F. Camanni

Preliminary evidence that Ghrelin, the natural GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor ligand, strongly stimulates GH secretion in humans

An endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue-receptor (GHS-R) has been recently purified from rat and human stomach and named Ghrelin. It has been demonstrated that Ghrelin specifically stimulates GH secretion from rat pituitary cells in culture as well as in rats in vivo. In this preliminary study, in 4 normal adults [age (mean±SE): 28.6±3.5 yr; body mass index (BMI): 22.3±2.1 kg/m2] we administered 1.0 μg/kg Ghrelin or GHRH-29 to compare their GH-releasing activities in humans. In all subjects Ghrelin induced a prompt, marked and long-lasting increase in circulating GH levels (peak: 107.9±26.1 μg/l; AUC: 6503.1±1632.7 μg/l/h). The GH response to Ghrelin was clearly higher (p<0.05) than that after GHRH (peak: 22.3±4.5 μg/l; AUC: 1517.5±338.4 μg/l/h). In conclusion, this preliminary study shows that Ghrelin exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans releasing more GH than GHRH.

Biologic activities of growth hormone secretagogues in humans

Growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) are synthetic peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules with strong, dose-dependent, and reproducible growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity even after oral administration. GHSs release GH via actions on specific receptors (GHS-R) at the pituitary and, mainly, at the hypothalamic levels. GHSs likely act as functional somatostatin antagonists and meantime enhance the activity of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-secreting neurons. The GH-releasing effect of GHSs is independent of gender but undergoes marked age-related variations. Estrogens play a major role in enhancing the GH response to GHSs at puberty, which GHRH hypoactivity, somatostatinergic hyperactivity and impaired activity of the putative GHS-like ligand and receptors probably explain the reduced GH-releasing effect of GHSs in aging. The activity of GHSs is not fully specific for GH. Their slight prolactin-releasing activity probably comes from direct pituitary action. In physiological conditions, the ACTH-releasing activity of GHSs is dependent on central actions; a direct action on GHS-R in pituitary ACTH-secreting tumors likely explains the peculiar ACTH and cortisol hyperresponsiveness to GHSs in Cushing disease. GHSs have specific receptor subtypes in other central and peripheral endocrine and nonendocrine tissues mediating GH-independent biologic activities. GHSs influence sleep pattern, stimulated food intake, and have cardiovascular activities. GHs have specific binding in normal and neoplastic follicular derived human thyroid tissue and inhibit the proliferation of follicular-derived neoplastic cell lines. The discovery of ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide synthesized in the stomach but also in other tissues, has opened new fascinating perspectives of research in this field.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone combined with arginine or growth hormone secretagogues for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults.

Insulin-induced hypoglycemia (ITT) is currently the “gold-standard” test for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD). ITT is often contraindicated, however, particularly in conditions that are also common in patients with suspected GHD. Used alone, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) has no diagnostic value owing to within-subject variability and the inability to distinguish GHD from normal subjects. When combined with arginine, however, GHRH becomes a potent and reproducible test, which is unaffected by gender and aging, showing excellent specificity. The GHRH+ arginine (ARG) test distinguishes GHD patients from normal subjects and is at least as sensitive as ITT, provided that appropriate cutoff limits are considered. Its reliability for retesting GHD has also been demonstrated. The GHRH+ARG test can also be performed in a shorter procedure, resulting in potential for cost reduction. Synthetic GH secretagogues (GHSs) possess a strong and reproducible GH-releasing effect and synergize with GHRH. The combination of GHRH and a peptidyl GHS, such as hexarelin or GH-releasing peptide-6, has recently been shown as another reliable test for the diagnosis of adult GHD, again provided that the cutoff limit is appropriate to the potency of the test. Thus, GHRH combined with either arginine or GHS is a potential tool for the diagnosis of adult GHD.

Cholinergic Involvement in the Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone-Induced Growth Hormone Release: Studies in Normal and Acromegalic Subjects

To throw light onto the mechanism(s) by which the cholinergic system influences growth hormone (GH) release, the effects of two muscarinic receptor blockers, pirenzepine and atropine, and of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, pyridostigmine bromide, on the GH response to GHRH-44 were studied in 19 normal volunteers. Moreover, the effects of pirenzepine administration on plasma GH levels both in basal conditions and after stimulation by GHRH-44 and TRH were studied in 9 acromegalics. Both pirenzepine (0.6 mg/kg i.v., 5 min before GHRH) and atropine (1 mg i.m., 15 min before GHRH) blunted the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v. bolus) (area under the response curve, AUC: 81.3 +/- 17.3 vs. 481.2 +/- 211.3 ng/ml/h for pirenzepine and 100.2 +/- 27.0 vs. 364.7 +/- 81.0 ng/ml/h for atropine; p less than 0.01). Pyridostigmine (120 mg orally, 30 min before GHRH) induced a variable but significant (p less than 0.02) rise in basal plasma GH levels and, furthermore, an unequivocal potentiation of the GH response to GHRH (AUC: 1044.6 +/- 245.3 vs. 481.2 +/- 211.3 ng/ml/h; p less than 0.01). In all but one acromegalics 0.6 mg/kg i.v. pirenzepine was unable to modify the basal GH levels whilst it showed a variable inhibitory effect on the GH response to GHRH. The GH response to TRH (200 micrograms i.v. bolus) was instead unmodified by pirenzepine. In conclusion, muscarinic receptor blockade inhibits while cholinergic potentiation seems to positively modulate the GH response to GHRH. Therefore, the cholinergic system seems to positively modulate the GHRH effect on somatotrophs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Growth Hormone-Releasing Peptides and Their Analogs

Growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are a series of hepta (GHRP-1)- and hexapeptides (GHRP-2, GHRP-6, Hexarelin) that have been shown to be effective releasers of GH in animals and humans. More recently, a series of nonpeptidyl GH secretagogues (L-692,429, L-692,585, MK-0677) were discovered using GHRP-6 as a template. Some cyclic peptides as well as penta-, tetra-, and pseudotripeptides have also been described. This review summarizes recent developments in our understanding of the GHRPs, as well as the current nonpeptide pharmacologic analogs. GHRPs and their analogs have no structural homology with GHRH and act via specific receptors present at either the pituitary or the hypothalamic level. The GHRP receptor has recently been cloned and it does not show sequence homology with other G-protein-coupled receptors known so far. This evidence strongly suggests the existence of a natural GHRP-like ligand which, however, has not yet been found. Although the exact mechanism of action of GHRPs has not been fully established, there is probably a dual site of action on both the pituitary and the hypothalamus, possibly involving regulatory factors in addition to GHRH and somatostatin. Moreover, the possibility that GHRPs act via an unknown hypothalamic factor (U factor) is still open. The marked GH-releasing activity of GHRPs is reproducible and dose-related after intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal, and even oral administration. The GH-releasing effect of GHRPs is the same in both sexes, but undergoes age-related variations. It increases from birth to puberty and decreases in aging. The GH-releasing activity of GHRPs is synergistic with that of GHRH and not affected by opioid receptor antagonists, while it is only blunted by inhibitory influences that are known to nearly abolish the effect of GHRH, such as neurotransmitters, glucose, free fatty acids, glucocorticoids, rhGH, and even exogenous somatostatin. GHRPs maintain their GH-releasing effect in somatotrope hypersecretory states, such as acromegaly, anorexia nervosa, and hyperthyroidism. On the other hand, GHRPs and their analogs have been reported to be effective in idiopathic short stature, in some situations of GH deficiency, in obesity, and in hypothyroidism, while in patients with pituitary stalk disconnection and in Cushings syndrome the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRPs is almost absent. A potential role in the treatment of short stature, aging, catabolic states, and dilated cardiomyopathy has been envisaged.

Arginine reinstates the somatotrope responsiveness to intermittent growth hormone-releasing hormone administration in normal adults.

It is well known that in normal adults the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) is inhibited by previous administration of the neurohormone. In 7 healthy volunteers (age 20-34 years) we studied the GH responses to two consecutive GHRH boluses (1 microgram/kg i.v. every 120 min) alone or coadministered with arginine (30 g i.v. over 30 min). The GH response to the first GHRH bolus (area under the curve, mean +/- SEM: 506.3 +/- 35.1 micrograms/l/h) was higher (p = 0.0001) than that to the second one (87.1 +/- 14.6 micrograms/l/h). The latter response was clearly increased (p = 0.0001) by coadministering arginine (980.5 +/- 257.5 micrograms/l/h). When every GHRH bolus was combined with arginine a marked potentiation of GH response to both boluses was found. However, the second combined administration of arginine and GHRH induced a GH increase which was lower compared to the first one (p = 0.016). In conclusion, our results show that arginine potentiates the GHRH-induced GH secretion preventing the lessening of somatotrope responsiveness to the neurohormone alone. As there is evidence that this phenomenon is due to an enhanced somatostatin release, these findings give further evidence of a somatostatin-suppressing effect of arginine.

Prevalence of thyroid diseases in patients with acromegaly: results of an Italian Multi-center Study

Acromegaly is frequently associated with the presence of thyroid disorders, however the exact prevalence is still controversial. An Italian multicenter study was performed on 258 patients with active acromegaly (high levels of IGF-I and lack of suppression of serum GH levels below 2 μg/l after an OGTT). The control group was represented by 150 patients affected by non-functioning and PRL-secreting pituitary adenomas. Two hundred and two out of 258 acromegalic patients (78%) were affected by thyroid disorders with a significantly higher prevalence with respect to the control group (27%, p<0.0001). One hundred and three patients presented (39.9%) non-toxic nodular goiter, 46 (17.8%) non-toxic diffuse goiter, 37 (14.3%) toxic nodular goiter, 1 toxic diffuse goiter (0.4%), 12 (4.6%) Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, 3 (1.2%) thyroid cancer. Two patients presented a co-secreting TSH pituitary adenoma. Thirty-six patients had been previously treated for various thyroid abnormalities. Among the 222 acromegalic patients never treated for thyroid disorders thyroid ultrasonography was performed on 194 subjects. Thyroid volume in patients with thyroid abnormalities was 28±17.5 ml (median 23) while it was 10.8±3.6 ml (median 10) in patients without thyroid disorders (p<0.0001). Thyroid volume was correlated with the estimated duration of acromegaly (r=0.7, p<000.1), but not with age or with serum GH, IGF-I and TSH concentrations. Thyroid volume was higher in acromegalic patients than in the above control population (23.5±16.9 ml vs 13.9±12.8 ml, p<0.0001). In 62 acromegalic patients 101 fine-needle biopsies of thyroid nodules were performed; 7 nodules were suspicious and the patients were submitted to thyroid surgery: papillary thyroid carcinoma was found in 3 patients. In conclusion, in a large series of acromegalic patients an increased prevalence of thyroid disorders (78%), particularly non-toxic nodular goiter, has been observed. Thyroid volume, evaluated by ultrasonography, was correlated to the estimated duration of acromegaly. Finally, the prevalence of thyroid carcinoma was slightly increased than in the general population.

Arginine potentiates the GHRH- but not the pyridostigmine-induced GH secretion in normal short children. Further evidence for a somatostatin suppressing effect of arginine.

To investigate the mechanism underlying the GH‐releasing effect of arginine (ARG), we studied the interactions of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused i. v. over 30 min) with GHRH (1 μg/kg i. v.) and with pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg orally) on GH secretion in 15 children and adolescents with familial short stature (5.1‐15.4 years). In a group of eight subjects ARG induced a GH increase not statistically different to that observed after GHRH (peak, mean±SEM: 38.0±10.4 vs 64.0±14.4 mU/1). The combined administration of ARG and GHRH led to GH levels (101±15.2 mU/1) higher than those observed after GHRH (P < 0.025) or ARG alone (P < 0.001) and overlapping with those recorded after combined PD and GHRH administration (111±22.4 mU/1). In the other seven subjects, ARG and PD administration induced a similar GH response either when administered alone (25.2±13.6 and 27.8±4.0 mU/1, respectively) or in combination (33.8±5.4 mU/1). In conclusion, our results show that in children ARG administration potentiates GHRH‐ but not PD‐induced GH increase. These findings agree with the hypothesis that the GH‐releasing effect of both ARG and PD is mediated via the same mechanism, namely, by suppression of endogeneous somatostatin release. Combined administration of either ARG or PD with GHRH has a similar striking GH‐releasing effect which is clearly higher than that of GHRH alone.

Effects of GHRP-2 and hexarelin, two synthetic GH-releasing peptides, on GH, prolactin, ACTH and cortisol levels in man. Comparison with the effects of GHRH, TRH and hCRH.

GHRP-2 (D-Ala-D-beta Nal-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) and Hexarelin (HEX) (His-D-2-methylTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2) are synthetic, non-natural super-analogs of GHRP-6 endowed with potent stimulatory effect on GH secretion and slight stimulatory effect on PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. Their GH-releasing activity ahs never been compared each other and their effects on PRL, ACTH and cortisol have never been compared with that of other stimuli. To clarify these points, in 6 normal young adults (22-27 yr) we studied the GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol responses to 1 and 2 micrograms/kg i.v. GHRP-2 and HEX comparing them with that after 1 micrograms/kg i.v. GHRH and 400 micrograms i.v. TRH + 2 micrograms/kg i.v. hCRH. The Gh responses to 2 micrograms/kg i.v. GHRP-2 or HEX, compared with those to 1 microgram/kg GHRH, were also studied in 6 normal elderly subjects (66-73 yr). In young adults 1 microgram/kg i.v. GHRP-2 and HEX induced a similar, strong GH response, which was higher (p < 0.05) than that to GHRH. The administration of 2.0 micrograms/kg i.v. GHRP-2 and HEX again elicited a similar GH response, which was higher (p < 0.05) than that after the 1.0 microgram/kg dose. In elderly subjects, the GH those in young subjects. In young adults, the PRL responses to all doses of GHRP-2 or HEX were similar and lower (p < 0.01) responses were similar to those to hCRH. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that, in man, GHRP-2 and HEX have similar, 2 and HEX is not fully specific, as they induce similar increases in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. The PRL-releasing activity of GHRPs is lower than that of TRH while their ACTH/cortisol-releasing activity is similar to that of hCRH.

Arginine potentiates but does not restore the blunted growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in obesity.

A blunted growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli, including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), has been shown in obesity. Arginine (ARG) has been demonstrated to potentiate the GHRH-induced GH increase in normal subjects, likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To shed further light onto the mechanisms underlying the blunted GH secretion in obesity, we studied the effect of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused intravenously [IV] over 30 minutes) on both basal and GHRH (1 micron/kg IV)-stimulated GH secretion. Eight obese subjects (aged 26.4 +/- 3.9 years; body mass index, 39.0 +/- 1.9 kg/m2) and eight normal control volunteers (aged 27.0 +/- 1.7 years; body mass index, 22.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) were studied. In obese subjects, the GH response to both GHRH and ARG was lower (P less than .01 and P less than .002, respectively) than in controls. ARG potentiated the GH response to GHRH in obese patients (P less than .0003). However, in these patients, the GH secretion elicited by GHRH, even when coadministered with ARG, persisted at reduced levels (P less than .005) when compared with controls. Basal insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels did not significantly differ in obese subjects and in normal subjects (161.1 +/- 37.0 v 181.0 +/- 12.8 micrograms/L). In conclusion, ARG enhances the blunted GHRH-induced GH increase in obese patients, but the GH responses to ARG alone and to ARG + GHRH persist at lower levels than in normals. Thus, our results suggest the existence of a reduced pituitary GH pool in obesity.