Florian Brockhaus

Safety, efficacy and convenience of tobramycin inhalation powder in cystic fibrosis patients: The EAGER trial

BACKGROUND A light-porous-particle, dry-powder formulation of tobramycin was developed, using PulmoSphere® technology, to improve airway delivery efficiency, substantially reduce delivery time, and improve patient convenience and satisfaction. We evaluated the safety, efficacy and convenience of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP™) versus tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS, TOBI®) for treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients aged ≥6 years. METHODS In this open-label study, 553 patients were randomized 3:2 to TIP (total 112mg tobramycin) via the Novartis T-326 Inhaler or TIS 300mg/5mL via PARI LC® PLUS nebulizer twice daily for three treatment cycles (28 days on-drug, 28 days off-drug). Safety, efficacy, and treatment satisfaction outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS TIP was generally well-tolerated; adverse events were similar in both groups. The rate of cough suspected to be study drug related was higher in TIP-treated patients (TIP: 25.3%; TIS: 4.3%), as was the overall discontinuation rate (TIP: 26.9%; TIS: 18.2%). Increases in FEV(1)% predicted from baseline to Day 28 of Cycle 3 were similar between groups; the mean reduction in sputum P. aeruginosa density (log(10) CFU/g) on Day 28 of Cycle 3 was also comparable between groups. Administration time was significantly less for TIP (mean: 5.6 versus 19.7min, p<0.0001). Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher for TIP for effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS TIP has a safety and efficacy profile comparable with TIS, and offers a far more convenient treatment option for pseudomonas lung infection in CF.

Tobramycin inhalation powder for P. aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis: the EVOLVE trial.

Tobramycin inhalation solution is used to treat chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel, light‐porous particle, dry‐powder formulation of tobramycin, which was developed to improve delivery efficiency to the airways and substantially reduce the delivery time. In this randomized, double‐blind study, patients with CF (age 6–21 years) received tobramycin inhalation powder (112 mg tobramycin) twice daily (n = 46) or placebo (n = 49) via the T‐326 Inhaler for one cycle, followed by two open‐label cycles (all patients). Cycles were 28 days on, 28 days off treatment. The primary endpoint was change in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) % predicted from baseline to Day 28 of Cycle 1. The study was terminated early based on positive results in the interim analysis. Tobramycin inhalation powder significantly improved FEV1 % predicted versus placebo at Day 28 (difference 13.3, 95% CI: 5.31–21.28; P = 0.0016). Similar changes in FEV1 were seen in patients switching from placebo to tobramycin inhalation powder in Cycle 2; improvements were maintained over time. Tobramycin inhalation powder also reduced sputum P. aeruginosa density, respiratory‐related hospitalization and antipseudomonal antibiotic use versus placebo. The most common adverse event was cough; the frequency of cough was higher in patients receiving placebo (26.5%) versus tobramycin inhalation powder (13.0%) in Cycle 1. Tobramycin inhalation powder was not associated with ototoxicity or nephrotoxicity. Administration time was between 4 and 6 min. In conclusion, tobramycin inhalation powder was effective and well tolerated in CF patients, and may offer an important treatment option to decrease the treatment burden of CF pseudomonas lung infections. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011; 46:230–238.

Tobramycin inhalation powder manufactured by improved process in cystic fibrosis: the randomized EDIT trial

Abstract Background: Tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) was reported to be effective in two Phase III studies in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) chronically infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa). The EDIT study evaluated the efficacy and safety of TIP manufactured by an improved process in CF subjects aged 6–21 years. Methods: CF patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≥25% to ≤80% predicted, positive Pa cultures and inhaled antipseudomonal therapy naïve (or at least for past 4 months) were enrolled into this double-blind, multicenter trial. Patients were randomized to receive TIP or placebo (1:1) twice daily for one treatment cycle (28.5 days on drug, 28 days off drug). The primary endpoint was relative change in FEV1 percentage predicted from baseline to day 29. A pre-specified sensitivity analysis evaluated absolute change in FEV1% predicted. Other endpoints included Pa sputum density and safety. Results: A total of 62 patients out of a target of 100 (mean age 12.9 years, baseline FEV1 59.2% predicted, Pa sputum density 7.4 log10 colony forming units [CFU] per gram) were randomized. Mean treatment differences (TIP - placebo) were 5.9% (p = 0.148) and 4.4% (p < 0.05) for relative and absolute change in FEV1% predicted respectively. TIP significantly reduced Pa sputum density by −1.2 log10 CFU (p = 0.002). Treatment with TIP was well tolerated. Conclusions: Relative change in FEV1% predicted with TIP treatment was in the expected range based on the literature, but did not reach statistical significance versus placebo. Placebo control and use of treatment naïve patients led to significant recruitment challenges and an underpowered study with consequent impact on the generated data. However, significant improvements in other outcomes including absolute change in FEV1% predicted and reduction in Pa sputum density indicate that TIP is efficacious and well tolerated in CF patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00918957.

WS5.6 A challenging double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tobramycin inhalation powder in cystic fibrosis: results of the EDIT trial

WS5.5 A randomised, open label phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dry powder formulation of inhaled colistimethate sodium (Colobreathe®) versus tobramycin nebuliser solution (TNS) in cystic fibrosis subjects with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection M. Goldman1, A. Schuster2, C. Halliburn3, G. Doring4, The Freedom Study Group. 1Forest Laboratories UK Ltd, Medical, Dartford, Kent, United Kingdom; 2University of Dusseldorf, Paediatrics, Dusselfdorf, Germany; 3Hartington Data Managment and Statitistics, Statistics, London, United Kingdom; 4University of Tubingen, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Tubingen, Germany