed in CBCT images were significant factors for deciding on coronectomy.

Patient discomfort and retakes in periapical examination of mandibular third molars using digital receptors and film

OBJECTIVE The aim was to compare patient discomfort and evaluate the frequency of retakes using intraoral digital receptors and conventional film for radiographic examination of mandibular third molars. STUDY DESIGN Both mandibular third molar regions were examined in 110 patients with 2 of 5 digital intraoral receptors. Discomfort was scored on a visual analog scale (VAS) for each receptor and for film as a reference. If the whole tooth was not imaged on the digital image, a retake was performed using film. t Tests evaluated differences in VAS score, chi-squared tests evaluated differences in frequency of remakes, and logistic regression analyses evaluated factors predisposing for retake. RESULTS No significant difference existed in VAS scores between right and left sides for film (P = .24). The digital receptors were more uncomfortable than film (P < .001), and CDR-APS was more uncomfortable than Digora (P = .049) and Vista (P = .002). The frequency of retakes was higher for solid-state sensors than photostimulable phosphor plates (PSPs) (P < .018). Gender (P = .022), type of receptor (P < .021), and VAS score (P = .001) were predisposing factors for a retake. CONCLUSION Patients accepted film better than digital intraoral receptors, and retake frequency was lower for PSPs compared with solid-state sensors.

Factors affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography examination

OBJECTIVE To assess operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors, affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination. STUDY DESIGN The sample consisted of 248 CBCT examinations in 190 patients video-recorded during examination. Three observers scored the videos; the patient moved or did not move. Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors were evaluated separately (chi-square test) and by multivariate regression analyses (patient movement and re-exposure as separate outcomes). RESULTS The prevalence of movement was 21%. Cotton roll stabilizing patients jaws, CBCT unit touching patients hair, and patients age 15 years or greater were related to movement. Age 15 years or greater had a significant impact on movement (P < .001; odds ratio [OR] 11.0). There were 16 re-exposures (6.4%). Age 15 years or greater, presence of a cotton roll, and field of view (FOV) were related to re-exposure. Use of a large FOV had significant impact on re-exposure (P = .04; OR 5.8). CONCLUSIONS Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors may affect patient movement and re-exposure in CBCT examination.

Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery

Abstract Objective. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic imaging, stereo-scanography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for assessment of mandibular third molars. Material and methods. One hundred and twelve patients (147 third molars) underwent radiographic examination by panoramic imaging, stereo-scanography and CBCT. Tooth angulation, root morphology, number of roots and relation to the mandibular canal were assessed. The same variables were assessed intra- and post-operatively and served as reference for the radiographic assessments. The diagnostic accuracy for each variable was compared between the three modalities and accuracy was further expressed as sensitivity and specificity and tested between the modalities for identifying the relation to the mandibular canal. Results. There were no significant differences between the modalities regarding tooth angulation, root morphology and number of roots. However, CBCT was more accurate than stereo-scanography for determining root bending in the bucco-lingual plane (p = 0.02). Moreover, sensitivity for direct contact to the mandibular canal (panoramic imaging: 0.29, stereo-scanography: 0.57, CBCT: 0.67) was higher for CBCT than for panoramic images (p = 0.05) and specificity for no direct contact to the mandibular canal (panoramic imaging: 0.78, stereo-scanography: 0.53, CBCT: 0.68) was higher for panoramic images and CBCT than for scanograms (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Panoramic imaging, stereo-scanography and CBCT seem equally valuable for examination of tooth angulation, number and morphology of roots of mandibular third molars. However, CBCT was more accurate for assessment of root bending in the bucco-lingual plane and more accurate than panoramic images to identify direct contact to the mandibular canal.

Thermography as a quantitative imaging method for assessing postoperative inflammation

OBJECTIVE To assess differences in skin temperature between the operated and control side of the face after mandibular third molar surgery using thermography. METHODS 127 patients had 1 mandibular third molar removed. Before the surgery, standardized thermograms were taken of both sides of the patients face using a Flir ThermaCam™ E320 (Precisions Teknik AB, Halmstad, Sweden). The imaging procedure was repeated 2 days and 7 days after surgery. A region of interest including the third molar region was marked on each image. The mean temperature within each region of interest was calculated. The difference between sides and over time were assessed using paired t-tests. RESULTS No significant difference was found between the operated side and the control side either before or 7 days after surgery (p > 0.3). The temperature of the operated side (mean: 32.39 °C, range: 28.9-35.3 °C) was higher than that of the control side (mean: 32.06 °C, range: 28.5-35.0 °C) 2 days after surgery [0.33 °C, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.44 °C, p < 0.001]. No significant difference was found between the pre-operative and the 7-day post-operative temperature (p > 0.1). After 2 days, the operated side was not significantly different from the temperature pre-operatively (p = 0.12), whereas the control side had a lower temperature (0.57 °C, 95% CI: 0.29-0.86 °C, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Thermography seems useful for quantitative assessment of inflammation between the intervention side and the control side after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. However, thermography cannot be used to assess absolute temperature changes due to normal variations in skin temperature over time.

Movement characteristics in young patients and the impact on CBCT image quality

OBJECTIVES To assess patient movement characteristics in children and young adults and the impact on CBCT image quality. METHODS During 33 CBCT examinations, the patients (age: average, 14 years; range, 9-25 years) who had moved were identified by video observation [movement group (MG)]. The CBCT data sets were matched with those of 33 non-moving patients according to age, diagnostic task, examined region, field of view and voxel resolution [non-movement group (N-MG)]. Three observers scored the videos of MG, regarding motional state second by second (moving/non-moving), and movement characteristics: duration (in seconds), complexity (uniplanar or multiplanar) and distance (<3/≥3 ≤ 10/>10 mm). The observers blindly assessed axial sections of the 66 examinations individually, categorizing the image quality (appropriate/acceptable/inappropriate). Next, the observers blindly assessed axial sections of the matched-pairs images simultaneously, deciding which image in the pair had the highest image quality or if it was impossible to decide. The relationship between image quality and movement/movement characteristics was evaluated. RESULTS When the 66 CBCT images were evaluated individually, no relationship between image quality and movement was found. However, based on the matched-pairs assessment, accumulated number (≤2 vs ≥3, p = 0.039), duration (≤5 s vs ≥6 s, p = 0.024) and complexity (uniplanar vs multiplanar, p = 0.046) of movements had an impact on image quality; the more severe the movement, the more often the image quality was assessed lower in the MG. CONCLUSIONS Axial CBCT images of young patients who moved during examination did not always present lower quality than images originating from non-moving patients. Image quality was, however, significantly lower in the moving patients when movement occurred several times, had a long duration or was multiplanar.

Audit of a 5-year radiographic protocol for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgical intervention

OBJECTIVES To perform an audit of a three-step protocol for radiographic examination of mandibular third molars before surgery. METHODS 1769 teeth underwent surgery. A standardized three-step radiographic protocol was followed: (1) panoramic imaging (PAN), (2) stereoscanography (SCAN) and (3) CBCT. If there was overprojection between the tooth and the canal in PAN, SCAN was performed. If the tooth was determined to be in close contact with the canal in SCAN, CBCT was performed. Close contact between the tooth and the canal was assessed in all images, and patient-reported sensory disturbances from the alveolar inferior nerve were recorded after surgery. The relation between the final radiographic examination and sensory disturbances was determined. Logistic regression analysis tested whether signs for a close contact in PAN/SCAN could predict no bony separation between the tooth and canal in CBCT. RESULTS 46% of teeth underwent PAN, 31% underwent SCAN and 23% underwent CBCT as the final examination. 21% underwent all three radiographic examinations. 53/76% of teeth with close relation to the canal in PAN/SCAN showed no bony separation in CBCT; if there was close relation in PAN/SCAN, there was 1.6/4.3 times higher probability that no bony separation existed in CBCT. 16 cases of sensory disturbances were recorded: 4 operations were based on PAN, 8 on SCAN and 4 on CBCT. CONCLUSIONS The radiographic protocol was in general followed. SCAN was superior to PAN in predicting no bony separation between the tooth and the canal in CBCT, and there was no relation between sensory disturbances and radiographic method.

Is thermography useful for assessment of postoperative inflammation after surgical removal of mandibular third molars when methylprednisolone is administered and how does it correlate with patients' perception of swelling?

PURPOSE To assess the differences in facial skin temperature after mandibular third molar removal when patients received methylprednisolone and placebo, respectively and to assess the correlation between patient-reported swelling using a visual analog scale (VAS) and facial skin temperature measured using thermography. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study involved patients with 2 mandibular third molars with an indication for removal. The patients received either methylprednisolone or placebo in a randomized, crossover study design. Thermograms and the swelling VAS score were recorded 2 days after surgery. The outcome variable was the temperature difference (Δt) between the operated and control sides. A 2-sample t test analyzed the difference in Δt between the first and second operations. Spearmans rank correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between the swelling VAS scores and the Δt. RESULTS A total of 124 patients (67 males, 57 females, mean age 25 years) had both mandibular third molars removed on 2 separate occasions. No difference in Δt was found when methylprednisolone and placebo were given (P = .07). In addition, the correlation between the swelling VAS score and Δt was 0.30 (P = .001) and 0.09 (P = .3) after the first and second operation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Thermography does not seem sensitive enough to detect differences in the inflammatory response when patients received methylprednisolone or placebo. The correlation between the Δt and patient-reported swelling was low (≤0.3).

Accuracy of scanography using storage phosphor plate systems and film for assessment of mandibular third molars

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two digital photostimulable storage phosphor (PSP) systems and film for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery. METHODS 110 patients were referred to have both their mandibular third molars removed. Each patient underwent a radiographic examination with scanography using either Digora (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) and film or VistaScan (Dürr Dental, Beitigheim-Bissingen, Germany) and film in a randomized paired design. Two observers examined the following variables on the scanograms: bone coverage, angulation of the tooth in the bone, number of roots, root morphology and the relationship to the mandibular canal. In 75 of the pairs (Digora/film pair = 38 and Vista/film pair = 37) both third molars were eventually removed. During and after surgery the same variables were assessed, which served as reference standard for the radiographic assessments. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test tested differences in accuracy (radiographic compared with surgical findings) between Digora/film and between Vista/film. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference between the diagnostic accuracy of film and either of the two digital receptors for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery (P > 0.05), although Digora obtained a higher accuracy than film. CONCLUSIONS Scanography is a valuable method for examination of mandibular third molars before removal and the PSP digital receptors in this study were equal to film for this purpose.