Kara G. Cafferty
Idaho National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kara G. Cafferty.
Archive | 2013
Susanne B. Jones; Pimphan A. Meyer; Lesley J. Snowden-Swan; Asanga B. Padmaperuma; Eric Tan; Abhijit Dutta; Jacob J. Jacobson; Kara G. Cafferty
This report describes a proposed thermochemical process for converting biomass into liquid transportation fuels via fast pyrolysis followed by hydroprocessing of the condensed pyrolysis oil. As such, the analysis does not reflect the current state of commercially-available technology but includes advancements that are likely, and targeted to be achieved by 2017. The purpose of this study is to quantify the economic impact of individual conversion targets to allow a focused effort towards achieving cost reductions.
Bioresource Technology | 2015
Patrick Lamers; Mohammad S. Roni; Jaya Shankar Tumuluru; Jacob J. Jacobson; Kara G. Cafferty; Jason K. Hansen; Kevin L. Kenney; Farzaneh Teymouri; Bryan Bals
Decentralized biomass processing facilities, known as biomass depots, may be necessary to achieve feedstock cost, quantity, and quality required to grow the future U.S. bioeconomy. In this paper, we assess three distinct depot configurations for technical difference and economic performance. The depot designs were chosen to compare and contrast a suite of capabilities that a depot could perform ranging from conventional pelleting to sophisticated pretreatment technologies. Our economic analyses indicate that depot processing costs are likely to range from ∼US
Bioresource Technology | 2015
Ning Sun; Feng Xu; Noppadon Sathitsuksanoh; Vicki S. Thompson; Kara G. Cafferty; Chenlin Li; Deepti Tanjore; Akash Narani; Todd R. Pray; Blake A. Simmons; Seema Singh
30 to US
Annals of Operations Research | 2017
Mohammad S. Roni; Sandra D. Eksioglu; Kara G. Cafferty; Jacob J. Jacobson
63 per dry metric tonne (Mg), depending upon the specific technology implemented and the energy consumption for processing equipment such as grinders and dryers. We conclude that the benefits of integrating depots into the overall biomass feedstock supply chain will outweigh depot processing costs and that incorporation of this technology should be aggressively pursued.
Archive | 2014
Richard D. Boardman; Kara G. Cafferty; Corrie Nichol; Erin Searcy; Tyler L. Westover; Richard A. Wood; Mark D. Bearden; James E. Cabe; Corinne Drennan; Susanne B. Jones; Jonathan L. Male; George G. Muntean; Lesley J. Snowden-Swan; Sarah H. Widder
Municipal solid waste (MSW) represents an attractive cellulosic resource for sustainable fuel production. However, its heterogeneity is the major barrier to efficient conversion to biofuels. MSW paper mix was generated and blended with corn stover (CS). It has been shown that both of them can be efficiently pretreated in certain ionic liquids (ILs) with high yields of fermentable sugars. After pretreatment in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([C2C1Im][OAc]), over 80% glucose has been released with enzymatic saccharification. We have also applied an enzyme-free process by adding mineral acid and water directly into the IL/biomass slurry to induce hydrolysis. With the acidolysis process in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([C2C1Im]Cl), up to 80% glucose and 90% xylose are released. There is a correlation between the viscosity profile and hydrolysis efficiency; low viscosity of the hydrolysate generally corresponds to high sugar yields. Overall, the results indicate the feasibility of incorporating MSW as a robust blending agent for biorefineries.
Archive | 2014
Kevin L. Kenney; Kara G. Cafferty; Jacob J. Jacobson; Ian J. Bonner; Garold L. Gresham; J. Richard Hess; William A. Smith; David N. Thompson; Vicki S. Thompson; Jaya Shankar Tumuluru; Neal Yancey
In this paper we propose a multi-objective, mixed integer linear programming model to design and manage the supply chain for biofuels. This model captures the trade-offs that exist between costs, environmental and social impacts of delivering biofuels. The in-bound supply chain for biofuel plants relies on a hub-and-spoke structure which optimizes transportation costs of biomass. The model proposed optimizes the
Archive | 2013
Jacob J. Jacobson; Erin Searcy; Kara G. Cafferty; Jennifer B. Dunn; Michael Johnson; Zhichao Wang; Michael Wang; Mary J. Biddy; Abhijit Dutta; Daniel Inman; Eric Tan; Sue Jones; Lesley J. Snowden-Swan
Biomass Supply Chains for Bioenergy and Biorefining | 2016
Mohammad S. Roni; Kara G. Cafferty; J.R. Hess; Jacob J. Jacobson; Kevin L. Kenney; Erin Searcy; Jaya Shankar Tumuluru
\hbox {CO}_{2}
Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining | 2014
David J. Muth; Matthew Langholtz; Eric Tan; Jacob J. Jacobson; Amy Schwab; May M. Wu; Andrew M Argo; Craig C. Brandt; Kara G. Cafferty; Yi‑Wen Chiu; Abhijit Dutta; Laurence Eaton; Erin Searcy
Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining | 2015
Patrick Lamers; Eric Tan; Erin Searcy; Christopher J. Scarlata; Kara G. Cafferty; Jacob J. Jacobson
CO2 emissions due to transportation-related activities in the supply chain. The model also optimizes the social impact of biofuels. The social impacts are evaluated by the number of jobs created. The multi-objective optimization model is solved using an augmented