Heidi L. Wald

Indwelling Urinary Catheter Use in the Postoperative Period: Analysis of the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project Data

OBJECTIVES To describe the frequency and duration of perioperative catheter use and to determine the relationship between catheter use and postoperative outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Two thousand nine hundred sixty-five acute care US hospitals. PATIENTS Medicare inpatients (N = 35 904) undergoing major surgery (coronary artery bypass and other open-chest cardiac operations; vascular surgery; general abdominal colorectal surgery; or hip or knee total joint arthroplasty) in 2001. Main Outcome Measure Postoperative urinary tract infection. RESULTS Eighty-six percent of patients undergoing major operations had perioperative indwelling urinary catheters. Of these, 50% had catheters for longer than 2 days postoperatively. These patients were twice as likely to develop urinary tract infections than patients with catheterization of 2 days or less. In multivariate analyses, a postoperative catheterization longer than 2 days was associated with an increased likelihood of in-hospital urinary tract infection (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.41) and 30-day mortality (parameter estimate, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.72) as well as a decreased likelihood of discharge to home (parameter estimate, - 0.57; 95% CI, - 0.64 to - 1.51). CONCLUSIONS Indwelling urinary catheters are routinely in place longer than 2 days postoperatively and may result in excess nosocomial infections. The association with adverse outcomes makes postoperative catheter duration a reasonable target of infection control and surgical quality-improvement initiatives.

Nonpayment for Harms Resulting From Medical Care: Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections

FIRST, DO NO HARM” IS ONE OF THE ENDURING PRINciples of the health care professions. In a painful irony, however, the current reimbursement system not only fails to penalize hospitals for largely preventable harms due to medical care, but it often rewards them in the form of additional reimbursement. That paradigm will change, however, in response to a modification to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS), which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) instituted on August 1, 2007. Following a congressional mandate, the CMS has reshaped the reimbursement system to hold hospitals accountable for failing to avert 8 largely preventable harms (BOX) resulting from medical care.

Post-hospitalization transitions: Examining the effects of timing of primary care provider follow-up.

BACKGROUND The transition between the inpatient and outpatient setting is a high-risk period for patients. The presence and role of the primary care provider (PCP) is critical during this transition. This study evaluated characteristics and outcomes of discharged patients lacking timely PCP follow-up, defined as within 4 weeks of discharge. METHODS This prospective cohort enrolled 65 patients admitted to University of Colorado Hospital, an urban 425-bed tertiary care center. We collected patient demographics, diagnosis, payer source and PCP information. Post-discharge phone calls determined PCP follow-up and readmission status. Thirty-day readmission rate and hospital length of stay (LOS) were compared in patients with and without timely PCP follow-up. RESULTS The rate of timely PCP follow-up was 49%. For a patients same medical condition, the 30-day readmission rate was 12%. Patients lacking timely PCP follow-up were 10 times more likely to be readmitted (odds ratio [OR] = 9.9, P = 0.04): 21% in patients lacking timely PCP follow-up vs. 3% in patients with timely PCP follow-up, P = 0.03. Lack of insurance was associated with lower rates of timely PCP follow-up: 29% vs. 56% (P = 0.06), but did not independently increase readmission rate or LOS (OR = 1.0, P = 0.96). Index hospital LOS was longer in patients lacking timely PCP follow-up: 4.4 days vs. 6.3 days, P = 0.11. CONCLUSIONS Many patients discharged from this large urban academic hospital lacked timely outpatient PCP follow-up resulting in higher rates of readmission and a non-significant trend toward longer hospital LOS. Effective transitioning of care for vulnerable patients may require timely PCP follow-up.

Extended use of indwelling urinary catheters in postoperative hip fracture patients.

Background:Indwelling urinary catheters are used postoperatively in hip fracture care. Their use beyond the immediate postoperative period may result in excess nosocomial infections. Objectives:The objectives of this study were to explore the relationship between extended indwelling urinary catheterization and outcomes for patients sustaining hip fracture discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), and to describe patient and hospital predictors of extended indwelling urinary catheterization. Research Design:The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study. Subjects:This study consisted of Medicare admissions to SNFs of patients discharged from a hospital with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture in 2001 (n = 111,330). Measures:Dependent variables were the presence of urinary catheter at SNF admission and the patient-specific 30-day outcomes of rehospitalization for urinary tract infection, rehospitalization for sepsis, discharge to the community, and mortality. Independent variables were demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics. Results:Thirty-two percent of hip fracture discharges to SNFs had urinary catheters. These patients had greater odds of rehospitalization for urinary tract infection (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.6, P < 0.001) and death (AOR 1.3, P < 0.001) at 30 days than patients without catheters after adjusting for patient characteristics such as age and comorbid conditions. Western region and urban location were associated with a higher likelihood of having an indwelling urinary catheter, whereas northern region and teaching hospital status were associated with a lower likelihood of having an indwelling urinary catheter. Conclusions:Extended use of indwelling urinary catheters postoperatively is associated with poor outcomes. The likelihood of having an indwelling urinary catheter at hospital discharge after hip fracture is associated with hospital characteristics in addition to patient characteristics. This practice variation deserves further study.

Indwelling urinary catheter management and catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention practices in Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders hospitals

BACKGROUND Indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) are commonly used in hospitalized patients, especially elders. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) account for 34% of all health care associated infections in the United States, associated with excess morbidity and health care costs. Adherence to CAUTI prevention practices has not been well described. METHODS This study used an electronic survey to examine IUC care practices for CAUTI prevention in 3 areas-(1) equipment and alternatives and insertion and maintenance techniques; (2) personnel, policies, training, and education; and (3) documentation, surveillance, and removal reminders-at 75 acute care hospitals in the Nurses Improving the Care of Healthsystem Elders (NICHE) system. RESULTS CAUTI prevention practices commonly followed included wearing gloves (97%), handwashing (89%), maintaining a sterile barrier (81%), and using a no-touch insertion technique (73%). Silver-coated catheters were used to varying degrees in 59% of the hospitals; 4% reported never using a catheter-securing device. Urethral meatal care was provided daily by 43% of hospitals and more frequently that that by 41% of hospitals. Nurses were the most frequently reported IUC inserters. Training in aseptic technique and CAUTI prevention at the time of initial nursing hire was provided by 64% of hospitals; however, only 47% annually validated competency in IUC insertion. Systems for IUC removal were implemented in 56% of hospitals. IUC documentation and routine CAUTI surveillance practices varied widely. CONCLUSIONS Although many CAUTI prevention practices at NICHE hospitals are in alignment with evidence-based guidelines, there is room for improvement. Further research is needed to identify the effect of enhanced compliance with CAUTI prevention practices on the prevalence of CAUTI in NICHE hospitals.

A failure to communicate: a qualitative exploration of care coordination between hospitalists and primary care providers around patient hospitalizations.

BackgroundCare coordination between adult hospitalists and primary care providers (PCPs) is a critical component of successful transitions of care from hospital to home, yet one that is not well understood.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to understand the challenges in coordination of care, as well as potential solutions, from the perspective of hospitalists and PCPs in North Carolina.Design and ParticipantsWe conducted an exploratory qualitative study with 58 clinicians in four hospitalist focus groups (n = 32), three PCP focus groups (n = 19), and one hybrid group with both hospitalists and PCPs (n = 7).ApproachInterview guides included questions about care coordination, information exchange, follow-up care, accountability, and medication management. Focus group sessions were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed in ATLAS.ti. The constant comparative method was used to evaluate differences between hospitalists and PCPs.Key ResultsHospitalists and PCPs were found to encounter similar care coordination challenges, including (1) lack of time, (2) difficulty reaching other clinicians, (3) lack of personal relationships with other clinicians, (4) lack of information feedback loops, (5) medication list discrepancies, and (6) lack of clarity regarding accountability for pending tests and home health. Hospitalists additionally noted difficulty obtaining timely follow-up appointments for after-hours or weekend discharges. PCPs additionally noted (1) not knowing when patients were hospitalized, (2) not having hospital records for post-hospitalization appointments, (3) difficulty locating important information in discharge summaries, and (4) feeling undervalued when hospitalists made medication changes without involving PCPs. Hospitalists and PCPs identified common themes of successful care coordination as (1) greater efforts to coordinate care for “high-risk” patients, (2) improved direct telephone access to each other, (3) improved information exchange through shared electronic medical records, (4) enhanced interpersonal relationships, and (5) clearly defined accountability.ConclusionsHospitalists and PCPs encounter similar challenges in care coordination, yet have important experiential differences related to sending and receiving roles for hospital discharges. Efforts to improve coordination of care between hospitalists and PCPs should aim to understand perspectives of clinicians in each setting.

Extended Use of Urinary Catheters in Older Surgical Patients: A Patient Safety Problem?

OBJECTIVES To explore the relationship between the extended postoperative use of indwelling urinary catheters and outcomes for older patients who have undergone cardiac, vascular, gastrointestinal, or orthopedic surgery in skilled nursing facilities and to describe patient and hospital characteristics associated with the extended use of indwelling urinary catheters. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING US acute care hospitals and skilled nursing facilities. PATIENTS A total of 170,791 Medicare patients aged 65 years or more who were admitted to skilled nursing facilities after discharge from a hospital with a primary diagnosis code indicating major cardiac, vascular, orthopedic, or gastrointestinal surgery in 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-specific 30-day rate of rehospitalization for urinary tract infection (UTI) and 30-day mortality rate, as well as the risk of having an indwelling urinary catheter at the time of admission to a skilled nursing facility. RESULTS A total of 39,282 (23.0%) of the postoperative patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities had indwelling urinary catheters. After adjusting for patient characteristics, the patients with catheters had greater odds of rehospitalization for UTI and death within 30 days than patients who did not have catheters. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for UTI ranged from 1.34 for patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery (P<.001) to 1.85 for patients who underwent cardiac surgery (P<.001); the aORs for death ranged from 1.25 for cardiac surgery (P=.01) to 1.48 for orthopedic surgery (P=.002) and for gastrointestinal surgery (P<.001). After controlling for patient characteristics, hospitalization in the northeastern or southern regions of the United States was associated with a lower likelihood of having an indwelling urinary catheter, compared with hospitalization in the western region (P=.002 vs P=.03). CONCLUSIONS Extended postoperative use of indwelling urinary catheters is associated with poor outcomes for older patients. The likelihood of having an indwelling urinary catheter at the time of discharge after major surgery is strongly associated with a hospitals geographic region, which reflects a variation in practice that deserves further study.

Quality of Care and Outcomes for In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke Findings From the National Get With The Guidelines-Stroke

Background and Purpose— Analysis of quality of care for in-hospital stroke has not been previously performed at the national level. This study compares patient characteristics, process measures of quality, and outcomes for in-hospital strokes with those for community-onset strokes in a national cohort. Methods— We performed a retrospective cohort study of the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) database of The American Heart Association from January 2006 to April 2012, using data from 1280 sites that reported ≥1 in-hospital stroke. Patient characteristics, comorbid illnesses, medications, quality of care measures, and outcomes were analyzed for 21 349 in-hospital ischemic strokes compared with 928 885 community-onset ischemic strokes. Results— Patients with in-hospital stroke had more thromboembolic risk factors, including atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart valves, carotid stenosis, and heart failure (P<0.0001), and experienced more severe strokes (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Score 9.0 versus 4.0; P<0.0001). Using GWTG-Stroke achievement measures, the proportion of patients with defect-free care was lower for in-hospital strokes (60.8% versus 82.0%; P<0.0001). After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, patients with in-hospital strokes were less likely to be discharged home (adjusted odds ratio 0.37; 95% confidence intervals [0.35–0.39]) or be able to ambulate independently at discharge (adjusted odds ratio 0.42; 95% confidence intervals [0.39–0.45]). In-hospital mortality was higher for in-hospital stroke (adjusted odds ratio 2.72; 95% confidence intervals [2.57–2.88]). Conclusions— Compared with community-onset ischemic stroke, patients with in-hospital stroke experienced more severe strokes, received lower adherence to process-based quality measures, and had worse outcomes. These findings suggest there is an important opportunity for targeted quality improvement efforts for patients with in-hospital stroke.

Quality of Care for In-Hospital Stroke: Analysis of a Statewide Registry

Background and Purpose— Approximately 4% to 17% of all adult strokes have onset in the hospital. Previous research indicates significant in-hospital evaluation delays and lower adherence to some measures of quality care compared to out-of-hospital strokes. Methods— Quality of care for in-hospital ischemic strokes compared to stroke with out-of-hospital onset was examined using cohort analysis of a statewide stroke database maintained by the Colorado Stroke Alliance. Results— One-hundred sixteen in-hospital strokes were compared to 4946 out-of-hospital strokes. Patients with in-hospital strokes were significantly more likely to have history of coronary artery disease (36.7% vs 26.5%; P=0.02), and in-hospital strokes were more severe (NIHSS score 9.5 vs 7.0; P=0.01). Time to brain imaging was not significantly different (54 minutes vs 43 minutes; P=0.13) between groups. Patients with in-hospital stroke were significantly more likely to have documentation of stroke education (90.4% vs 73.1%; P=0.0002) and assessment for rehabilitation (67.7% vs 45.2%; P<0.0001). Total deficit-free care defined as adherence to all Get With the Guidelines Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) measures was better for in-hospital strokes compared to strokes in the community (52.8% vs 32.3%; P<0.0001). Conclusions— Adherence to GWTG-Stroke performance measures was better for in-hospital strokes in this statewide registry. Variability in reporting by participating hospitals suggests in-hospital strokes are under-recognized or under-reported. In-hospital stroke evaluation times remain more than twice the recommended benchmark of 25 minutes, representing an opportunity for process improvement.

Culture change in infection control: applying psychological principles to improve hand hygiene.

Hand hygiene occurs at the intersection of habit and culture. Psychological and social principles, including operant conditioning and peer pressure of conforming social norms, facilitate behavior change. Participatory leadership and level hierarchies are needed for sustainable patient safety culture. Application of these principles progressively and significantly improved hand hygiene compared with the hospital aggregate control. Changes to hand hygiene auditing and response processes demonstrate ability to improve and sustain adherence rates within a clinical microsystem.