Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where F. Zuiderveen Borgesius is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by F. Zuiderveen Borgesius.


Internet Policy Review | 2016

Should We Worry About Filter Bubbles

F. Zuiderveen Borgesius; Damian Trilling; Judith Möller; Balázs Bodó; C.H. de Vreese; Natali Helberger

Some fear that personalised communication can lead to information cocoons or filter bubbles. For instance, a personalised news website could give more prominence to conservative or liberal media items, based on the (assumed) political interests of the user. As a result, users may encounter only a limited range of political ideas. We synthesise empirical research on the extent and effects of self-selected personalisation, where people actively choose which content they receive, and pre-selected personalisation, where algorithms personalise content for users without any deliberate user choice. We conclude that at present there is little empirical evidence that warrants any worries about filter bubbles.


Journal of Advertising | 2017

Online Behavioral Advertising: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

Sophie C. Boerman; Sanne Kruikemeier; F. Zuiderveen Borgesius

Advertisers are increasingly monitoring peoples online behavior and using the information collected to show people individually targeted advertisements. This phenomenon is called online behavioral advertising (OBA). Although advertisers can benefit from OBA, the practice also raises concerns about privacy. Therefore, OBA has received much attention from advertisers, consumers, policymakers, and scholars. Despite this attention, there is neither a strong definition of OBA nor a clear accumulation of empirical findings. This article defines OBA and provides an overview of the empirical findings by developing a framework that identifies and integrates all factors that can explain consumer responses toward OBA. The framework suggests that the outcomes of OBA are dependent on advertiser-controlled factors (e.g., the level of personalization) and consumer-controlled factors (e.g., knowledge and perceptions about OBA and individual characteristics). The article also overviews the theoretical positioning of OBA by placing the theories that are used to explain consumers’ responses to OBA in our framework. Finally, we develop a research agenda and discuss implications for policymakers and advertisers.


Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper | 2013

Consent to Behavioural Targeting in European Law - What are the Policy Implications of Insights from Behavioural Economics?

F. Zuiderveen Borgesius

Behavioural targeting is the monitoring of people’s online behaviour to target advertisements to specific individuals. European law requires companies to obtain informed consent of the internet user before they use tracking technologies for behavioural targeting. Other jurisdictions also emphasise the importance of choice for internet users. But many people click ‘I agree’ to any statement that is presented to them. This paper discusses insights from behavioural economics to analyse problems with informed consent to behavioural targeting from a regulatory perspective. What are the policy implications of insights from behavioural economics in the context of behavioural targeting? Two approaches to improve regulation are explored. The first focuses on empowering the individual, for example by making informed consent more meaningful. The second approach focuses on protecting the individual. If aiming to empower people is not the right tactic to protect privacy, maybe specific prohibitions should be introduced.


European Intellectual Property Review | 2013

Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam Cases

S. Kulk; F. Zuiderveen Borgesius


Computer law review international | 2012

Google's dead end, or: on Street View and the right to data protection: an analysis of Google Street View's compatibility with EU data protection law

B. van der Sloot; F. Zuiderveen Borgesius


European Data Protection Law Review | 2017

Tracking Walls, Take-It-Or-Leave-It Choices, the GDPR, and the ePrivacy Regulation

F. Zuiderveen Borgesius; Sanne Kruikemeier; Sophie C. Boerman; Natali Helberger


Archive | 2014

Academics Against Mass Surveillance

N. van Eijk; B. Roessler; F. Zuiderveen Borgesius; M. Oostveen; R.J.J.H. van Son; F. Verkade; M. Vliek; C.A. Alberdingk Thijm; K. Apt; B. Böhler; A. den Boon; K. Breemen; V. Breemen; M. de Goede; S. van Gompel; L. Guibault; Natali Helberger; A.W. Hins; B. Hugenholtz; J.J.C. Kabel; M.B.M. Loos; T. Nijhuis; G. van 't Noordende; R. Peters; Marjoleine Zieck; T. McGonagle; A. Arnbak; Balázs Bodó; Robin Celikates; M.M.M. van Eechoud


Computerrecht | 2011

De meldplicht voor datalekken in de Telecommunicatiewet

F. Zuiderveen Borgesius


Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht & Handelspraktijken | 2016

Mensen aanwijzen maar niet bij naam noemen: behavioural targeting, persoonsgegevens en de nieuwe Privacyverordening

F. Zuiderveen Borgesius


Computerrecht | 2016

Algoritmische verzuiling en filter bubbles: een bedreiging voor de democratie?

F. Zuiderveen Borgesius; Damian Trilling; Judith Möller; Sarah Eskens; Balázs Bodó; C.H. de Vreese; Natali Helberger

Collaboration


Dive into the F. Zuiderveen Borgesius's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. van Eijk

University of Amsterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge