Ewelina Swora-Cwynar

Selected biologic markers of inflammation and activity of Crohn’s disease

Abstract The study aimed to compare the accuracy of selected biologic markers in assessing the disease activity in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). The analysis included serum IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, TNF-α, IFN-γ, hsCRP, peripheral CD4 + CD25 + FOXP3 + regulatory T cells, as well as fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin. A group of 55 adults with CD was enrolled to the study. Disease activity was assessed using Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS), which currently represents the gold standard for the evaluation of endoscopic activity. For clinical activity scoring, the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was used. Concentrations of investigated markers were estimated by means of flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and the results were correlated with both indices. The study demonstrated that both fecal markers, i.e. calprotectin (r = 0.827, p < 0.001) and lactoferrin (r = 0.704, p < 0.001), correlate closely with CDEIS score, and might be used to evaluate the severity of CD in clinical setting. The correlation of those markers with CDAI was also significant, with r = 0.742 for calprotectin (p < 0.001) and r = 0.675 for lactoferrin (p < 0.05). As for the other investigated markers, only hsCRP (r = 0.672, p < 0.001) and IL-17 (r = 0.296, p < 0.005) correlated closely with CDEIS. The correlation of the markers with CDAI was also significant, though weaker, with r = 0.518 for hsCRP (p < 0.001) and r = 0.296 for IL-17 (p < 0.05). The study showed that IL-17, despite its vague role in the pathogenesis of CD, might be a useful marker, comparable with hsCRP, in assessing the activity of the disease.

The effect of orlistat versus metformin on body composition and insulin resistance in obese premenopausal women: 3-month randomized prospective open-label study

Introduction Our aim was to evaluate the effects of metformin and orlistat on body composition and glucose–insulin homeostasis in obese premenopausal women. Material and methods Seventy-three obese premenopausal Caucasian women aged 32.4 ±8.3 years were treated with either metformin (1000 mg/day; n = 37) or orlistat (360 mg/day; n = 36). Anthropometric parameters were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Glucose tolerance, using the oral glucose tolerance test; insulin resistance, using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR); and insulin sensitivity, using the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (ISI Matsuda), were assessed at the commencement of the study and after 3 months. Results Those treated with orlistat showed greater weight loss (−9.4 ±2.3 vs. –4.9 ±1.3 kg, p < 0.05) and decrease of fat mass (−5.4 ±3.0 vs. –3.5 ±0.7 kg, p < 0.05) than those treated with metformin. The percentage of android and gynoid fat deposits was reduced in both groups; however, a greater decrease in android fat was observed in those treated with metformin. Improvement in ISI Matsuda and post-load insulin were similar in both groups. High initial post-load insulin and low ISI Matsuda corresponded with reductions in total fat, trunk fat, and waist circumference in both groups, and a decrease in android fat in those treated with metformin. Conclusions Orlistat treatment resulted in greater weight loss and improvement in body composition; metformin treatment resulted in a reduction of android fat. Both drugs produced a comparable improvement in insulin/glucose homeostasis. Overall, insulin-resistant women showed improvement with treatment, irrespective of which drug was used.

Usefulness of selected laboratory markers in ulcerative colitis

IntroductionThis study aimed to compare the accuracy of selected laboratory markers in assessing disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The analysis included serum IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α, IFN-γ, hsCRP, peripheral regulatory T cells, as well as fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin.Patients and methodsA group of 45 adults with UC was enrolled in the study. Disease activity was assessed using the Mayo endoscopic index, while for clinical activity scoring, the Clinical Activity Index (CAI) was used. Concentrations of markers investigated were estimated by means of flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays: the results were correlated with both indices.ResultsThe study demonstrated that both fecal markers, i.e. calprotectin (r = 0.880, P<0.001) and lactoferrin (r = 0.799, P<0.001) correlated closely with the Mayo endoscopic score, and might be used to evaluate the severity of UC in the clinical setting. The correlation of these markers with CAI was also significant, with r = 0.831 for calprotectin (P<0.001) and r = 0.672 for lactoferrin (P<0.05). As for the other markers investigated, only IL-6 (r = 0.598, P<0.001), IL-17A (r = 0.587, P<0.005), and TNF-α (r = 0.701, P<0.001) correlated closely with the Mayo endoscopic index. The correlation of the markers with CAI was also significant, though weaker, with r = 0.525 for IL-6 (P<0.001), r = 0.587 for IL-17A (P<0.05), and r = 0.624 for TNF-α (P<0.001).DiscussionDespite the fact, that UC is generally considered to be an IL-13-driven, Th2-like type of disease, markers of inflammation such as serum interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, TNF-α, fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin might be useful in assessing disease activity.

Salivary fingerprint of simple obesity

HighlightsSaliva of obese individuals contains increased concentrations of several mediators.TNF‐R1 and serpin A12 discriminate obesity with high sensitivity and specificity.Their levels correlate with plaque build‐up and inferior gingival status.Obesity, even without comorbidities, leads to distinct changes in the saliva. Background: The nature of a link between poor oral health and obesity is not fully understood. It is also unclear if saliva contributes to it and whether the properties of saliva change as a result of an increase in body mass or rather as a consequence of obesity‐associated comorbidities. This pilot study was undertaken in an attempt to determine if salivary biomarkers can identify obesity per se. Methods: Whole mixed saliva was analysed for 16 soluble parameters covering 4 categories (inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, adipokines). In the discovery group, 19 obese and 25 non‐obese women matched for age, with similar hygiene habits, with no comorbidities and not taking any medication known to affect saliva secretion were analysed. In the validation group, a cohort of no‐preselected 81 individuals (34 obese) were analysed. Results: Individuals with obesity had significantly higher salivary concentrations of several cytokines and adipokines, of which TNF‐R1, serpin A12 and PAI‐1 were identified as parameters discriminating between obese and non‐obese subjects with the highest sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: Obesity per se leads to distinct changes in the concentration of several parameters in saliva. These findings may have diagnostic implications for distinguishing the effects of obesity and obesity‐linked comorbidities on oral health.

Applicability of endoscopic indices in the determination of disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Objective The combination of clinical remission and mucosal healing represents a major goal of different treatment strategies for ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to assess which of the endoscopic indices used to evaluate mucosal changes in UC are correlated with clinical indices currently used to determine disease activity, as well as which of the endoscopic indices are correlated with the Geboes Index used for histological evaluation. It also aimed to find correlations between the currently used clinical activity indices and the histological Geboes Index. Methods A group of 49 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of UC and a group of 52 individuals without a diagnosis of gastrointestinal disease, who constituted the control group, were investigated. All patients were evaluated by colonoscopy, and the severity of mucosal changes was scored in terms of nine different endoscopic indices commonly used in both pharmacological trials and clinical practice. Evaluation was also carried out using clinical and histological indices. Endoscopic indices used for UC were then correlated with different clinical and histological indices to find the strongest correlations. Results and conclusion A high correlation was demonstrated between three of the 11 evaluated clinical indices – Improvement Based on Individual Symptom Scores, Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index, and Schroeder Index – and all nine endoscopic indices – Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity, Baron Score, Schroeder Index, Feagan Index, Powell–Tuck Index, Rachmilewitz Index, Sutherland Index, Lofberg Index, and Lemman Index. Improvement Based on Individual Symptom Scores was the index with the highest correlation with all the endoscopic indices used for UC. The above indices are recommended for clinical evaluation of UC activity. The Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity was moderately correlated with a histological index, and it is therefore recommended for routine endoscopic mucosal evaluation in patients with UC.

Obesity – should we revise indications for treatment with metformin?

Introduction Treatment of obesity with life style modifications often fails; therefore pharmacological treatment has become a very popular approach. Metformin is one of the examined possibilities. The aim of this study was to verify indications for metformin use in obese women based on metabolic and anthropometric parameters assessed by dual-X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), to establish the degree of insulin resistance and its correlations. Material and methods Anthropometry, fat measurement by bioimpedance and metabolic profile, including lipids, and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with insulin (0 and 120 min) were performed in 50 female patients diagnosed with simple obesity, aged 18-40 years. Homeostatic model assessment HOMA-R was calculated for insulin resistance, and area under the curve (AUC) for insulin response. Total, android and gynoid fat distribution, and their ratio (A/G), were measured by DXA. Results From 50 women who entered the study, 33 were classified as insulin resistant (IR subgroup) and 17 as non-insulin resistant (non-IR subgroup), according to their HOMA-R indices. IR women presented higher waist circumference and DXA A/G ratio. The IR subgroup demonstrated elevated fasting triglycerides and glucose (but in the normal range) and a higher insulin response in OGTT (4.1-fold vs 2.5-fold). From different insulin measurements HOMA index turned out to have the strongest correlations with the metabolic parameters triglycerides and glucose. We found significant positive correlations between android fat and insulin: waist circumference and HOMA-R, WHR and HOMA-R, android fat and HOMA-R, A/G ratio and insulin after OGTT, and A/G ratio and HOMA-R. We found a strong correlation between WHR and A/R ratio. Conclusions 67% of premenopausal obese women were insulin resistant. Measures of DXA visceral fat determined by android fat percentage and android/gynoid ratio were the strongest determinants of insulin resistance. Waist-to-hip ratio might be a simple method for determining the indications for metformin treatment.