Eva Wardelmann

Mammography, Breast Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Women at High Familial Risk for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To compare the effectiveness of mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for surveillance of women at increased familial risk for breast cancer (lifetime risk of 20% or more). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a surveillance cohort study of 529 asymptomatic women who, based on their family history and/or mutational analysis, were suspected or proven to carry a breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA). A total of 1,542 annual surveillance rounds were completed with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years. Diagnostic accuracies of the three imaging modalities used alone or in different combinations were compared. RESULTS Forty-three breast cancers were identified in the total cohort (34 invasive, nine ductal carcinoma-in-situ). Overall sensitivity of diagnostic imaging was 93% (40 of 43 breast cancers); overall node-positive rate was 16%, and one interval cancer occurred (one of 43 cancers, or 2%). In the analysis by modality, sensitivity was low for mammography (33%) and ultrasound (40%) or the combination of both (49%). MRI offered a significantly higher sensitivity (91%). The sensitivity of mammography in the higher risk groups was 25%, compared with 100% for MRI. Specificity of MRI (97.2%) was equivalent to that of mammography (96.8%). CONCLUSION Mammography alone, and also mammography combined with breast ultrasound, seems insufficient for early diagnosis of breast cancer in women who are at increased familial risk with or without documented BRCA mutation. If MRI is used for surveillance, diagnosis of intraductal and invasive familial or hereditary cancer is achieved with a significantly higher sensitivity and at a more favorable stage.

One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial

CONTEXT Adjuvant imatinib administered for 12 months after surgery has improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) compared with placebo. OBJECTIVE To investigate the role of imatinib administration duration as adjuvant treatment of patients who have a high estimated risk for GIST recurrence after surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Patients with KIT-positive GIST removed at surgery were entered between February 2004 and September 2008 to this randomized, open-label phase 3 study conducted in 24 hospitals in Finland, Germany, Norway, and Sweden. The risk of GIST recurrence was estimated using the modified National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria. INTERVENTION Imatinib, 400 mg per day, orally for either 12 months or 36 months, started within 12 weeks of surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was RFS; the secondary end points included overall survival and treatment safety. RESULTS Two hundred patients were allocated to each group. The median follow-up time after randomization was 54 months in December 2010. Diagnosis of GIST was confirmed in 382 of 397 patients (96%) in the intention-to-treat population at a central pathology review. KIT or PDGFRA mutation was detected in 333 of 366 tumors (91%) available for testing. Patients assigned for 36 months of imatinib had longer RFS compared with those assigned for 12 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.65; P < .001; 5-year RFS, 65.6% vs 47.9%, respectively) and longer overall survival (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.89; P = .02; 5-year survival, 92.0% vs 81.7%). Imatinib was generally well tolerated, but 12.6% and 25.8% of patients assigned to the 12- and 36-month groups, respectively, discontinued imatinib for a reason other than GIST recurrence. CONCLUSION Compared with 12 months of adjuvant imatinib, 36 months of imatinib improved RFS and overall survival of GIST patients with a high risk of GIST recurrence. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00116935.

Polyclonal Evolution of Multiple Secondary KIT Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors under Treatment with Imatinib Mesylate

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are characterized by a strong KIT receptor activation most often resulting from KIT mutations. In a smaller subgroup of tumors without KIT mutations, analogous activating mutations are found in the platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα) gene. Both PDGFRα and KIT receptors are targets of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (Glivec) which has improved the treatment of advanced GISTs significantly. However, a subgroup of tumors show a secondary progress under therapy with imatinib after initial response. One possible mechanism of secondary resistance is the development of newly acquired KIT mutations. In the present study, we evaluated the frequency of such secondary KIT mutations in a series of GIST patients in which tumor tissue was resected under treatment. We examined one to seven different tumor areas in 32 cases (total of 104 samples) and found up to four newly acquired KIT mutations in 14 patients (43.8%). These were always located in exons encoding the first or second tyrosine kinase domain (exon 13, 14, or 17). Mutations were found only in a subset of samples analyzed from each case whereas others retained the wild-type sequence in the same region. There was never more than one new mutation in the same sample. Consistent with a secondary clonal evolution, the primary mutation was always detectable in all samples from each tumor. According to our results, the identification of newly acquired KIT mutations in addition to the primary mutation is dependent on the number of tissue samples analyzed and has high implications for further therapeutic strategies.

Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO–EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Oncological Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IFO, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany; Institut Curie, Paris, France; NORDIX, Athens, Greece; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Vienna General Hospital (AKH), Medizinische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria; Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio-CIBERONC, Seville, Spain; Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Aviano; Ospedale Regionale di Treviso “S.Maria di Cà Foncello”, Treviso, Italy; Integrated Unit ICO Hospitalet, HUB, Barcelona, Spain; Sarcoma Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK; Skane University Hospital-Lund, Lund, Sweden; N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation; Institute of Scientific Hospital Care (IRCCS), Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome; Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan; Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi Firenze, Florence, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam and Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Turku University Hospital (Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala), Turlu, Finland; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany; Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH), Helsinki, Finland; Royal Marsden Hospital, London; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; University Hospital Motol, Prague; Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Maria Skłodowska Curie Institute, Oncology Centre, Warsaw, Poland; Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Ichilov), Tel Aviv, Israel; Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi Università di Bologna, Bologna; Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Cita della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Fundacio de Gestio Sanitaria de L’hospital de la SANTA CREU I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany; YCRC Department of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK; Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Finland; Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Oncology of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University College Hospital, London, UK; Gerhard-Domagk-Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre Leon Bernard and UCBL1, Lyon, France

β‐Catenin (CTNNB1) mutations and clinicopathological features of mesenteric desmoid‐type fibromatosis

Aims and methods:  Desmoid‐type fibromatosis (desmoid) is a fibroblastic tumour that shows locally aggressive growth. Mesenteric desmoid is a rare lesion that shares morphological and biological features with fibromatoses occurring in the abdominal wall or in extraabdominal sites, but differs in terms of gross appearance and clinical presentation. We report on a series of 56 cases of mesenteric desmoids from our consultation files and compare them with cases of non‐mesenteric desmoids and retroperitoneal fibrosis.

Tumor Genotype Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of Gastric Origin: A European Multicenter Analysis Based on ConticaGIST

Purpose: Although the mutational status in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) can predict the response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the role of tumor genotype as a prognostic factor remains controversial. The ConticaGIST study sought to determine the pathologic and molecular factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with operable, imatinib-naive GIST. Experimental Design: Clinicopathologic and molecular data from 1,056 patients with localized GIST who underwent surgery with curative intention (R0/R1) and were registered in the European ConticaGIST database were prospectively obtained and reviewed. Risk of tumor recurrence was stratified using the modified NIH criteria. The median follow-up was 52 months. Results: On testing for potential prognostic parameters, the following were associated with inferior DFS on multivariable Cox model analysis: primary nongastric site, size >10 cm, mitotic index >10 mitoses per 50 high power field, and the KIT exon 9 duplication [hazard ratio (HR), 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9–2.5; P = 0.037] and KIT exon 11 deletions involving codons 557 and/or 558 [KITdel-inc557/558; HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.0–2.2; P = 0.004]. Conversely, PDGFRA exon 18 mutations were indicators of better prognosis [HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.1–0.6; P = 0.002]. KITdel-inc557/558 were an adverse indicator only in GIST localized in the stomach (P < 0.001) but not in tumors with nongastric origin. In gastric GIST, all other mutations presented remarkably superior 5-year DFS. Conclusions: In conclusion, tumor genotype is an independent molecular prognostic variable associated with gastric GIST and should be used for optimizing tailored adjuvant imatinib treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 20(23); 6105–16. ©2014 AACR.

Activating PDGFRA mutations in inflammatory fibroid polyps occur in exons 12, 14 and 18 and are associated with tumour localization

Huss S, Wardelmann E, Goltz D, Binot E, Hartmann W, Merkelbach‐Bruse S, Büttner R & Schildhaus H‐U (2012) Histopathology 61, 59–68

SRC Signaling Is Crucial in the Growth of Synovial Sarcoma Cells

Synovial sarcoma is a soft-tissue malignancy characterized by a reciprocal t(X;18) translocation encoding a chimeric transcriptional modifier. Several receptor tyrosine kinases have been found activated in synovial sarcoma; however, no convincing therapeutic concept has emerged from these findings. On the basis of the results of phosphokinase screening arrays, we here investigate the functional and therapeutic relevance of the SRC kinase in synovial sarcoma. Immunohistochemistry of phosphorylated SRC and its regulators CSK and PTP1B (PTPN1) was conducted in 30 synovial sarcomas. Functional aspects of SRC, including dependence of SRC activation on the SS18/SSX fusion proteins, were analyzed in vitro. Eventually, synovial sarcoma xenografts were treated with the SRC inhibitor dasatinib in vivo. Activated phospho (p)-(Tyr416)-SRC was detected in the majority of tumors; dysregulation of CSK or PTP1B was excluded as the reason for the activation of the kinase. Expression of the SS18/SSX fusion proteins in T-REx-293 cells was associated with increased p-(Tyr416)-SRC levels, linked with an induction of the insulin-like growth factor pathway. Treatment of synovial sarcoma cells with dasatinib led to apoptosis and inhibition of cellular proliferation, associated with reduced phosphorylation of FAK (PTK2), STAT3, IGF-IR, and AKT. Concurrent exposure of cells to dasatinib and chemotherapeutic agents resulted in additive effects. Cellular migration and invasion were dependent on signals transmitted by SRC involving regulation of the Rho GTPases Rac and RhoA. Treatment of nude mice with SYO-1 xenografts with dasatinib significantly inhibited tumor growth in vivo. In summary, SRC is of crucial biologic importance and represents a promising therapeutic target in synovial sarcoma.

Current diagnostic methods of HER-2/neu detection in breast cancer with special regard to real-time PCR

In this study we compare different diagnostic methods to measure HER-2/neu gene amplification in breast cancer with special regard to real-time polymerase chain reaction. Fifty specimens of breast cancer were analyzed, and the use of laser-assisted microdissection prior to PCR was investigated. A total of 38 of 50 cases showed HER-2/neu overexpression in immunohistochemistry. In the 2+ scored group, 2 of 23 cases turned out to be amplified after FISH analysis and 14 of 15 cases in the 3+ group were amplified. Of the 16 amplified cases, 3 initially were measured as nonamplified by real-time PCR but showed amplification after laser capture microdissection. One case showed amplification by PCR but turned out to have only one copy of chromosome 17 by FISH. All 0 or 1+ scored cases were measured as nonamplified both by FISH and PCR. Initial concordance rate between FISH and PCR was 92% and could be increased to 98% using laser-assisted microdissection. FISH and PCR showed high diagnostic accuracy and concordance while immunohistochemistry overestimates amplification within the 2+ scored group. Therefore, either FISH or PCR should be applied in cases scored 2+ by immunohistochemistry. Diagnostic accuracy of PCR can be increased using laser-assisted microdissection.

Integrative DNA methylation and gene expression analysis in high-grade soft tissue sarcomas

BackgroundHigh-grade soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous, complex group of aggressive malignant tumors showing mesenchymal differentiation. Recently, soft tissue sarcomas have increasingly been classified on the basis of underlying genetic alterations; however, the role of aberrant DNA methylation in these tumors is not well understood and, consequently, the usefulness of methylation-based classification is unclear.ResultsWe used the Infinium HumanMethylation27 platform to profile DNA methylation in 80 primary, untreated high-grade soft tissue sarcomas, representing eight relevant subtypes, two non-neoplastic fat samples and 14 representative sarcoma cell lines. The primary samples were partitioned into seven stable clusters. A classification algorithm identified 216 CpG sites, mapping to 246 genes, showing different degrees of DNA methylation between these seven groups. The differences between the clusters were best represented by a set of eight CpG sites located in the genes SPEG, NNAT, FBLN2, PYROXD2, ZNF217, COL14A1, DMRT2 and CDKN2A. By integrating DNA methylation and mRNA expression data, we identified 27 genes showing negative and three genes showing positive correlation. Compared with non-neoplastic fat, NNAT showed DNA hypomethylation and inverse gene expression in myxoid liposarcomas, and DNA hypermethylation and inverse gene expression in dedifferentiated and pleomorphic liposarcomas. Recovery of NNAT in a hypermethylated myxoid liposarcoma cell line decreased cell migration and viability.ConclusionsOur analysis represents the first comprehensive integration of DNA methylation and transcriptional data in primary high-grade soft tissue sarcomas. We propose novel biomarkers and genes relevant for pathogenesis, including NNAT as a potential tumor suppressor in myxoid liposarcomas.