Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Fang-Chieh Chou is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Fang-Chieh Chou.


RNA | 2015

RNA-Puzzles Round II: assessment of RNA structure prediction programs applied to three large RNA structures

Zhichao Miao; Ryszard W. Adamiak; Marc-Frédérick Blanchet; Michal Boniecki; Janusz M. Bujnicki; Shi-Jie Chen; Clarence Yu Cheng; Grzegorz Chojnowski; Fang-Chieh Chou; Pablo Cordero; José Almeida Cruz; Adrian R. Ferré-D'Amaré; Rhiju Das; Feng Ding; Nikolay V. Dokholyan; Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz; Wipapat Kladwang; Andrey Krokhotin; Grzegorz Lach; Marcin Magnus; François Major; Thomas H. Mann; Benoît Masquida; Dorota Matelska; Mélanie Meyer; Alla Peselis; Mariusz Popenda; Katarzyna J. Purzycka; Alexander Serganov; Juliusz Stasiewicz

This paper is a report of a second round of RNA-Puzzles, a collective and blind experiment in three-dimensional (3D) RNA structure prediction. Three puzzles, Puzzles 5, 6, and 10, represented sequences of three large RNA structures with limited or no homology with previously solved RNA molecules. A lariat-capping ribozyme, as well as riboswitches complexed to adenosylcobalamin and tRNA, were predicted by seven groups using RNAComposer, ModeRNA/SimRNA, Vfold, Rosetta, DMD, MC-Fold, 3dRNA, and AMBER refinement. Some groups derived models using data from state-of-the-art chemical-mapping methods (SHAPE, DMS, CMCT, and mutate-and-map). The comparisons between the predictions and the three subsequently released crystallographic structures, solved at diffraction resolutions of 2.5-3.2 Å, were carried out automatically using various sets of quality indicators. The comparisons clearly demonstrate the state of present-day de novo prediction abilities as well as the limitations of these state-of-the-art methods. All of the best prediction models have similar topologies to the native structures, which suggests that computational methods for RNA structure prediction can already provide useful structural information for biological problems. However, the prediction accuracy for non-Watson-Crick interactions, key to proper folding of RNAs, is low and some predicted models had high Clash Scores. These two difficulties point to some of the continuing bottlenecks in RNA structure prediction. All submitted models are available for download at http://ahsoka.u-strasbg.fr/rnapuzzles/.


eLife | 2015

Consistent global structures of complex RNA states through multidimensional chemical mapping

Clarence Yu Cheng; Fang-Chieh Chou; Wipapat Kladwang; Siqi Tian; Pablo Cordero; Rhiju Das

Accelerating discoveries of non-coding RNA (ncRNA) in myriad biological processes pose major challenges to structural and functional analysis. Despite progress in secondary structure modeling, high-throughput methods have generally failed to determine ncRNA tertiary structures, even at the 1-nm resolution that enables visualization of how helices and functional motifs are positioned in three dimensions. We report that integrating a new method called MOHCA-seq (Multiplexed •OH Cleavage Analysis with paired-end sequencing) with mutate-and-map secondary structure inference guides Rosetta 3D modeling to consistent 1-nm accuracy for intricately folded ncRNAs with lengths up to 188 nucleotides, including a blind RNA-puzzle challenge, the lariat-capping ribozyme. This multidimensional chemical mapping (MCM) pipeline resolves unexpected tertiary proximities for cyclic-di-GMP, glycine, and adenosylcobalamin riboswitch aptamers without their ligands and a loose structure for the recently discovered human HoxA9D internal ribosome entry site regulon. MCM offers a sequencing-based route to uncovering ncRNA 3D structure, applicable to functionally important but potentially heterogeneous states. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07600.001


PLOS Computational Biology | 2014

Blind predictions of DNA and RNA tweezers experiments with force and torque.

Fang-Chieh Chou; Jan Lipfert; Rhiju Das

Single-molecule tweezers measurements of double-stranded nucleic acids (dsDNA and dsRNA) provide unprecedented opportunities to dissect how these fundamental molecules respond to forces and torques analogous to those applied by topoisomerases, viral capsids, and other biological partners. However, tweezers data are still most commonly interpreted post facto in the framework of simple analytical models. Testing falsifiable predictions of state-of-the-art nucleic acid models would be more illuminating but has not been performed. Here we describe a blind challenge in which numerical predictions of nucleic acid mechanical properties were compared to experimental data obtained recently for dsRNA under applied force and torque. The predictions were enabled by the HelixMC package, first presented in this paper. HelixMC advances crystallography-derived base-pair level models (BPLMs) to simulate kilobase-length dsDNAs and dsRNAs under external forces and torques, including their global linking numbers. These calculations recovered the experimental bending persistence length of dsRNA within the error of the simulations and accurately predicted that dsRNAs “spring-like” conformation would give a two-fold decrease of stretch modulus relative to dsDNA. Further blind predictions of helix torsional properties, however, exposed inaccuracies in current BPLM theory, including three-fold discrepancies in torsional persistence length at the high force limit and the incorrect sign of dsRNA link-extension (twist-stretch) coupling. Beyond these experiments, HelixMC predicted that ‘nucleosome-excluding’ poly(A)/poly(T) is at least two-fold stiffer than random-sequence dsDNA in bending, stretching, and torsional behaviors; Z-DNA to be at least three-fold stiffer than random-sequence dsDNA, with a near-zero link-extension coupling; and non-negligible effects from base pair step correlations. We propose that experimentally testing these predictions should be powerful next steps for understanding the flexibility of dsDNA and dsRNA in sequence contexts and under mechanical stresses relevant to their biology.


Methods of Molecular Biology | 2016

RNA Structure Refinement Using the ERRASER-Phenix Pipeline.

Fang-Chieh Chou; Nathaniel Echols; Thomas C. Terwilliger; Rhiju Das

The final step of RNA crystallography involves the fitting of coordinates into electron density maps. The large number of backbone atoms in RNA presents a difficult and tedious challenge, particularly when experimental density is poor. The ERRASER-Phenix pipeline can improve an initial set of RNA coordinates automatically based on a physically realistic model of atomic-level RNA interactions. The pipeline couples diffraction-based refinement in Phenix with the Rosetta-based real-space refinement protocol ERRASER (Enumerative Real-Space Refinement ASsisted by Electron density under Rosetta). The combination of ERRASER and Phenix can improve the geometrical quality of RNA crystallographic models while maintaining or improving the fit to the diffraction data (as measured by R free). Here we present a complete tutorial for running ERRASER-Phenix through the Phenix GUI, from the command-line, and via an application in the Rosetta On-line Server that Includes Everyone (ROSIE).


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2016

Blind tests of RNA nearest-neighbor energy prediction

Fang-Chieh Chou; Wipapat Kladwang; Kalli Kappel; Rhiju Das

Significance Understanding RNA machines and how their behavior can be modulated by chemical modification is increasingly recognized as an important biological and bioengineering problem, with continuing discoveries of riboswitches, mRNA regulons, CRISPR-guided editing complexes, and RNA enzymes. Computational strategies for understanding RNA energetics are being proposed, but have not yet faced rigorous tests. We describe a modeling strategy called RECCES–Rosetta (reweighting of energy-function collection with conformational ensemble sampling in Rosetta) that models the full ensemble of motions of RNA in single-stranded form and in helices, including nonstandard nucleotides, such as 2,6-diaminopurine, a variant of adenosine. When compared with experiments, including blind tests, the energetic accuracies of RECCES–Rosetta calculations are at levels close to experimental error, suggesting that computation can now be used to predict and design basic RNA energetics. The predictive modeling and design of biologically active RNA molecules requires understanding the energetic balance among their basic components. Rapid developments in computer simulation promise increasingly accurate recovery of RNA’s nearest-neighbor (NN) free-energy parameters, but these methods have not been tested in predictive trials or on nonstandard nucleotides. Here, we present, to our knowledge, the first such tests through a RECCES–Rosetta (reweighting of energy-function collection with conformational ensemble sampling in Rosetta) framework that rigorously models conformational entropy, predicts previously unmeasured NN parameters, and estimates these values’ systematic uncertainties. RECCES–Rosetta recovers the 10 NN parameters for Watson–Crick stacked base pairs and 32 single-nucleotide dangling-end parameters with unprecedented accuracies: rmsd of 0.28 kcal/mol and 0.41 kcal/mol, respectively. For set-aside test sets, RECCES–Rosetta gives rmsd values of 0.32 kcal/mol on eight stacked pairs involving G–U wobble pairs and 0.99 kcal/mol on seven stacked pairs involving nonstandard isocytidine–isoguanosine pairs. To more rigorously assess RECCES–Rosetta, we carried out four blind predictions for stacked pairs involving 2,6-diaminopurine–U pairs, which achieved 0.64 kcal/mol rmsd accuracy when tested by subsequent experiments. Overall, these results establish that computational methods can now blindly predict energetics of basic RNA motifs, including chemically modified variants, with consistently better than 1 kcal/mol accuracy. Systematic tests indicate that resolving the remaining discrepancies will require energy function improvements beyond simply reweighting component terms, and we propose further blind trials to test such efforts.


bioRxiv | 2014

MOHCA-seq: RNA 3D models from single multiplexed proximity-mapping experiments

Clarence Yu Cheng; Fang-Chieh Chou; Wipapat Kladwang; Siqi Tian; Pablo Cordero; Rhiju Das

Large RNAs control myriad biological processes but challenge tertiary structure determination. We report that integrating multiplexed •OH cleavage analysis with tabletop deep sequencing (MOHCA-seq) gives nucleotide-resolution proximity maps of RNA structure from single straightforward experiments. After achieving 1-nm resolution models for RNAs of known structure, MOHCA-seq reveals previously unattainable 3D information for ligand-induced conformational changes in a double glycine riboswitch and the sixth community-wide RNA puzzle, an adenosylcobalamin riboswitch.


Nature Methods | 2013

Correcting pervasive errors in RNA crystallography through enumerative structure prediction.

Fang-Chieh Chou; Parin Sripakdeevong; Sergey M. Dibrov; Thomas Hermann; Rhiju Das


Journal of the American Chemical Society | 2012

Automated RNA Structure Prediction Uncovers a Kink-Turn Linker in Double Glycine Riboswitches

Wipapat Kladwang; Fang-Chieh Chou; Rhiju Das


RNA | 2017

RNA-Puzzles Round III: 3D RNA structure prediction of five riboswitches and one ribozyme

Zhichao Miao; Ryszard W. Adamiak; Maciej Antczak; Robert T. Batey; Alexander J. Becka; Marcin Biesiada; Michal Boniecki; Janusz M. Bujnicki; Shi-Jie Chen; Clarence Yu Cheng; Fang-Chieh Chou; Adrian R. Ferré-D'Amaré; Rhiju Das; Wayne K. Dawson; Feng Ding; Nikolay V. Dokholyan; Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz; Caleb Geniesse; Kalli Kappel; Wipapat Kladwang; Andrey Krokhotin; Grzegorz Łach; François Major; Thomas H. Mann; Marcin Magnus; Katarzyna Pachulska-Wieczorek; Dinshaw J. Patel; Joseph A. Piccirilli; Mariusz Popenda; Katarzyna J. Purzycka


Methods in Enzymology | 2015

Modeling complex RNA tertiary folds with Rosetta.

Clarence Yu Cheng; Fang-Chieh Chou; Rhiju Das

Collaboration


Dive into the Fang-Chieh Chou's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adrian R. Ferré-D'Amaré

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrey Krokhotin

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nikolay V. Dokholyan

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge