Erna A. van Niekerk

Extracellular stimuli specifically regulate localized levels of individual neuronal mRNAs

Subcellular regulation of protein synthesis requires the correct localization of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) within the cell. In this study, we investigate whether the axonal localization of neuronal mRNAs is regulated by extracellular stimuli. By profiling axonal levels of 50 mRNAs detected in regenerating adult sensory axons, we show that neurotrophins can increase and decrease levels of axonal mRNAs. Neurotrophins (nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and neurotrophin-3) regulate axonal mRNA levels and use distinct downstream signals to localize individual mRNAs. However, myelin-associated glycoprotein and semaphorin 3A regulate axonal levels of different mRNAs and elicit the opposite effect on axonal mRNA levels from those observed with neurotrophins. The axonal mRNAs accumulate at or are depleted from points of ligand stimulation along the axons. The translation product of a chimeric green fluorescent protein–β-actin mRNA showed similar accumulation or depletion adjacent to stimuli that increase or decrease axonal levels of endogenous β-actin mRNA. Thus, extracellular ligands can regulate protein generation within subcellular regions by specifically altering the localized levels of particular mRNAs.

Sumoylation in axons triggers retrograde transport of the RNA-binding protein La

A surprisingly large population of mRNAs has been shown to localize to sensory axons, but few RNA-binding proteins have been detected in these axons. These axonal mRNAs include several potential binding targets for the La RNA chaperone protein. La is transported into axonal processes in both culture and peripheral nerve. Interestingly, La is posttranslationally modified in sensory neurons by sumoylation. In axons, small ubiquitin-like modifying polypeptides (SUMO)-La interacts with dynein, whereas native La interacts with kinesin. Lysine 41 is required for sumoylation, and sumoylation-incompetent LaK41R shows only anterograde transport, whereas WT La shows both anterograde and retrograde transport in axons. Thus, sumoylation of La determines the directionality of its transport within the axonal compartment, with SUMO-La likely recycling to the cell body.

Dynamics of axonal mRNA transport and implications for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Locally generating new proteins in subcellular regions provide means to spatially and temporally modify protein content in polarized cells. Recent years have seen resurgence of the concept that axonal processes of neurons can locally synthesize proteins. Experiments from a number of groups have now shown that axonal protein synthesis helps to initiate growth, provides a means to respond to guidance cues, and generates retrograde signaling complexes. Additionally, there is increasing evidence that locally synthesized proteins provide functions beyond injury responses and growth in the mature peripheral nervous system. A key regulatory event in this translational regulation is moving the mRNA templates into the axonal compartment. Transport of mRNAs into axons is a highly regulated and specific process that requires interaction of RNA binding proteins with specific cis-elements or structures within the mRNAs. mRNAs are transported in ribonucleoprotein particles that interact with microtubule motor proteins for long-range axonal transport and likely use microfilaments for short-range movement in the axons. The mature axon is able to recruit mRNAs into translation with injury and possibly other stimuli, suggesting that mRNAs can be stored in a dormant state in the distal axon until needed. Axotomy triggers a shift in the populations of mRNAs localized to axons, indicating a dynamic regulation of the specificity of the axonal transport machinery. In this review, we discuss how axonal mRNA transport and localization are regulated to achieve specific changes in axonal RNA content in response to axonal stimuli.

Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1 (LRP1) Dependent Cell Signaling Promotes Axonal Regeneration

Background: LRP1 activation is neuroprotective in vitro. The role of LRP1 in axonal plasticity and regeneration is unknown. Results: LRP1-dependent cell signaling that includes TrkC activation promotes axonal growth in the CNS. Conclusion: LRP1 agonists promote regeneration after spinal cord injury. Significance: A significant role is established for LRP1 in axonal growth and regeneration after CNS injury, identifying a novel class of therapeutic targets for neurological disorders. Low-density lipoprotein receptors (LRPs) are present extensively on cells outside of the nervous system and classically exert roles in lipoprotein metabolism. It has been reported recently that LRP1 activation could phosphorylate the neurotrophin receptor TrkA in PC12 cells and increase neurite outgrowth from developing cerebellar granule cells. These intriguing findings led us to explore the hypothesis that LRP1 activation would activate canonical neurotrophic factor signaling in adult neurons and promote axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury. We now find that treatment of adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro with LRP1 agonists (the receptor binding domain of α-2-macroglobulin or the hemopexin domain of matrix metalloproteinase 9) induces TrkC, Akt, and ERK activation; significantly increases neurite outgrowth (p < 0.01); and overcomes myelin inhibition (p < 0.05). These effects require Src family kinase activation, a classic LRP1-mediated Trk transactivator. Moreover, intrathecal infusions of LRP1 agonists significantly enhance sensory axonal sprouting and regeneration after spinal cord injury in rats compared with control-infused animals (p < 0.05). A significant role is established for lipoprotein receptors in sprouting and regeneration after CNS injury, identifying a novel class of therapeutic targets to explore for traumatic neurological disorders.

Dependence of Regenerated Sensory Axons on Continuous Neurotrophin-3 Delivery

Previous studies have shown that injured dorsal column sensory axons extend across a spinal cord lesion site if axons are guided by a gradient of neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) rostral to the lesion. Here we examined whether continuous NT-3 delivery is necessary to sustain regenerated axons in the injured spinal cord. Using tetracycline-regulated (tet-off) lentiviral gene delivery, NT-3 expression was tightly controlled by doxycycline administration. To examine axon growth responses to regulated NT-3 expression, adult rats underwent a C3 dorsal funiculus lesion. The lesion site was filled with bone marrow stromal cells, tet-off-NT-3 virus was injected rostral to the lesion site, and the intrinsic growth capacity of sensory neurons was activated by a conditioning lesion. When NT-3 gene expression was turned on, cholera toxin β-subunit-labeled sensory axons regenerated into and beyond the lesion/graft site. Surprisingly, the number of regenerated axons significantly declined when NT-3 expression was turned off, whereas continued NT-3 expression sustained regenerated axons. Quantification of axon numbers beyond the lesion demonstrated a significant decline of axon growth in animals with transient NT-3 expression, only some axons that had regenerated over longer distance were sustained. Regenerated axons were located in white matter and did not form axodendritic synapses but expressed presynaptic markers when closely associated with NG2-labeled cells. A decline in axon density was also observed within cellular grafts after NT-3 expression was turned off possibly via reduction in L1 and laminin expression in Schwann cells. Thus, multiple mechanisms underlie the inability of transient NT-3 expression to fully sustain regenerated sensory axons.

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Axonal Regeneration After Spinal Cord Injury

Following axotomy, a complex temporal and spatial coordination of molecular events enables regeneration of the peripheral nerve. In contrast, multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors contribute to the general failure of axonal regeneration in the central nervous system. In this review, we examine the current understanding of differences in protein expression and post-translational modifications, activation of signaling networks, and environmental cues that may underlie the divergent regenerative capacity of central and peripheral axons. We also highlight key experimental strategies to enhance axonal regeneration via modulation of intraneuronal signaling networks and the extracellular milieu. Finally, we explore potential applications of proteomics to fill gaps in the current understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying regeneration, and to provide insight into the development of more effective approaches to promote axonal regeneration following injury to the nervous system.

PC12 cells regulate inducible cyclic AMP (cAMP) element repressor expression to differentially control cAMP response element-dependent transcription in response to nerve growth factor and cAMP.

Both cyclic AMP (cAMP) and nerve growth factor (NGF) have been shown to cause rapid activation of cAMP response element‐binding protein (CREB) by phosphorylation of serine 133, but additional regulatory events contribute to CREB‐targeted gene expression. Here, we have used stable transfection with a simple cAMP response element (CRE)‐driven reporter to address the kinetics of CRE‐dependent transcription during neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells. In naive cells, dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP) generated a rapid increase in CRE‐driven luciferase activity by 5 h that returned to naive levels by 24 h. Luciferase induction after NGF treatment was delayed until 48 h when CRE‐driven luciferase expression became TrkA dependent. Blocking histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity accelerated NGF‐dependent CRE‐driven luciferase expression by at least 24 h and resulted in a sustained cAMP‐dependent expression of CRE‐driven luciferase beyond 24 h. Inhibition of protein synthesis before stimulation with NGF or dbcAMP indicated that both stimuli induce expression of a transcriptional repressor that delays NGF‐dependent and attenuates cAMP‐dependent CRE‐driven transcription. NGF caused a rapid but transient HDAC‐dependent increase in inducible cAMP element repressor (ICER) expression, but ICER expression was sustained with increased cAMP. Depletion of ICER from PC12 cells indicated that HDAC‐dependent ICER induction is responsible for the delay in CRE‐dependent transcription after NGF treatment.

SUMO-Modification of the La Protein Facilitates Binding to mRNA In Vitro and in Cells

The RNA-binding protein La is involved in several aspects of RNA metabolism including the translational regulation of mRNAs and processing of pre-tRNAs. Besides its well-described phosphorylation by Casein kinase 2, the La protein is also posttranslationally modified by the Small Ubiquitin-like MOdifier (SUMO), but the functional outcome of this modification has not been defined. The objective of this study was to test whether sumoylation changes the RNA-binding activity of La. Therefore, we established an in vitro sumoylation assay for recombinant human La and analyzed its RNA-binding activity by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. We identified two novel SUMO-acceptor sites within the La protein located between the RNA recognition motif 1 and 2 and we demonstrate for the first time that sumoylation facilitates the RNA-binding of La to small RNA oligonucleotides representing the oligopyrimidine tract (TOP) elements from the 5’ untranslated regions (UTR) of mRNAs encoding ribosomal protein L22 and L37 and to a longer RNA element from the 5’ UTR of cyclin D1 (CCND1) mRNA in vitro. Furthermore, we show by RNA immunoprecipitation experiments that a La mutant deficient in sumoylation has impaired RNA-binding activity in cells. These data suggest that modulating the RNA-binding activity of La by sumoylation has important consequences on its functionality.

An omic approach to spinal cord injury mechanisms

Spinal cord injury (SCI) research continues to make substantial progress in identifying both neuron-intrinsic and neuron-extrinsic mechanisms that limit central nervous system (CNS) plasticity and regeneration. The identification of these mechanisms has in turn led to several novel strategies for therapeutically enhancing recovery of the injured CNS. Despite this progress, clinical translation remains a challenge for several reasons, including: 1) problems in projecting beneficial outcomes from small animal models to primate systems, 2) a lack of robust improvement in functional outcomes in animal models, and 3) difficulty replicating published reports in the field. Collectively, while the field has seen great progress, reconstructing the exquisite circuitry of the injured human CNS will require yet greater progress in both understanding of basic mechanisms underlying axonal growth and guidance, and testing of optimized therapies in models more predictive of potential human benefit. An omic approach to spinal cord injury mechanisms