Francesco Blasi

uPAR: a versatile signalling orchestrator

The plasminogen system has been implicated in clot lysis, wound healing, tissue regeneration, cancer and many other processes that affect health and disease. The urokinase receptor uPAR was originally thought to assist the directional invasion of migrating cells, but it is now becoming increasingly evident that this proteinase receptor elicits a plethora of cellular responses that include cellular adhesion, differentiation, proliferation and migration in a non-proteolytic fashion.

Proteolytic cleavage of the urokinase receptor substitutes for the agonist-induced chemotactic effect.

Physiological concentrations of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) stimulated a chemotactic response in human monocytic THP‐1 through binding to the urokinase receptor (uPAR). The effect did not require the protease moiety of uPA, as stimulation was achieved also with the N‐terminal fragment (ATF), while the 33 kDa low molecular weight uPA was ineffective. Co‐immunoprecipitation experiments showed association of uPAR with intracellular kinase(s), as demonstrated by in vitro kinase assays. Use of specific antibodies identified p56/p59hck as a kinase associated with uPAR in THP‐1 cell extracts. Upon addition of ATF, p56/p59hck activity was stimulated within 2 min and returned to normal after 30 min. Since uPAR lacks an intracellular domain capable of interacting with intracellular kinase, activation of p56/p59hck must require a transmembrane adaptor. Evidence for this was strongly supported by the finding that a soluble form of uPAR (suPAR) was capable of inducing chemotaxis not only in THP‐1 cells but also in cells lacking endogenous uPAR (IC50, 5 pM). However, activity of suPAR require chymotrypsin cleavage between the N‐terminal domain D1 and D2 + D3. Chymotrypsin‐cleaved suPAR also induced activation of p56/p59hck in THP‐1 cells, with a time course comparable with ATF. Our data show that uPA‐induced signal transduction takes place via uPAR, involves activation of intracellular tyrosine kinase(s) and requires an as yet undefined adaptor capable of connecting the extracellular ligand binding uPAR to intracellular transducer(s).

Recycling of the urokinase receptor upon internalization of the uPA:serpin complexes

The GPI‐anchored urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) does not internalize free urokinase (uPA) but readily internalizes and degrades uPA:serpin complexes in a process that requires the α2‐macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein (α2MR‐LRP). This process is accompanied by the internalization of uPAR which renders it resistant to phosphatidylinositol‐specific phospholipase C (PI‐PLC). In this paper we show that during internalization of uPA:serpins at 37°C, analysed by FACScan, immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy, an initial decrease of cell surface uPAR was observed, followed by its reappearance at later times. This effect was not due to redistribution of previously intracellular receptors, nor to the surface expression of newly synthesized uPAR. Recycling was directly demonstrated in cell surface‐biotinylated, uPA: PAI‐1‐exposed cells in which biotinylated uPAR was first internalized and subsequently recycled back to the surface upon incubation at 37°C. In fact, uPAR was resistant to PI‐PLC after the 4°C binding of uPA:PAI‐1 to biotinylated cells, but upon incubation at 37°C PI‐PLC‐sensitive biotinylated uPAR reappeared at the cell surface. Binding of uPA:PAI‐1 by uPAR, while essential to initiate the whole process, was, however, dispensable at later stages as both internalization and recycling of uPAR could be observed also after dissociation of the bound ligand from the cell surface.

The urokinase receptor: Focused cell surface proteolysis, cell adhesion and signaling

uPAR is highly expressed during tissue reorganization, inflammation, and in virtually all human cancers. Since its discovery, in vitro and in vivo models, as well as retrospective clinical studies have shown that over‐expression of components of the uPA/uPAR‐system correlates with increased proliferation, migration, and invasion affecting the malignant phenotype of cancer. uPAR regulates the cells–extracellular matrix interactions promoting its degradation and turnover through the plasminogen activation cascade.

A Pbx1-dependent genetic and transcriptional network regulates spleen ontogeny

The genetic control of cell fate specification, morphogenesis and expansion of the spleen, a crucial lymphoid organ, is poorly understood. Recent studies of mutant mice implicate various transcription factors in spleen development, but the hierarchical relationships between these factors have not been explored. In this report, we establish a genetic network that regulates spleen ontogeny, by analyzing asplenic mice mutant for the transcription factors Pbx1, Hox11 (Tlx1), Nkx3.2 (Bapx1) and Pod1 (capsulin, Tcf21). We show that Hox11 and Nkx2.5, among the earliest known markers for splenic progenitor cells, are absent in the splenic anlage of Pbx1 homozygous mutant (-/-) embryos, implicating the TALE homeoprotein Pbx1 in splenic cell specification. Pbx1 and Hox11 genetically interact in spleen formation and loss of either is associated with a similar reduction of progenitor cell proliferation and failed expansion of the splenic anlage. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays show that Pbx1 binds to the Hox11 promoter in spleen mesenchymal cells, which co-express Pbx1 and Hox11. Furthermore, Hox11 binds its own promoter in vivo and acts synergistically with TALE proteins to activate transcription, supporting its role in an auto-regulatory circuit. These studies establish a Pbx1-Hox11-dependent genetic and transcriptional pathway in spleen ontogeny. Additionally, we demonstrate that while Nkx3.2 and Pod1 control spleen development via separate pathways, Pbx1 genetically regulates key players in both pathways, and thus emerges as a central hierarchical co-regulator in spleen genesis.

Urokinase Regulates Vitronectin Binding by Controlling Urokinase Receptor Oligomerization

Adhesion of monocytes to the extracellular matrix is mediated by a direct high affinity interaction between cell-surface urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) receptor (uPAR) and the extracellular matrix protein vitronectin. We demonstrate a tight connection between uPA-regulated uPAR oligomerization and high affinity binding to immobilized vitronectin. We find that binding of soluble uPAR (suPAR) to immobilized vitronectin is strictly ligand-dependent with a linear relationship between the observed binding and the concentration of ligand added. Nevertheless, a comparison of experimentally obtained binding curves to those generated using a simple equilibrium model suggests that the high affinity vitronectin-binding pro-uPA·suPAR complex contains two molecules of suPAR. In co-immunoprecipitation experiments, using different epitope-tagged suPAR molecules, suPAR/suPAR co-immunoprecipitation displayed a similar uPA dose dependence as that observed for vitronectin binding, demonstrating that the high affinity vitronectin-binding complex indeed contains oligomeric suPAR. Structurally, the kringle domain of uPA was found to be critical for the formation of the vitronectin-binding competent complex because the amino-terminal fragment, but not the growth factor-like domain, behaved as a full-length uPA. Our data represent the first demonstration of functional, ligand-induced uPAR oligomerization having extensive implications for glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored receptors in general, and for the biology of the uPA/uPAR system in particular.

Proteomics Analysis of Nucleolar SUMO-1 Target Proteins upon Proteasome Inhibition

Many cellular processes are regulated by the coordination of several post-translational modifications that allow a very fine modulation of substrates. Recently it has been reported that there is a relationship between sumoylation and ubiquitination. Here we propose that the nucleolus is the key organelle in which SUMO-1 conjugates accumulate in response to proteasome inhibition. We demonstrated that, upon proteasome inhibition, the SUMO-1 nuclear dot localization is redirected to nucleolar structures. To better understand this process we investigated, by quantitative proteomics, the effect of proteasome activity on endogenous nucleolar SUMO-1 targets. 193 potential SUMO-1 substrates were identified, and interestingly in several purified SUMO-1 conjugates ubiquitin chains were found to be present, confirming the coordination of these two modifications. 23 SUMO-1 targets were confirmed by an in vitro sumoylation reaction performed on nuclear substrates. They belong to protein families such as small nuclear ribonucleoproteins, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins, ribosomal proteins, histones, RNA-binding proteins, and transcription factor regulators. Among these, histone H1, histone H3, and p160 Myb-binding protein 1A were further characterized as novel SUMO-1 substrates. The analysis of the nature of the SUMO-1 targets identified in this study strongly indicates that sumoylation, acting in coordination with the ubiquitin-proteasome system, regulates the maintenance of nucleolar integrity.

Modulation of urokinase plasminogen activator gene expression during the transition from quiescent to proliferative state in normal mouse cells

We have investigated the regulation of urokinase (u‐PA) mRNA in quiescent mouse fibroblasts and keratinocytes stimulated to divide by the addition of serum or epidermal growth factor (EGF), respectively. Serum stimulation of quiescent fibroblasts (BALB/c 3T3 or Swiss 3T3) results in an early and transient increase of u‐PA mRNA level, which precedes by several hours the onset of DNA synthesis. A similar response is elicited by EGF stimulation of quiescent keratinocytes. The increase of u‐PA mRNA parallels that of c‐myc mRNA, does not require protein synthesis and is at least in part due to increase in template activity of the u‐PA gene. Induction of terminal differentiation of mouse keratinocytes results in a decrease of u‐PA mRNA which parallels the decrease of thymidine incorporation. In conclusion, variation in the level of u‐PA mRNA is seen during G0/G1 transition and correlates with the proliferative state of these normal mouse cells.

Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor affects bone homeostasis by regulating osteoblast and osteoclast function.

The uPAR and its ligand uPA are expressed by both osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Their function in bone remodeling is unknown. We report that uPAR‐lacking mice display increased BMD, increased osteogenic potential of osteoblasts, decreased osteoclasts formation, and altered cytoskeletal reorganization in mature osteoclasts.

Urokinase–urokinase receptor interaction mediates an inhibitory signal for HIV-1 replication

Elevated levels of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) receptor, CD87/u-PAR, predict survival in individuals infected with HIV-1. Here, we report that pro-uPA (or uPA) inhibits HIV-1 expression in U937-derived chronically infected promonocytic U1 cells stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) or tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). However, pro-uPA did not inhibit PMA or TNF-α-dependent activation of nuclear factor-kB or activation protein-1 in U1 cells. Cell-associated HIV protein synthesis also was not decreased by pro-uPA, although the release of virion-associated reverse transcriptase activity was substantially inhibited, suggesting a functional analogy between pro-uPA and the antiviral effects of IFNs. Indeed, cell disruption reversed the inhibitory effect of pro-uPA on activated U1 cells, and ultrastructural analysis confirmed that virions were preferentially retained within cell vacuoles in pro-uPA treated cells. Neither expression of endogenous IFNs nor activation of the IFN-inducible Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway were induced by pro-uPA. Pro-uPA also inhibited acute HIV replication in monocyte-derived macrophages and activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, although with great inter-donor variability. However, pro-uPA inhibited HIV replication in acutely infected promonocytic U937 cells and in ex vivo cultures of lymphoid tissue infected in vitro. Because these effects occurred at concentrations substantially lower than those affecting thrombolysis, pro-uPA may represent a previously uncharacterized class of antiviral agents mimicking IFNs in their inhibitory effects on HIV expression and replication.