Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Erik Lee is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Erik Lee.


Psychiatry Research-neuroimaging | 2017

Resting state functional connectivity in primary insomnia, generalized anxiety disorder and controls

Edward F. Pace-Schott; Jared P. Zimmerman; Rm Bottary; Erik Lee; Mohammed R. Milad; Joan A. Camprodon

Sleep abnormalities are extremely common in anxiety disorders and may contribute to their development and persistence. Their shared pathophysiological mechanisms could thus serve as biomarkers or targets for novel therapeutics. Individuals with Primary Insomnia were age- and sex-matched to controls and to persons with Generalized Anxiety Disorder. All underwent fMRI resting-state scans at 3-T. In Primary Insomnia and controls, sleep was recorded for 2 weeks using diaries and actigraphy. All participants completed state-anxiety and neuroticism inventories. Whole-brain connectivity of 6 fear- and extinction-related seeds were compared between the 3 groups using ANOVA. The only significant between-group main effect was seen for connectivity between the left amygdala seed and a bilateral cluster in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex. The latter is believed to exert top-down control over amygdala activity and their interaction may thus constitute an emotion regulatory circuit. This connectivity was significantly greatest in controls while Primary Insomnia was intermediate between that of controls and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Across Primary Insomnia and control subjects, mean connectivity decreased with poorer sleep. Across all 3 groups, connectivity decreased with greater neuroticism and pre-scan anxiety. Decreased top-down control of the amygdala may increase risk of developing an anxiety disorder with preexisting Primary Insomnia.


AIP Advances | 2017

Effect of anatomical variability in brain on transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment

Farheen Syeda; Hamzah Magsood; Erik Lee; Ahmed A. El-Gendy; David Jiles; R. L. Hadimani

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation is a non-invasive clinical therapy used to treat depression and migraine, and shows further promise as treatment for Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurological disorders. However, it is yet unclear as to how anatomical differences may affect stimulation from this treatment. We use finite element analysis to model and analyze the results of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in various head models. A number of heterogeneous head models have been developed using MRI data of real patients, including healthy individuals as well as patients of Parkinson’s disease. Simulations of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation performed on 22 anatomically different models highlight the differences in induced stimulation. A standard Figure of 8 coil is used with frequency 2.5 kHz, placed 5 mm above the head. We compare cortical stimulation, volume of brain tissue stimulated, specificity, and maximum E-field induced in the brain for models ranging from ages 20 to 60. Resul...


Clinical Neurophysiology | 2018

Impact of non-brain anatomy and coil orientation on inter- and intra-subject variability in TMS at midline

Erik Lee; Priyam Rastogi; R. L. Hadimani; David Jiles; Joan A. Camprodon

OBJECTIVE To investigate inter-subject variability with respect to cerebrospinal fluid thickness and brain-scalp distance, and to investigate intra-subject variability with different coil orientations. METHODS Simulations of the induced electric field (E-Field) using a figure-8 coil over the vertex were conducted on 50 unique head models and varying orientations on 25 models. Metrics exploring stimulation intensity, spread, and localization were used to describe inter-subject variability and effects of non-brain anatomy. RESULTS Both brain-scalp distance and CSF thickness were correlated with weaker stimulation intensity and greater spread. Coil rotations show that for the dorsal portion of the stimulated brain, E-Field intensities are highest when the anterior-posterior axis of the coil is perpendicular to the longitudinal fissure, but highest for the medial portion of the stimulated brain when the coil is oriented parallel to the longitudinal fissure. CONCLUSIONS Normal anatomical variation in healthy individuals leads to significant differences in the site of TMS, the intensity, and the spread. These variables are generally neglected but could explain significant variability in basic and clinical studies. SIGNIFICANCE This is the first work to show how brain-scalp distance and cerebrospinal fluid thickness influence focality, and to show the disassociation between dorsal and medial TMS.


AIP Advances | 2018

Investigation of shape, position, and permeability of shielding material in quadruple butterfly coil for focused transcranial magnetic stimulation

Priyam Rastogi; Bowen Zhang; Yalun Tang; Erik Lee; R. L. Hadimani; David Jiles

Transcranial magnetic stimulation has been gaining popularity in the therapy for several neurological disorders. A time-varying magnetic field is used to generate electric field in the brain. As the development of TMS methods takes place, emphasis on the coil design increases in order to improve focal stimulation. Ideally reduction of stimulation of neighboring regions of the target area is desired. This study, focused on the improvement of the focality of the Quadruple Butterfly Coil (QBC) with supplemental use of different passive shields. Parameters such as shape, position and permeability of the shields have been explored to improve the focus of stimulation. Results have been obtained with the help of computer modelling of a MRI derived heterogeneous head model over the vertex position and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex position using a finite element tool. Variables such as maximum electric field induced on the grey matter and scalp, volume and area of stimulation above half of the maximum value of electric field on the grey matter, and ratio of the maximum electric field in the brain versus the scalp have been investigated.Transcranial magnetic stimulation has been gaining popularity in the therapy for several neurological disorders. A time-varying magnetic field is used to generate electric field in the brain. As the development of TMS methods takes place, emphasis on the coil design increases in order to improve focal stimulation. Ideally reduction of stimulation of neighboring regions of the target area is desired. This study, focused on the improvement of the focality of the Quadruple Butterfly Coil (QBC) with supplemental use of different passive shields. Parameters such as shape, position and permeability of the shields have been explored to improve the focus of stimulation. Results have been obtained with the help of computer modelling of a MRI derived heterogeneous head model over the vertex position and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex position using a finite element tool. Variables such as maximum electric field i...


ieee international magnetics conference | 2017

Quadruple Butterfly Coil With Passive Magnetic Shielding for Focused Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Priyam Rastogi; Yalun Tang; Bowen Zhang; Erik Lee; R. L. Hadimani; David Jiles

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive, safe and promising therapy for neurological conditions which utilizes transient magnetic fields for inducing electric field in the brain.


Biological Psychiatry | 2018

S141. Electroconvulsive Therapy Leads to Plastic Changes in the Medial Forebrain Bundle Associated With Improvement in Anhedonia and Depression Severity

Ana María Rivas-Grajales; Palig Mouradian; George N. Papadimitriou; Erik Lee; Marek Kubicki; Nikos Makris; Joan A. Camprodon


Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2017

Quadruple Cone Coil with improved focality than Figure-8 coil in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Priyam Rastogi; Erik Lee; R. L. Hadimani; David Jiles


Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2017

Effect of Parkinson's Disease in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment

Farheen Syeda; Hamzah Magsood; Erik Lee; Ahmed A. El-Gendy; David Jiles; R. L. Hadimani


Brain Stimulation | 2017

Mechanisms and predictors ofelectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) anti-suicidal properties

Joan A. Camprodon; Kristen K. Ellard; J. Zimmermann; Erik Lee; M. Henry; A. Weiner; Nikos Makris; M. Nock


Brain Stimulation | 2017

TMS field localization: How anatomy shapes stimulation

Erik Lee; Priyam Rastogi; R. L. Hadimani; David Jiles; Joan A. Camprodon

Collaboration


Dive into the Erik Lee's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. L. Hadimani

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ahmed A. El-Gendy

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Farheen Syeda

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hamzah Magsood

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge