Erin Searcy

Uniform-Format Solid Feedstock Supply System: A Commodity-Scale Design to Produce an Infrastructure-Compatible Bulk Solid from Lignocellulosic Biomass -- Executive Summary

This report, Uniform-Format Solid Feedstock Supply System: A Commodity-Scale Design to Produce an Infrastructure-Compatible Bulk Solid from Lignocellulosic Biomass, prepared by Idaho National Laboratory (INL), acknowledges the need and provides supportive designs for an evolutionary progression from present day conventional bale-based supply systems to a uniform-format, bulk solid supply system that transitions incrementally as the industry launches and matures. These designs couple to and build from current state of technology and address science and engineering constraints that have been identified by rigorous sensitivity analyses as having the greatest impact on feedstock supply system efficiencies and costs.

Optimization of Biomass Transport and Logistics

Global demand for lignocellulosic biomass is growing, driven by a desire to increase the contribution of renewable energy to the world energy mix. A barrier to the expansion of this industry is that biomass is not always geographically where it needs to be, nor does it have the characteristics required for efficient handling, storage, and conversion, due to low energy density compared to fossil fuels. Technologies exist that can create a more standardized feedstock for conversion processes and decrease handling and transport costs; however, the cost associated with those operations often results in a feedstock that is too expensive. The disconnect between quantity of feedstock needed to meet bioenergy production goals, the quality required by the conversion processes, and the cost bioenergy producers are able to pay creates a need for new and improved technologies that potentially remove barriers associated with biomass use.

Logistics, Costs, and GHG Impacts of Utility Scale Cofiring with 20% Biomass

This report presents the results of an evaluation of utility-scale biomass cofiring in large pulverized coal power plants. The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the cost and greenhouse gas reduction benefits of substituting relatively high volumes of biomass in coal. Two scenarios for cofiring up to 20% biomass with coal (on a lower heating value basis) are presented; (1) woody biomass in central Alabama where Southern Pine is currently produced for the wood products and paper industries, and (2) purpose-grown switchgrass in the Ohio River Valley. These examples are representative of regions where renewable biomass growth rates are high in correspondence with major U.S. heartland power production. While these scenarios may provide a realistic reference for comparing the relative benefits of using a high volume of biomass for power production, this evaluation is not intended to be an analysis of policies concerning renewable portfolio standards or the optimal use of biomass for energy production in the U.S.

Transition Strategies: Resource Mobilization Through Merchandisable Feedstock Intermediates

Abstract A variety of feedstock types will be needed to grow the bioeconomy. Respective logistics and market structures will be needed to cope with the spatial, temporal, and compositional variability of these feedstocks. At present, pilot-scale cellulosic biorefineries rely on vertically integrated supply systems designed to support traditional agricultural and forestry industries. The vision of the future feedstock supply system is a network of distributed biomass processing centers (depots) and centralized terminals. This introduces methods to increase feedstock volume while decreasing price and quality supply uncertainties. Depots are located close to the resource, while shipping and blending terminals are located in strategic logistical hubs with access to high bulk transportation systems. The system emulates the current grain commodity supply system, which manages crop diversity at the point of harvest and at the storage elevator, allowing subsequent supply system infrastructure to be similar for all resources. The initiation of depot (pilot) operations is seen as a strategic stepping stone to transition to this logistic system. A fundamental part of initiating (pilot-) depot operations is to establish the value proposition to the biomass grower, as biomass becomes available to the market place only through mobilization. A feedstock supply industry independently mobilizing biomass by producing value-add merchandisable intermediates creates a market push that will derisk and accelerate the deployment of bioenergy technologies. Companion markets can help mobilize biomass without biorefineries. That is, depots produce value-added intermediates that are fully fungible in both a companion and the biorefining market. To achieve this, a separation between feedstock supply and conversion industry may be necessary.

Impact of screening on behavior during storage and cost of ground small-diameter pine trees: a case study.

Whole comminuted trees are known to self-heat and undergo quality changes during storage. Trommel screening after grinding is a process that removes fines from the screened material and removes a large proportion of high-ash, high-nutrient material. In this study, the trade-off between an increase in preprocessing cost from trommel screening and an increase in quality of the screened material was examined. Fresh lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) was comminuted using a drum grinder with a 10-cm screen, and the resulting material was distributed into separate fines and overs piles. A third pile of unscreened material, the unsorted pile, was also examined. The three piles exhibited different characteristics during a 6-week storage period. The overs pile was much slower to heat. The overs pile reached a maximum temperature of 56.8°C, which was lower than the maximum reached by the other two piles (65.9°C and 63.4°C for the unsorted and fines, respectively). The overs also cooled faster and dried to a more unifo...

Commodity-Scale Biomass Trade and Integration with Other Supply Chains

A global bioeconomy requires adequate logistical infrastructure to support trade of biomass feedstock and intermediates. An integration of biomass trade streams with existing supply chain infrastructure, originally constructed for other goods, presents an opportunity to efficiently enable such growth. This chapter examines to what extent existing logistical infrastructure can be used and/or shared with biomass trade streams via specific case studies. It identifies how biomass trade is already or could be integrated into existing supply chains handling infrastructure, and for what kind of biomass specifications a dedicated infrastructure is needed. It finds that the existing solids handling infrastructure is well suited to integrate biomass intermediates such as conventional or torrefied pellets. Liquids with a higher energy density than solids, for example, pyrolysis oil, could potentially realize many opportunities to leverage infrastructure designed for the petroleum industry, and may even enable leveraging home heating infrastructure, for example, in the US northeast, preventing costly modifications. However, high oxygen levels render pyrolysis oil corrosive, requiring investments in stainless steel or other more durable handling equipment. Biomethane injection into natural gas grids is already a common technology in most of Europe, but major hurdles remain, including high production costs, pipeline access, and the lack of quality standards.

Supply Chain Sustainability Analysis of Fast Pyrolysis and Hydrotreating Bio-Oil to Produce Hydrocarbon Fuels

The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Bioenergy Technology Office (BETO) aims at developing and deploying technologies to transform renewable biomass resources into commercially viable, high-performance biofuels, bioproducts and biopower through public and private partnerships (DOE, 2015). BETO and its national laboratory teams conduct in-depth techno-economic assessments (TEA) of technologies to produce biofuels. These assessments evaluate feedstock production, logistics of transporting the feedstock, and conversion of the feedstock to biofuel. There are two general types of TEAs. A design case is a TEA that outlines a target case for a particular biofuel pathway. It enables identification of data gaps and research and development needs, and provides goals and targets against which technology progress is assessed. On the other hand, a state of technology (SOT) analysis assesses progress within and across relevant technology areas based on actual experimental results relative to technical targets and cost goals from design cases, and includes technical, economic, and environmental criteria as available.

An Integrated Landscape Management Approach to Sustainable Bioenergy Production

Integrated landscape management has emerged in recent years as a methodology to integrate the environmental impacts of various agricultural practices along with yield and profitability in a variety of cropping systems. In this study, the Landscape Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF), a decision support toolset for use in integrated landscape management and developed at Idaho National Laboratory, was used to evaluate the profitability of grain-producing subfields, to determine the efficacy of sustainably harvesting residual biomass after grain harvest, and to determine the efficacy of integrating bioenergy crops into grain-producing landscapes to enhance farmer profitability. Three bioenergy crops, sorghum, switchgrass, and miscanthus, were integrated into non-profitable subfields in four US counties. The manuscript describes in detail the material and methods used to define crop rotations, land management units and practices, subfield units and productivity, grain profitability, sustainability criteria, energy crop integration, and feedstock cost estimation. With the integration of bioenergy crops, the overall annual biomass production rates in the four counties could be increased by factors ranging from 0.8 to 21, depending on the energy crop and county, over the annual residue biomass production rates. By modeling the harvesting of residual biomass and energy crops using geo-referenced, precision harvesting equipment and optimal harvesting paths on individual subfields, the average logistics costs including harvesting of both residual biomass and energy crops were observed to fall well below US DOE’s 2017 goals for biomass feedstock price of US

Supply Chain Sustainability Analysis of Three Biofuel Pathways

84/ton or US

Biomass market dynamics supporting the large-scale deployment of high-octane fuel production in the United States

92.6/dry Mg. Miscanthus, grown in counties in Ohio and Kansas, provided the maximum potential, among the three energy crops considered, for increment in biomass production and also posed maximum threat to the grain production. Considerable variability was observed in the harvesting and total costs because of the size, shape, and productivity of individual subfields. It was shown that variability in the harvesting costs could be used to down-select non-profitable farms with low harvesting costs and high residue and bioenergy crop yields and to reduce the negative impacts of bioenergy crop integration into croplands on grain production. The results of the assessment suggest that (1) the potential to produce biomass is considerably enhanced when non-profitable grain-producing subfields are replaced by bioenergy crops and (2) the subfield-scale integrated landscape assessment provides a defensible methodology to directly address individual farmer’s profitability, sustainability, and environmental stewardship.