Laura Gianotti

Biologic activities of growth hormone secretagogues in humans

Growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) are synthetic peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules with strong, dose-dependent, and reproducible growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity even after oral administration. GHSs release GH via actions on specific receptors (GHS-R) at the pituitary and, mainly, at the hypothalamic levels. GHSs likely act as functional somatostatin antagonists and meantime enhance the activity of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-secreting neurons. The GH-releasing effect of GHSs is independent of gender but undergoes marked age-related variations. Estrogens play a major role in enhancing the GH response to GHSs at puberty, which GHRH hypoactivity, somatostatinergic hyperactivity and impaired activity of the putative GHS-like ligand and receptors probably explain the reduced GH-releasing effect of GHSs in aging. The activity of GHSs is not fully specific for GH. Their slight prolactin-releasing activity probably comes from direct pituitary action. In physiological conditions, the ACTH-releasing activity of GHSs is dependent on central actions; a direct action on GHS-R in pituitary ACTH-secreting tumors likely explains the peculiar ACTH and cortisol hyperresponsiveness to GHSs in Cushing disease. GHSs have specific receptor subtypes in other central and peripheral endocrine and nonendocrine tissues mediating GH-independent biologic activities. GHSs influence sleep pattern, stimulated food intake, and have cardiovascular activities. GHs have specific binding in normal and neoplastic follicular derived human thyroid tissue and inhibit the proliferation of follicular-derived neoplastic cell lines. The discovery of ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide synthesized in the stomach but also in other tissues, has opened new fascinating perspectives of research in this field.

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome impairs insulin sensitivity independently of anthropometric variables

objectives Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is strongly associated with obesity and characterized by endocrine and metabolic changes including impairment of insulin sensitivity. The aim of this study was to further clarify the insulin dynamics and glucose metabolism in this condition.

Modulation of Growth Hormone-Releasing Activity of Hexarelin in Man

Hexarelin (His-D-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) is a new synthetic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide. The mechanism of action of hexarelin in man is not fully elucidated. As for other GH-releasing peptides, an action on both the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus has been hypothesized. In the present study, we evaluated the modulation of GH-releasing activity of hexarelin in man. In a first experiment conducted on 6 healthy male volunteers, we studied the interaction of the maximally effective intravenous dose of hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg i.v.) with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH, 2 micrograms/kg i.v.) and somatostatin (2 micrograms/kg/h i.v.). In a second experiment involving another 6 male subjects, we evaluated the interaction of hexarelin with neuroactive substances, such as pirenzepine (0.6 mg/kg i.v.), pyridostigmine (120 mg p.o.) and arginine (0.5 g/kg i.v.), thought to modulate endogenous somatostatin secretion. Hexarelin induced a higher increase in GH levels as compared to GHRH (integrated output calculated as area under the curve AUC0-120 4,693 +/- 691 vs. 1,494 +/- 102 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.01). Coadministration of hexarelin and GHRH produced a higher GH response than hexarelin alone (AUC0-120 7,395 +/- 450 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.05). Somatostatin abolished the GH response to GHRH (AUC0-120 363 +/- 89 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.01), while it only blunted that to hexarelin (AUC0-120 1,314 +/- 297 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Activity of GH/IGF-I axis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

There is evidence showing that GH and IGF‐I have specific receptors in the heart and that these hormones are able to promote cardiac remodelling and inotropism. It has been reported that patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) benefit from treatment with rhGH showing a striking increase in cardiac contractility. However, until now, the activity of GH/IGF‐I axis in DCM has never been clearly assessed.

Metabolic modulation of the growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin in man☆

Hexarelin (His-D-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) is a new potent synthetic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide. The mechanism of action of hexarelin in man has never been evaluated. Hexarelin may act directly on specific pituitary receptors and indirectly on the hypothalamus. To elucidate its mechanism of action in man, we studied the interaction of hexarelin with glucose and free fatty acids (FFA), two metabolic factors known to inhibit both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulated GH secretion. Glucose is thought to inhibit GH secretion via stimulation of endogenous somatostatin release, whereas FFA could also act directly on somatotrope cells. Therefore, we investigated the effect of oral glucose (100 g) and lipid-heparin infusion (250 mL of a 10% lipid solution + 2,500 U heparin) on the GH response to a maximal dose (2 micrograms/kg intravenously [IV]) of hexarelin or GHRH in six normal men. Hexarelin elicited a clear-cut GH response (mean +/- SEM; peak, 62.6 +/- 8.0 micrograms/L) that was higher (P < .01) than that observed after GHRH (peak, 19.8 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L). Although similar increases in plasma glucose were observed with the two peptides, oral glucose almost abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 5.6 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 38.4 +/- 7.9 micrograms/L, P < .05). Similarly, lipid-heparin infusion nearly abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 4.9 +/- 1.0 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 34.2 +/- 4.5 micrograms/L, P < .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ageing, growth hormone and physical performance.

Human ageing is associated to a declining activity of the GH/IGF-I axis and to several changes in body composition, function and metabolism which show strict similarities with those of younger adults with pathological GH deficiency. The age-related changes of the GH/IGF-I axis activity are mainly dependent on age-related variations in the hypothalamic control of somatotroph function, which is also affected by changes in peripheral hormones and metabolic input. The term “somatopause” indicates the potential link between the age-related decline in GH and IGF-I levels and changes in body composition, structural functions and metabolism which characterise ageing. Physical exercise is an important environmental regulator of the GH/IGF-I axis activity. Increased physical fitness and regular training increase GH production in adults, while the GH response to aerobic or resistance exercise is reduced with age. In older subjects regular exercise has the potential to improve overall fitness and quality of life and is also associated to decreased morbidity and increased longevity. Similar effects are seen following GH therapy in adult deficiency. This assumption led to clinical trials focusing on rhGH and/or rhIGF-I as potential anabolic drug interventions in elderly subjects. To restore the activity of GH/IGF-I axis with anabolic, anti-ageing purposes, attention has been also paid to GH-releasing molecules such as GHRH, orally active synthetic GH-secretagogues (GHS) and, more recently, to the endogenous natural GHS, ghrelin, which exerts several important biological actions, including the regulation of metabolic balance and orexigenic effects. At present, however, there is no definite evidence that “frail” elderly subjects really benefit from restoring GH and IGF-I levels within the young adult range by treatment with rhGH, rhIGF-I, GHRH or GHS. In this article the alteration of the GH/IGF-I axis activity during ageing is revised taking into account the role of physical activity as a regulator of the axis function and considering the effects of the restoration of GH and IGF-I circulating levels on body composition and physical performance. 2003, Editrice Kurtis

Endocrine and Non-Endocrine Activities of Growth Hormone Secretagogues in Humans

Growth hormone (GH) secretagogues (GHS) are synthetic peptidyl and non-peptidyl molecules which possess strong, dose-dependent and reproducible GH releasing effects as well as significant prolactin (PRL) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) releasing effects. The neuroendocrine activities of GHS are mediated by specific receptors mainly present at the pituitary and hypothalamic level but also elsewhere in the central nervous system. GHS release GH via actions at the pituitary and (mainly) the hypothalamic level, probably acting on GH releasing hormone (GHRH) secreting neurons and/or as functional somatostatin antagonists. GHS release more GH than GHRH and the coadministration of these peptides has a synergistic effect but these effects need the integrity of the hypothalamo-pituitary unit. The GH releasing effect of GHS is generally gender-independent and undergoes marked age-related variations reflecting age-related changes in the neural control of anterior pituitary function. The PRL releasing activity of GHS probably comes from direct pituitary action, which indeed is slight and independent of both age and gender. The acute stimulatory effect of GHS on ACTH/cortisol secretion is similar to that of corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and arginine vasopressin (AVP). In physiological conditions, the ACTH releasing activity of GHS is mediated by central mechanisms, at least partially, independent of both CRH and AVP but probably involving GABAergic mechanisms. The ACTH releasing activity of GHS is gender-independent and undergoes peculiar age-related variations showing a trend towards increase in ageing. GHS possess specific receptors also at the peripheral levels in endocrine and non-endocrine human tissues. Cardiac receptors are specific for peptidyl GHS and probably mediate GH-independent cardiotropic activities both in animals and in humans.

Age-related Variations in the Neuroendocrine Control, More Than Impaired Receptor Sensitivity, Cause The Reduction in the GH-releasing Activity of GHRPs in Human Aging

The mechanisms underlying the reduction in the GH-releasing activity of GHRPs in aging are still unclear. Aim of our study was to verify in man whether age-related impairment of the neurohormonal control of GH secretion and/or receptor alterations are involved in the reduced GH response to GHRPs in aging. To this goal, in 16 normal elderly subjects (E, 66–81 yr) and 12 young controls (Y, 24–28 yr) we studied the effects of 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 μg/kg iv Hexarelin (HEX), a synthetic hexapeptide, or GHRH, as well as the interaction among HEX (2.0 μg/kg), GHRH (2.0 μg/kg) and arginine (ARG, 0.5 gr/kg) on GH secretion. In Y the GH response to increasing doses of HEX (1.0 vs. 2.0 vs. 3.0 μg/kg; AUC0;v–120 ± SEM: 1728.4 ± 406.4 vs. 2265.9 ± 298.4 vs. 2934.3 ± 482.2 μg//L/h, p < 0.05 for 1.0 vs. 2.0 μg/kg) and GHRH (649.6 ± 111.4 vs. 792.2 ± 117.6 vs. 1402.6 ± 363.0 μg/L/h) showed a progressive increase. Two μg/kg HEX and 1 μg/kg GHRH were the maximal effective doses. Similarly, in E the GH response to increasing doses of HEX (336.7 ± 50.0 vs. 742.8 ± 157.9 vs. 1205.1 ± 178.1 μg/L/h, p < 0.05 for 1.0 vs. 2 μg/kg, p < 0.001 for 1.0 vs. 3.0 μg/kg and p < 0.03 for 2.0 vs. 3.0 μg/kg) and GHRH (183.8 ± 27.3 vs. 260.9 ± 17.3 vs. 356.1 ± 46.3 μg/L/h, p < 0.005 for 1.0 vs. 3.0 μg/kg and p < 0.05 for 2.0 vs. 3.0 μg/kg) showed a progressive increase. In E the GH response to 3 μg/kg HEX or GHRH were clearly higher than those to 2 μg/kg. However, at each dose the GH responses to HEX or GHRH in E were lower (p < 0.05) than those in Y. In Y the GH response to HEX + GHRH was synergistical (4259.2 ± 308.0 μg/L/h, p < 0.05). ARG strikingly potentiated the GHRH-induced GH rise (2640.8 ± 273.6 μg/L/h, p < 0.01) but not the HEX-induced one (2371.7 ± 387.2 μg/L/h) as well as the synergistical effect of HEX and GHRH (4009.1 ± 360.8 μg/L/h). In E the GH response to HEX and GHRH was still synergistical (1947.7 ± 306.0 μg/L/h, p < 0.05) but these responses were lower than those in young (p < 0.01). On the other hand, in E ARG restored the GH response to GHRH (1858.9 ± 172.8 μg/L/h, p < 0.01) and even those to HEX (2069.5 ± 528.7 μg/L/h, p < 0.01) and HEX + GHRH (4406.0 ± 1079.2 μg/L/h, p < 0.05). Our present results indicate that the impairment of GHRP and GHRH receptor activity may have a role in the reduction of the somatotrope responsiveness in aging. However, the age-related reduction in the GH-releasing activity of GHRPs seems mainly dependent on age-related variations in the neural control, i.e. concomitant GHRH hypoactivity and somatostatinergic hyperactivity.

Effects of Dexamethasone and Alprazolam, a Benzodiazepine, on the Stimulatory Effect of Hexarelin, a Synthetic GHRP, on ACTH, Cortisol and GH Secretion in Humans

Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic GHRP which acts on specific receptors at both the pituitary and the hypothalamic level to stimulate GH release both in animals and in humans. Like other GHRPs, HEX possesses also acute ACTH and cortisol-releasing activity similar to that of hCRH. The mechanisms underlying the stimulatory effect of GHRPs on hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis are still unclear, although a CNS-mediated action has been demonstrated. In 6 normal healthy young women (26–34 years) we studied the effects on ACTH and cortisol secretion of HEX (2.0 µg/kg i.v. at 0 min) alone and preceded by dexamethasone (DEXA, 1 mg p.o. at 23.00 h on the previous night) or alprazolam (ALP, 0.02 mg/kg p.o. at –90 min), a benzodiazepine which binds to GABA receptors and possesses CRH-mediated inhibitory activity on HPA axis. ACTH and cortisol secretion after saline administration as well as the GH response to HEX alone and preceded by DEXA or ALP were also studied. HEX administration elicited an increase in ACTH (peak vs. baseline, mean ± SEM: 28.0 ± 6.7 vs. 11.7 ± 2.2 pg/ml, p < 0.05) and cortisol secretion (162.6 ± 15.0 vs. 137.7 ± 12.6 µg/l, p < 0.05). DEXA pretreatment strongly inhibited basal ACTH (3.2 ± 0.7 pg/ml, p < 0.01) and cortisol levels (11.3 ± 2.5 µg/l, p < 0.001) and abolished the ACTH and cortisol responses to HEX (3.6 ± 0.9 pg/ml, p < 0.01 and 10.7 ± 2.0 µg/l, p < 0.001), respectively. On the other hand, ALP pretreatment did not significantly modify basal ACTH (7.9 ± 2.0 pg/ml) and cortisol levels (127.6 ± 14.5 µg/l) but abolished the HEX-induced ACTH and cortisol secretions (8.6 ± 2.4 pg/ml, p < 0.05 and 111.0 ± 6.0 µg/l, p < 0.05), respectively. ACTH and cortisol levels after HEX when preceded by ALP overlapped with those recorded during saline. HEX induced a clear GH response (peak at 15 min vs. baseline: 65.5 ± 20.5 vs. 2.2 ± 0.7 µg/l, p < 0.03) which was blunted by ALP (peak at 15 min: 21.5 ± 5.5 µg/l, p < 0.05) while it was not modified by DEXA pretreatment (78.7 ± 7.6 µg/l). In conclusion, our present data demonstrate that the ACTH- and cortisol-releasing effect of HEX is abolished by either dexamethasone or alprazolam, a benzodiazepine, which is even able to blunt the GH-releasing activity of the hexapeptide. These findings suggest that, in physiological conditions, the stimulatory effect of GHRPs on HPA axis is sensitive to the negative glucocorticoid feedback and could be mediated by GABAergic mechanisms; the latter seem also involved in the GH-releasing activity of GHRPs.

Obese patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome show a peculiar alteration of the corticotroph but not of the thyrotroph and lactotroph function

objective  Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is strongly associated with obesity (OB) and is characterized by several changes in endocrine functions, e.g. GH/IGF‐I axis, adrenal and thyroid activity. It is still unclear whether these alterations simply reflect overweight or include peculiar hypoxia‐induced hormonal alterations. Hormonal evaluations have been generally performed in basal conditions but we have recently reported that OSAS is characterized by a more severe reduction of the GH releasable pool in comparison to simple obesity. We aimed to extend our evaluation of anterior pituitary function to corticotroph, thyrotroph and lactotroph secretion under dynamic testing in OSAS in comparison with simply obese and normal subjects.