Ethan Cumbler

National stroke association recommendations for systems of care for transient ischemic attack

Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) are common and portend a high short‐term risk of stroke. Evidence‐based recommendations for the urgent evaluation and treatment of patients with TIA have been published. However, implementation of these recommendations reliably and consistently will require changes in the systems of care established for TIA. The National Stroke Association convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop recommendations for the essential components of systems of care at hospitals to improve the quality of care provided to patients with TIA. The panel recommends that hospitals establish standardized protocols to assure rapid and complete evaluation and treatment for patients with TIA, with particular attention to urgency and close observation in patients at high risk of stroke. ANN NEUROL 2011

Quality of Care and Outcomes for In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke Findings From the National Get With The Guidelines-Stroke

Background and Purpose— Analysis of quality of care for in-hospital stroke has not been previously performed at the national level. This study compares patient characteristics, process measures of quality, and outcomes for in-hospital strokes with those for community-onset strokes in a national cohort. Methods— We performed a retrospective cohort study of the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) database of The American Heart Association from January 2006 to April 2012, using data from 1280 sites that reported ≥1 in-hospital stroke. Patient characteristics, comorbid illnesses, medications, quality of care measures, and outcomes were analyzed for 21 349 in-hospital ischemic strokes compared with 928 885 community-onset ischemic strokes. Results— Patients with in-hospital stroke had more thromboembolic risk factors, including atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart valves, carotid stenosis, and heart failure (P<0.0001), and experienced more severe strokes (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Score 9.0 versus 4.0; P<0.0001). Using GWTG-Stroke achievement measures, the proportion of patients with defect-free care was lower for in-hospital strokes (60.8% versus 82.0%; P<0.0001). After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, patients with in-hospital strokes were less likely to be discharged home (adjusted odds ratio 0.37; 95% confidence intervals [0.35–0.39]) or be able to ambulate independently at discharge (adjusted odds ratio 0.42; 95% confidence intervals [0.39–0.45]). In-hospital mortality was higher for in-hospital stroke (adjusted odds ratio 2.72; 95% confidence intervals [2.57–2.88]). Conclusions— Compared with community-onset ischemic stroke, patients with in-hospital stroke experienced more severe strokes, received lower adherence to process-based quality measures, and had worse outcomes. These findings suggest there is an important opportunity for targeted quality improvement efforts for patients with in-hospital stroke.

Quality of Care for In-Hospital Stroke: Analysis of a Statewide Registry

Background and Purpose— Approximately 4% to 17% of all adult strokes have onset in the hospital. Previous research indicates significant in-hospital evaluation delays and lower adherence to some measures of quality care compared to out-of-hospital strokes. Methods— Quality of care for in-hospital ischemic strokes compared to stroke with out-of-hospital onset was examined using cohort analysis of a statewide stroke database maintained by the Colorado Stroke Alliance. Results— One-hundred sixteen in-hospital strokes were compared to 4946 out-of-hospital strokes. Patients with in-hospital strokes were significantly more likely to have history of coronary artery disease (36.7% vs 26.5%; P=0.02), and in-hospital strokes were more severe (NIHSS score 9.5 vs 7.0; P=0.01). Time to brain imaging was not significantly different (54 minutes vs 43 minutes; P=0.13) between groups. Patients with in-hospital stroke were significantly more likely to have documentation of stroke education (90.4% vs 73.1%; P=0.0002) and assessment for rehabilitation (67.7% vs 45.2%; P<0.0001). Total deficit-free care defined as adherence to all Get With the Guidelines Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) measures was better for in-hospital strokes compared to strokes in the community (52.8% vs 32.3%; P<0.0001). Conclusions— Adherence to GWTG-Stroke performance measures was better for in-hospital strokes in this statewide registry. Variability in reporting by participating hospitals suggests in-hospital strokes are under-recognized or under-reported. In-hospital stroke evaluation times remain more than twice the recommended benchmark of 25 minutes, representing an opportunity for process improvement.

Culture change in infection control: applying psychological principles to improve hand hygiene.

Hand hygiene occurs at the intersection of habit and culture. Psychological and social principles, including operant conditioning and peer pressure of conforming social norms, facilitate behavior change. Participatory leadership and level hierarchies are needed for sustainable patient safety culture. Application of these principles progressively and significantly improved hand hygiene compared with the hospital aggregate control. Changes to hand hygiene auditing and response processes demonstrate ability to improve and sustain adherence rates within a clinical microsystem.

Inpatient falls: defining the problem and identifying possible solutions. Part I: an evidence-based review.

In this 2 part series, analysis of the risk stratification tools that are available, definition for the scope of the problem, and potential solutions through a review of the literature are presented. A systematic review was used to identify articles for risk stratification and interventions. Three risk stratification systems are discussed, St Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool in Falling Elderly Inpatients, Morse Fall Scale, and the Hendrich Fall Risk Model. Of these scoring systems, the Hendrich Fall Risk Model is the easiest to use and score. Predominantly, multifactorial interventions are used to prevent patient falls. Education and rehabilitation are common themes in studies with statistically significant results. The second article presents a guide to implementing a quality improvement project around hospital falls. A 10-step approach to Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles is described. Specific examples of problems and analysis are easily applicable to any institution. Furthermore, the sustainability of interventions and targeting new areas for improvement is discussed. Although specific to falls in the hospitalized patient, the goal is to present a stepwise approach which is broadly applicable to other areas requiring quality improvement.

Stroke alert program improves recognition and evaluation time of in-hospital ischemic stroke.

An inpatient stroke alert program is effective in decreasing evaluation time for in-hospital strokes, although response times remain significantly longer than those in the emergency department. It is capable of increasing the percentage of ischemic strokes identified by the hospitals stroke team, at the cost of an increased percentage of false alarms.

In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke

Between 2.2% and 17% of all strokes have symptom onset during hospitalization in a patient originally admitted for another diagnosis or procedure. These in-hospital strokes represent a unique population with different risk factors, more mimics, and substantially worsened outcomes compared to community-onset strokes. The fact that these strokes manifest during the acute care hospitalization, in patients with higher rates of thrombolytic contraindications, creates distinct challenges for treatment. However, the best evidence suggests benefit to treating appropriately selected in-hospital ischemic strokes with thrombolysis. Evidence points toward a “quality gap” for in-hospital stroke with longer in-hospital delays to evaluation and treatment, lower rates of evaluation for etiology, and decreased adherence to consensus quality process measures of care. This quality gap for in-hospital stroke represents a focused opportunity for quality improvement.

Determining Need for Remediation Through Postrotation Evaluations

INTRODUCTION Postrotation evaluations are frequently used by residency program directors for early detection of residents with academic difficulties; however, the accuracy of these evaluations in assessing resident performance has been questioned. METHODS This retrospective case-control study examines the ability of postrotation evaluation characteristics to predict the need for remediation. We compared the evaluations of 17 residents who were placed on academic warning or probation, from 2000 to 2007, with those for a group of peers matched on sex, postgraduate year (PGY), and entering class. RESULTS The presence of an outlier evaluation, the number of words written in the comments section, and the percentage of evaluations with negative or ambiguous comments were all associated with the need for remediation (P  =  .01, P  =  .001, P  =  .002, P  =  < .001, respectively). In contrast, United States Medical Licensing Examination step 1 and step 2 scores, total number of evaluations received, and percentage of positive comments on the evaluations were not associated with the need for remediation (P  =  .06, P  =  .87, P  =  .55, respectively). DISCUSSION Despite ambiguous evaluation comments, the length and percentage of ambiguous or negative comments did indicate future need for remediation. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that postrotation evaluation characteristics can be used to identify residents as risk. However, larger prospective studies, encompassing multiple institutions, are needed to validate various evaluation methods in measuring resident performance and to accurately predict the need for remediation.

How Hospital Clinicians Select Patients for Skilled Nursing Facilities

To understand how hospital‐based clinicians evaluate older adults in the hospital and decide who will be transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for postacute care.

Improving stroke alert response time: Applying quality improvement methodology to the inpatient neurologic emergency

BACKGROUND Stroke often leaves its victims with devastating disabilities if not treated promptly. Guidelines recommend that brain imaging be obtained within 25 minutes, yet this benchmark is rarely achieved for the in-hospital stroke. PURPOSE To reduce time to evaluation for strokes occurring in patients already hospitalized, through systematic analysis of current processes and application of standardized quality improvement methodology. METHODS Improving the quality of care for in-hospital stroke patients involved 4 key steps: (1) creation of a detailed process map to identify inefficiencies in the current process for identifying and treating hospitalized stroke patients, (2) development of an optimized care pathway, (3) implementation of a checklist of optimal practices for the acute stroke response team and nursing staff, and (4) real-time feedback. Time from stroke alert to initiation of computed tomography (CT) scan was prospectively tracked for the 6-month period prior to intervention. After a 3-month interval for intervention roll-out, the response times for the pre-intervention period were compared to a 6-month post-intervention evaluation period. RESULTS Pre-intervention median inpatient stroke alert-to-CT time was 69.0 minutes, with 19% meeting the goal of 25 minutes from alert to CT time. Post-intervention median inpatient stroke alert-to-CT time was reduced to 29.5 minutes, with 32% at goal (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS This inpatient stroke alert quality improvement initiative decreased median inpatient alert-to-CT time by 57%, and demonstrated that speed of in-hospital stroke evaluation can be improved through systematic application of quality improvement principles.