Lucia Del Vecchio

Corticosteroid Effectiveness in IgA Nephropathy: Long-Term Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Proteinuria plays a causal role in the progression of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). A previous controlled trial showed that steroids are effective in reducing proteinuria and preserving renal function in patients with IgAN. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of steroids in IgAN, examine the trend of proteinuria during follow-up (starting from the hypothesis that the degree of reduction in proteinuria may influence IgAN outcome), and evaluate how histologic scores can influence steroid response. A secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 86 adult IgAN patients who were receiving supportive therapy or intravenous methylprednisolone plus oral prednisone for 6 mo was conducted. Ten-year renal survival was significantly better in the steroid than in the control group (97% versus 53%; log rank test P = 0.0003). In the 72 patients who did not reach the end point (doubling in baseline serum creatinine), median proteinuria significantly decreased (1.9 g/24 h at baseline, 1.1 g/24 h after 6 mo, and 0.6 g/24 h after a median of 7 yr). In the 14 progressive patients, proteinuria increased from a median of 1.7 g/24 h at baseline to 2.0 g/24 h after 6 mo and 3.3 g/24 h after a median of 5 yr. Steroids were effective in every histologic class. Cox multivariate regression analyses showed that, in addition to steroids, a low baseline histologic score, a reduction in proteinuria after 6 mo, and no increase in proteinuria during follow-up all were independent predictors of a beneficial outcome. Steroids significantly reduce proteinuria and protect against renal function deterioration in IgAN. The histologic picture and proteinuria during early and late follow-up improve the prediction of outcome, but considerable variability remains outside the model.

Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with Diabetes and End-Stage Renal Disease

The number of patients who have diabetes and ESRD and are being admitted to renal replacement treatment (RRT) is increasing dramatically worldwide, and in many countries, diabetes has become the single most frequent cause of ESRD. Although the prognosis of patients who have diabetes and are receiving RRT has greatly improved, survival and medical rehabilitation rates continue to be significantly worse than those of nondiabetic patients, mainly because of preexisting severely compromised cardiovascular conditions. The most common RRT modality in patients with diabetes is still hemodialysis, but it gives rise to a number of clinical problems, in particular difficulties in the management of the vascular access and high frequency of intradialytic hypotension. However, patients who have diabetes and are on peritoneal dialysis have to face a progressive increase in peritoneal permeability, loss of ultrafiltration, and peritoneal fibrosis, all phenomena being accelerated in patients with diabetes and ultimately leading to an increased technique failure. The results of observational studies and national registries, although conflicting, suggest that these two dialytic modalities are somehow comparable in terms of outcomes, whereas accumulating evidence shows that both survival and medical rehabilitation of patients with diabetes are significantly better after renal transplantation, which should be the first-choice option for patients who have diabetes and reach ESRD but unfortunately still accounts for only a limited proportion of RRT treatments in these patients.

Renal Manifestations in the Metabolic Syndrome

The metabolic syndrome, which is characterized by obesity, serum lipid profile alterations, hypertension, and fasting hyperglycemia, is very common in developed countries, and its prevalence is likely to increase. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) also has become a significant public health problem because it affects a considerable proportion of the adult population and is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and premature death. Although it is widely known that the metabolic syndrome is a major risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, its precise relationship with the risk for renal impairment only recently has been clarified: Patients with the metabolic syndrome are at significantly higher risk for microalbuminuria and/or CKD, and the level of risk is related to the number of components of the syndrome itself. Although it is difficult to discriminate the detrimental renal effects of the metabolic syndrome from those of hypertension and impaired glucose metabolism, its other aspects (particularly obesity) may favor independently the development of renal abnormalities and may be considered new modifiable risk factors for CKD. These observations provide a rationale for intervention studies that aim to verify whether treating the many components of the metabolic syndrome can effectively prevent the development and progression of renal damage.

Morbidity and Mortality on Maintenance Haemodialysis

Despite the many technical advances in medical care and dialysis delivery, mortality and morbidity remain high in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. A number of factors seem to contribute. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death: volume overload, anaemia, hypertension, arteriovenous fistula, uraemia-related myocardial cell injury all contribute to the development of ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure. The underlying disease is determinant for prognosis, with diabetics displaying an excess cardiovascular mortality. Elderly are also more likely to experience intercurrent medical conditions, vascular disease and diabetes, thus increasing the risk of death. Protein-energy malnutrition and wasting also contribute to the higher mortality in renal replacement therapy. Although nowadays high-risk patients are dialysed too, the rate of acceptance of ESRD patients still varies widely in different countries, possibly because of hidden selection criteria. The patients in the registries with a higher acceptance rate are more likely to be affected by co-morbid conditions and greater disease severity; the assessment of these co-morbid conditions is extremely important when comparing outcomes in different haemodialysis populations. Dialysis adequacy, obtained by means of longer duration of the treatment, is also of paramount importance; it allows minimizing the clinical effects of ultrafiltration and ensure that correct dry weight is reached. This means decreasing the incidence of intradialytic hypotensive episodes, but also improving blood pressure control, a strong predictor of survival. Family and social support, together with adequate medical care, greatly affect the quality of life of patients and can improve compliance to dialysis, diet and drugs and therefore survival.

Addition of Azathioprine to Corticosteroids Does Not Benefit Patients with IgA Nephropathy

The optimal treatment for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) remains unknown. Some patients respond to corticosteroids, suggesting that more aggressive treatment may provide additional benefit. We performed a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial to determine whether adding azathioprine to steroids improves renal outcome. We randomly assigned 207 IgAN patients with creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dl and proteinuria ≥1.0 g/d to either (1) a 3-day pulse of methylprednisolone in months 1, 3, and 5 in addition to both oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg every other day and azathioprine 1.5 mg/kg per day for 6 months (n = 101, group 1) or (2) steroids alone on the same schedule (n = 106, group 2). The primary outcome was renal survival (time to 50% increase in plasma creatinine from baseline); secondary outcomes were changes in proteinuria over time and safety. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 13 patients in group 1 (12.9%, 95% CI 7.5 to 20.9%) and 12 patients in group 2 (11.3%, CI 6.5 to 18.9%) (P = 0.83). Five-year cumulative renal survival was similar between groups (88 versus 89%; P = 0.83). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that female gender, systolic BP, number of antihypertensive drugs, ACE inhibitor use, and proteinuria during follow-up predicted the risk of reaching the primary endpoint. Treatment significantly decreased proteinuria from 2.00 to 1.07 g/d during follow-up (P < 0.001) on average, with no difference between groups. Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent among those receiving azathioprine. In summary, adding low-dose azathioprine to corticosteroids for 6 months does not provide additional benefit to patients with IgAN and may increase the risk for adverse events.

What we know about oxidative stress in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis--clinical effects, potential treatment, and prevention.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) experience accelerated atherosclerosis leading to excessive cardiovascular death. This cannot be fully explained by traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Oxidative stress is currently receiving attention as an important pathogenetic mediator of tissue damage. Oxidative stress is highly prevalent in patients with CKD. Increased prooxidant activity (age, diabetes, hypertension, inflammation, incompatibility of dialysis membranes, and solutions) goes together with reduced antioxidant defense (reduced activity of the glutathione system, low levels of vitamin E, C). Oxidative stress has been linked to several surrogate markers of atherosclerosis in patients with CKD, such as endothelial dysfunction and intima‐media thickness. However, large epidemiological studies testing hard endpoints are lacking. Oxidative stress may also influence response to erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents. Among possible therapeutic approaches, the use of vitamin E seems to be the most promising. Given orally, it has been shown to significantly improve cardiovascular outcomes in a relatively small clinical trial. When bonded to biocompatible dialysis membranes, it may be effective in improving erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents’ responsiveness. Similarly, vitamin C may be effective in reducing cardiovascular events in haemodialysis patients. Further well‐designed, randomized controlled clinical trials with antioxidants are required to establish their potential to make a substantive difference in clinical practice.

The regulatory framework of biosimilars in the European Union

In the European Union (EU), the regulatory policy for biosimilars has enabled different biosimilar products to be marketed through an abridged application, which allows the applicant to submit a reduced dossier. Nevertheless, some manufacturers of biological products that share some characteristics with copies have opted for a full application; therefore, the number and extent of clinical studies required in these cases is increased. Here, we focus on a comparison of recombinant human erythropoietin medicinal products. We analyse and discuss clinical studies submitted to the European Medicines Agency that relate to available biosimilars and biological medicinal products that are authorised with a full dossier. We also discuss the issues of interchangeability and substitution, given that the EU allows each Member State to set their own substitution policies.

Survival of Prosthetic Grafts of Different Materials after Impairment of a Native Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients

In our department, hemodialysis vascular accesses with graft, are used in patients with impairment of native distal and proximal arteriovenous fistulas (AVF-E). The aim of this study was to compare the survival of grafts of different materials (PTFE vs. bovine vein) in these patients. From 1991 to 1999, we prospectively evaluated 53 patients (35 women, 18 men, age 68 ± 11 years, on dialysis for 70 ± 65 months). Fifty-three PTFE, 10 reinforced PTFE, and 22 bovine vein grafts were placed. We evaluated the primary patency (PP) (days between fistula placement and the last dialysis before thrombosis occurred) and the secondary patency (SP) (days between fistula placement and the last dialysis treatment before it was considered lost) by separating PTFE survival from that of bovine veins. In the same patients, we also evaluated the survival of the native arteriovenous fistulas (AVF-E) during the pregraft period. Furthermore, we evaluated 404 patients (172 women, 232 men, age 65 ± 14 years, on dialysis for 50 ± 53 months) in whom only AVF-E were placed during the same follow-up period. Graft and AVF-E survival were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. In patients with grafts, the PP at 1 year was 17.4% for PTFE and 23.9% for bovine veins. At 12 months, the SP of bovine veins was significantly higher than that of PTFE (81,9% vs. 50%, p < 0.04). In the patients who only had AVF-E, the PP and SP was, respectively, 43% at 12 months and 52.4% at 50 months. A preliminary experience in 22 patients with a 20 month follow-up confirms better survival of bovine veins than PTFE (p < 0.04).

Targeted-release budesonide versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy (NEFIGAN): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial

BACKGROUND IgA nephropathy is thought to be associated with mucosal immune system dysfunction, which manifests as renal IgA deposition that leads to impairment and end-stage renal disease in 20-40% of patients within 10-20 years. In this trial (NEFIGAN) we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of a novel targeted-release formulation of budesonide (TRF-budesonide), designed to deliver the drug to the distal ileum in patients with IgA nephropathy. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial, comprised of 6-month run-in, 9-month treatment, and 3-month follow-up phases at 62 nephrology clinics across ten European countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with biopsy-confirmed primary IgA nephropathy and persistent proteinuria despite optimised renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade. We randomly allocated patients with a computer algorithm, with a fixed block size of three, in a 1:1:1 ratio to 16 mg/day TRF-budesonide, 8 mg/day TRF-budesonide, or placebo, stratified by baseline urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR). Patients self-administered masked capsules, once daily, 1 h before breakfast during the treatment phase. All patients continued optimised RAS blockade treatment throughout the trial. Our primary outcome was mean change from baseline in UPCR for the 9-month treatment phase, which was assessed in the full analysis set, defined as all randomised patients who took at least one dose of trial medication and had at least one post-dose efficacy measurement. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the intervention. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01738035. FINDINGS Between Dec 11, 2012, and June 25, 2015, 150 randomised patients were treated (safety set) and 149 patients were eligible for the full analysis set. Overall, at 9 months TRF-budesonide (16 mg/day plus 8 mg/day) was associated with a 24·4% (SEM 7·7%) decrease from baseline in mean UPCR (change in UPCR vs placebo 0·74; 95% CI 0·59-0·94; p=0·0066). At 9 months, mean UPCR had decreased by 27·3% in 48 patients who received 16 mg/day (0·71; 0·53-0·94; p=0·0092) and 21·5% in the 51 patients who received 8 mg/day (0·76; 0·58-1·01; p=0·0290); 50 patients who received placebo had an increase in mean UPCR of 2·7%. The effect was sustained throughout followup. Incidence of adverse events was similar in all groups (43 [88%] of 49 in the TRF-budesonide 16 mg/day group, 48 [94%] of 51 in the TRF-budesonide 8 mg/day, and 42 [84%] of 50 controls). Two of 13 serious adverse events were possibly associated with TRF-budesonide-deep vein thrombosis (16 mg/day) and unexplained deterioration in renal function in follow-up (patients were tapered from 16 mg/day to 8 mg/day over 2 weeks and follow-up was assessed 4 weeks later). INTERPRETATION TRF-budesonide 16 mg/day, added to optimised RAS blockade, reduced proteinuria in patients with IgA nephropathy. This effect is indicative of a reduced risk of future progression to end-stage renal disease. TRF-budesonide could become the first specific treatment for IgA nephropathy targeting intestinal mucosal immunity upstream of disease manifestation. FUNDING Pharmalink AB.

New Treatment Approaches for the Anemia of CKD

Normocytic normochromic anemia is a common complication in chronic kidney disease and is associated with many adverse clinical consequences. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and adjuvant iron therapy represent the primary treatment for anemia in chronic kidney disease. The introduction of ESAs into clinical practice was a success story, mediating an increase in hemoglobin concentrations without the risk for recurrent blood transfusions and improving quality of life substantially. However, recombinant ESAs are still expensive and require a parenteral route of administration. Moreover, concern has arisen following randomized clinical trials showing that higher hemoglobin targets and/or high ESA doses may cause significant harm. This, together with changes in ESA reimbursement policy in some countries, has resulted in a significant reduction in ESA prescribing and the hemoglobin level targeted during therapy. Several attempts are being made to develop new drugs with improved characteristics and/or easier manufacturing processes compared with currently available ESAs, including new treatment approaches that may indirectly improve erythropoiesis. We give an update on the new investigational strategies for increasing erythropoiesis, examining in depth their characteristics and possible advantages in the clinical setting and the caveats to be aware of at the present stage of development.