Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Eva Bay Wedebye is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Eva Bay Wedebye.


Toxicological Sciences | 2014

Are Structural Analogues to Bisphenol A Safe Alternatives

Anna Kjerstine Rosenmai; Marianne Dybdahl; Mikael Pedersen; Barbara van Vugt-Lussenburg; Eva Bay Wedebye; Camilla Taxvig; Anne Marie Vinggaard

BACKGROUND Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical with widespread human exposure suspected of causing low-dose effects. Thus, a need for developing alternatives to BPA exists. Structural analogues of BPA have already been detected in foods and humans. Due to the structural analogy of the alternatives, there is a risk of effects similar to BPA. OBJECTIVES The aim was to elucidate and compare the hazards of bisphenol B (BPB), bisphenol E (BPE), bisphenol F (BPF), bisphenol S (BPS) and 4-cumylphenol (HPP) to BPA. METHODS In vitro studies on steroidogenesis, receptor activity, and biomarkers of effect, as well as Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling. RESULTS All test compounds caused the same qualitative effects on estrogen receptor and androgen receptor activities, and most of the alternatives exhibited potencies within the same range as BPA. Hormone profiles for the compounds indicated a specific mechanism of action on steroidogenesis which generally lead to decreased androgen, and increased estrogen and progestagen levels. Differential effects on corticosteroid synthesis were observed suggesting a compound-specific mechanism. Overall, BPS was less estrogenic and antiandrogenic than BPA, but BPS showed the largest efficacy on 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (17α-OH progesterone). Finally, there were indications of DNA damage, carcinogenicity, oxidative stress, effects on metabolism, and skin sensitization of one or more of the test compounds. CONCLUSIONS Interference with the endocrine system was the predominant effect of the test compounds. A substitution of BPA with these structural analogues should be carried out with caution.


Environmental Health Perspectives | 2016

CERAPP : Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project

Kamel Mansouri; Ahmed Abdelaziz; Aleksandra Rybacka; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Alexander Tropsha; Alexandre Varnek; Alexey V. Zakharov; Andrew Worth; Ann M. Richard; Christopher M. Grulke; Daniela Trisciuzzi; Denis Fourches; Dragos Horvath; Emilio Benfenati; Eugene N. Muratov; Eva Bay Wedebye; Francesca Grisoni; Giuseppe Felice Mangiatordi; Giuseppina M. Incisivo; Huixiao Hong; Hui W. Ng; Igor V. Tetko; Ilya Balabin; Jayaram Kancherla; Jie Shen; Julien Burton; Marc C. Nicklaus; Matteo Cassotti; Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov; Orazio Nicolotti

Background: Humans are exposed to thousands of man-made chemicals in the environment. Some chemicals mimic natural endocrine hormones and, thus, have the potential to be endocrine disruptors. Most of these chemicals have never been tested for their ability to interact with the estrogen receptor (ER). Risk assessors need tools to prioritize chemicals for evaluation in costly in vivo tests, for instance, within the U.S. EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program. Objectives: We describe a large-scale modeling project called CERAPP (Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project) and demonstrate the efficacy of using predictive computational models trained on high-throughput screening data to evaluate thousands of chemicals for ER-related activity and prioritize them for further testing. Methods: CERAPP combined multiple models developed in collaboration with 17 groups in the United States and Europe to predict ER activity of a common set of 32,464 chemical structures. Quantitative structure–activity relationship models and docking approaches were employed, mostly using a common training set of 1,677 chemical structures provided by the U.S. EPA, to build a total of 40 categorical and 8 continuous models for binding, agonist, and antagonist ER activity. All predictions were evaluated on a set of 7,522 chemicals curated from the literature. To overcome the limitations of single models, a consensus was built by weighting models on scores based on their evaluated accuracies. Results: Individual model scores ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, showing high prediction reliabilities. Out of the 32,464 chemicals, the consensus model predicted 4,001 chemicals (12.3%) as high priority actives and 6,742 potential actives (20.8%) to be considered for further testing. Conclusion: This project demonstrated the possibility to screen large libraries of chemicals using a consensus of different in silico approaches. This concept will be applied in future projects related to other end points. Citation: Mansouri K, Abdelaziz A, Rybacka A, Roncaglioni A, Tropsha A, Varnek A, Zakharov A, Worth A, Richard AM, Grulke CM, Trisciuzzi D, Fourches D, Horvath D, Benfenati E, Muratov E, Wedebye EB, Grisoni F, Mangiatordi GF, Incisivo GM, Hong H, Ng HW, Tetko IV, Balabin I, Kancherla J, Shen J, Burton J, Nicklaus M, Cassotti M, Nikolov NG, Nicolotti O, Andersson PL, Zang Q, Politi R, Beger RD, Todeschini R, Huang R, Farag S, Rosenberg SA, Slavov S, Hu X, Judson RS. 2016. CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project. Environ Health Perspect 124:1023–1033; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510267


Sar and Qsar in Environmental Research | 2008

QSAR models for reproductive toxicity and endocrine disruption in regulatory use – a preliminary investigation

Gunde Egeskov Jensen; Jay Russell Niemelä; Eva Bay Wedebye; Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov

A special challenge in the new European Union chemicals legislation, Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals, will be the toxicological evaluation of chemicals for reproductive toxicity. Use of valid quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) is a possibility under the new legislation. This article focuses on a screening exercise by use of our own and commercial QSAR models for identification of possible reproductive toxicants. Three QSAR models were used for reproductive toxicity for the endpoints teratogenic risk to humans (based on animal tests, clinical data and epidemiological human studies), dominant lethal effect in rodents (in vivo) and Drosophila melanogaster sex-linked recessive lethal effect. A structure set of 57,014 European Inventory of Existing Chemical Substances (EINECS) chemicals was screened. A total of 5240 EINECS chemicals, corresponding to 9.2%, were predicted as reproductive toxicants by one or more of the models. The chemicals predicted positive for reproductive toxicity will be submitted to the Danish Environmental Protection Agency as scientific input for a future updated advisory classification list with advisory classifications for concern for humans owing to possible developmental toxic effects: Xn (Harmful) and R63 (Possible risk of harm to the unborn child). The chemicals were also screened in three models for endocrine disruption. †Presented at the 13th International Workshop on QSARs in the Environmental Sciences (QSAR 2008), 8–12 June 2008, Syracuse, USA.


Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology | 2012

QSAR model for human pregnane X receptor (PXR) binding: screening of environmental chemicals and correlations with genotoxicity, endocrine disruption and teratogenicity.

Marianne Dybdahl; Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov; Eva Bay Wedebye; Svava Ósk Jónsdóttir; Jay Russell Niemelä

The pregnane X receptor (PXR) has a key role in regulating the metabolism and transport of structurally diverse endogenous and exogenous compounds. Activation of PXR has the potential to initiate adverse effects, causing drug-drug interactions, and perturbing normal physiological functions. Therefore, identification of PXR ligands would be valuable information for pharmaceutical and toxicological research. In the present study, we developed a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model for the identification of PXR ligands using data based on a human PXR binding assay. A total of 631 molecules, representing a variety of chemical structures, constituted the training set of the model. Cross-validation of the model showed a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 85%, and a concordance of 84%. The developed model provided knowledge about molecular descriptors that may influence the binding of molecules to PXR. The model was used to screen a large inventory of environmental chemicals, of which 47% was found to be within domain of the model. Approximately 35% of the chemicals within domain were predicted to be PXR ligands. The predicted PXR ligands were found to be overrepresented among chemicals predicted to cause adverse effects, such as genotoxicity, teratogenicity, estrogen receptor activation and androgen receptor antagonism compared to chemicals not causing these effects. The developed model may be useful as a tool for predicting potential PXR ligands and for providing mechanistic information of toxic effects of chemicals.


Sar and Qsar in Environmental Research | 2011

QSAR models for anti-androgenic effect--a preliminary study.

Gunde Egeskov Jensen; Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov; Eva Bay Wedebye; Tine Ringsted; Jay Russell Niemelä

Three modelling systems (MultiCase®, LeadScope® and MDL® QSAR) were used for construction of androgenic receptor antagonist models. There were 923–942 chemicals in the training sets. The models were cross-validated (leave-groups-out) with concordances of 77–81%, specificity of 78–91% and sensitivity of 51–76%. The specificity was highest in the MultiCase® model and the sensitivity was highest in the MDL® QSAR model. A complementary use of the models may be a valuable tool when optimizing the prediction of chemicals for androgenic receptor antagonism. When evaluating the fitness of the model for a particular application, balance of training sets, domain definition, and cut-offs for prediction interpretation should also be taken into account. Different descriptors in the modelling systems are illustrated with hydroxyflutamide and dexamethasone as examples (a non-steroid and a steroid anti-androgen, respectively). More research concerning the mechanism of anti-androgens would increase the possibility for further optimization of the QSAR models. Further expansion of the basis for the models is in progress, including the addition of more drugs.


Reproductive Toxicology | 2015

The ChemScreen project to design a pragmatic alternative approach to predict reproductive toxicity of chemicals

Bart van der Burg; Eva Bay Wedebye; Daniel R. Dietrich; Joanna Jaworska; Inge Mangelsdorf; Eduard Pauné; Michael Schwarz; Aldert H. Piersma; E. Dinant Kroese

There is a great need for rapid testing strategies for reproductive toxicity testing, avoiding animal use. The EU Framework program 7 project ChemScreen aimed to fill this gap in a pragmatic manner preferably using validated existing tools and place them in an innovative alternative testing strategy. In our approach we combined knowledge on critical processes affected by reproductive toxicants with knowledge on the mechanistic basis of such effects. We used in silico methods for prescreening chemicals for relevant toxic effects aiming at reduced testing needs. For those chemicals that need testing we have set up an in vitro screening panel that includes mechanistic high throughput methods and lower throughput assays that measure more integrative endpoints. In silico pharmacokinetic modules were developed for rapid exposure predictions via diverse exposure routes. These modules to match in vitro and in vivo exposure levels greatly improved predictivity of the in vitro tests. As a further step, we have generated examples how to predict reproductive toxicity of chemicals using available data. We have executed formal validations of panel constituents and also used more innovative manners to validate the test panel using mechanistic approaches. We are actively engaged in promoting regulatory acceptance of the tools developed as an essential step towards practical application, including case studies for read-across purposes. With this approach, a significant saving in animal use and associated costs seems very feasible.


Reproductive Toxicology | 2015

QSAR screening of 70,983 REACH substances for genotoxic carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and developmental toxicity in the ChemScreen project

Eva Bay Wedebye; Marianne Dybdahl; Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov; Svava Ósk Jónsdóttir; Jay Russell Niemelä

The ChemScreen project aimed to develop a screening system for reproductive toxicity based on alternative methods. QSARs can, if adequate, contribute to the evaluation of chemical substances under REACH and may in some cases be applied instead of experimental testing to fill data gaps for information requirements. As no testing for reproductive effects should be performed in REACH on known genotoxic carcinogens or germ cell mutagens with appropriate risk management measures implemented, a QSAR pre-screen for 70,983 REACH substances was performed. Sixteen models and three decision algorithms were used to reach overall predictions of substances with potential effects with the following result: 6.5% genotoxic carcinogens, 16.3% mutagens, 11.5% developmental toxicants. These results are similar to findings in earlier QSAR and experimental studies of chemical inventories, and illustrate how QSAR predictions may be used to identify potential genotoxic carcinogens, mutagens and developmental toxicants by high-throughput virtual screening.


Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology | 2015

Raspberry ketone in food supplements – High intake, few toxicity data – A cause for safety concern?

Lea Bredsdorff; Eva Bay Wedebye; Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov; Torben Hallas-Møller; Kirsten Pilegaard

Raspberry ketone (4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanone) is marketed on the Internet as a food supplement. The recommended intake is between 100 and 1400 mg per day. The substance is naturally occurring in raspberries (up to 4.3 mg/kg) and is used as a flavouring substance. Toxicological studies on raspberry ketone are limited to acute and subchronic studies in rats. When the lowest recommended daily dose of raspberry ketone (100 mg) as a food supplement is consumed, it is 56 times the established threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) of 1800 μg/day for Class 1 substances. The margin of safety (MOS) based on a NOAEL of 280 mg/kg bw/day for lower weight gain in rats is 165 at 100 mg and 12 at 1400 mg. The recommended doses are a concern taking into account the TTC and MOS. Investigations of raspberry ketone in quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models indicated potential cardiotoxic effects and potential effects on reproduction/development. Taking into account the high intake via supplements, the compounds toxic potential should be clarified with further experimental studies. In UK the pure compound is regarded as novel food requiring authorisation prior to marketing but raspberry ketone is not withdrawn from Internet sites from this country.


Sar and Qsar in Environmental Research | 2009

QSAR models for P450 (2D6) substrate activity

Tine Ringsted; Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov; Gunde Egeskov Jensen; Eva Bay Wedebye; Jay Russell Niemelä

Human Cytochrome P450 (CYP) is a large group of enzymes that possess an essential function in metabolising different exogenous and endogenous compounds. Humans have more than 50 different genes encoding CYP enzymes, among these a gene encoding for the CYP isoenzyme 2D6, a CYP able to metabolise drugs and other chemicals. A training set of 747 chemicals primarily based on in vivo human data for the CYP isoenzyme 2D6 was collected from the literature. QSAR models focusing on substrate/non-substrate activity were constructed by the use of MultiCASE, Leadscope and MDL quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) modelling systems. They cross validated (leave-groups-out) with concordances of 71%, 81% and 82%, respectively. Discrete organic European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances (EINECS) chemicals were screened to predict an approximate percentage of CYP 2D6 substrates. These chemicals are potentially present in the environment. The biological importance of the CYP 2D6 and the use of the software mentioned above were discussed.


Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry | 2012

Identification of cytochrome P450 2D6 and 2C9 substrates and inhibitors by QSAR analysis.

Svava Ósk Jónsdóttir; Tine Ringsted; Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov; Marianne Dybdahl; Eva Bay Wedebye; Jay Russell Niemelä

This paper presents four new QSAR models for CYP2C9 and CYP2D6 substrate recognition and inhibitor identification based on human clinical data. The models were used to screen a large data set of environmental chemicals for CYP activity, and to analyze the frequency of CYP activity among these compounds. A large fraction of these chemicals were found to be CYP active, and thus potentially capable of affecting human physiology. 20% of the compounds within applicability domain of the models were predicted to be CYP2C9 substrates, and 17% to be inhibitors. The corresponding numbers for CYP2D6 were 9% and 21%. Where the majority of CYP2C9 active compounds were predicted to be both a substrate and an inhibitor at the same time, the CYP2D6 active compounds were primarily predicted to be only inhibitors. It was demonstrated that the models could identify compound classes with a high occurrence of specific CYP activity. An overrepresentation was seen for poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (group of procarcinogens) among CYP2C9 active and mutagenic compounds compared to CYP2C9 inactive and mutagenic compounds. The mutagenicity was predicted with a QSAR model based on Ames in vitro test data.

Collaboration


Dive into the Eva Bay Wedebye's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nikolai Georgiev Nikolov

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jay Russell Niemelä

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marianne Dybdahl

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gunde Egeskov Jensen

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tine Ringsted

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Svava Ósk Jónsdóttir

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Marie Vinggaard

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Trine Klein Reffstrup

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Camilla Taxvig

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge