Francesco Locatelli

Effect of the Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibitor Benazepril on the Progression of Chronic Renal Insufficiency

Background Drugs that inhibit angiotensin-converting enzyme slow the progression of renal insufficiency in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Whether these drugs have a similar action in patients with other renal diseases is not known. We conducted a study to determine the effect of the angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitor benazepril on the progression of renal insufficiency in patients with various underlying renal diseases. Methods In a three-year trial involving 583 patients with renal insufficiency caused by various disorders, 300 patients received benazepril and 283 received placebo. The underlying diseases included glomerulopathies (in 192 patients), interstitial nephritis (in 105), nephrosclerosis (in 97), polycystic kidney disease (in 64), diabetic nephropathy (in 21), and miscellaneous or unknown disorders (in 104). The severity of renal insufficiency was classified according to the base-line creatinine clearance: 227 patients had mild insufficiency (creatinine clearance, 46 to 60 ml per minu...

End-stage renal failure in type 2 diabetes: A medical catastrophe of worldwide dimensions

The incidence of patients with end-stage renal failure and diabetes mellitus type 2 as a comorbid condition has increased progressively in the past decades, first in the United States and Japan, but subsequently in all countries with a western lifestyle. Although there are explanations for this increase, the major factor is presumably diminishing mortality from hypertension and cardiovascular causes, so that patients survive long enough to develop nephropathy and end-stage renal failure. This review summarizes the striking differences between countries against the background of a similar tendency of an increasing incidence in all countries. Survival on renal replacement therapy continues to be substantially worse for patients with type 2 diabetes. A major reason for this observation is that patients enter renal replacement programs with cardiovascular morbidity acquired in the preterminal phase of renal failure. It is argued that the challenge for the future will be better patient management in earlier phases of diabetic nephropathy to attenuate or prevent progression, as well as cardiovascular complications.

Corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND IgA nephropathy is progressive in most cases and has no established therapy. In this randomised trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of a 6-month course of steroids in this disorder. METHODS Between July, 1987, and September, 1995, we enrolled 86 consecutive patients from seven renal units in Italy. Eligible patients had biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy, urine protein excretion of 1.0-3.5 g daily, and plasma creatinine concentrations of 133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL) or less. Patients were randomly assigned either supportive therapy alone or steroid treatment (intravenous methylprednisolone 1 g per day for 3 consecutive days at the beginning of months 1, 3, and 5, plus oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg on alternate days for 6 months). The primary endpoint was deterioration in renal function defined as a 50% or 100% increase in plasma creatinine concentration from baseline. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS Nine of 43 patients in the steroid group and 14 of 43 in the control group reached the primary endpoint (a 50% increase in plasma creatinine) by year 5 of follow-up (p<0.048). Factors influencing renal survival were vascular sclerosis (relative risk for 1-point increase in score 1.53, p=0.0347), female sex (0.22, p=0.0163), and steroid therapy (0.41, p=0.0439). All 43 patients assigned steroids completed the treatment without experiencing any important side-effects. INTERPRETATION A 6-month course of steroid treatment protected against deterioration in renal function in IgA nephropathy with no notable adverse effects during follow-up. An increase in urinary protein excretion could be a marker indicating the need for a second course of steroid therapy.

Corticosteroid Effectiveness in IgA Nephropathy: Long-Term Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Proteinuria plays a causal role in the progression of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). A previous controlled trial showed that steroids are effective in reducing proteinuria and preserving renal function in patients with IgAN. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of steroids in IgAN, examine the trend of proteinuria during follow-up (starting from the hypothesis that the degree of reduction in proteinuria may influence IgAN outcome), and evaluate how histologic scores can influence steroid response. A secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 86 adult IgAN patients who were receiving supportive therapy or intravenous methylprednisolone plus oral prednisone for 6 mo was conducted. Ten-year renal survival was significantly better in the steroid than in the control group (97% versus 53%; log rank test P = 0.0003). In the 72 patients who did not reach the end point (doubling in baseline serum creatinine), median proteinuria significantly decreased (1.9 g/24 h at baseline, 1.1 g/24 h after 6 mo, and 0.6 g/24 h after a median of 7 yr). In the 14 progressive patients, proteinuria increased from a median of 1.7 g/24 h at baseline to 2.0 g/24 h after 6 mo and 3.3 g/24 h after a median of 5 yr. Steroids were effective in every histologic class. Cox multivariate regression analyses showed that, in addition to steroids, a low baseline histologic score, a reduction in proteinuria after 6 mo, and no increase in proteinuria during follow-up all were independent predictors of a beneficial outcome. Steroids significantly reduce proteinuria and protect against renal function deterioration in IgAN. The histologic picture and proteinuria during early and late follow-up improve the prediction of outcome, but considerable variability remains outside the model.

Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Overt Nephropathy

Context Previously published results of this randomized, double-blind trial showed that high-risk patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy had better renal protection if they were treated with irbesartan rather than amlodipine in addition to conventional antihypertensive therapy. Contribution These detailed analyses showed no differences in overall cardiovascular outcomes between patients given irbesartan or amlodipine. Fewer patients given irbesartan had heart failure and fewer patients given amlodipine had heart attacks. Cautions The trial had limited power to detect important differences between groups in mortality or strokes, and most patients received several antihypertensive agents. The Editors Patients with diabetes have an increased risk for cardiovascular complications and death (1). Studies that analyzed the effects of inhibition of the reninangiotensin system on the risk for cardiovascular complications included a substantial number of patients with diabetes (2-5) or were done exclusively in patients with diabetes (6-8). The meta-analysis of these studies (9), the analysis of the diabetic cohorts in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study (2), and the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) trial (5) demonstrated that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (2, 9) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (5) had a statistically significant advantage over placebo or alternative agents in decreasing the risk for several cardiovascular events. These studies randomly assigned few patients with renal involvement and overt proteinuria. Overt proteinuria occurred in fewer than 20% of the 470 patients in the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) trial (6), and only 11% of the 1195 patients in the LIFE trial (5). The Captopril Prevention Project (CAPP) (3) and the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 (STOP Hypertension-2) (4) did not state the number of patients with diabetes and overt proteinuria. There were no such patients in the Fosinopril versus Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Trial (FACET) (7), and patients with dipstick-positive albuminuria were excluded from the HOPE trial (2). Since proteinuria is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (10, 11), the data obtained in the aforementioned trials cannot be extrapolated to patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. Trials performed in such patients have reported a blood pressureindependent effect of two different angiotensin-receptor blocker agents to protect against nephropathy (12, 13) without a change in all-cause mortality. Apart from studies in heart failure, few cardiovascular data exist for receptor blockers compared with either placebo or calcium-channel blockers. We report on the analysis of the cardiovascular end points that were monitored as secondary end points in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) (12) and assess whether an angiotensin II receptor blocker or a calcium-channel blocker alters the risk for cardiovascular events beyond those observed by blood pressure reduction alone without such agents. Methods Patients The IDNT was a randomized, double-blind study on the effect of treatment with irbesartan or amlodipine compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. The protocol of this study has been published (12, 14). Entry criteria required that patients be between 30 and 70 years of age and have type 2 diabetes mellitus and overt nephropathy, as evidenced by current treatment for hypertension or by a protein excretion rate of 900 mg/d or greater, serum creatinine level of 89 mol/L (1.0 mg/dL) to 266 mol/L (3.0 mg/dL) in women or of 106 mol/L (1.2 mg/dL) to 266 mol/L (3.0 mg/dL) in men, and baseline seated blood pressure greater than 135/85 mm Hg. The institutional review boards of each center approved the protocol. All patients gave written informed consent. Treatment and Randomization Patients were randomly assigned centrally by computer to receive treatment with irbesartan, 300 mg/d (Avapro, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey); amlodipine, 10 mg/d (Norvasc, Pfizer, New York); or matched placebo. To minimize any center effect, randomization was blocked by center. All patients had blood pressure controlled to the same blood pressure goal of less than 135/85 mm Hg by using antihypertensive agents other than ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blocking agents, or calcium-channel blockers. For the analysis of cardiovascular end points, patients were followed to initiation of treatment for end-stage renal failure (dialysis or renal transplantation), reaching a serum creatinine level of 530.4 mol/L (6.0 mg/dL) or higher, death, or administrative censoring in December 2000. Outcomes We prospectively established cardiovascular outcomes, defined in the Appendix Table. Appendix Table. Classification for Fatal and Nonfatal Cardiovascular Events Ascertainment of Cardiovascular Events Information about hospitalizations and adverse events were screened at Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, by trained, blinded clinical research associates to identify potential cardiovascular events. Investigators used study forms to report and characterize all cardiovascular outcomes. For all potential events, records, including laboratory values, electrocardiograms, and radiographic reports were obtained for clarification. Since myocardial infarctions may go unrecognized, a central electrocardiogram reading center was established at Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, where two cardiologists reviewed every electrocardiogram. Electrocardiography was performed at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. A total of 5698 electrocardiograms were reviewed at the center. When a new Q-wave infarction was found, the cardiologists asked whether a clinical myocardial infarction was reported. Even when myocardial infarctions were not clinically reported, these Q-wave infarctions were adjudicated as myocardial infarctions. Adjudication of Cardiovascular Events Investigators at each center reported cardiovascular events, defined in the Appendix Table. The information on all potential events was referred to one member of the Outcomes Confirmation and Classification Committee (Appendix). If the committee member agreed with the judgment of the center investigator, their combined judgment was accepted. If the center investigator and the committee member differed, the case material was reviewed by the membership of the committee, whose decision was accepted. Deaths were adjudicated by a Mortality Committee (Appendix). Each death was reviewed by two members of the committee and presented to the membership, whose decision was accepted as final. Statistical Analysis For graphical presentation (Figure) and overall testing for statistically significant differences among the three treatment groups, time to the first occurrence of either a specific cardiovascular outcome or one of the composite outcomes was analyzed by product-limit survival curves and the log-rank test (15). We used proportional hazards modeling to determine hazard ratios. For the cardiovascular death outcome, which could occur only once, we used the standard proportional hazards model (16), with treatment assignment as the only independent covariate. For other cardiovascular outcomes, which could occur more than once, we used the AndersonGill formulation of the proportional hazards model (17), in which patients are considered at risk for the first event from randomization to the first event, at risk for the second event from the day following the first event to the second event, and so forth, permitting use of all the data. In accordance with the method of Lee and colleagues (18), we used a robust variance estimate that accounts for the possibility of correlation of risk for several events within a patient. We believed that occurrence of a first event of a given type increases the likelihood of a subsequent similar event. Therefore, both treatment assignment and a time-dependent covariate indicating whether the event was the first of its type or a subsequent event were included in these analyses. The time-dependent covariate was statistically significant in each case, confirming the above assumption. There was no statistically significant interaction between treatment and the time-dependent covariatethe effects of treatment assignment were similar for first and subsequent eventsand inclusion of the time-dependent covariate did not change either the estimates of the treatment effect or their statistical significances. Figure. Time to first cardiovascular composite event as a function of treatment assignment. P Data management and computations were done by using SAS software for Windows, version 8 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina), or S-Plus for Windows, version 6.0 (Insightful Corp., Seattle, Washington). Statistical tests were two sided. A P value of 0.05 or less, unadjusted for the multiple comparisons, was considered statistically significant. Role of the Funding Sources The funding sources were involved in the data collection but not in the analysis or interpretation or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Results The baseline characteristics of the three groups are shown in Table 1. A flow diagram of the study is shown in the Appendix Figure. Table 1. Baseline Characteristics Appendix Figure. Flow diagram for the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial. Clinical Management During the study, the blood pressure decreased from the baseline values to 140/77 mm Hg in the irbesartan group, 141/77 mm Hg in the amlodipine group, and 144/80 mm Hg in the placebo group. Blood pressure in the two active treatment groups did not differ; values in both groups were statistically significantly lower than in the placebo group (P = 0.001). The distribution of nonstudy drugs used to achieve the target blood pressure was similar i

Impact of achieved blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial.

Elevated arterial pressure enhances the risk for cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The optimal BP and the component of the elevated BP that affect the risk have not been defined. A post hoc analysis was performed to assess the impact of achieved systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures on CV outcomes in 1590 adults who had overt diabetic nephropathy and were enrolled in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and had a baseline serum creatinine above the normal range, up to 266 micromol/L (3.0 mg/dL), 24-h urine protein >900 mg/d, and at least 6 mo of follow-up. Patients were randomized to irbesartan, amlodipine, or placebo, with other antihypertensive agents to a BP goal of < or =135/85 mmHg. Progressively lower achieved systolic BP (SBP) to 120 mmHg predicted a decrease in CV mortality and congestive heart failure (CHF) but not myocardial infarctions (MI). A SBP below this threshold was associated with increased risk for CV deaths and CHF events. Achieved diastolic BP <85 mmHg was associated with a trend to increase in all-cause mortality, significant increase in MI, but decreased risk for strokes. Increased pulse pressure predicted increased all-cause mortality, CV mortality, MI, and CHF. It is concluded that achieved SBP approaching 120 mmHg and diastolic BP of 85 mmHg are associated with the best protection against CV events in these patients. BP < or =120/85 may be associated with an increase in CV events.

Effect of Membrane Permeability on Survival of Hemodialysis Patients

The effect of high-flux hemodialysis membranes on patient survival has not been unequivocally determined. In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 738 incident hemodialysis patients, stratified them by serum albumin < or = 4 and >4 g/dl, and assigned them to either low-flux or high-flux membranes. We followed patients for 3 to 7.5 yr. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference between high-flux and low-flux membranes, and a Cox proportional hazards model concurred. Patients with serum albumin < or = 4 g/dl had significantly higher survival rates in the high-flux group compared with the low-flux group (P = 0.032). In addition, a secondary analysis revealed that high-flux membranes may significantly improve survival of patients with diabetes. Among those with serum albumin < or = 4 g/dl, slightly different effects among patients with and without diabetes suggested a potential interaction between diabetes status and low serum albumin in the reduction of risk conferred by high-flux membranes. In summary, we did not detect a significant survival benefit with either high-flux or low-flux membranes in the population overall, but the use of high-flux membranes conferred a significant survival benefit among patients with serum albumin < or = 4 g/dl. The apparent survival benefit among patients who have diabetes and are treated with high-flux membranes requires confirmation given the post hoc nature of our analysis.

Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Pathogenesis, Disease Progression, and Therapeutic Options

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a challenge frequently encountered in the management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Downregulation of the parathyroid vitamin D and calcium-sensing receptors represent critical steps that lead to abnormalities in mineral metabolism: high phosphate, low calcium, and vitamin D deficiency. These imbalances result in parathyroid hyperplasia and contribute to vascular calcification. New studies have established a central role for fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) in the regulation of phosphate-vitamin D homeostasis. FGF-23 concentration increases in CKD and contributes to SHPT. Achieving current targets for the key mineral parameters in the management of SHPT set by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines can be challenging. This review summarizes the current understanding and evidence supporting strategies for SHPT treatment in CKD patients. Treatment should include a combination of dietary phosphorus restriction, phosphate binders, vitamin D sterols, and calcimimetics. Parathyroidectomy is effective in suitable candidates refractory to medical therapy and the standard against which new approaches should be measured. Future strategies may focus on the stimulation of apoptotic activity of hyperplastic parathyroid cells.

The OPTIMA Study: Assessing a New Cinacalcet (Sensipar/Mimpara) Treatment Algorithm for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cinacalcet, a novel calcimimetic, targets the calcium-sensing receptor to lower parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, and phosphorus levels in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). This study compared the efficacy of a cinacalcet-based regimen with unrestricted conventional care (vitamin D and phosphate binders) for achieving the stringent National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) targets for dialysis patients. STUDY DESIGN In this multicenter, open-label study, hemodialysis patients with poorly controlled SHPT were randomized to receive conventional care (n = 184) or a cinacalcet-based regimen (n = 368). Doses of cinacalcet, vitamin D sterols, and phosphate binders were adjusted during a 16-wk dose-optimization phase with the use of algorithms that allowed cinacalcet to be used with adjusted doses of vitamin D. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with mean intact PTH < or =300 pg/ml during a 7-wk efficacy assessment phase. RESULTS A higher proportion of patients receiving the cinacalcet-based regimen versus conventional care achieved the targets for PTH (71% versus 22%, respectively; P < 0.001), Ca x P (77% versus 58%, respectively; P < 0.001), calcium (76% versus 33%, respectively; P < 0.001), phosphorus (63% versus 50%, respectively; P = 0.002), and PTH and Ca x P (59% versus 16%, respectively, P < 0.001), and allowed a 22% reduction in vitamin D dosage in patients receiving vitamin D at baseline. Achievement of targets was greatest in patients with less severe disease (intact PTH range, 300 to 500 pg/ml) and the cinacalcet dose required was lower in these patients (median = 30 mg/d). CONCLUSIONS Compared with conventional therapy, a cinacalcet-based treatment algorithm increased achievement of KDOQI treatment targets in dialysis patients in whom conventional therapy was no longer effective in controlling this disease.

Hemofiltration and Hemodiafiltration Reduce Intradialytic Hypotension in ESRD

Symptomatic intradialytic hypotension is a common complication of hemodialysis (HD). The application of convective therapies to the outpatient setting may improve outcomes, including intradialytic hypotension. In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study, we randomly assigned 146 long-term dialysis patients to HD (n = 70), online predilution hemofiltration (HF; n = 36), or online predilution hemodiafiltration (HDF; n = 40). The primary end point was the frequency of intradialytic symptomatic hypotension (ISH). Compared with the run-in period, the frequency of sessions with ISH during the evaluation period increased for HD (7.1 to 7.9%) and decreased for both HF (9.8 to 8.0%) and HDF (10.6 to 5.2%) (P < 0.001). Mean predialysis systolic BP increased by 4.2 mmHg among those who were assigned to HDF compared with decreases of 0.6 and 1.8 mmHg among those who were assigned to HD and HF, respectively (P = 0.038). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated significant risk reductions in ISH for both HF (odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.92) and HDF (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.63). There was a trend toward higher dropout for those who were assigned to HF (P = 0.107). In conclusion, compared with conventional HD, convective therapies (HDF and HF) reduce ISH in long-term dialysis patients.