Erin E. Young

Genetic basis of pain variability: recent advances

An estimated 15–50% of the population experiences pain at any given time, at great personal and societal cost. Pain is the most common reason patients seek medical attention, and there is a high degree of individual variability in reporting the incidence and severity of symptoms. Research suggests that pain sensitivity and risk for chronic pain are complex heritable traits of polygenic origin. Animal studies and candidate gene testing in humans have provided some progress in understanding the heritability of pain, but the application of the genome-wide association methodology offers a new tool for further elucidating the genetic contributions to normal pain responding and pain in clinical populations. Although the determination of the genetics of pain is still in its infancy, it is clear that a number of genes play a critical role in determining pain sensitivity or susceptibility to chronic pain. This review presents an update of the most recent findings that associate genetic variation with variability in pain and an overview of the candidate genes with the highest translational potential.

Interleukin-6 as a mechanism for the adverse effects of social stress on acute Theiler's virus infection

Prior exposure to social disruption stress (SDR) exacerbates both the acute and chronic phase of Theilers murine encephalomyelitis virus infection (TMEV; [Johnson, R.R., Storts, R., Welsh, T.H., Jr., Welsh, C.J., Meagher, M.W., 2004. Social stress alters the severity of acute Theilers virus infection. J. Neuroimmunol. 148, 74--85; Johnson, R.R., Prentice, T.W., Bridegam, P., Young, C.R., Steelman, A.J., Welsh, T.H., Welsh, C.J.R., Meagher, M.W., 2006. Social stress alters the severity and onset of the chronic phase of Theilers virus infection. J. Neuroimmunol. 175, 39--51]). However, the neuroimmune mechanism(s) mediating this effect have not been determined. The present study examined whether stress-induced increases in the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) contributes to the adverse effects of SDR on acute TMEV infection. Experiment 1 demonstrated that SDR increases central and peripheral levels of IL-6 and that this effect is reversed by intracerebral ventricular infusion of neutralizing antibody to IL-6 prior to each of six SDR sessions. Although SDR reduced the sensitivity of spleen cells to the anti-inflammatory effects of corticosterone, the neutralizing antibody to IL-6 did not alter this effect. To investigate whether stress-induced increases in IL-6 contribute to the exacerbation of acute TMEV infection, Experiment 2 examined whether intracerebral administration of neutralizing antibody to IL-6 during SDR would prevent the subsequent exacerbation of acute TMEV infection. Experiment 3 then replaced the social stress with intracerebral infusion of IL-6 to assess sufficiency. As expected, prior exposure to SDR subsequently increased infection-related sickness behaviors, motor impairment, CNS viral titers, and CNS inflammation. These deleterious effects of SDR were either prevented or significantly attenuated by intracerebral infusion of neutralizing antibody to IL-6 during the stress exposure period. However, infusion of IL-6 alone did not mimic the adverse effects of SDR. We conclude that IL-6 is necessary but not sufficient to exacerbate acute TMEV infection.

Pain management in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: translational approaches from bench to bedside.

Abstract:Abdominal pain is a common symptom in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that negatively affects quality of life and can lead to increased health-seeking behavior. Although abdominal pain has been traditionally attributed to inflammation, there is growing literature demonstrating the existence of functional abdominal pain in patients with IBD, of which there are a variety of potential causes. Thus, when approaching a patient with IBD who has abdominal pain, in addition to IBD-related complications (e.g., inflammation/stricture), it is important to screen for related contributors, including peripheral factors (visceral hypersensitivity, bacterial overgrowth, and bowel dysmotility) and centrally mediated neurobiological and psychosocial underpinnings. These central factors include psychological symptoms/diagnoses, sleep disturbance, and stress. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (e.g., narcotic bowel syndrome) is also growing in recognition as a potential central source of abdominal pain. This review draws from clinical studies and animal models of colitis and abdominal pain to consider how knowledge of these potential etiologies can be used to individualize treatment of abdominal pain in patients with IBD, including consideration of potential novel treatment modalities for the future. Accurate assessment of the source(s) of pain in patients with IBD can help guide appropriate diagnostic workup and use of disease-modifying therapy.Abdominal pain is a common symptom in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that negatively affects quality of life and can lead to increased health-seeking behavior. Although abdominal pain has been traditionally attributed to inflammation, there is growing literature demonstrating the existence of functional abdominal pain in patients with IBD, of which there are a variety of potential causes. Thus, when approaching a patient with IBD who has abdominal pain, in addition to IBD-related complications (e.g., inflammation/stricture), it is important to screen for related contributors, including peripheral factors (visceral hypersensitivity, bacterial overgrowth, and bowel dysmotility) and centrally mediated neurobiological and psychosocial underpinnings. These central factors include psychological symptoms/diagnoses, sleep disturbance, and stress. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (e.g., narcotic bowel syndrome) is also growing in recognition as a potential central source of abdominal pain. This review draws from clinical studies and animal models of colitis and abdominal pain to consider how knowledge of these potential etiologies can be used to individualize treatment of abdominal pain in patients with IBD, including consideration of potential novel treatment modalities for the future. Accurate assessment of the source(s) of pain in patients with IBD can help guide appropriate diagnostic workup and use of disease-modifying therapy.

Pain and learning in a spinal system: Contradictory outcomes from common origins

The long-standing belief that the spinal cord serves merely as a conduit for information traveling to and from the brain is changing. Over the past decade, research has shown that the spinal cord is sensitive to response-outcome contingencies, demonstrating that spinal circuits have the capacity to modify behavior in response to differential environmental cues. If spinally transected rats are administered shock contingent on leg extension (controllable shock), they will maintain a flexion response that minimizes shock exposure. If, however, this contingency is broken, and shock is administered irrespective of limb position (uncontrollable shock), subjects cannot acquire the same flexion response. Interestingly, each of these treatments has a lasting effect on behavior; controllable shock enables future learning, while uncontrollable shock produces a long-lasting learning deficit. Here we suggest that the mechanisms underlying learning and the deficit may have evolved from machinery responsible for the spinal processing of noxious information. Experiments have shown that learning and the deficit require receptors and signaling cascades shown to be involved in central sensitization, including activation of NMDA and neurokinin receptors, as well as CaMKII. Further supporting this link between pain and learning, research has also shown that uncontrollable stimulation results in allodynia. Moreover, systemic inflammation and neonatal hindpaw injury each facilitate pain responding and undermine the ability of the spinal cord to support learning. These results suggest that the plasticity associated with learning and pain must be placed in a balance in order for adaptive outcomes to be observed.

Neurokinin receptors modulate the impact of uncontrollable stimulation on adaptive spinal plasticity

Previous research has demonstrated that spinally transected rats can acquire a prolonged flexion response to prevent the delivery of shock. However, rats that receive shock irrespective of leg position cannot learn to maintain the same response. The present experiments examined the role of neurokinin receptors in this learning deficit. Results demonstrated that neurokinin (NK1 and NK2) antagonists blocked the induction of the learning deficit, whereas NK agonists induced a learning deficit. The study found that NK agonist administration did not substitute for uncontrollable shock exposure. Finally, administration of an NK1 agonist prior to uncontrollable shock prevented the induction of the deficit. These results provide additional evidence that engaging nociceptive plasticity undermines the capability of spinal neurons to support adaptive changes.

Intrathecal infusions of anisomycin impact the learning deficit but not the learning effect observed in spinal rats that have received instrumental training

Previous research has shown that spinally transected rats will learn to maintain a flexion response when administered shock contingent upon leg position. In short, a contingency is arranged between shock delivery and leg extension so that Master rats exhibit an increase in flexion duration that lasts throughout the training session. Furthermore, when Master rats are later tested they reacquire the flexion response in fewer trials, indicative of some savings. As a control, a second group of spinal rats (Yoked rats) are given shock irrespective of leg position (noncontingent shock). These animals fail to show the same increase in leg flexion duration. Interestingly, when Yoked rats are later tested with a shock contingency in place, they still fail to learn (learning deficit). The present experiments were designed to determine whether both forms of instrumental learning in spinal animals require de novo protein synthesis. As such, we administered various doses of anisomycin intrathecally prior to training. Additionally, spinal rats were trained and tested either immediately or 24 h after test. We found that only the highest dose of anisomycin (125 microg/microl) had an effect in Yoked animals that were tested 24 h after training. Specifically, the highest dose of anisomycin reversed the learning deficit in those animals. Moreover, anisomycin had a similar effect when administered prior to training and immediately following training, but not 6 h after training. Finally, the results demonstrated that the observed effect of anisomycin was not due to state-dependency.

Glucocorticoid exposure alters the pathogenesis of Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus during acute infection

Previous research has shown that chronic restraint stress exacerbates Theilers virus infection, a murine model for CNS inflammation and multiple sclerosis. The current set of experiments was designed to evaluate the potential role of glucocorticoids in the deleterious effects of restraint stress on acute CNS inflammatory disease. Exposure to chronic restraint stress resulted in elevated levels of corticosterone as well as increased clinical scores and weight loss (Experiment 1). In addition, corticosterone administration alone exacerbated behavioral signs of TMEV-induced sickness (i.e. decreased body weight, increased symptoms of encephalitis, and increased mortality) and reduced inflammation in the CNS (Experiment 2). Infected subjects receiving exogenous corticosterone showed exacerbation of acute phase measures of sickness and severe mortality as well as decreased viral clearance from CNS (Experiment 3). These findings indicate that corticosterone exposure alone is sufficient to exacerbate acute CNS inflammatory disease.

Chronic restraint stress during early Theiler’s virus infection exacerbates the subsequent demyelinating disease in SJL mice: II. CNS disease severity

Theilers murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) infection is a well-characterized model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Previous research has shown that chronic restraint stress (RS) during early TMEV infection exacerbates behavioral signs of the disease. The present data suggest that RS-induced increases in CNS inflammation, demyelination, and axonal degeneration may underlie this exacerbation. In addition, we report that males exhibit greater CNS inflammation and higher numbers of demyelinating lesions while females show greater susceptibility to RS-induced exacerbation. These findings indicate that RS during early TMEV infection increases CNS lesion formation during the late phase and suggest that the effects of RS are sex-dependent.

Social disruption induced priming of CNS inflammatory response to Theiler's virus is dependent upon stress induced IL-6 release

Chronic social disruption stress (SDR) exacerbates acute and chronic phase Theilers murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) infection, a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. However, the precise mechanism by which this occurs remains unknown. The present study suggests that SDR exacerbates TMEV disease course by priming virus-induced neuroinflammation. It was demonstrated that IL-1β mRNA expression increases following acute SDR; however, IL-6 mRNA expression, but not IL-1β, is upregulated in response to chronic SDR. Furthermore, this study demonstrated SDR prior to infection increases infection related central IL-6 and IL-1β mRNA expression, and administration of IL-6 neutralizing antibody during SDR reverses this increase in neuroinflammation.

Heritability of Nociception IV: Neuropathic pain assays are genetically distinct across methods of peripheral nerve injury

Summary Genetic correlation analysis of murine pain models indicates that novel genetic mechanisms remain to be determined for several mechanical hypersensitivity assays and neuropathic pain assays. ABSTRACT Prior genetic correlation analysis of 22 heritable behavioral measures of nociception and hypersensitivity in the mouse identified 5 genetically distinct pain types. In the present study, we reanalyzed that dataset and included the results of an additional 9 assays of nociception and hypersensitivity, with the following goals: to replicate the previously identified 5 pain types; to test whether any of the newly added pain assays represent novel genetically distinct pain types; and to test the level of genetic relatedness among 9 commonly used neuropathic pain assays. Multivariate analysis of pairwise correlations between assays shows that the newly added zymosan‐induced heat hypersensitivity assay does not conform to the 2 previously identified groups of heat hypersensitivity assays and cyclophosphamide‐induced cystitis, the first organ‐specific visceral pain model examined, is genetically distinct from other inflammatory assays. The 4 included mechanical hypersensitivity assays are genetically distinct and do not comprise a single pain type as previously reported. Among the 9 neuropathic pain assays including autotomy, chemotherapy, nerve ligation and spared nerve injury assays, at least 4 genetically distinct types of neuropathic sensory abnormalities were identified, corresponding to differences in nerve injury method. In addition, 2 itch assays and Comt genotype were compared to the expanded set of nociception and hypersensitivity assays. Comt genotype was strongly related only to spontaneous inflammatory nociception assays. These results indicate the priority for continued investigation of genetic mechanisms in several assays newly identified to represent genetically distinct pain types.