Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eugenia V. Gurevich is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eugenia V. Gurevich.


Neuropsychopharmacology | 1999

Distribution of dopamine D3 receptor expressing neurons in the human forebrain: comparison with D2 receptor expressing neurons.

Eugenia V. Gurevich; Jeffrey N. Joyce

The dopamine D2 and D3 receptors are members of the D2 subfamily that includes the D2, D3 and D4 receptor. In the rat, the D3 receptor exhibits a distribution restricted to mesolimbic regions with little overlap with the D2 receptor. Receptor binding and nonisotopic in situ hybridization were used to study the distribution of the D3 receptors and neurons positive for D3 mRNA in comparison to the D2 receptor/mRNA in subcortical regions of the human brain. D2 binding sites were detected in all brain areas studied, with the highest concentration found in the striatum followed by the nucleus accumbens, external segment of the globus pallidus, substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area, medial preoptic area and tuberomammillary nucleus of the hypothalamus. In most areas the presence of D2 receptor sites coincided with the presence of neurons positive for its mRNA. D3 binding sites and D3 mRNA positive neurons were most abundant in the limbic striatum and efferent structures, such as the nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum, substantia nigra, internal segment of the globus pallidus, anteroventral nucleus of the thalamus, and rostral pars reticulata of the substantia nigra. One important difference from the rat is that D3 receptors were virtually absent in the ventral tegmental area. D3 receptor and D3 mRNA positive neurons were observed in sensory, hormonal, and association regions such as the nucleus basalis, anteroventral, mediodorsal, and geniculate nuclei of the thalamus, mammillary nuclei, the basolateral, basomedial, and cortical nuclei of the amygdala. As revealed by simultaneous labeling for D3 and D2 mRNA, D3 mRNA was often expressed in D2 mRNA positive neurons. Neurons that solely expressed D2 mRNA were numerous and regionally widespread, whereas only occasional D3-positive-D2-negative cells were observed. The regions of relatively higher expression of the D3 receptor and its mRNA appeared linked through functional circuits, but co-expression of D2 and D3 mRNA suggests a functional convergence in many regions of the signals mediated by the two receptor subtypes.


Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2012

G protein-coupled receptor kinases: More than just kinases and not only for GPCRs

Eugenia V. Gurevich; John J. G. Tesmer; Arcady Mushegian; Vsevolod V. Gurevich

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) are best known for their role in homologous desensitization of GPCRs. GRKs phosphorylate activated receptors and promote high affinity binding of arrestins, which precludes G protein coupling. GRKs have a multidomain structure, with the kinase domain inserted into a loop of a regulator of G protein signaling homology domain. Unlike many other kinases, GRKs do not need to be phosphorylated in their activation loop to achieve an activated state. Instead, they are directly activated by docking with active GPCRs. In this manner they are able to selectively phosphorylate Ser/Thr residues on only the activated form of the receptor, unlike related kinases such as protein kinase A. GRKs also phosphorylate a variety of non-GPCR substrates and regulate several signaling pathways via direct interactions with other proteins in a phosphorylation-independent manner. Multiple GRK subtypes are present in virtually every animal cell, with the highest expression levels found in neurons, with their extensive and complex signal regulation. Insufficient or excessive GRK activity was implicated in a variety of human disorders, ranging from heart failure to depression to Parkinsons disease. As key regulators of GPCR-dependent and -independent signaling pathways, GRKs are emerging drug targets and promising molecular tools for therapy. Targeted modulation of expression and/or of activity of several GRK isoforms for therapeutic purposes was recently validated in cardiac disorders and Parkinsons disease.


Genome Biology | 2006

Arrestins: ubiquitous regulators of cellular signaling pathways.

Eugenia V. Gurevich; Vsevolod V. Gurevich

SummaryIn vertebrates, the arrestins are a family of four proteins that regulate the signaling and trafficking of hundreds of different G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Arrestin homologs are also found in insects, protochordates and nematodes. Fungi and protists have related proteins but do not have true arrestins. Structural information is available only for free (unbound) vertebrate arrestins, and shows that the conserved overall fold is elongated and composed of two domains, with the core of each domain consisting of a seven-stranded β-sandwich. Two main intramolecular interactions keep the two domains in the correct relative orientation, but both of these interactions are destabilized in the process of receptor binding, suggesting that the conformation of bound arrestin is quite different. As well as binding to hundreds of GPCR subtypes, arrestins interact with other classes of membrane receptors and more than 20 surprisingly diverse types of soluble signaling protein. Arrestins thus serve as ubiquitous signaling regulators in the cytoplasm and nucleus.


Biological Psychiatry | 1997

Alterations in the cortical serotonergic system in schizophrenia: A postmortem study

Eugenia V. Gurevich; Jeffrey N. Joyce

Previous studies have suggested a disturbance in the cortical serotonergic (5-HT) system in schizophrenia; however, these studies have been confounded by suicide in the patients groups, which in itself is associated with alterations in the 5-HT system. In this study we characterized various components of the 5-HT system in 14 areas of the frontal and parietal cortex in tissue obtained at postmortem from aged chronically hospitalized nonsuicidal schizophrenics compared to age-matched controls. We found no differences between control and schizophrenic subjects in the density of 5-HT uptake sites or other markers of 5-HT innervation. In Brodmann areas 24 and 6 the concentration of 5-HT2A,C receptors was decreased in all schizophrenics regardless of their antipsychotic treatment history. In all other areas examined 5-HT2A,C receptor concentrations were dramatically decreased in schizophrenics patients on drugs at time of death, whereas those off drugs at death showed the same values as control subjects. The density of 5-HT1A receptors was increased in areas 24, 9a (caudal part of area 9), 44, and 6 in subjects with schizophrenia. Antipsychotic treatment did not appear to have a significant effect. Thus, the specific pattern of alterations in the 5-HT system in schizophrenia may depend on the patient population and on antemortem antipsychotic treatment. These data also provide evidence that regulation of the 5-HT2 receptor may be involved in antipsychotic action.


Trends in Neurosciences | 2008

GPCR monomers and oligomers: it takes all kinds

Vsevolod V. Gurevich; Eugenia V. Gurevich

Accumulating evidence of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) oligomerization on the one hand and perfect functionality of monomeric receptors on the other creates an impression of controversy. However, the GPCR superfamily is extremely diverse, both structurally and functionally. The life cycle of each receptor includes many stages: synthesis, quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum, maturation in the Golgi, delivery to the plasma membrane (where it can be in the inactive or active state, in complex with cognate G protein, G-protein-coupled receptor kinase or arrestin), endocytosis and subsequent sorting in endosomes. Different GPCR subtypes, and even the same receptor at different stages of its life cycle, most likely exist in different oligomerization states, from monomers to dimers and possibly higher-order oligomers.


Trends in Pharmacological Sciences | 2008

How and why do GPCRs dimerize

Vsevolod V. Gurevich; Eugenia V. Gurevich

Dimerization is fairly common in the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. First attempts to rationalize this phenomenon gave rise to an idea that two receptors in a dimer could be necessary to bind a single molecule of G protein or arrestin. Although GPCRs, G proteins and arrestins were crystallized only in their inactive conformations (in which they do not interact), the structures appeared temptingly compatible with this beautiful model. However, it did not survive the rigors of experimental testing: several recent studies unambiguously demonstrated that one receptor molecule is sufficient to activate a G protein and bind arrestin. Thus, to figure out the biological role of receptor self-association we must focus on other functions of GPCRs at different stages of their functional cycle.


Neuron | 2005

Light-dependent redistribution of arrestin in vertebrate rods is an energy-independent process governed by protein-protein interactions

K. Saidas Nair; Susan M. Hanson; Ana Mendez; Eugenia V. Gurevich; Matthew J. Kennedy; Valery I. Shestopalov; Sergey A. Vishnivetskiy; Jeannie Chen; James B. Hurley; Vsevolod V. Gurevich; Vladlen Z. Slepak

In rod photoreceptors, arrestin localizes to the outer segment (OS) in the light and to the inner segment (IS) in the dark. Here, we demonstrate that redistribution of arrestin between these compartments can proceed in ATP-depleted photoreceptors. Translocation of transducin from the IS to the OS also does not require energy, but depletion of ATP or GTP inhibits its reverse movement. A sustained presence of activated rhodopsin is required for sequestering arrestin in the OS, and the rate of arrestin relocalization to the OS is determined by the amount and the phosphorylation status of photolyzed rhodopsin. Interaction of arrestin with microtubules is increased in the dark. Mutations that enhance arrestin-microtubule binding attenuate arrestin translocation to the OS. These results indicate that the distribution of arrestin in rods is controlled by its dynamic interactions with rhodopsin in the OS and microtubules in the IS and that its movement occurs by simple diffusion.


Progress in Neurobiology | 2015

Pathophysiology of L-dopa-induced motor and non-motor complications in Parkinson's disease.

Matthieu F. Bastide; Wassilios G. Meissner; Barbara Picconi; Stefania Fasano; Pierre-Olivier Fernagut; Michael Feyder; Veronica Francardo; Cristina Alcacer; Yunmin Ding; Riccardo Brambilla; Gilberto Fisone; A. Jon Stoessl; Mathieu Bourdenx; Michel Engeln; Sylvia Navailles; Philippe De Deurwaerdère; Wai Kin D. Ko; Nicola Simola; Micaela Morelli; Laurent Groc; Maria Cruz Rodriguez; Eugenia V. Gurevich; Maryka Quik; Michele Morari; Manuela Mellone; Fabrizio Gardoni; Elisabetta Tronci; Dominique Guehl; François Tison; A.R. Crossman

Involuntary movements, or dyskinesia, represent a debilitating complication of levodopa (L-dopa) therapy for Parkinsons disease (PD). L-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) are ultimately experienced by the vast majority of patients. In addition, psychiatric conditions often manifested as compulsive behaviours, are emerging as a serious problem in the management of L-dopa therapy. The present review attempts to provide an overview of our current understanding of dyskinesia and other L-dopa-induced dysfunctions, a field that dramatically evolved in the past twenty years. In view of the extensive literature on LID, there appeared a critical need to re-frame the concepts, to highlight the most suitable models, to review the central nervous system (CNS) circuitry that may be involved, and to propose a pathophysiological framework was timely and necessary. An updated review to clarify our understanding of LID and other L-dopa-related side effects was therefore timely and necessary. This review should help in the development of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing the generation of dyskinetic symptoms.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2007

RGS9–2 Negatively Modulates l-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine-Induced Dyskinesia in Experimental Parkinson's Disease

Stephen J. Gold; Chau V. Hoang; Bryan W. Potts; Grégory Porras; Elsa Y. Pioli; Ki Woo Kim; Agnès Nadjar; Chuan Qin; Gerald J. LaHoste; Qin Li; Bernard Bioulac; Jeffrey L. Waugh; Eugenia V. Gurevich; Rachael L. Neve; Erwan Bezard

Chronic l-dopa treatment of Parkinsons disease (PD) often leads to debilitating involuntary movements, termed l-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), mediated by dopamine (DA) receptors. RGS9–2 is a GTPase accelerating protein that inhibits DA D2 receptor-activated G proteins. Herein, we assess the functional role of RGS9–2 on LID. In monkeys, Western blot analysis of striatal extracts shows that RGS9–2 levels are not altered by MPTP-induced DA denervation and/or chronic l-dopa administration. In MPTP monkeys with LID, striatal RGS9–2 overexpression – achieved by viral vector injection into the striatum – diminishes the involuntary movement intensity without lessening the anti-parkinsonian effects of the D1/D2 receptor agonist l-dopa. In contrasts, in these animals, striatal RGS9–2 overexpression diminishes both the involuntary movement intensity and the anti-parkinsonian effects of the D2/D3 receptor agonist ropinirole. In unilaterally 6-OHDA-lesioned rats with LID, we show that the time course of viral vector-mediated striatal RGS9–2 overexpression parallels the time course of improvement of l-dopa-induced involuntary movements. We also find that unilateral 6-OHDA-lesioned RGS9−/− mice are more susceptible to l-dopa-induced involuntary movements than unilateral 6-OHDA-lesioned RGS9+/+ mice, albeit the rotational behavior – taken as an index of the anti-parkinsonian response – is similar between the two groups of mice. Together, these findings suggest that RGS9–2 plays a pivotal role in LID pathophysiology. However, the findings also suggest that increasing RGS9–2 expression and/or function in PD patients may only be a suitable therapeutic strategy to control involuntary movements induced by nonselective DA agonist such as l-dopa.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2007

Each rhodopsin molecule binds its own arrestin

Susan Hanson; Eugenia V. Gurevich; Sergey A. Vishnivetskiy; Mohamed R. Ahmed; Xiufeng Song; Vsevolod V. Gurevich

Arrestins (Arrs) are ubiquitous regulators of the most numerous family of signaling proteins, G protein-coupled receptors. Two models of the Arr–receptor interaction have been proposed: the binding of one Arr to an individual receptor or to two receptors in a dimer. To determine the binding stoichiometry in vivo, we used rod photoreceptors where rhodopsin (Rh) and Arr are expressed at comparably high levels and where Arr localization in the light is determined by its binding to activated Rh. Genetic manipulation of the expression of both proteins shows that the maximum amount of Arr that moves to the Rh-containing compartment exceeds 80%, but not 100%, of the molar amount of Rh present. In vitro experiments with purified proteins confirm that Arr “saturates” Rh at a 1:1 ratio. Thus, a single Rh molecule is necessary and sufficient to bind Arr. Remarkable structural conservation among receptors and Arrs strongly suggests that all Arr subtypes bind individual molecules of their cognate receptors.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eugenia V. Gurevich's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey N. Joyce

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Evgeny Bychkov

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeannie Chen

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey L. Benovic

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Rafiuddin Ahmed

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge