Sebastiano Marra

Drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease. The DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare, in a large all-comers registry, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis. BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention with DES implantation in ULMCA has been shown to be a feasible and safe approach at midterm clinical follow-up. METHODS All consecutive patients with ULMCA stenosis treated by PCI with DES versus CABG were analyzed in this multinational registry. A propensity score analysis was performed to adjust for baseline differences in the overall cohort. RESULTS In total 2,775 patients were included: 1,874 were treated with PCI versus 901 with CABG. At 1,295 (interquartile range: 928 to 1,713) days, there were no differences, at the adjusted analysis, in the primary composite endpoint of death, cerebrovascular accidents, and myocardial infarction (MI) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85 to 1.42; p = 0.47), mortality (adjusted HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.55; p = 0.32), or composite endpoint of death and MI (adjusted HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.64; p = 0.11). An advantage of CABG over PCI was observed in the composite secondary endpoint of MACCE (adjusted HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.03; p < 0.0001), driven exclusively by the higher incidence of target vessel revascularization with PCI. CONCLUSIONS In our multinational all-comers registry, no difference was observed in the occurrence of death, cerebrovascular accidents, and MI between PCI and CABG. An advantage of CABG over PCI was observed in the incidence of MACCE, driven by the higher incidence of target vessel revascularization with PCI.

Mid-term prognostic value of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of adjusted observational results.

AIMS Coronary artery disease (CAD) negatively affects prognosis in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, being currently evaluated in the most common used risk score. Our meta-analysis aims to clarify the prognostic role of CAD on mid-term survival in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS Studies reporting multivariate predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI were systematically searched for and pooled, when appropriate, using a random-effect method. 960 citations were first screened and finally 7 studies (2472 patients) were included. Diagnosis of CAD was reported in 52%(42-65) of patients and 1169 Edwards SAPIEN and 1303 CoreValve prostheses were implanted. After a median follow up of 452 days (357-585) 24% of patients (19-33) died, and 23 (14-32) for cardiovascular death. At pooled analysis of multivariate approach, diagnosis of coronary artery disease did not increase risk of death (OR 1.0, 95% CI, confidence interval, 0.67-1.50 I(2) 0%). CONCLUSION CAD does not affect mid-term TAVI outcome: this finding should be weighted to accurately evaluate risk and strategies for patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Meta-Analysis of the Usefulness of Mitraclip in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Midterm outcomes for patients presenting with heart failure and functional mitral regurgitation (MR) treated with Mitraclip remain unclear. Pubmed, Medline, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for studies enrolling patients with severe-moderate MR who underwent Mitraclip implantation. All events after at least 6 months were the primary safety end point (including death, rehospitalization for heart failure, and reinterventions), whereas change in the ejection fraction, left ventricular volumes, arterial pulmonary pressure, and left atrial diameters were considered as secondary end points. Meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of baseline clinical and echocardiographic parameters on efficacy outcomes: 875 patients were included in 9 studies; 1.48 clips (1.3 to 1.7) for patients were implanted, and after a median follow-up of 9 months (6 to 12), 409 patients (78% [75% to 83%]) were in class New York Heart Association I/II and 57 (11% [8% to 14%]) still had moderate-to-severe MR. Overall adverse events occurred in 137 (26% [20% to 31%]) of the patients and 78 (15% [1% to 17%]) of them died; 6-minute walk test improved by 100 m (83 to 111), whereas a significant reduction in left ventricular volumes and systolic pulmonary pressure was reported. At meta-regression analysis, an increase in left ventricle systolic volumes positively affected reduction of volumes after Mitraclip, whereas atrial fibrillation reduced the positive effect of the valve implantation on ejection fraction on end-diastolic and -systolic volumes. In conclusion, Mitraclip represents an efficacious strategy for patients with heart failure and severe MR. It offers a significant improvement in functional class and in cardiac remodeling, in patients with severely dilated hearts as well, although its efficacy remains limited in the presence of atrial fibrillation.

Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial

AIMS To test the equivalence of high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban vs. abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in terms of ST-segment resolution (STR). METHODS AND RESULTS The FATA trial (Facilitated Angioplasty with Tirofiban or Abciximab) was a prospective, multicentre, open-label trial that enrolled 692 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPCI. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive abciximab (n = 341) or HDB tirofiban (n = 351). Primary endpoint was the rate of complete (> or =70%) STR 90 min after first balloon inflation. Thirty-day incidence of major bleedings, death, re-infarction and new revascularizations was also evaluated. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well-balanced, with the exception of previous MI rates (tirofiban 6% vs. abciximab 2.6%, P = 0.03). The procedure was successful in 96.7% of the abciximab and in 96.6% of the tirofiban cohort (P = 0.94). Complete STR was obtained in 67.05% of the tirofiban and 70.45% of the abciximab group (Delta -3.4%, 95% confidence interval -10.35 to +3.56), which falls beyond the predefined Delta +/- 10% equivalence boundaries. Rates of secondary endpoints were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION This study failed to show the equivalence of HBD of tirofiban and abciximab as adjunctive therapy to PPCI.

Impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury definition on clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) is a frequent complication after infusion of contrast media in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. A wide range of CIAKI rates occurs after intervention between 3% and 30%, depending on the definition. The aim of this study was to identify which methodology was more effective at recognizing patients at high risk for in-hospital and out-of-hospital adverse events. METHODS AND RESULTS Serum creatinine increases, after contrast agent infusion, were evaluated in 755 consecutive and unselected patients. Incidences of CIAKI diagnosed by 2 common definitions varied from 6.9% (creatinine increase of ≥0.5 mg/dL, CIAKI-0.5) to 15.9% (creatinine increase of ≥25%, CIAKI-25%). Significant differences appeared between the 2 definitions of sensitivity to predict renal failure according to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (98% for CIAKI-0.5 and 62% for CIAKI-25%), using a cutoff value of postprocedural glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min. Both definitions of CIAKI were related to composite adverse events, but CIAKI-0.5 showed a stronger predicting value (odds ratio 2.875 vs 1.802, P = .036). In multivariate linear regression, only CIAKI-0.5 was a predictive variable of death (odds ratio 3.174, 95% CI 1.368-7.361). CONCLUSIONS An increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.5 mg/dL is more sensitive because it recognizes more selectively those patients with a higher risk of mortality and morbidity. Serum creatinine increases of ≥25% overestimate CIAKI by including many patients without postprocedural relevant deterioration of renal function and affected by a lower risk of adverse events at follow-up.

Inaccuracy of available surgical risk scores to predict outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Introduction Despite encouraging short-term and mid-term results, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) interventions are still burdened from high rates of adverse events, stressing the need for accurate predictive risk instruments. We compared available surgical risk scores to describe unfavorable outcomes after TAVI. Methods The Age, Creatinine, and Ejection fraction (ACEF) score, the logistic Euroscore, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Mortality score (STS) were appraised for their independent power of prediction and for their accuracy (C-index) to predict 30-day and medium-term mortality, according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium. Results Nine hundred and sixty-two patients were included. All the scores demonstrated a moderate positive correlation. The closest correlation was observed between the STS score and Euroscore. After logistic regression analysis, STS score and Logistic Euroscore provided independent prediction for short-term all-cause mortality [P = 0.02, odds ratio (OR) 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–1.31 and P = 0.027, OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.405]. For in-hospital complications, only STS score performed significantly (P = 0.005, OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01–1.06). ACEF, Euroscore, and STS score showed low accuracy for 30-day all-cause mortality (area under the curve 0.6, 0.44–0.75; vs. 0.53, 0.42–0.61; vs. 0.62, 0.52–0.71, respectively), whereas STS score performed better for in-hospital complications (0.59, 0.55–0.64). Moreover, after Cox-multivariate adjustments, only ACEF score was near to significance to predict all-cause mortality at mid-term (OR 1.7; 0.8–2.9; P = 0.058), showing the highest accuracy (0.63, 0.55–0.71). Conclusion In TAVI patients, ACEF score, STS score and Logistic Euroscore provided only a moderate correlation and a low accuracy both for 30-day and medium-term outcomes. Dedicated scores are needed to properly tailor time and kind of approach.

A Gender Based Analysis of Predictors of All Cause Death After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

The impact of gender-related pathophysiologic features of severe aortic stenosis on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes remains to be determined, as does the consistency of predictors of mortality between the genders. All consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at 6 institutions were enrolled in this study and stratified according to gender. Midterm all-cause mortality was the primary end point, with events at 30 days and at midterm as secondary end points. All events were adjudicated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions. Eight hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled, 464 (55.5%) of whom were female. At midterm follow-up (median 365 days, interquartile range 100 to 516) women had similar rates of all-cause mortality compared with men (18.1% vs 22.6%, p = 0.11) and similar incidence of myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident. Gender did not affect mortality also on multivariate analysis. Among clinical and procedural features, glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36 to 4.79) and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure >50 mm Hg (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.02) independently predicted mortality in women, while insulin-treated diabetes (HR 3.45, 95% CI 1.47 to 8.09), previous stroke (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.43 to 8.18), and an ejection fraction <30% (HR 3.82, 95% CI 1.41 to 10.37) were related to mortality in men. Postprocedural aortic regurgitation was independently related to midterm mortality in the 2 groups (HR 11.19, 95% CI 3.3 to 37.9). In conclusion, women and men had the same life expectancy after TAVI, but different predictors of adverse events stratified by gender were demonstrated. These findings underline the importance of a gender-tailored clinical risk assessment in TAVI patients.

Aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair as treatment of complications after percutaneous core valve implantation.

CLINICAL SUMMARY We describe the case of a 66-year-old man who had surgical intervention for a core valve malfunction 3 months after transfemoral implantation. The patient was scheduled for percutaneous aortic valve implantation (PAVI) because of the presence of numerous risk factors, such as obesity (body mass index, 35%) and myelodysplasia. The main concern about elective standard aortic valve replacement was related to the patient’s pulmonary function. As a result of a history of smoking and obesity, he had severe chronic pulmonary disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, <35%) and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome requiring noninvasive mechanical ventilation. The patient presented with rapid worsening of dyspnea. An echocardiogram showed a severely calcified aortic stenosis with left ventricular hypertrophy and good ejection fraction (60%). For this reason, he was evaluated for aortic valve replacement. Preoperative coronary angiographic analysis revealed normal coronary arteries. Despite a relative low EuroSCORE, PAVI was indicated because of multiple comorbidities and requested by the patient. PAVI with a core valve bioprosthesis was performed without procedural complications. Only a second balloon dilatation was required for a moderate paraprosthetic aortic regurgitation detected immediately after the procedure, and a mild-to-moderate paraprosthetic aortic regurgitation re-

Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery from the DELTA registry: A multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to report the long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for ostial/midshaft lesions in an unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA). BACKGROUND Data regarding outcomes in these patients are limited. METHODS Of a total of 2,775 patients enrolled in the DELTA multinational registry, 856 patients with isolated ostial/midshaft lesions in an ULMCA treated by PCI with DES (n = 482) or CABG (n = 374) were analyzed. RESULTS At a median follow-up period of 1,293 days, there were no significant differences in the propensity score-adjusted analyses for the composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular accident (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 1.86; p = 0.372), all-cause death (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.80 to 2.27; p = 0.255), the composite endpoint of all-cause death and MI (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.83 to 2.12; p = 0.235) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.93; p = 0.113). These results were sustained after propensity-score matching. However, a higher incidence of target vessel revascularization (HR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.03 to 3.64; p = 0.039) was observed in the PCI compared with the CABG group, with a trend toward higher target lesion revascularization (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 0.90 to 4.45; p = 0.090). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that PCI for ostial/midshaft lesions in an ULMCA is associated with clinical outcomes comparable to those observed with CABG at long-term follow-up, despite the use of older first-generation DES.

Impact of drug-eluting stent selection on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: the sirolimus vs paclitaxel drug-eluting stent for left main registry (SP-DELFT).

AIM To compare the long-term relative efficacy and safety of SES and PES in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease and to evaluate the role of lesion location and stenting technique in determining outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS From April 2002 to April 2004, 288 consecutive patients who underwent elective PCI with DES implantation for de novo lesions on ULMCA have been retrospectively selected and analyzed in seven European and US tertiary care centers. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 3 years. SES was used in 152 patients while 136 received PES. Isolated ostial-shaft disease was present in 27% of patients. Distal LM disease (73%) was treated with single and double stent approach in 29.5% and 43.4% of patients respectively. After 3 years, rates of survival free from any of the events investigated, were independent from lesion location and stenting approach and did not differ significantly between SES and PES groups. Freedom from MACE (SES vs. PES) was 76.3% vs. 83.1% in the ostial/shaft group, 80.3% vs. 72.8% in the distal-single stent group and 67.1% vs. 66.2% in the distal-double stent group. Definite stent thrombosis occurred only in 1(0.3%) patient at 439 days. CONCLUSIONS In elective patients who underwent PCI for de novo lesions in the ostium, shaft or distal ULMCA, long-term clinical outcomes with SES and PES use were similar independently of lesion location and stenting technique.