Florian Otto

The Runx3 transcription factor regulates development and survival of TrkC dorsal root ganglia neurons

The RUNX transcription factors are important regulators of linage‐specific gene expression in major developmental pathways. Recently, we demonstrated that Runx3 is highly expressed in developing cranial and dorsal root ganglia (DRGs). Here we report that within the DRGs, Runx3 is specifically expressed in a subset of neurons, the tyrosine kinase receptor C (TrkC) proprioceptive neurons. We show that Runx3‐deficient mice develop severe limb ataxia due to disruption of monosynaptic connectivity between intra spinal afferents and motoneurons. We demonstrate that the underlying cause of the defect is a loss of DRG proprioceptive neurons, reflected by a decreased number of TrkC‐, parvalbumin‐ and β‐galactosidase‐positive cells. Thus, Runx3 is a neurogenic TrkC neuron‐specific transcription factor. In its absence, TrkC neurons in the DRG do not survive long enough to extend their axons toward target cells, resulting in lack of connectivity and ataxia. The data provide new genetic insights into the neurogenesis of DRGs and may help elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying somatosensory‐related ataxia in humans.

Upstream and downstream targets of RUNX proteins

In recent years, the in vivo role of the three members of the RUNX family of transcription factors has in part been elucidated. While Runx1 is essential for mature haematopoiesis and Runx2 for osteochondrogenesis, Runx3 has a function in the nervous system. Translocations and mutations affecting the RUNX1 gene are clearly implicated in leukemogenesis whereas recent data suggest that changed expression levels of RUNX3 may be involved in gastric carcinogenesis. Germ line mutations in RUNX2 have been identified in patients with an autosomal dominant skeletal disorder, cleidocranial dysplasia. While a number of pathways have been delineated that regulate RUNX activity, transcription factors binding to RUNX promoters are only beginning to be identified. A growing number of genes have been characterised that are being regulated in their transcriptional activity by different RUNX proteins. Whether a particular RUNX protein specifically targets a defined subset of downstream genes or whether there is some redundancy as to which RUNX protein activates which target promoter remains to be elucidated. J. Cell. Biochem. 89: 9–18, 2003.

Mammalian Groucho homologs: Redundancy or specificity?

The proteins termed TLE in humans, Grg in mice and Groucho in Drosophila constitute a family of transcriptional corepressors. In mammalians there are five different genes encoding an even larger number of proteins. Interactions between these TLE/Grg proteins and an array of transcription factors has been described. But is there any specificity? This review tries to make a case for a non‐redundant function of individual TLE/Grg proteins. The specificity may be brought about by a tightly controlled temporo‐spatial expression pattern, post‐translational modifications, and subtle structural differences leading to distinct preferences for interacting transcription factors. A confirmation of this concept will ultimately need to come from genetic experiments.

Runx3 knockouts and stomach cancer

Gene targeting often results in knockout mice that show several phenotypes, some of which may not directly relate to the intrinsic function of the disrupted gene. Hence, to study the biological function of genes using knockout mice, one must identify the defects that are directly due to the loss of the targeted gene. Runx3 is a transcription factor that regulates lineage‐specific gene expression in developmental processes. Recently, two groups produced Runx3 knockout mice. Two comparable defects were identified in both knockout strains, one involved neurogenesis and the other thymopoiesis. In addition, a stomach defect pertaining to gastric cancer was observed in one of the mutant strains, but not in the other. Here, we assess the differences between the two Runx3 mutant strains and discuss further studies that could reconcile these discrepancies. This article highlights the difficulties of inferring gene function through the interpretation of knockout phenotypes.

Expression of Runx2 transcription factor in non-skeletal tissues, sperm and brain

Runx2 is a master transcription factor for chondrocyte and osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. However expression of Runx2 (by RT‐PCR), has been reported in non‐skeletal tissues such as breast, T cells and testis. To better define Runx2 activity in non‐skeletal tissues, we examined transgenic (Tg) mice expressing LacZ gene under control of 3.0 kb (3 kb Tg) or 1.0 kb (1 kb Tg) of the Runx2 distal (P1) promoter, Runx2 LacZ knock‐in (Runx2+/LacZ) and Runx2/P1 LacZ knock‐in (Runx2/P1+/LacZ). In the Runx2 3 kb Tg mouse, β‐galactosidase (β‐gal) expression appeared in various non‐skeletal tissues including testis, skin, adrenal gland and brain. β‐gal expression from both 3 kb and 1 kb Tg, reflecting activity of the Runx2 promoter, was readily detectable in seminiferous tubules of the testis and the epididymis. At the single cell level, β‐gal was detected in spermatids and mature sperms not in sertoli or Leydig cells. We also detected a positive signal from the Runx2+/LacZ and Runx2/P1+/LacZ mice. Indeed, Runx2 expression was observed in isolated mature sperms, which was confirmed by RT‐PCR and Western blot analysis. Runx2, however, was not related to sex determination and sperm motility. Runx2 mediated β‐gal activity is also found robustly in the hippocampus and frontal lobe of the brain in Runx2+/LacZ. Collectively, these results indicate that Runx2 is expressed in several non‐skeletal tissues particularly sperms of testis and hippocampus of brain. It suggests that Runx2 may play an important role in male reproductive organ testis and brain. J. Cell. Physiol. 217: 511–517, 2008.

Control of RUNX2 isoform expression: the role of promoters and enhancers.

The three mammalian RUNX genes constitute the family of runt domain transcription factors that are involved in the regulation of a number of developmental processes such as haematopoiesis, osteogenesis and neuronal differentiation. All three genes show a complex temporo‐spatial pattern of expression. Since the three proteins are probably mutually interchangeable with regard to function, most of the specificity of each family member seems to be based on a tightly controlled regulation of expression. While RUNX gene expression is driven by two promoters for each gene, the promoter sequence alone does not seem to suffice for a proper expressional control. This review focuses on the available evidence for the existence of such control mechanisms and studies aiming at discovering cis‐acting regulatory sequences of the RUNX2 gene.

Identification of Novel Target Genes of the Bone-Specific Transcription Factor Runx2†

Fifteen putative transcriptional target genes regulated by the osteogenic transcription factor Runx2 were identified by cDNA microarray and differential hybridization techniques. Expression pattern and regulation of one gene, Pttg1ip, was analyzed in detail.

Genomic characterization of the RUNX2 gene of Fugu rubripes.

A 105 kb Fugu rubripes genomic region containing the RUNX2 ortholog (frunx2) was sequenced and analysed. Spanning 32 kb, frunx2 is seven times smaller than its human orthologue (223 kb). By comparison of Fugu and human genomic environment a stretch of conserved synteny, comprising the neighbouring genes on both sides, was identified. Except one exon that is alternatively spliced in human RUNX2, all other seven exons could be identified in frunx2. The predicted protein sequence of frunx2 shows a high degree of sequence conservation compared with RUNX2 (83% identity). Like all human paralogues, frunx2 possesses two promoter regions separated by a large intron. Both promoter regions are conserved between the two species and contain several RUNX binding sites pointing to a self-regulatory function. Three further conserved non-coding regions were identified possibly functioning as enhancer elements for tissue-specific expression of RUNX2.

The transcriptional co-repressor Grg3/Tle3 promotes pancreatic endocrine progenitor delamination and β-cell differentiation

Pancreatic β-cells arise from Ngn3+ endocrine progenitors within the trunk epithelium of the embryonic pancreas. The emergence of endocrine cells requires E-cadherin downregulation, but the crucial steps that elicit such are not clear, yet probably important for ultimately being able to efficiently generate β-cells de novo from stem cells. Grg3 (groucho-related gene 3, also known as Tle3), encodes a member of the Groucho/TLE family of co-repressors and its function in various cell contexts is mediated by recruitment to target genes by different transcription factors. Grg proteins broadly regulate the progression of progenitor cells to differentiated cell types, but specific developmental mechanisms have not been clear. We find that Grg3 is expressed in most β-cells and a subset of other endocrine cell types in the pancreas. Grg3 is highly expressed in Ngn3+ endocrine progenitor descendants just after transient Ngn3 expression. Grg3-null embryos die at E14.5, which is associated with placental defects, so we explanted E12.5 pancreata to allow endocrine differentiation to occur in culture. Grg3 knockout explants displayed a drastic decrease in the differentiation of all endocrine cell types owing to defects in the delamination of early endocrine progenitors from the trunk epithelium. We find that Grg3 normally suppresses E-cadherin gene expression, thereby allowing delamination of endocrine cells from the trunk epithelium and revealing how this transcriptional co-repressor modulates this crucial step of β-cell development.

Simplified method for gene targeting vector construction.

Gene Targets Gene targeting in embryonic stem (ES) cells has become a routine tool for the analysis of in vivo gene function. The technique depends on homologous recombination between a plasmid vec...