Evert J. Van Limbergen
Maastricht University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Evert J. Van Limbergen.
Acta Oncologica | 2015
Philippe Lambin; Jaap D. Zindler; Ben G. L. Vanneste; Lien Van De Voorde; Maria Jacobs; Daniëlle B.P. Eekers; Jurgen Peerlings; Bart Reymen; Ruben T.H.M. Larue; Timo M. Deist; Evelyn E.C. de Jong; Aniek J.G. Even; Adriana J. Berlanga; Erik Roelofs; Qing Cheng; S. Carvalho; R. Leijenaar; C.M.L. Zegers; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Maaike Berbee; Wouter van Elmpt; Cary Oberije; Ruud Houben; Andre Dekker; Liesbeth Boersma; Frank Verhaegen; Geert Bosmans; Frank Hoebers; Kim M. Smits; Sean Walsh
ABSTRACT Background. Trials are vital in informing routine clinical care; however, current designs have major deficiencies. An overview of the various challenges that face modern clinical research and the methods that can be exploited to solve these challenges, in the context of personalised cancer treatment in the 21st century is provided. Aim. The purpose of this manuscript, without intending to be comprehensive, is to spark thought whilst presenting and discussing two important and complementary alternatives to traditional evidence-based medicine, specifically rapid learning health care and cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design. Rapid learning health care is an approach that proposes to extract and apply knowledge from routine clinical care data rather than exclusively depending on clinical trial evidence, (please watch the animation: http://youtu.be/ZDJFOxpwqEA). The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design is a pragmatic method which has been proposed to help overcome the weaknesses of conventional randomised trials, taking advantage of the standardised follow-up approaches more and more used in routine patient care. This approach is particularly useful when the new intervention is a priori attractive for the patient (i.e. proton therapy, patient decision aids or expensive medications), when the outcomes are easily collected, and when there is no need of a placebo arm. Discussion. Truly personalised cancer treatment is the goal in modern radiotherapy. However, personalised cancer treatment is also an immense challenge. The vast variety of both cancer patients and treatment options makes it extremely difficult to determine which decisions are optimal for the individual patient. Nevertheless, rapid learning health care and cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design are two approaches (among others) that can help meet this challenge.
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews | 2017
Philippe Lambin; Jaap D. Zindler; Ben G. L. Vanneste; Lien Van De Voorde; Daniëlle B.P. Eekers; Inge Compter; Kranthi Marella Panth; Jurgen Peerlings; Ruben T.H.M. Larue; Timo M. Deist; Arthur Jochems; Tim Lustberg; Johan van Soest; Evelyn E.C. de Jong; Aniek J.G. Even; Bart Reymen; Nicolle H. Rekers; Marike W. van Gisbergen; Erik Roelofs; S. Carvalho; R. Leijenaar; C.M.L. Zegers; Maria Jacobs; Janita van Timmeren; P.J.A.M. Brouwers; Jonathan A Lal; Ludwig Dubois; Ala Yaromina; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Maaike Berbee
Abstract A paradigm shift from current population based medicine to personalized and participative medicine is underway. This transition is being supported by the development of clinical decision support systems based on prediction models of treatment outcome. In radiation oncology, these models ‘learn’ using advanced and innovative information technologies (ideally in a distributed fashion — please watch the animation: http://youtu.be/ZDJFOxpwqEA) from all available/appropriate medical data (clinical, treatment, imaging, biological/genetic, etc.) to achieve the highest possible accuracy with respect to prediction of tumor response and normal tissue toxicity. In this position paper, we deliver an overview of the factors that are associated with outcome in radiation oncology and discuss the methodology behind the development of accurate prediction models, which is a multi‐faceted process. Subsequent to initial development/validation and clinical introduction, decision support systems should be constantly re‐evaluated (through quality assurance procedures) in different patient datasets in order to refine and re‐optimize the models, ensuring the continuous utility of the models. In the reasonably near future, decision support systems will be fully integrated within the clinic, with data and knowledge being shared in a standardized, dynamic, and potentially global manner enabling truly personalized and participative medicine. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available.
International Journal of Colorectal Disease | 2015
Ben G. L. Vanneste; Lien Van De Voorde; Rogier J. De Ridder; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Philippe Lambin; Emile N. van Lin
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to give an overview of the measures used to prevent chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) and to provide an algorithm for the treatment of CRP.MethodsMedical literature databases including PubMed and Medline were screened and critically analyzed for relevance in the scope of our purpose.ResultsCRP is a relatively frequent late side effect (5–20%) and mainly dependent on the dose and volume of irradiated rectum. Radiation treatment (RT) techniques to prevent CRP are constantly improving thanks to image-guided RT and intensity-modulated RT. Also, newer techniques like protons and new devices such as rectum spacers and balloons have been developed to spare rectal structures. Biopsies do not contribute to diagnosing CRP and should be avoided because of the risk of severe rectal wall damage, such as necrosis and fistulas. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of CRP. A variety of possibilities is available and includes topical and oral agents, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and endoscopic interventions.ConclusionsCRP has a natural history of improving over time, even without treatment. This is important to take into account when considering these treatments: first be conservative (topical and oral agents) and be aware that invasive treatments can be very toxic.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2015
Nicolle H. Rekers; C.M.L. Zegers; Ala Yaromina; Natasja G. Lieuwes; Rianne Biemans; Birgit L. M. G. Senden-Gijsbers; Mario Losen; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Wilfred T. V. Germeraad; Dario Neri; Ludwig Dubois; Philippe Lambin
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recently, we have shown that radiotherapy (RT) combined with the immunocytokine L19-IL2 can induce long-lasting antitumour effects, dependent on ED-B expression and infiltration of cytotoxic T cells. On the other hand, in certain tumours, IL2 treatment can trigger a natural killer cell (NK) immune response. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic effect of our combination therapy in the ED-B positive F9 teratocarcinoma model, lacking MHCI expression and known to be dependent on NK immune responses. MATERIAL AND METHODS In syngeneic F9 tumour bearing 129/FvHsd mice tumour growth delay was evaluated after local tumour irradiation (10Gy) combined with systemic administration of L19-IL2. Immunological responses were investigated using flow cytometry. RESULTS Tumour growth delay of L19-IL2 can be further improved by a single dose of RT administered before immunotherapy, but not during immunotherapy. Furthermore, treatment of L19-IL2 favours a NK response and lacks cytotoxic T cell tumour infiltrating immune cells, which may be explained by the absence of MHCI expression. CONCLUSION An additive effect can be detected when the NK dependent F9 tumour model is treated with radiotherapy and L19-IL2 and therefore this combination could be useful in the absence of tumoural MHCI expression.
BioMed Research International | 2016
Ben G. L. Vanneste; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Emile N. van Lin; Joep G. H. van Roermund; Philippe Lambin
Radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) has steadily evolved over the last decades, with improving biochemical disease-free survival. Recently population based research also revealed an association between overall survival and doses ≥ 75.6 Gray (Gy) in men with intermediate- and high-risk PC. Examples of improved RT techniques are image-guided RT, intensity-modulated RT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and stereotactic ablative body RT, which could facilitate further dose escalation. Brachytherapy is an internal form of RT that also developed substantially. New devices such as rectum spacers and balloons have been developed to spare rectal structures. Newer techniques like protons and carbon ions have the intrinsic characteristics maximising the dose on the tumour while minimising the effect on the surrounding healthy tissue, but clinical data are needed for confirmation in randomised phase III trials. Furthermore, it provides an overview of an important discussion issue in PC treatment between urologists and radiation oncologists: the comparison between radical prostatectomy and RT. Current literature reveals that all possible treatment modalities have the same cure rate, but a different toxicity pattern. We recommend proposing the possible different treatment modalities with their own advantages and side-effects to the individual patient. Clinicians and patients should make treatment decisions together (shared decision-making) while using patient decision aids.
British Journal of Radiology | 2017
Evert J. Van Limbergen; Dirk De Ruysscher; Veronica Olivo Pimentel; Damiënne Marcus; Maaike Berbee; Ann Hoeben; Nicolle H. Rekers; Jan Theys; Ala Yaromina; Ludwig Dubois; Philippe Lambin
The advent of immunotherapy is currently revolutionizing the field of oncology, where different drugs are used to stimulate different steps in a failing cancer immune response chain. This review gives a basic overview of the immune response against cancer, as well as the historical and current evidence on the interaction of radiotherapy with the immune system and the different forms of immunotherapy. Furthermore the review elaborates on the many open questions on how to exploit this interaction to the full extent in clinical practice.
Physics in Medicine and Biology | 2017
Gabriel P. Fonseca; Mark Podesta; Murillo Bellezzo; Michiel R Van den Bosch; Ludy Lutgens; Ben G. L. Vanneste; Robert Voncken; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Brigitte Reniers; Frank Verhaegen
Brachytherapy is employed to treat a wide variety of cancers. However, an accurate treatment verification method is currently not available. This study describes a pre-treatment verification system that uses an imaging panel (IP) to verify important aspects of the treatment plan. A detailed modelling of the IP was only possible with an extensive calibration performed using a robotic arm. Irradiations were performed with a high dose rate (HDR) 192Ir source within a water phantom. An empirical fit was applied to measure the distance between the source and the detector so 3D Cartesian coordinates of the dwell positions can be obtained using a single panel. The IP acquires 7.14 fps to verify the dwell times, dwell positions and air kerma strength (Sk). A gynecological applicator was used to create a treatment plan that was registered with a CT image of the water phantom used during the experiments for verification purposes. Errors (shifts, exchanged connections and wrong dwell times) were simulated to verify the proposed verification system. Cartesian source positions (panel measurement plane) have a standard deviation of about 0.02 cm. The measured distance between the source and the panel (z-coordinate) have a standard deviation up to 0.16 cm and maximum absolute error of ≈0.6 cm if the signal is close to sensitive limit of the panel. The average response of the panel is very linear with Sk. Therefore, Sk measurements can be performed with relatively small errors. The measured dwell times show a maximum error of 0.2 s which is consistent with the acquisition rate of the panel. All simulated errors were clearly identified by the proposed system. The use of IPs is not common in brachytherapy, however, it provides considerable advantages. It was demonstrated that the IP can accurately measure Sk, dwell times and dwell positions.
Current Opinion in Oncology | 2017
Dirk De Ruysscher; Kobe Reynders; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Maarten Lambrecht
Purpose of review The immunomodulatory effects of ionizing radiation have long been recognized; however, so far these have not been fully exploited in clinical practice. We review the rationale to combine radiation with immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are used in standard practice. Recent findings Preclinical research suggests a synergy between radiotherapy and these immune checkpoint inhibitors. Whether or not this benefit translates into a clinical benefit is currently subject of ongoing research. Summary It is highly rational to combine radiation with immune therapy as in preclinical models and in proof of concept trials in humans it clearly can increase the antitumor immunity when given together with other immune interventions.
OncoImmunology | 2017
Nicolle H. Rekers; Veronica Olivo Pimentel; Ala Yaromina; Natasja G. Lieuwes; Rianne Biemans; C.M.L. Zegers; Wilfred T. V. Germeraad; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Dario Neri; Ludwig Dubois; Philippe Lambin
ABSTRACT Recently, we have shown that the administration of the tumour-targeted antibody-based immunocytokine L19-IL2 after radiotherapy (RT) resulted in synergistic anti-tumour effect. Here we show that RT and L19-IL2 can activate a curative abscopal effect, with a long-lasting immunological memory. Ionizing radiation (single dose of 15Gy, 5 × 2Gy or 5 × 5Gy) was delivered to primary C51 colon tumour-bearing immunocompetent mice in combination with L19-IL2 and response of secondary non-irradiated C51 or CT26 colon tumours was evaluated. 15Gy + L19-IL2 triggered a curative (20%) abscopal effect, which was T cell dependent. Moreover, 10Gy + L19-IL2 treated and cured mice were re-injected after 150 days with C51 tumour cells and tumour uptake was assessed. Age-matched controls (matrigel injected mice treated with 10Gy + L19-IL2, mice cured after treatment with surgery + L19-IL2 and mice cured after high dose RT 40Gy + vehicle) were included. Several immunological parameters in blood, tumours, lymph nodes and spleens were investigated. Treatment with 10Gy + L19-IL2 resulted in long-lasting immunological memory, associated with CD44+CD127+ expression on circulating T cells. This combination treatment can induce long-lasting curative abscopal responses, and therefore it has also great potential for treatment of metastatic disease. Preclinical findings have led to the initiation of a phase I clinical trial (NCT02086721) in our institute investigating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with L19-IL2 in patients with oligometastatic solid tumours.
Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology | 2018
Ben G. L. Vanneste; Evert J. Van Limbergen; Kees van de Beek; Emile van Lin; Ludy Lutgens; Philippe Lambin
Highlights • Active inflammatory bowel disease is an exclusion criterion for high-dose radiotherapy.• A rectum spacer was inserted between the prostate and the rectal wall.• The rectum spacer pushes the rectum outside of the high-dose area.• No rectal toxicity of the radiotherapy or toxicity flare of the IBD was observed.