Viviana Murgia

Quantitative evaluation of oxidative stress, chronic inflammatory indices and leptin in cancer patients: correlation with stage and performance status.

In advanced cancer patients, the oxidative stress could take place either at the onset of disease or as a function of disease progression. To test this hypothesis, the following parameters were investigated: the erythrocyte activity of the enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), the serum activity of glutathione reductase (GR) and the serum total antioxidant status (TAS). The total antioxidant capacity of plasma LMWA was evaluated by the cyclic voltammetry methodology. We further determined the serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL‐6 and TNFα), IL‐2, leptin and C‐reactive protein (CRP). All of these parameters have been correlated with the most important clinical indices of patients such as Stage of disease, ECOG PS and clinical response. Eighty‐two advanced stage cancer patients and 36 healthy individuals used as controls were included in the study. Our findings show that SOD activity was significantly higher in cancer patients than in controls and GPx activity was significantly lower in cancer patients than in controls. Serum values of IL‐6, TNFα and CRP were significantly higher in patients than in controls. Serum leptin values of cancer patients were significantly lower than controls. SOD activity increased significantly from Stage II/ECOG 0‐1 to Stage IV/ECOG 0–1, whereas it decreased significantly in Stage IV/ECOG 3. GPx activity decreased significantly in Stage IV/ECOG 2–3. An inverse correlation between ECOG PS and serum leptin levels was found. Serum levels of IL‐2 decreased from Stage II/ECOG 0–1 to Stage IV/ECOG 2–3. A direct correlation between Stage/ECOG PS and serum levels of both IL‐6 and CRP was observed. Cisplatin administration induced a significant increase of GPx after 24 hr. In conclusion, this is the first study that shows that several “biological” parameters of cancer patients such as antioxidant enzyme activity, cytokines, leptin and CRP strictly correlate with the most important clinical parameters of disease such as Stage and ECOG PS.

Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant mechanisms and serum cytokine levels in cancer patients: impact of an antioxidant treatment

Objective. So far, it is not well established whether oxidative stress found in cancer patients results from an increased production of oxidants in the body or from a failure of physiological antioxidant systems. To further investigate this question we have assessed the blood levels of reactive oxygen species as a marker of free radicals producing oxidative stress and the most relevant of the physiological body enzymes counteracting reactive oxygen species, namely glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase. Serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines and IL‐2 were also investigated. All these parameters were studied in relation to the clinically most important index of disease progression, namely Performance Status (ECOG PS). We also tested the reducing ability of different antioxidant agents on reactive oxygen species levels by measuring the increase in glutathione peroxidase activity, and the reduction of serum levels of IL‐6 and TNF. Design, setting and subjects. We carried out an open non randomized study on 28 advanced stage cancer patients (stage III, 10.7%, and stage IV, 89.3%) with tumours at different (8) sites: all were hospitalized in the Medical Oncology Dept, University of Cagliari Interventions. The patients were divided into 5 groups and a different antioxidant treatment was administered to each group. The selected antioxidants were: alpha lipoic acid 200 mg/day orally, N‐acetylcysteine 1800 mg/day i.v. or carboxycysteine‐lysine salt 2.7 g/day orally, amifostine 375 mg/day i.v., reduced glutathione 600 mg/day i.v., vitamin A 30000 IU/day orally plus vitamin E 70 mg/day orally plus Vitamin C 500 mg/day orally. The antioxidant treatment was administered for 10 consecutive days. Results. Our results show that all but one of the antioxidants tested were effective in reducing reactive oxygen species levels and 2 of them (cysteine‐containing compounds and amifostine) had the additional effect of increasing glutathione peroxidase activity. Comprehensively, the “antioxidant treatment” was found to have an effect both on reactive oxygen species levels and glutathione peroxidase activity. The antioxidant treatment also reduced serum levels of IL‐6 and TNF. Patients in both ECOG PS 0‐1 and ECOG PS 2‐3 responded to antioxidant treatment.

Activity of Pemetrexed on brain metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

UNLABELLED Brain metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer are usually associated with poor prognosis and up to now chemotherapy has shown a modest activity upon cerebral localizations. We investigated the role of Pemetrexed, a new, well tolerated multi-target antifolate, on brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS We collected 39 patients with evidence of cerebral nervous system (CNS) localizations from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) before starting treatment with Pemetrexed as second-line or further-line therapy. RESULTS We confirmed the good tolerability of Pemetrexed even in that setting of patients and we reported a progressive disease (PD) in 12 patients (30.8%), a stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR) in 12 (30.8%) and 15 (38.4%) patients respectively, with an overall clinical benefit obtained in 69% of patients. The cerebral response to Pemetrexed was interesting with a cerebral radiological benefit obtained in 32 patients (82%), while 7 patients only showed brain progressive disease. Overall median survival was 10 months. All irradiation-naïve patients and those with clear radiological evidence of cerebral progression after brain radiotherapy and before Pemetrexed, overall 22 patients, were included in one group, in order to avoid overlapping effects between brain radiotherapy and Pemetrexed over CNS localizations. Within that setting, we demonstrated an overall clinical benefit (SD+PR) and cerebral benefit in 63% and 68%, of patients respectively. Distribution of patients by overall response to Pemetrexed and CNS response was highly suggestive of activity of Pemetrexed on brain metastases. CONCLUSION We demonstrated the good tolerability of Pemetrexed even in patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastases, and we found a very good overall response rate with evidence of activity on brain localizations.

Multiple Rechallenges for Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Responding to First-line Docetaxel: Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors

OBJECTIVE To describe the feasibility and efficacy of multiple sequential rechallenges and analyze the predictive factors that may aid in selecting patients who are more likely to respond. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility and activity of a single docetaxel rechallenge in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), thus providing an additional opportunity for treatment in docetaxel-sensitive CRPC patients in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS CRPC patients who completed first-line docetaxel therapy without disease progression have been offered a docetaxel rechallenge, and the responders have undergone further rechallenges until the appearance of docetaxel resistance. We assessed their clinical outcomes and evaluated all the variables potentially capable of predicting the response to rechallenge by means of uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Forty-six consecutive patients underwent 92 rechallenges. The overall biochemical response rate (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] reduction >50%) was 66%. Median overall survival was 32 months with a projected 2-year overall survival from the first docetaxel administration of 77.5%. Multivariate analysis showed that the time slope-log PSA, the time from the previous cycle, and the response to the previous cycle were predictive of the response to a rechallenge. CONCLUSION A docetaxel rechallenge may be safely repeated several times in CRPC patients and in selected patients could improve disease control. The predictive factors found in our analysis may help select the most appropriate strategy in the light of the availability of active second-line drugs.

Development and validation of a microRNA-based signature (MiROvaR) to predict early relapse or progression of epithelial ovarian cancer: a cohort study

BACKGROUND Risk of relapse or progression remains high in the treatment of most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, and development of a molecular predictor could be a valuable tool for stratification of patients by risk. We aimed to develop a microRNA (miRNA)-based molecular classifier that can predict risk of progression or relapse in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS We analysed miRNA expression profiles in three cohorts of samples collected at diagnosis. We used 179 samples from a Multicenter Italian Trial in Ovarian cancer trial (cohort OC179) to develop the model and 263 samples from two cancer centres (cohort OC263) and 452 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas epithelial ovarian cancer series (cohort OC452) to validate the model. The primary clinical endpoint was progression-free survival, and we adapted a semi-supervised prediction method to the miRNA expression profile of OC179 to identify miRNAs that predict risk of progression. We assessed the independent prognostic role of the model using multivariable analysis with a Cox regression model. FINDINGS We identified 35 miRNAs that predicted risk of progression or relapse and used them to create a prognostic model, the 35-miRNA-based predictor of Risk of Ovarian Cancer Relapse or progression (MiROvaR). MiROvaR was able to classify patients in OC179 into a high-risk group (89 patients; median progression-free survival 18 months [95% CI 15-22]) and a low-risk group (90 patients; median progression-free survival 38 months [24-not estimable]; hazard ratio [HR] 1·85 [1·29-2·64], p=0·00082). MiROvaR was a significant predictor of progression in the two validation sets (OC263 HR 3·16, 95% CI 2·33-4·29, p<0·0001; OC452 HR 1·39, 95% CI 1·11-1·74, p=0·0047) and maintained its independent prognostic effect when adjusted for relevant clinical covariates using multivariable analyses (OC179: adjusted HR 1·48, 95% CI 1·03-2·13, p=0·036; OC263: adjusted HR 3·09 [2·24-4·28], p<0·0001; and OC452: HR 1·41 [1·11-1·79], p=0·0047). INTERPRETATION MiROvaR is a potential predictor of epithelial ovarian cancer progression and has prognostic value independent of relevant clinical covariates. MiROvaR warrants further investigation for the development of a clinical-grade prognostic assay. FUNDING AIRC and CARIPLO Foundation.

A randomized multicenter phase III study comparing weekly versus every 3 weeks carboplatin (C) plus paclitaxel (P) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC): Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer (MITO-7)--European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups (ENGOT-ov-10) and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) trial.

LBA5501 Background: Three-weekly (3w) CP is standard first-line chemotherapy for AOC pts. Weekly (w) P combined with 3w C prolonged PFS and OS in a JGOG phase III trial. MITO-7 is an academic randomized phase III study, comparing 3w vs. w CP. METHODS AOC chemonaive pts, stage IC-IV, age≤75, ECOG PS≤2, were randomized to 3wCP (C AUC6 + P 175mg/m², d1q21) for 6 cycles or to wCP (C AUC2 + P 60mg/m²) for 18 administrations. Coprimary endpoints were PFS and quality of life (QoL), measured by FACT-O and FACT/GOG-Ntx. With 80% power in detecting HR of 0.75, 2-sided α=0.05, 383 events were needed for PFS analysis. The arms were compared with a log-rank test and in a Cox model adjusted by stage, PS, residual disease, age and size of institution, following intention-to-treat. QoL was measured at baseline and weekly for 9 wks. Interaction between arm and QoL time was tested in a linear mixed model. Toxicity was coded by NCI-CTCAE v3.0. RESULTS 822 pts were enrolled by MITO, MANGO, and GINECO. Median age was 60; stage III (66%) and IV (18%) were prevalent. As of March 18, 2013, with median follow-up 20 months, 410 PFS events were recorded. Median PFS was 18.8 months with wCP and 16.5 months with 3wCP (HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.72-1.06, p=0.18). Lack of significant difference was confirmed (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.71-1.05) in Cox model. For all scores, QoL course was significantly different between arms (p<0.0001). With 3wCP, QoL scores clearly worsened after each chemotherapy course (weeks 1, 4, 7), whilst with wCP, after a small and transient worsening at week 1, scores remained stable. Considering severe grades (≥3), wCP produced significantly less neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, renal toxicity, and neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS Compared to standard CP every 3 weeks, weekly CP did not demonstrate a significant benefit in PFS, but was associated with better QoL and toxicity. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT00660842.

Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Efficacy of Platinum-Free Interval Prolongation in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: The MITO-8, MaNGO, BGOG-Ov1, AGO-Ovar2.16, ENGOT-Ov1, GCIG Study.

Purpose Platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) for patients with progressing ovarian cancer (OC) is more effective with a longer time interval from previous platinum treatment (platinum-free interval [PFI]). In 1999, it was hypothesized that prolonging PFI with single-agent non-PBC (NPBC) may offer a strategy to improve overall outcome. MITO-8 aimed to verify this hypothesis commonly used in clinical practice although it has not been prospectively tested. Methods MITO-8 is an open-label, prospective, randomized, superiority trial. Patients with OC who experienced disease progression 6 to 12 months after their last platinum treatment were randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental sequence of NPBC followed by PBC at subsequent relapse or the standard reverse treatment sequence. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. Results Two hundred fifteen patients were enrolled (standard arm [n = 108]; experimental arm [n = 107]). The trial ended before planned because of slow enrollment. PFI was prolonged in the experimental arm (median, 7.8 v 0.01 months). There was no OS benefit in the experimental arm (median, 21.8 v 24.5 months; hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.94; P = .06). Progression-free survival after the sequence was significantly shorter in the experimental arm (median, 12.8 v 16.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.92; P = .025). Global quality-of-life change after three cycles was worse in the experimental arm. Slight differences were observed in the incidence of adverse effects. Conclusion MITO-8 supports the recommendation that PBC not be delayed in favor of an NPBC in patients with partially platinum-sensitive OC. PBC should be used as a control arm in future trials of new drugs in this setting.

Multicenter phase 2 study of combined gemcitabine and epirubicin as second-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Objective: The aim of this phase 2 trial was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of combined gemcitabine (G) and epirubicin (E) as second-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: Treatment with G 1000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) and E 60 mg/m2 (day 1) every 3 weeks for 3 or, in the absence of progression, 6 courses. Results: Fifty patients with advanced ovarian cancer (31 serous, 2 endometrioid, 10 unclassified adenocarcinoma, and 7 other) and a median age of 60 years (range, 38-74 years) were enrolled after giving their informed consent. Performance status according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group was 0 in 29 patients (58%), 1 in 17 patients (34%), and 2 in 4 patients (8%), and the initial stages according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics were I to II in 4 patients (8%), III in 31 patients (62%), and IV in 15 patients (30%). They had previously received a median of 1.5 lines of treatment (range, 1-4). The median platinum-free interval was 5 months (range, 0-12 months): 32 patients had relapse within 6 months and 18 patients had relapse after 6 months. The response rate was 42% (2% complete response and 40% partial response), with a median duration of 7.2 months: the corresponding figures were 37.5% and 5.2 months in the platinum-resistant patients and 50% and 8.8 months in the platinum-sensitive patients. The main grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia (56% of cases). After a median follow-up of 13.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5 months, and median overall survival was 23.5 months. Conclusions: This E + G combination seems to be active and safe in platinum-resistant/refractory patients.

Weekly paclitaxel after first-line failure in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: everyday clinical practice in a single centre.

To assess the activity of weekly paclitaxel (wPCT) in pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). In 2005, we included wPCT 80 mg/m2 for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week interval in our department’s everyday clinical practice guidelines for the second-line (or subsequent) treatment of patients with nonsquamous histologies who have previously received pemetrexed-based treatments and patients with squamous histology. In the absence of clinical evidence of disease progression, patients repeat the pretreatment staging procedures after 16 weeks (two cycles) and, in the absence of disease progression or severe toxicity, continue treatment for a maximum of four courses. Between May 2005 and December 2013, we treated 60 patients (47 in second-line and 13 in third/fourth line), who received a median of two courses (range: 1–4). The most frequent toxicity was grade 1–2 neutropaenia (five patients); only four patients experienced grade 3–4 toxicity. When used as a second-line treatment, wPCT led to a disease control rate of 36.2%, with a median progression-free survival of 3.7 months and a median overall survival of 9.0 months; when used in the third/fourth line, the disease control rate was 41.7%, the median progression-free survival was 5.0 months and the median overall survival was 10.3 months. Our data confirm that wPCT is active and well tolerated in an unselected patient population with aNSCLC and can be considered a valuable alternative to docetaxel in a second-line treatment.

Quality-of-life analysis of the MITO-8, MaNGO, BGOG-Ov1, AGO-Ovar2.16, ENGOT-Ov1, GCIG study comparing platinum-based versus non-platinumbased chemotherapy in patients with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

Background MITO-8 showed that prolonging platinum-free interval by introducing non-platinum-based chemotherapy (NPBC) does not improve prognosis of patients with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Quality of life (QoL) was a secondary outcome. Patients and methods Ovarian cancer patients recurring or progressing 6-12 months after previous platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) were randomized to receive PBC or NPBC as first treatment. QoL was assessed at baseline, third and sixth cycles, with the EORTC C-30 and OV-28 questionnaires. Mean changes and best response were analysed. Progression-free survival, response rate, and toxicity are also reported for proper interpretation of data. All analyses were based on intention-to-treat. Results Out of the 215 patients, 151 (70.2%) completed baseline questionnaire, balanced between the arms; thereafter, missing rate was higher in the NPBC arm. At mean change analysis, C30 scores were prevalently worse in the NPBC than PBC arm, statistical significance being attained for emotional functioning, global health status/QoL, fatigue, and dyspnoea (effect sizes ranging from 0.30 to 0.51). Conversely, as for OV28 scale, the other chemotherapy side-effects item was significantly worse with PBC at three and six cycles, with a larger effect size (0.70 and 0.54, respectively). At best response analysis, improvement of emotional functioning and pain and worsening of peripheral neuropathy and other chemotherapy side-effects were significantly more frequent in the PBC arm. Progression-free survival (median 9 versus 5 months, P = 0.001) and objective response rate (51.6% versus 19.4%, P = 0.0001) were significantly better with PBC. Allergy, blood cell count, alopecia, nausea, musculoskeletal, and neurological side-effects were more frequent and severe with PBC; hand-foot skin reaction, rash/desquamation, mucositis, and vascular events were more frequent with NPBC. Conclusion MITO-8 QoL analysis shows that deterioration of some functioning and symptom scales is lower with PBC, with improvement of emotional functioning and pain, despite worsening of toxicity-related items. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00657878.