Eynav Klechevsky

Functional Specializations of Human Epidermal Langerhans Cells and CD14+ Dermal Dendritic Cells

Little is known about the functional differences between the human skin myeloid dendritic cell (DC) subsets, epidermal CD207(+) Langerhans cells (LCs) and dermal CD14(+) DCs. We showed that CD14(+) DCs primed CD4(+) T cells into cells that induce naive B cells to switch isotype and become plasma cells. In contrast, LCs preferentially induced the differentiation of CD4(+) T cells secreting T helper 2 (Th2) cell cytokines and were efficient at priming and crosspriming naive CD8(+) T cells. A third DC population, CD14(-)CD207(-)CD1a(+) DC, which resides in the dermis, could activate CD8(+) T cells better than CD14(+) DCs but less efficiently than LCs. Thus, the human skin displays three DC subsets, two of which, i.e., CD14(+) DCs and LCs, display functional specializations, the preferential activation of humoral and cellular immunity, respectively.

Dendritic cell subsets in health and disease

Summary:  The dendritic cell (DC) system of antigen‐presenting cells controls immunity and tolerance. DCs initiate and regulate immune responses in a manner that depends on signals they receive from microbes and their cellular environment. They allow the immune system to make qualitatively distinct responses against different microbial infections. DCs are composed of subsets that express different microbial receptors and express different surface molecules and cytokines. Our studies lead us to propose that interstitial (dermal) DCs preferentially activate humoral immunity, whereas Langerhans cells preferentially induce cellular immunity. Alterations of the DC system result in diseases such as autoimmunity, allergy, and cancer. Conversely, DCs can be exploited for vaccination, and novel vaccines that directly target DCs in vivo are being designed.

Cross-priming CD8+ T cells by targeting antigens to human dendritic cells through DCIR.

We evaluated human CD8(+) T-cell responses generated by targeting antigens to dendritic cells (DCs) through various lectin receptors. We found the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-containing DC immunoreceptor (DCIR) to mediate potent cross-presentation. A single exposure to a low dose of anti-DCIR-antigen conjugate initiated antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cell immunity by all human DC subsets including ex vivo-generated DCs, skin-isolated Langerhans cells, and blood myeloid DCs and plasmacytoid DCs. The delivery of influenza matrix protein (FluMP) through DCIR resulted in expansion of FluMP-specific memory CD8(+) T cells. Enhanced specific CD8(+) T-cell responses were observed when an antigen was delivered to the DCs via DCIR, compared with those induced by a free antigen, or antigen conjugated to a control monoclonal antibody or delivered via DC-SIGN, another lectin receptor. DCIR targeting also induced primary CD8(+) T-cell responses against self (MART-1) and viral (HIV gag) antigens. Addition of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7/8 agonist enhanced DCIR-mediated cross-presentation as well as cross-priming, particularly when combined with a CD40 signal. TLR7/8 activation was associated with increased expansion of the primed CD8(+) T cells, high production of interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α, and reduced levels of type 2-associated cytokines. Thus, antigen targeting via the human DCIR receptor allows activation of specific CD8(+) T-cell immunity.

Harnessing human dendritic cell subsets for medicine.

Summary:  Immunity results from a complex interplay between the antigen‐non‐specific innate immune system and the antigen‐specific adaptive immune system. The cells and molecules of the innate system employ non‐clonal recognition receptors including lectins, Toll‐like receptors, NOD‐like receptors, and helicases. B and T lymphocytes of the adaptive immune system employ clonal receptors recognizing antigens or their derived peptides in a highly specific manner. An essential link between innate and adaptive immunity is provided by dendritic cells (DCs). DCs can induce such contrasting states as immunity and tolerance. The recent years have brought a wealth of information on the biology of DCs revealing the complexity of this cell system. Indeed, DC plasticity and subsets are prominent determinants of the type and quality of elicited immune responses. In this article, we summarize our recent studies aimed at a better understanding of the DC system to unravel the pathophysiology of human diseases and design novel human vaccines.

Immune and clinical outcomes in patients with stage IV melanoma vaccinated with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells derived from CD34+ progenitors and activated with type I interferon.

Twenty-two HLA A*0201+ patients with stage IV melanoma were enrolled in a phase 1 safety and feasibility trial using a composite dendritic cell (DC) vaccine generated by culturing CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors and activated with IFN-α. The DC vaccine was loaded with peptides derived from four melanoma tissue differentiation antigens (MART-1, tyrosinase, MAGE-3, and gp100) and influenza matrix peptide (Flu-MP). Twenty patients were evaluable, 14 of whom received vaccination with peptide-pulsed DCs without keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and 6 of whom received vaccination with KLH-loaded DCs. Patients were vaccinated until disease progression or until they had received eight vaccinations. None of the analyzed patients showed the expansion of melanoma-peptide-specific circulating effector memory T cells that secrete IFN-γ in direct ELISPOT. Melanoma-peptide-specific recall memory CD8+ T cells able to secrete IFN-γ and to proliferate could be detected in six of the seven analyzed patients. There were no objective clinical responses. The estimated median overall survival was 12 months (range 2-38), and the median event-free survival was 4 months (range 1-12). There was no statistically significant survival advantage in patients who received KLH-loaded vaccines. As of March 2005, four patients remained alive, 26+, 28+, 28+, and 36+ months. Three of them had received KLH-loaded vaccines and all of them had had additional therapy. Overall, these results suggest that IFN-α-activated CD34-DCs are safe but elicit only limited immune responses, underscoring the need to test different DC maturation factors.

The differential production of cytokines by human Langerhans cells and dermal CD14(+) DCs controls CTL priming.

We recently reported that human epidermal Langerhans cells (LCs) are more efficient than dermal CD14(+) DCs at priming naive CD8(+) T cells into potent CTLs. We hypothesized that distinctive dendritic cell (DC) cytokine expression profiles (ie, IL-15 produced by LCs and IL-10 expressed by dermal CD14(+) DCs) might explain the observed functional difference. Blocking IL-15 during CD8(+) T-cell priming reduced T-cell proliferation by ∼ 50%. These IL-15-deprived CD8(+) T cells did not acquire the phenotype of effector memory cells. They secreted less IL-2 and IFN-γ and expressed only low amounts of CD107a, granzymes and perforin, and reduced levels of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2. Confocal microscopy analysis showed that IL-15 is localized at the immunologic synapse of LCs and naive CD8(+) T cells. Conversely, blocking IL-10 during cocultures of dermal CD14(+) DCs and naive CD8(+) T cells enhanced the generation of effector CTLs, whereas addition of IL-10 to cultures of LCs and naive CD8(+) T cells inhibited their induction. TGF-β1 that is transcribed by dermal CD14(+) DCs further enhanced the inhibitory effect of IL-10. Thus, the respective production of IL-15 and IL-10 explains the contrasting effects of LCs and dermal CD14(+) DCs on CD8(+) T-cell priming.

Targeting Human Dendritic Cell Subsets for Improved Vaccines

Dendritic cells (DCs) were discovered in 1973 by Ralph Steinman as a previously undefined cell type in the mouse spleen and are now recognized as a group of related cell populations that induce and regulate adaptive immune responses. Studies of the past decade show that, both in mice and humans, DCs are composed of subsets that differ in their localization, phenotype, and functions. These progresses in our understanding of DC biology provide a new framework for improving human health. In this review, we discuss human DC subsets in the context of their medical applications, with a particular focus on DC targeting.

Harnessing human dendritic cell subsets to design novel vaccines

Dendritic cells (DCs) orchestrate a repertoire of immune responses that endow resistance to infection and tolerance to self. DC plasticity and subsets are prominent determinants of the quality of elicited immune responses. Different DC subsets display different receptors and surface molecules and express different sets of cytokines/chemokines, all of which lead to distinct immunological outcomes. Recent findings on human DC subsets and their functional specialization have provided insights for the design of novel human vaccines.

Modification of a Tumor-Derived Peptide at an HLA-A2 Anchor Residue Can Alter the Conformation of the MHC-Peptide Complex: Probing with TCR-Like Recombinant Antibodies

A common assumption about peptide binding to the class I MHC complex is that each residue in the peptide binds independently. Based on this assumption, modifications in class I MHC anchor positions were used to improve the binding properties of low-affinity peptides (termed altered peptide ligands), especially in the case when tumor-associated peptides are used for immunotherapy. Using a new molecular tool in the form of recombinant Abs endowed with Ag-specific MHC-restricted specificity of T cells, we show that changes in the identity of anchor residues may have significant effects, such as altering the conformation of the peptide-MHC complex, and as a consequence, may affect the TCR-contacting residues. We herein demonstrate that the binding of TCR-like recombinant Abs, specific for the melanoma differentiation Ag gp100 T cell epitope G9-209, is entirely dependent on the identity of a single peptide anchor residue at position 2. An example is shown in which TCR-like Abs can recognize the specific complex only when a modified peptide, G9-209-2 M, with improved affinity to HLA-A2 was used, but not with the unmodified natural peptide. Importantly, these results demonstrate, using a novel molecular tool, that modifications at anchor residues can dramatically influence the conformation of the MHC peptide groove and thus may have a profound effect on TCR interactions. Moreover, these results may have important implications in designing modifications in peptides for cancer immunotherapy, because most such peptides studied are of low affinity.

Antitumor Activity of Immunotoxins with T-Cell Receptor–like Specificity against Human Melanoma Xenografts

In this study, we have explored the use of Fab-toxin proteins (immunotoxin) to target antigen-specific MHC-peptide complexes of in vitro and in vivo cancer cells. A human phage display library was used to screen for T-cell receptor (TCR)-like antibodies that are highly specific for the peptide melanoma-associated antigen MART-1(26-35) presented by HLA-A201. We also used previously selected TCR-like antibodies specific for the peptide melanoma-associated antigen gp100(280-288) presented by HLA-A201. The recombinant immunotoxin constructs were generated by fusing the targeting Fab fragment to a truncated form of Pseudomonas exotoxin, PE38KDEL. These immunotoxins bound with high affinity to the EBV-transformed JY cell line pulsed with the aforementioned peptides and internalized within 30 min. A significant inhibition of protein synthesis, which resulted in cell death, was detected at 24 h. MART-1-specific and gp100-specific immunotoxins bound and killed HLA-A201 melanoma MART-1(+) and gp100(+) cell lines that were presented at natural levels but do not bind to HLA-A201(-) or to HLA-A201(+) MART-1(-) and gp100(-) cell lines. In severe combined immunodeficient mice, MART-1 and gp100 immunotoxins significantly and discriminately inhibited human melanoma growth. These results show that MHC class I/peptide complexes can serve as a specific target for passive immunotherapy of cancer.