Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eugenio Aguglia is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eugenio Aguglia.


Journal of Psychosomatic Research | 1996

Cross validation of the factor structure of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: An Italian multicenter study

Cinzia Bressi; Graeme J. Taylor; James D. A. Parker; Sergio Bressi; Virginia Brambilla; Eugenio Aguglia; Ida Allegranti; Antonio Bongiorno; Franco Giberti; Maurizio Bucca; Orlando Todarello; Camilla Callegari; Simone Vender; Constanzo Gala; Giordano Invernizzi

The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) has been shown in previous research to measure a general dimension of alexithymia with three intercorrelated factors. This study evaluated the reliability and factorial validity of an Italian translation of the TAS-20 in a group of normal adults (N = 206) and in a mixed group of medical and psychiatric outpatients (N = 642). Using confirmatory factor analyses, the previously established three-factor model of the TAS-20 was found to be replicable in both groups. In addition, the Italian TAS-20 demonstrated adequate estimates of internal reliability and test-retest reliability. Although evaluation of the convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity of the TAS-20 is required in Italian populations, the present results support the use of the Italian translation of the scale for clinical and research purposes.


European Neuropsychopharmacology | 1998

Guidelines for depot antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia

John M. Kane; Eugenio Aguglia; A. CarloA. Altamura; José Luis Ayuso Gutierrez; Nicoletta Brunello; W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Wolfang Gaebel; Jes Gerlach; Julien-D. Guelfi; Werner Kissling; Yvon D. Lapierre; Eva Lindström; Julien Mendlewicz; Giorgio Racagni; Luis Salvador Carulla; Nina R. Schooler

These guidelines for depot antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia were developed during a two-day consensus conference held on July 29 and 30, 1995 in Siena, Italy. Depot antipsychotic medications were developed in the 1960s as an attempt to improve the long-term treatment of schizophrenia (and potentially other disorders benefiting from long-term antipsychotic medication). Depot drugs as distinguishable from shorter acting intramuscularly administered agents can provide a therapeutic concentration of at least a seven day duration in one parenteral dose. The prevention of relapse in schizophrenia remains an enormous public health challenge worldwide and improvements in this area can have tremendous impact on morbidity, mortality and quality of life, as well as direct and indirect health care costs. Though there has been debate as to what extent depot (long-acting injectable) antipsychotics are associated with significantly fewer relapses and rehospitalizations, in our view when all of the data from individual trials and metaanalyses are taken together, the findings are extremely compelling in favor of depot drugs. However in many countries throughout the world fewer than 20% of individuals with schizophrenia receive these medications. The major advantage of depot antipsychotics over oral medication is facilitation of compliance in medication taking. Non-compliance is very common among patients with schizophrenia and is a frequent cause of relapse. In terms of adverse effects, there are not convincing data that depot drugs are associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse effects than oral drugs. Therefore in our opinion any patient for whom long-term antipsychotic treatment is indicated should be considered for depot drugs. In choosing which drug the clinician should consider previous experience, personal patient preference, patients history of response (both therapeutic and adverse effects) and pharmacokinetic properties. In conclusion the use of depot antipsychotics has important advantages in facilitating relapse prevention. Certainly pharmacotherapy must be combined with other treatment modalities as needed, but the consistent administration of the former is often what enables the latter.


Journal of Psychiatric Research | 2013

The dietary pattern of patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review

Salvatore Dipasquale; Carmine M. Pariante; Paola Dazzan; Eugenio Aguglia; Philip McGuire; Valeria Mondelli

OBJECTIVE People with schizophrenia show a high incidence of metabolic syndrome, which is associated with a high mortality from cardiovascular disease. The aetiology of the metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia is multi-factorial and may involve antipsychotic treatment, high levels of stress and unhealthy lifestyle, such as poor diet. As a poor diet can predispose to the development of metabolic abnormalities, the aims of this review are to clarify: 1) the dietary patterns of patients with schizophrenia, 2) the association of these dietary patterns with a worse metabolic profile, and 3) the possible factors influencing these dietary patterns. METHODS A search was conducted on Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Ovid, Psychoinfo and ISI web of Knowledge from 1950 to the 1st of November 2011. 783 articles were found through the investigation of such databases. After title, abstract or full-text reading and applying exclusion criteria we reviewed 31 studies on dietary patterns and their effects on metabolic parameters in schizophrenia. RESULTS Patients with schizophrenia have a poor diet, mainly characterized by a high intake of saturated fat and a low consumption of fibre and fruit. Such diet is more likely to increase the risk to develop metabolic abnormalities. Data about possible causes of poor diet in schizophrenia are still few and inconsistent. CONCLUSION Subjects with schizophrenia show a poor diet that partly accounts for their higher incidence of metabolic abnormalities. Further studies are needed to clarify the causes of poor diet and the role of dietary intervention to improve their physical health.


Brain Behavior and Immunity | 2013

The role of immune genes in the association between depression and inflammation: a review of recent clinical studies.

Chiara Bufalino; Nilay Hepgul; Eugenio Aguglia; Carmine M. Pariante

The role for dysregulation of the immune system in the pathogenesis of depressive disorder is well established, and emerging research suggests the role of an underlying genetic vulnerability. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing literature on the genetic variants involved in neurobiological pathways associated with both immune activation and depression. Using PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid of Medline, PsycINFO and ISI web of Knowledge, we selected 52 papers which are relevant for this literature review. Findings across the literature suggest that functional allelic variants of genes for interleukin-1beta (IL)-1β, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP), as well as genetic variations affecting T-cell function, may increase the risk for depression. Moreover, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-11 genes, and in those regulating T-cell function may be associated with reduced responsiveness to antidepressant therapy. There is also some evidence indicative of a role of genetic variants of the enzymes, Cyclo-oxygenase2 (COX-2) and Phospholipase2 (PLA2), in the aetiology of depression. Finally, SNPs in genes related to the serotonin pathway may play a fundamental role in the shared genetic liability to both immune activation and depressive symptoms. Our review confirms that genetic variants influence the biological mechanisms by which the innate immune system contributes to the development of depression. However, future studies are necessary to identify the molecular mechanisms underlying these associations.


World Psychiatry | 2014

The influence of illness-related variables, personal resources and context-related factors on real-life functioning of people with schizophrenia.

S. Galderisi; Alessandro Rossi; Paola Rocca; Alessandro Bertolino; A. Mucci; Paola Bucci; Paola Rucci; Dino Gibertoni; Eugenio Aguglia; Mario Amore; Antonello Bellomo; Massimo Biondi; Roberto Brugnoli; Liliana Dell'Osso; Diana De Ronchi; Gabriella Di Emidio; Massimo Di Giannantonio; Andrea Fagiolini; Carlo Marchesi; Palmiero Monteleone; L. Oldani; Federica Pinna; Rita Roncone; Emilio Sacchetti; Paolo Santonastaso; Alberto Siracusano; Antonio Vita; P. Zeppegno; Mario Maj

In people suffering from schizophrenia, major areas of everyday life are impaired, including independent living, productive activities and social relationships. Enhanced understanding of factors that hinder real‐life functioning is vital for treatments to translate into more positive outcomes. The goal of the present study was to identify predictors of real‐life functioning in people with schizophrenia, and to assess their relative contribution. Based on previous literature and clinical experience, several factors were selected and grouped into three categories: illness‐related variables, personal resources and context‐related factors. Some of these variables were never investigated before in relationship with real‐life functioning. In 921 patients with schizophrenia living in the community, we found that variables relevant to the disease, personal resources and social context explain 53.8% of real‐life functioning variance in a structural equation model. Neurocognition exhibited the strongest, though indirect, association with real‐life functioning. Positive symptoms and disorganization, as well as avolition, proved to have significant direct and indirect effects, while depression had no significant association and poor emotional expression was only indirectly and weakly related to real‐life functioning. Availability of a disability pension and access to social and family incentives also showed a significant direct association with functioning. Social cognition, functional capacity, resilience, internalized stigma and engagement with mental health services served as mediators. The observed complex associations among investigated predictors, mediators and real‐life functioning strongly suggest that integrated and personalized programs should be provided as standard treatment to people with schizophrenia.


International Clinical Psychopharmacology | 1993

Double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of sertraline versus fluoxetine in major depression.

Eugenio Aguglia; Casacchia M; Giovanni B. Cassano; Faravelli C; Ferrari G; Giordano P; Pancheri P; Ravizza L; Trabucchi M; Bolino F

An eight-week double-blind, multicentre study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sertraline vs. fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression (DSM-III-R). There were 108 out-patients, from nine Italian centres, entered into the study, of whom 88 were evaluable (48 sertraline, 40 fluoxetine). The final mean daily dose of sertraline was 72 mg and for fluoxetine it was 28 mg. Both treatment groups showed a statistically significant improvement from baseline at one week, and this was maintained until the end of treatment for all of the following measures: Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety, the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Scale, Zung Self-Rating Scale for Anxiety and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire. Although there was a numerical advantage for sertraline on several efficacy measures, there was no statistically significant difference found between the treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar for both treatments; 40.4% for sertraline and 39.3% for fluoxetine. However, adverse events were generally rated by patients as of lower severity in the sertraline group. In addition, for the fluoxetine group, there was a higher incidence of agitation, anxiety and insomnia than for sertraline. Sertraline was considered to be better tolerated than fluoxetine overall, since only 9.6% of sertraline-treated patients discontinued treatment due to therapy failure whereas in the fluoxetine-treated group this figure was 19.6%. By contrast, 13.5% of sertraline-treated patients discontinued prematurely because of clinical improvement, compared with 10.7% of fluoxetine-treated patients.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2011

Fibromyalgia syndrome and depressive symptoms: Comorbidity and clinical correlates

Andrea Aguglia; Virginio Salvi; Giuseppe Maina; Ilaria Rossetto; Eugenio Aguglia

OBJECTIVE Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain and higher pain perception in specific anatomic sites called tender points. Fibromyalgia is frequently associated with psychiatric symptoms, like depression and anxiety; indeed some authors have argued about the possibility to classify this syndrome into affective spectrum disorder. Few studies have analyzed the impact of depressive symptoms on pain threshold. This research is aimed at evaluating the prevalence and the clinical correlates of depressive symptoms in fibromyalgic patients, and investigating their impact on pain perception and quality of life. METHODS Outpatients between 18 and 75 years with diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology have been included. All subjects have been evaluated with the following rating scales: HAM-D; VAS (to quantify pain); a visual analogical scale to evaluate quality of life; and Paykels List of Recent Life Events. RESULTS Thirty subjects have been recruited. Most patients (83.3%) had clinically significant depressive symptoms as indicated by a HAM-D score >7. Depressive symptoms are associated with higher pain perception, worse quality of life and more severe life events. CONCLUSION The presence of depressive symptoms is associated with a great impairment in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: indeed the psychiatric comorbidity lowers pain threshold and worsens the quality of life of our patients. Future studies should be conducted in order to identify the individual factors, e.g. stress or inflammatory processes, which drive the association between depression and higher severity of fibromyalgia syndrome.


European Neuropsychopharmacology | 2010

Efficacy and tolerability of Hypericum extract for the treatment of mild to moderate depression.

Siegfried Kasper; Filippo Caraci; Bruno Forti; Filippo Drago; Eugenio Aguglia

Depression is a common condition in the community with a significant impact on affected individuals, their relatives and society. Many patients with depression do not seek treatment and are often concerned about the possible adverse effects of antidepressant drugs. Extract of Hypericum perforatum (St. Johns wort) has long been recognized as a treatment for depression. Several published trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of Hypericum extract for mild to moderate depression. Recent comparative trials of Hypericum extract and other antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), provide support for Hypericum extract efficacy. However, since the constituents of Hypericum extract differ between the individual manufacturers, the efficacy cannot be extrapolated from one extract to another. In this review, WS 5572, LI 160, WS 5570 and ZE 117 Hypericum extracts have been shown to be significantly more effective than placebo with at least similar efficacy and better tolerability compared to standard antidepressant drugs.


Human Psychopharmacology-clinical and Experimental | 1998

Clinical efficacy of reboxetine: a comparative study with desipramine, with methodological considerations

Thomas A. Ban; P. Gaszner; Eugenio Aguglia; R. Batista; A. Castillo; A. Lipcsey; J.-P. Macher; A. Torres-Ruiz; L. Vergara

The efficacy and tolerability of 4–8 mg reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (NARI) was verified in a 4‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐ and desipramine‐controlled study in hospitalised patients with major depression. Two‐hundred‐and‐fifty‐eight patients were recruited and randomised to treatment with 4–8 mg reboxetine, 100–200 mg desipramine or placebo on a fixed, changing dosage regimen. The therapeutic response rate (<50% reduction in mean efficacy rating scale total scores) was significantly higher with reboxetine than with placebo (p<0·05). The onset of therapeutic effect [when mean efficacy rating scale total scores became significantly (p<0·05) lower (better) than placebo] was consistently earlier with reboxetine than desipramine. From the three adverse events encountered with significant (p<0·05) difference among the groups, dryness of mouth and blurred vision were reported more frequently with desipramine than with reboxetine and placebo, whereas urinary hesitancy was reported more frequently with reboxetine than placebo. No clinically significant changes were observed in laboratory parameters and vital signs. The mean scores on the CGI‐Efficacy Index in the reboxetine group was significantly (p<0·05) higher (better) than in the desipramine and placebo groups. CODE‐DD demonstrated the broadness of the DSM‐III‐R diagnosis of major depression and provided information for designing studies for the detection of the treatment responsive population of reboxetine. In conclusion, reboxetine administered for 4 weeks in the daily doses of 4–8 mg was effective and well tolerated in treating hospitalised patients with major depression.


American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias | 2006

Different Perception of Cognitive Impairment, Behavioral Disturbances, and Functional Disabilities Between Persons With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer’s Disease and Their Caregivers

Maria Luisa Onor; Marianna Trevisiol; C. Negro; Eugenio Aguglia

Insight in dementia is a multifaceted concept and ability, which includes the persons’ perception of their behavioral and cognitive symptoms and functional disability. This ability seems to deteriorate as dementia progresses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of insight in the cognitive, behavioral, and functional disorders in a group of persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild AD (Alzheimer’s disease) and to compare their perception of their illness with that of their caregivers. The study involved a group of 121 persons with MCI and mild AD and their caregivers. The persons with MCI and mild AD were administered the tests Mini-Mental State Examination, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Activities of Daily Living, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Schedule for the Assessment of Insight, Clinical Insight Rating Scale, and a short interview. Major differences were identified between how the persons with MCI or mild AD and their caregivers perceived the persons’ cognitive and behavioral disorders. The group with MCI or mild AD underestimated their deficits, which were considered serious and disabling by their caregivers.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eugenio Aguglia's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eileen Chusid

New York College of Podiatric Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge