F. Valduga

Immunoreactivity for thyroid transcription factor-1 in stage I non-small cell carcinomas of the lung

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is a nuclear protein regulating the transcriptional activity of lung-specific genes in the normal and neoplastic bronchioloalveolar cells. It has been implicated in the normal growth and development of the lung, and the disruption of the TTF-1 locus leads to neonatal death with pulmonary hypoplasia. We evaluated retrospectively the prevalence and clinical significance of TTF-1 immunoreactivity in 222 patients with stage I non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with a follow-up time of at least 5 years, and we investigated its relationship with other markers of tumor growth, namely cell proliferation and angiogenesis. TTF-1 immunoreactivity was documented by using the commercially available monoclonal antibody 8G7G3/1 in 72% of 97 adenocarcinomas, 5% of 119 squamous cell carcinomas, and in the glandular component of two adenosquamous carcinomas. Four large cell carcinomas were completely unreactive. In adenocarcinomas, but not squamous cell carcinomas, TTF-1 immunoreactivity correlated significantly with microvessel density (p = 0.04) and inversely with the tumor proliferation fraction assessed by Ki-67 immunostaining (p = 0.03). Also, TTF-1-immunoreactive adenocarcinomas showed a trend for a size less than 3 cm (p = 0.08). TTF-1 expression was not related to specific growth patterns, tumor grade, or tumor cell typing. TTF-1 immunoreactivity did not significantly affect patient survival, although patients with more than 75% immunoreactive neoplastic cells showed a trend for longer overall and disease-free survival. Our findings suggest that TTF-1 could be involved in the development of small pulmonary adenocarcinomas, but it has not prognostic implications in patients with stage I NSCLC.

Clinical outcomes in patients receiving three lines of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from a large patient cohort

AIM A number of targeted therapies (TTs) are effective in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but clinical outcomes with the sequential use of three TTs have been poorly investigated, this study evaluates their outcome. METHODS Patients with clear cells mRCC treated with three TTs were retrospectively studied. Therapies were classified as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi). Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and total PFS (tPFS)--defined as the time from start of first-line to progression on third-line treatment--were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and curves were compared with log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 2065 patients with mRCC were consecutively treated with first-line TT in 23 centres in Italy. Overall 281/2065 patients (13%) were treated with three TTs. Median OS and tPFS were 44.7 and 34.1 months, respectively and were longer in patients receiving the sequence vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi)-VEGFi-mTORi compared with those receiving VEGFi-mTORi-VEGFi with a statistical difference in OS (50.7 versus 37.8 months, p = 0.004; 36.5 versus 29.3 months, p = 0.059, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Few patients received three lines of TTs. The sequence VEGFi-VEGFi-mTORi was associated with improved survival with respect to VEGFi-mTORi-VEGFi and primary resistance to first-line was a negative predictive and prognostic factor.

Phase I study of gemcitabine and radiotherapy plus cisplatin after transurethral resection as conservative treatment for infiltrating bladder cancer

PURPOSE Although the use of radical transurethral resection followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy leads to a similar survival rate to that achieved after cystectomy, the number of long-term survivors is low in both cases. An improvement may be obtained by adding a new drug, such as gemcitabine, which is active in bladder cancer and acts as a radiosensitizer. However, because gemcitabine may be very toxic when associated with radiotherapy, we designed this dose-finding study in an attempt to find the dose that can be safely added to radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients treated with transurethral resection for infiltrating bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS After undergoing macroscopically complete transurethral resections for transitional carcinoma of the bladder, patients staged pT2 or higher and without distant metastases concurrently received 54 Gy of fractionated radiotherapy over 6 weeks with cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) q.3 w), starting on Day 1 of radiotherapy. Concomitant gemcitabine was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 q.3 w for 2 cycles at a dose of 200 mg/m(2), escalated to 500 mg/m(2), with a 100 mg/m(2) increase at each dose level. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the dose of gemcitabine associated with dose-limiting toxic effects (febrile neutropenia, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Grade 3 or 4 enteric toxicity, or Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity) in 33% of the patients treated at that dose level. Six to 8 weeks after completing the therapy, the patients underwent cystoscopic reevaluation with multiple biopsies of the initial tumor site. RESULTS Of our consecutive series of 16 patients, 5 received a gemcitabine dose of 200 mg/m(2)/week, 3 a dose of 300 mg/m(2)/week, 3 a dose of 400 mg/m(2)/week, and 5 a dose of 500 mg/m(2)/week for 6 weeks. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed at doses of up to 400 mg/m(2)/week. At the dose 500 mg/m(2)/week, 1 patient experienced an intestinal perforation that recovered after surgery, and another suddenly died after developing Grade 3 untreated diarrhea in the last treatment week. All of the 15 evaluable patients were microscopically disease free at the cystoscopic reevaluation; furthermore, the posttreatment computed tomography scans did not reveal any distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS After transurethral resection for the conservative treatment of infiltrating bladder cancer, gemcitabine doses of up to 400 mg/m(2)/week seem to be safe in combination with cisplatin and radiotherapy in organ-sparing management. On the basis of the promising results of this Phase I study, we are currently conducting a Phase II trial to verify the possible improvement in local control resulting from the addition of gemcitabine.

Docetaxel, with or without estramustine phosphate, as first-line chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer: results of a multicentre, randomized phase II trial.

To report the results of a randomized phase II trial of docetaxel with and without estramustine phosphate (EP) in patients with hormone‐refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).

Multiple Rechallenges for Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Responding to First-line Docetaxel: Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors

OBJECTIVE To describe the feasibility and efficacy of multiple sequential rechallenges and analyze the predictive factors that may aid in selecting patients who are more likely to respond. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility and activity of a single docetaxel rechallenge in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), thus providing an additional opportunity for treatment in docetaxel-sensitive CRPC patients in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS CRPC patients who completed first-line docetaxel therapy without disease progression have been offered a docetaxel rechallenge, and the responders have undergone further rechallenges until the appearance of docetaxel resistance. We assessed their clinical outcomes and evaluated all the variables potentially capable of predicting the response to rechallenge by means of uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Forty-six consecutive patients underwent 92 rechallenges. The overall biochemical response rate (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] reduction >50%) was 66%. Median overall survival was 32 months with a projected 2-year overall survival from the first docetaxel administration of 77.5%. Multivariate analysis showed that the time slope-log PSA, the time from the previous cycle, and the response to the previous cycle were predictive of the response to a rechallenge. CONCLUSION A docetaxel rechallenge may be safely repeated several times in CRPC patients and in selected patients could improve disease control. The predictive factors found in our analysis may help select the most appropriate strategy in the light of the availability of active second-line drugs.

Estramustine plus docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer resistant to docetaxel alone

OBJECTIVE Although docetaxel (DOC) plus prednisone is currently the treatment of choice for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), no standard therapy is available for those patients who progress during DOC treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of estramustine (E) can overcome DOC resistance. METHODS Patients who had not responded to DOC in a previous randomised phase II trial received a one-hour intravenous infusion of DOC 70 mg/m(2) on day 2 in combination with oral E 840 mg/day divided into three daily administrations on days 1-5. The primary endpoint was a >50% decrease in PSA; the secondary endpoints were biochemical progression-free survival, overall survival, the objective response rate, and toxicity. RESULTS A biochemical response was observed in 52% of the 25 patients evaluable for response. The only grade 4 event was a cerebral stroke that occurred a few days after the administration of the first treatment course. Treatment discontinuation due to worsened compliance was observed in the patients who received a higher cumulative number of courses. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the addition of E may be useful in selected HRPC patients resistant to DOC alone.

Late events and clinical prognostic factors in stage I non small cell lung cancer

UNLABELLED Two hundred and forty six consecutive patients with pathological T1-2 N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer were reviewed. Median follow-up was 79 months (range 3-144). So far, 110 patients have relapsed (45.6%). Actuarial median time to recurrence was 26 months in the 45 patients with thoracic relapses versus 12 months of the 65 metastatic (P<0.001). Disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 5 and 10-year were 62 and 49%, respectively. Fifteen percent of the patients (20) disease-free at 5 years relapsed in the following years; of them, 40% (8) underwent new surgery. Extrapulmonary malignancies other than lung cancer occurred in 27 patients (11.2%), mostly (21) after the diagnosis of lung cancer; in this subset median time to occurrence was 52 months (range 8-105) with a rate of occurrence remaining constant over the years after operation. Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that large cell histology, lower performance status (PS) and presence of symptoms were unfavourable prognostic factors both for DFS and survival. IN CONCLUSION this study found a non-negligible proportion of late events and identified some prognostic factors (PS, presence of symptoms and large cell histology) using information obtained from routine data.

Persistent excess mortality from lung cancer in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer, disease-free after 5 years

Among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), those with pathological stage I have the best expectation of survival; however, survival is reduced to less than 50% in the long term. At present, it is unclear when patients can be reasonably defined as cured, and if they experience a higher incidence of malignant/nonmalignant diseases and a lower expectation of survival than the general population. A total of 134 stage I NSCLC patients, who had undergone resection at the Thoracic Surgery Unit of the General Hospital of Verona (north-eastern Italy) from October 1987 to December 1993, were still disease-free at 5 years. These subjects were further followed up, and morbidity and mortality rates were compared with those recorded in the general population of the same geographical area. The standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) for all malignancies and for lung cancer were higher than expected (2.39, 95% CI=1.6–3.5, P<0.001; 10.1, 95% CI=6.2–15.6, P<0.0001, respectively). The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) was also significantly increased (1.73, 95% CI=1.1–2.6, P=0.013). The excess mortality could be entirely explained by an increase in mortality from lung cancer (5.7, 95% CI=2.8–10.1, P<0.0001). This study shows that patients, resected for pathological stage I NSCLC and tumour-free after 5 years, have a higher incidence of new lung cancer compared with the general population, which in turn determines an excess in all-cause mortality in the following years.

A phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

Background We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal formulation of doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients. Methods Thirty patients were included in the study after having obtained an informed consent. Their main characteristics were: median age, 64 years (range, 45-80), ECOG performance status 0 in 17 patients (56%), 1 in 11 patients (36%) and 2 in 2 patients (6.6%). Eighteen patients had metastatic disease and 12 locally advanced disease. All patients were pretreated with a platinum-based chemotherapy: 3 were considered refractory to platinum (progression or stable disease), 2 were platinum resistant (relapse <12 months), and 7 were platinum sensitive (relapse ≥12 months). Treatment consisted of liposomal doxorubicin, 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Results The overall response rate was 26.6%, with 2 complete responses and 6 partial responses lasting 3.5 months. The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity was 23.3% for neutropenia, 10% for mucositis and 10% for plantar-palmar erythrodysesthesia. Median survival was 12+ months (range, 2-26+). Conclusions Liposomal doxorubicin appears to be a moderately active drug in pretreated patients, and its activity seems to be similar to that reported for other active regimens in terms of response rate. The toxicological profile of liposomal doxorubicin suggests that it may be combined with other drugs in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.

Induction TPF followed by concomitant treatment versus concomitant treatment alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer. A phase II–III trial

Background Platinum-based chemoradiation (CCRT) is the standard treatment for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous-Cell Carcinoma (LAHNSCC). Cetuximab/RT (CET/RT) is an alternative treatment option to CCRT. The efficacy of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiation compared to chemoradiation alone has not been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. The goals of this phase II-III trial were to assess: (i) the overall survival (OS) of IC versus no-induction (no-IC) and (ii) the Grade 3-4 in-field mucosal toxicity of CCRT versus CET/RT. The present paper focuses on the analysis of efficacy. Materials and methods Patients with LAHNSCC were randomized to receive concomitant treatment alone [CCRT (Arm A1) or CET/RT (Arm A2)], or three cycles of induction docetaxel/cisplatin/5 fluorouracil (TPF) followed by CCRT (Arm B1) or followed by CET/RT (Arm B2). The superiority hypothesis of OS comparison of IC versus no-IC (Arms B1 + B2 versus A1 + A2) required 204 deaths to detect an absolute 3-year OS difference of 12% (HR 0.675, with 80% power at two-sided 5% significance level). Results 414 out of 421 patients were finally analyzed: 206 in the IC and 208 in the no-IC arm. Six patients were excluded because of major violation and one because of metastatic disease at diagnosis. With a median follow-up of 44.8 months, OS was significantly higher in the IC arm (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.97; P = 0.031). Complete Responses (P = 0.0028), Progression Free Survival (P = 0.013) and the Loco-regional Control (P = 0.036) were also significantly higher in the IC arm. Compliance to concomitant treatments was not affected by induction TPF. Conclusions IC followed by concomitant treatment improved the outcome of patients with LAHNSCC without compromising compliance to the concomitant treatments. The degree of the benefit of IC could be different according to the type of the subsequent concomitant strategy. Clinical Trial Number NCT01086826, www.clinicaltrials.gov.