Erika Ohashi

Treatment patterns and duration in post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer in the US: a retrospective chart review in community oncology practices (2004–2010)

Abstract Background: Clinical guidelines prefer endocrine therapy (ET) as initial treatment for post-menopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Chemotherapy (CT) should be reserved for patients who develop symptomatic visceral disease or have no clinical benefit after three sequential ET regimens. It is unclear if real-world clinical practice reflects these guidelines. Objective: To describe treatment patterns and treatment durations by lines of therapy for ET and CT among post-menopausal HR+/HER2− mBC patients. Methods: Charts were reviewed from a network of community-based oncology practices of eligible patients who had progressed after initiating adjuvant or first-line treatment for mBC between 1 January 2004 and 30 September 2010. Extracted chart data included demographics, treatment histories, and outcomes. Treatment duration was estimated using Kaplan–Meier estimators. Results: A total of 144 patients were studied. Patients received a median of two lines of ET, and <10% had three or more lines of ET before receiving CT. From first line to second line, the median treatment duration was 11.6 to 4.9 months for ET overall; 13.8 to 10.5 months for anastrozole; 18.6 to 7.0 months for letrozole; and 5.1 to 2.9 months for fulvestrant. For CT, the median duration was 5.1 months in the first line and 3.7 months and below in subsequent lines. Conclusion: During the study period (1 January 2004 – 30 September 2012), most patients received <3 lines of ET before receiving CT. The drop in median duration of ET from first to second line suggests that single agent ETs might not be as effective beyond the first line. A key limitation of this study was the small sample size. In addition, more research is needed to further investigate the short treatment duration of fulvestrant across early lines of therapy (which could indicate lack of efficacy).

Everolimus-Based Therapy versus Chemotherapy among Patients with HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer: Comparative Effectiveness from a Chart Review Study

Objective. To compare the real-world effectiveness of everolimus-based therapy and chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive/human-epidermal-growth-factor-receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods. This retrospective chart review examined a nationwide sample of postmenopausal HR+/HER2− mBC women in community-based oncology practices. Patients received everolimus-based therapy or chemotherapy for mBC between 07/01/2012 and 04/15/2013, after failure of a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time on treatment (TOT) were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for line of therapy and baseline characteristics. Results. 234 and 137 patients received everolimus-based therapy and chemotherapy. Patients treated with everolimus-based therapy tended to have less aggressive mBC than patients treated with chemotherapy. Multivariate-adjusted Cox models showed that everolimus-based therapy was associated with significantly longer OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22–0.63], PFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.50–0.97), and TOT (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.25–0.45) than chemotherapy. Adjusted comparative effectiveness results were generally consistent across lines of therapy. Conclusion. In this retrospective chart review of postmenopausal HR+/HER2− mBC patients, treatment with everolimus-based therapy was associated with longer OS, PFS, and TOT than chemotherapy.

Comparative effectiveness of everolimus-based therapy versus endocrine monotherapy among postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective chart review in community oncology practices in the US

Abstract Background: Everolimus-based therapy and endocrine monotherapy are used among postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) whose disease progressed or recurred on a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). However, limited evidence exists regarding the real-world comparative effectiveness of these agents. Methods: This retrospective chart review examined postmenopausal HR+/HER2− mBC patients in community-based oncology practices who received everolimus-based therapy or endocrine monotherapy (index therapy) as any line of therapy for mBC between 1 July 2012 and 15 April 2013 after NSAI failure. Time on treatment (TOT), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to chemotherapy (TTC) from index therapy initiation were compared using Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 243 and 270 patients received everolimus-based therapy or endocrine monotherapy in a quota-based sample. Patients treated with everolimus-based therapy had a higher proportion of visceral metastases, high tumor burden, and use of prior chemotherapies for mBC. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, everolimus-based therapy was associated with significantly longer TOT (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.51–0.87) and PFS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57–0.98) than endocrine monotherapy. No significant difference was found between everolimus-based therapy and endocrine monotherapy in TTC (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.52–1.27). Results stratified by line of therapy were generally consistent with the overall results. Limitations: Limitations include recall and information bias with potentially absent or erroneous chart data, unobserved factors due to non-randomization, inability to measure outcome assessments paired with measuring outcomes prior to exposures, and potential patient selection bias associated with chart review. Conclusions: Among a nationwide sample of postmenopausal HR+/HER2− mBC patients treated in community oncology settings, treatment with everolimus-based therapy was associated with significantly longer TOT and PFS compared to endocrine monotherapy.

Real-world effectiveness of everolimus-based therapy versus endocrine monotherapy and chemotherapy in patients of HR+/HER2- breast cancer with liver metastasis in the USA

Objective: This study investigated the comparative effectiveness of everolimus-based therapy (EVE) versus endocrine monotherapy (ET) and chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive human-epidermal-growth-factor-receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients with liver metastasis. Methods: Medical charts of patients treated by community oncologists were examined. Eligible patients included postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC with liver metastasis who received EVE, ET or CT between 1 July 2012 and 15 April 2013 after non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor use. Time on treatment (TOT) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between EVE and ET or CT using Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among the 202 patients in the study, 82 received EVE, 49 ET, and 71 CT. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, EVE was associated with significantly longer TOT than ET (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.28 – 0.86) or CT (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.22 – 0.55), and significantly longer PFS than ET (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27 – 0.87). PFS was not significantly different with EVE versus CT (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.44 – 1.32). Conclusions: EVE had significantly longer TOT and PFS than ET and longer TOT than CT among postmenopausal HR+/HER2- mBC patients with liver metastasis.

Overall Survival (Os), Quality Of Life (Qol), And Neurocognitive Function (Nf) In Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme (Gbm): A Systematic Literature Review.

• Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used to assess QoL among patients with recurrent GBM included the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), the EORTC QLQ Brain Cancer Module (EORTC QLQBN20), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)–General (FACT-G), the FACT–Brain (FACT-Br), and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (Table 2)

Real-world effectiveness of everolimus-based therapy versus fulvestrant monotherapy in HR(+)/HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer.

AIMS Assessing real-world effectiveness of everolimus-based therapy (EVE) versus fulvestrant monotherapy (FUL) among postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR(+))/HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) after progression on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). DATA & METHODS Medical charts of community-based patients who received EVE or FUL for mBC after NSAI were examined. Progression-free survival (PFS), time on treatment and time to chemotherapy were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for line of therapy and patient characteristics. RESULTS & CONCLUSION 192 patients received EVE and 156 FUL. After adjusting for patient characteristics, EVE was associated with significantly longer PFS than FUL (hazard ratio: 0.71; p = 0.045). EVE was associated with better PFS than FUL among NSAI-refractory postmenopausal HR(+)/HER2(-) mBC patients.

Effectiveness of Everolimus Versus Endocrine Monotherapy or Chemotherapy Among HR+/HER2- mBC Patients With Multiple Metastatic Sites.

PURPOSE This review compared the real-world effectiveness of everolimus-based therapy versus endocrine monotherapy or chemotherapy in postmenopausal hormone receptor positive (HR+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients with multiple metastatic sites. METHODS This retrospective chart review examined a nationwide sample of postmenopausal HR+/HER2- mBC women with ≥2 non-lymph-node metastatic sites. Patients must have initiated everolimus-based therapy (monotherapy or combination therapy including everolimus), endocrine monotherapy (any endocrine agent), or chemotherapy (monotherapy or combination with another chemotherapeutic or endocrine agent) for mBC between July 1, 2012 and August 15, 2013 after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor failure. Progression-free survival and time on treatment were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for line of therapy and baseline characteristics. FINDINGS One hundred patients received everolimus-based therapy, 79 received endocrine monotherapy, and 86 received chemotherapy. Everolimus-based therapy was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival and time on treatment than endocrine monotherapy and chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS Among HR+/HER2- mBC patients with multiple metastatic sites, everolimus-based therapy was associated with better real-world effectiveness than endocrine monotherapy or chemotherapy.