Fabrizio Carinci

A Meta-analysis of Trials on Aldose Reductase Inhibitors in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy is one of the most common and disabling long‐term seque lae of diabetes mellitus. Aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) have been proposed and are increasingly used in many countries for the prevention and treatment of diabetic neuropathy. The aim of this study was to review existing evidence on the effectiveness of ARIs in the treatment of peripheral diabetic neuropathy, with particular reference to the type and clinical relevance of the end point used and to the consistency of results across studies. Thirteen randomized clinical trials (RTCs) comparing ARIs with placebo, published between 1981 and 1993 were included in the meta‐analysis. Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) was the only end point reported in all trials. Treatment effect was thus evaluated in terms of NCV mean difference in four different nerves: median motor, median sensory, peroneal motor, and sural sensory. A statistically significant reduction in decline of median motor NCV was present in the treated group as compared to the control group (mean 0.91 ms−1; 95 % CI 0.41–1.42 ms−1). For peroneal motor, median sensory, and sural sensory nerves results did not show any clear benefit for patients treated with ARIs. When the analysis was limited to trials with at least 1‐year treatment duration, a significant effect was present for peroneal motor NCV (mean 1.24 ms−1; 95 % CI 0.32–2.15 ms−1) and a benefit of borderline statistical significance was also present for median motor NCV (mean 0.69 ms−1; 95% CI −0.07−1.45 ms−1). A heterogeneous picture emerged when looking at the results of different studies and serious inconsistencies were also present in the direction of treatment effects among nerves in the same studies. Although the results of 1‐year treatment on motor NCV seem encouraging, the uncertainty about the reliability of the end‐point employed and the short treatment duration do not allow any clear conclusion about the efficacy of ARIs in the treatment of peripheral diabetic neuropathy.

Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators

OBJECTIVE To review and update the conceptual framework, indicator content and research priorities of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Developments (OECD) Health Care Quality Indicators (HCQI) project, after a decade of collaborative work. DESIGN A structured assessment was carried out using a modified Delphi approach, followed by a consensus meeting, to assess the suite of HCQI for international comparisons, agree on revisions to the original framework and set priorities for research and development. SETTING International group of countries participating to OECD projects. PARTICIPANTS Members of the OECD HCQI expert group. RESULTS A reference matrix, based on a revised performance framework, was used to map and assess all seventy HCQI routinely calculated by the OECD expert group. A total of 21 indicators were agreed to be excluded, due to the following concerns: (i) relevance, (ii) international comparability, particularly where heterogeneous coding practices might induce bias, (iii) feasibility, when the number of countries able to report was limited and the added value did not justify sustained effort and (iv) actionability, for indicators that were unlikely to improve on the basis of targeted policy interventions. CONCLUSIONS The revised OECD framework for HCQI represents a new milestone of a long-standing international collaboration among a group of countries committed to building common ground for performance measurement. The expert group believes that the continuation of this work is paramount to provide decision makers with a validated toolbox to directly act on quality improvement strategies.

Risk Factors for Lower Limb Complications in Diabetic Patients

Diabetic lower extremity complications may be influenced by a number of factors, including those related to the interaction between patients and the health-care system. Our objective is to identify risk factors for the development of lower limb complications, by looking for classical clinical variables and those related to quality of care. A case-control study was carried out between December 1993 and June 1994 by interviewing 348 patients with lower-limb diabetic complications and 1050 controls enrolled from 35 diabetes outpatient clinics and 49 general practitioners offices in Italy. Among sociodemographic characteristics associated with increased risk of lower limb complications were male gender [odds ratio (OR) = 2.5, confidence interval (CI) 1.6-3.9], age between 50 and 70 years as opposed to younger than 50 (OR = 3.6, CI 2.1-6.3) and being single as opposed to married (OR = 1.4, CI 1.1-1.8). Among clinical variables, treatment with insulin for IDDM and NIDDM patients was an important predictor of lower extremity complications compared to NIDDM patients not being treated with insulin. Cardio-cerebrovascular disease and presence of diabetic neuropathy were associated with a higher risk of being a case (OR = 1.4, CI 1.2-1.8 and OR = 3.0, CI 2.1-4.2, respectively). Patients who needed help to reach the health facility before the onset of the complications and those who did not attend health facilities regularly were more liable to develop complications (OR = 1.5, CI 1.1-2.2 and OR = 2.0, CI 1.3-3.0, respectively). Patients who had never received educational intervention had a threefold risk of being a case as compared to those who received health information regularly. The study identifies factors most likely to be related to adverse outcome and permits to discriminate between avoidable and unavoidable factors.

Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on gastrointestinal function and length of stay of preterm infants: an exploratory study

BackgroundOrganizational improvement of neonatal intensive care units requires strict monitoring of preterm infants, including routine assessment of physiological functions of the gastrointestinal system and optimized procedures for the definition of appropriate discharge timing.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study on the effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment in a cohort of N = 350 consecutive premature infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit without any major complication between 2005 and 2008. In addition to ordinary care, N = 162 subjects received osteopathic treatment. Endpoints of the study were differences between study and control groups in terms of excessive length of stay and gastrointestinal symptoms, defined as the upper quartiles in the distribution of the overall population. Statistical analysis was based on crude and adjusted odds ratios from multivariate logistic regression.ResultsBaseline characteristics were evenly distributed across treated/control groups, except for the rate of infants unable to be oral fed at admission, significantly higher among those undergoing osteopathic care (p = .03). Osteopathic treatment was significantly associated with a reduced risk of an average daily occurrence of gut symptoms per subject above .44 (OR = 0.45; 0.26-0.74). Gestational age lower or equal to 32 weeks, birth weight lower or equal to 1700 grams and no milk consumption at admission were associated with higher rates of length of stay in the unit of at least 28 days, while osteopathic treatment significantly reduced such risk (OR = 0.22;0.09-0.51).ConclusionsIn a population of premature infants, osteopathic manipulative treatment showed to reduce a high occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms and an excessive length of stay in the NICU. Randomized control studies are needed to generalize these results to a broad population of high risk newborns.

Patterns of Care of an Italian Diabetic Population

We set out to describe patterns of care of an Italian diabetic population, with reference to the recommendations of the St Vincent Declaration. We investigated different aspects of care received by 2707 patients, of whom 2196 in the charge of 35 Diabetes Outpatient Clinics (DOCs) and 511 cared for by 49 General Practitioners (GPs). Data were collected by interviewing the patients, their physicians and by reviewing medical records. Our data show that diabetes care in Italy differs in many aspects from the recommendations of the St Vincent Declaration. Glycated haemoglobin measurement was lacking in 50 % of the patients in the charge of GPs and in 15 % of those attending DOCs. While the control of cardiovascular risk factors was satisfactory, information on albumin excretion was not available in one third of the patients. Overall, 79 % of the patients had had an eye examination in the previous 12 months. More than one‐third of the patients had not received adequate information on different aspects of care, with wide variations according to the setting of care. Forty‐two per cent of the patients attending DOCs and 14 % of those cared for by GPs practised blood glucose self‐monitoring; similarly, insulin therapy self‐management was performed by 50 % and 19 % of the patients attending DOCs and GPs, respectively. Our data call for vigorous efforts aimed at improving the awareness of the potential for reducing major diabetic complications. Therefore, it is essential to promote the incorporation of clearly defined clinical practice guidelines at each level of care.

The effectiveness, safety and epidemiology of the use of acarbose in the treatment of patients with type II diabetes mellitus. A model of medicine-based evidence.

AbstractObjective: To assess the efficacy, safety and extent of perceived indications of acarbose, a new antidiabetic agent, under routine clinical practice conditions in an unselected Northern Italian population of type II diabetic patients. Methods: The study population was assigned to three different groups according to the physicians clinical judgement: group A (acarbose considered as an elective treatment); group B (acarbose considered to be of uncertain benefit); group C (acarbose deemed not to be appropriate). Group B patients were randomized either to continue their standard treatment or to add acarbose to it. Patients with type II diabetes mellitus were recruited from 17 diabetes outpatient clinics from one Italian region (Lombardy). A total of 1027 patients were recruited (group A: 283; group C: 494; group B: 250, of whom 124 were randomly assigned to standard treatment + acarbose and 126 to standard treatment alone). Acarbose was administered for 1 year at a median dose of 100 mg 3 times daily. Drug efficacy was evaluated in terms of mean HbA1c, pre- and post-prandial glycaemic values. Additional endpoints were the proportion of patients with HbA1c levels below 8% at the end of the study period and the proportion of subjects who needed a modification in the standard treatment. The safety and tolerability profiles of the drug were also investigated. Data on HbA1c, fasting and post-prandial blood glucose levels were analysed over time using repeated-measures analysis [Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models]. Results: The analysis of Group B showed that, after treatment for 1 year, the mean reduction in HbA1c levels in the acarbose group with respect to the control group was 0.30% (95% confidence limits −0.60 +0.02; P = 0.07), while the mean reduction in post-prandial glycaemia was 17 mg · dl−1 (95% c.l. −33.5 −0.8; P = 0.04). No difference resulted for fasting blood glucose levels. When looking at the baseline HbA1c levels, it emerged that the mean benefit associated with the use of acarbose was 0.14% (95% c.l. −0.6 +0.28; P = 0.5) in patients with HbA1c levels below 8%, 0.28% (95% c.l. −0.6 +0.05; P = 0.09) in those with values between 8% and 9.9% and 0.65% (95% c.l. −1.36 +0.06; P = 0.07) in those with values ≥10%. Only patients treated with diet ± oral anti-diabetic agents (OAA) benefited from acarbose treatment (mean benefit = 0.37%, 95% c.l. −0.65 −0.08), while no effect was shown for insulin-treated subjects. The proportion of patients with HbA1c below 8% increased from 31% to 44% in the acarbose group and from 40% to 45% in the control group (absolute difference between baseline and end-of-study values = 8.0% in favour of acarbose-treated patients; P = 0.058). Patients treated with acarbose were significantly more likely to undergo a dose reduction in concomitant diabetic treatments compared with the control group; they were also less likely to require an increase in the dose of standard treatment and to start insulin during the study period. One third of the patients could not assume the drug for the whole study period, mainly due to gastrointestinal side-effects. Conclusions: The design adopted in this study allowed an integrated evaluation of the overall effectiveness of acarbose in clinical practice. The benefits of the drug in an unselected population of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients are significant but of marginal clinical relevance. Only a better definition of the subgroups of patients who are more likely to benefit from long-term treatment, particularly through possible postponement of secondary OAA failure, will allow a reliable definition of the cost-effectiveness of this complementary component of anti-diabetic strategy.

Privacy impact assessment in the design of transnational public health information systems: the BIRO project

Objectives: To foster the development of a privacy-protective, sustainable cross-border information system in the framework of a European public health project. Materials and methods: A targeted privacy impact assessment was implemented to identify the best architecture for a European information system for diabetes directly tapping into clinical registries. Four steps were used to provide input to software designers and developers: a structured literature search, analysis of data flow scenarios or options, creation of an ad hoc questionnaire and conduction of a Delphi procedure. Results: The literature search identified a core set of relevant papers on privacy (n = 11). Technicians envisaged three candidate system architectures, with associated data flows, to source an information flow questionnaire that was submitted to the Delphi panel for the selection of the best architecture. A detailed scheme envisaging an “aggregation by group of patients” was finally chosen, based upon the exchange of finely tuned summary tables. Conclusions: Public health information systems should be carefully engineered only after a clear strategy for privacy protection has been planned, to avoid breaching current regulations and future concerns and to optimise the development of statistical routines. The BIRO (Best Information Through Regional Outcomes) project delivers a specific method of privacy impact assessment that can be conveniently used in similar situations across Europe.

The impact of different rehabilitation strategies after major events in the elderly: the case of stroke and hip fracture in the Tuscany region

BackgroundOn a regional level, our aims were to describe rehabilitation patterns for elderly patients with stroke and hip fracture and to investigate mortality risk during the 6-month post acute period.MethodsData sources included administrative data relative to patients aged 65+ resident in Tuscany admitted in hospital for stroke or hip fracture between 2001 and 2003, traced up to 3 years before and 6 months following index admission. The study design involves computerized linkage of administrative data, and an exploratory analysis of the association between rehabilitation patterns and 6-month mortality, adjusting for clinical, demographic, and acute-related care characteristics using multivariate Cox regression.ResultsRehabilitation patterns vary greatly across Tuscany with considerable cost implications. Six month mortality risk for stroke patients is significantly lower among residents of Local Health Authorities where patients are more frequently rehabilitated, specifically in extra-hospital settings.ConclusionOur study, targeting two crucial conditions for elderly patients, found a high variability of rehabilitation patterns across a region, albeit coherent between the two pathologies, associated with remarkable differences in average expenditure. Differences in hazard rates for 6-month mortality after stroke at population level were also found. These results need to be confirmed and further investigated through a more robust information framework.

Validation of a computerised measurement system for guided routine evaluation of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy

A study for evaluating the use of the Cardionomic system was conducted in six Italian Centres for Diabetes. Cardionomic is a portable computerised system that is used for a guided step-by-step performance of several cardiovascular tests for autonomic neuropathy (heart rate and blood pressure). It has been compared to the traditional method using an electrocardiograph. In this study, which involved 74 diabetic patients, 392 cardiovascular tests were conducted with the electrocardiograph and 392 were done using the portable system. The results were compared to the results obtained with the ECG assuming the latter as the standard ones. All the indices of validity that were investigated (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio) indicate that the proposed system is reliable. Because it saves a considerable amount of time and is also easy to use, it represents a valid alternative for the routine screening of autonomic neuropathy.

Health research and systems’ governance are at risk: should the right to data protection override health?

The European Union (EU) Data Protection Regulation will have profound implications for public health, health services research and statistics in Europe. The EU Commissions Proposal was a breakthrough in balancing privacy rights and rights to health and healthcare. The European Parliament, however, has proposed extensive amendments. This paper reviews the amendments proposed by the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and their implications for health research and statistics. The amendments eliminate most innovations brought by the Proposal. Notably, derogation to the general prohibition of processing sensitive data shall be allowed for public interests such as the management of healthcare services, but not health research, monitoring, surveillance and governance. The processing of personal health data for historical, statistical or scientific purposes shall be allowed only with the consent of the data subject or if the processing serves an exceptionally high public interest, cannot be performed otherwise and is legally authorised. Research, be it academic, government, corporate or market research, falls under the same rule. The proposed amendments will make difficult or render impossible research and statistics involving the linkage and analysis of the wealth of data from clinical, administrative, insurance and survey sources, which have contributed to improving health outcomes and health systems performance and governance; and may illegitimise efforts that have been made in some European countries to enable privacy-respectful data use for research and statistical purposes. If the amendments stand as written, the right to privacy is likely to override the right to health and healthcare in Europe.