Florian Kohler
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Florian Kohler.
Folia Geobotanica | 2006
Florian Kohler; François Gillet; Jean-Michel Gobat; Alexandre Buttler
Cattle influences gap dynamics in pastures in two ways: (1) by creating gaps and (2) by affecting the colonization process. This effect of cattle activity on gap revegetation can be subdivided in three main factors: herbage removal, trampling and dung and urine deposition. The objective of this study was to assess how these three effects moderate the plant succession following gap creation.In an exclosure, four controlled treatments simulating cattle activity (repeated mowing, trampling, manuring and untreated control) were applied on plots of 2 × 2 m. In the centre of each plot, one artificial gap of 60 × 60 cm was created. During three years, vegetation changes were monitored in spring and in autumn, with a square grid of 100 cells of 0.01 m2 centred on the gap.Our experiment confirmed that fine-scale gap creation may have a high impact on relative abundances of species in the community. The gap environment acts on species as a filter and this filtering was described in terms of regenerative attributes. Colonizers were species with small seeds, unspecialized seed dispersal, persistent seed bank and high vegetation spread. However, the role of dung deposition, herbage removal or trampling by cattle did not seem to be of primary importance in the revegetation process, but could moderate vegetation response. Therefore, the different cattle effects act as secondary filters that selectively favoured or disadvantaged different species from the gap-regenerating community. These complex interactions are probably keys to understand plant coexistence in perennial grasslands.
Agroforestry in Europe | 2009
Alexandre Buttler; Florian Kohler; François Gillet
Influenced by the combined action of grazing and forest management, wooded pastures represent a traditional form of multiple use of natural resources in some European mountains. This fragile semi-natural ecosystem is characterized by the coexistence of high biodiversity and extensive land use. Based on experimental and observational studies carried out at various spatial scales in the Swiss Jura Mountains, this chapter provides an insight into patterns and processes occurring in this typical silvopastoral ecosystem. Summer grazing by cattle is the main driving force affecting vegetation dynamics. Large herbivores influence vegetation in three ways: grazing and browsing, dung and urine deposition and trampling. Field observations reveal a high heterogeneity of cattle activities at both fine and large scales. Cattle habitat use controls the dynamics of plant species and functional groups in the herb layer. Natural tree regeneration is also closely affected by cattle activity and related to the heterogeneous environment. Distribution of tree seedlings is spatially associated with specific physical structures or nurse plants that facilitate their survival in the herb and the shrub layers. Moreover, the growth of tree saplings is related to grazing intensity. Knowledge of ecological functioning of wooded pastures has allowed the development of a novel, spatially explicit, mosaic compartment model of the dynamics of silvopastoral ecosystems. This model is able to explain some aspects of the origin of vegetation heterogeneity in pasture-woodland landscapes. The conservation of such ecosystems is an important challenge considering its complexity and the present change in agricultural practices in mountain regions. A better integration of ecological and socio-economic processes into predictive multi-level models will permit the exploration of the conditions for sustainable management schemes compatible with biodiversity conservation.
Plant and Soil | 2005
Florian Kohler; Jérôme Hamelin; François Gillet; Jean-Michel Gobat; Alexandre Buttler
The effect of cattle activity on pastures can be subdivided into three categories of disturbances: herbage removal, dunging and trampling. The objective of this study was to assess separately or in combination the effect of these factors on the potential activities of soil microbial communities and to compare these effects with those of soil properties and plant composition or biomass. Controlled treatments simulating the three factors were applied in a fenced area including a light gradient (sunny and shady situation): (i) repeated mowing; (ii) trampling; (iii) fertilizing with a liquid mixture of dung and urine. In the third year of the experiment, community level physiological profiles (CLPP) (Biolog Ecoplates™) were measured for each plots. Furthermore soil chemical properties (pH, total organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus), plant species composition and plant biomass were also assessed. Despite differences in plant communities and soil properties, the metabolic potential of the microbial community in the sunny and in the shady situations were similar. Effects of treatments on microbial communities were more pronounced in the sunny than in the shady situation. In both cases, repeated mowing was the first factor retained for explaining functional variations. In contrast, fertilizing was not a significant factor. The vegetation explained a high proportion of variation of the microbial community descriptors in the sunny situation, while no significant variation appeared under shady condition. The three components of cattle activities influenced differently the soil microbial communities and this depended on the light conditions within the wooded pasture. Cattle activities may also change spatially at a fine scale and short-term and induce changes in the microbial community structure. Thus, the shifting mosaic that has been described for the vegetation of pastures may also apply for below-ground microbial communities.
Frontiers in Microbiology | 2012
Pierre Rossi; Noam Shani; Florian Kohler; Gwenaël Imfeld; Christof Holliger
Massive usage, along with careless handling, storage, spills, and leakages made chloroethenes (CEs) one of the most abundant classes of groundwater contaminants. Anaerobic organohalide respiring bacteria (OHRB) can couple reductive dechlorination of CEs with energy conservation, a central microbial process in (enhanced) natural attenuation of CE-contaminated aquifers. Spatial variability of OHRB guild members present in contaminated sites has not yet been investigated in detail and it is not known whether the spatial localization of contaminated sites could impact differentially remediation capacities. The goal of this study was to investigate how spatially distant microbial communities responded to the presence of CEs. Bacterial communities associated with five geographically distant European CE-contaminated aquifers were analyzed with terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. Numerical ecology tools were used to assess the separate and combined effects on the communities of their spatial localization, their local environmental conditions and their contaminant concentrations. Three spatial scales were used for the assessment of the structuration of the communities as a function of geographical distances, namely at the aquifer scale, at medium (50 km) and long (ca. 1000 km) distances between aquifers. As a result, bacterial communities were structured with an almost identical contribution by both the geographical position of the aquifer and local environmental variables, especially electron donors and acceptors. The impact of environmental factors decreased with distance between aquifers, with the concomitant increase in importance of a geographical factor. Contrastingly, CEs contributed at a low extent at the medium scale and became important only when all aquifers were considered together, at a large geographical scale, suggesting that distant communities were structured partially by a common niche specialization in organohalide respiration.
Journal of Applied Ecology | 2007
Florian Kohler; Jort Verhulst; Roel van Klink; David Kleijn
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | 2010
Péter Batáry; András Báldi; Miklós Sárospataki; Florian Kohler; Jort Verhulst; Eva Knop; Felix Herzog; David Kleijn
Journal of Vegetation Science | 2004
Florian Kohler; François Gillet; Jean-Michel Gobat; Alexandre Buttler
FEMS Microbiology Ecology | 2006
Maryline Jossi; Nathalie Fromin; Sonia Estelle Tarnawski; Florian Kohler; François Gillet; Michel Aragno; Jérôme Hamelin
Landscape Ecology | 2006
Florian Kohler; François Gillet; Stéphanie Reust; Helene H. Wagner; Fawziah Gadallah; Jean-Michel Gobat; Alexandre Buttler
Biological Conservation | 2007
Florian Kohler; Jort Verhulst; Eva Knop; Felix Herzog; David Kleijn