Francisco Javier Cervera-Paz

Advantages of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf children before 2 years of age when compared with later implantation

Objectives: To compare the auditory abilities and speech performance of children with a profound prelingual bilateral hearing‐impairment when subjected to a cochlear implant (CI) before or after 2 years of age. To analyze the complications that arose during, or as a result of, the implantation process in these groups.

Cerebral auditory plasticity and cochlear implants.

Previous animal research and clinical experiences in humans suggest the existence of an auditory critical period in language acquisition. We review the literature and present the changes within the cochlear nuclei in bilaterally deafferentated adult non-human primates. We also present and analyse the results of 98 prelingually deaf children and teenagers who underwent a cochlear implantation at the University of Navarra. Patients received a Nucleus 22 or 24 multichannel cochlear implant (CI). They were grouped in five categories according to their age at surgery. Performance is compared with a control group of 58 postlinguals. Only early-implanted prelingual children (before 6 years of age) achieved a complete open-set speech recognition, even with better performance than postlinguals. These results clearly demonstrate the existence of a period of high neural auditory plasticity within the first 6 years of life. The introduction of auditory stimulation with a CI can not restore the loss of neural plasticity out of this period. Prelingual children under 6 years of age should receive a CI as soon as there is a reliable diagnosis of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Prospective long-term auditory results of cochlear implantation in prelinguistically deafened children: the importance of early implantation.

The objectives of this study were to report the long-term auditory results of prelinguistically deafened children with bilateral profound hearing impairment treated with a cochlear implant (CI); to analyze the role of auditory stimulation in the development of communicating abilities in early implanted children; and to define the limits of the auditory critical period. It was designed as a prospective cohort single-subject repeated-measures study of children with bilateral profound hearing impairment treated with a CI at a tertiary referral center with a pediatric CI program since 1991. A total of 182 children with bilateral prelinguistic hearing impairment of profound degree treated with a Nucleus CI were enrolled in the study. Eighty-six children received a Nucleus 22 CI and 74 received a Nucleus 24. For data analyses the children were categorized by ages: 0-3 years of age (n = 94); 4-6 years (n = 36); 7-10 years (n = 30); 11-14 years (n = 22). The children were evaluated with a protocol that included tests of audition and speech perception, with closed-set (Vowel Confusion test, Series of Daily Words) and open-set tests (e.g. bisyllables, CID Sentences, CID Sentences adapted for children). Pure-tone averages significantly improved for all children in all groups with the CI compared with preoperative values. Nevertheless, only children implanted before the age of 6 years developed a high ability for recognition of bisyllables and sentences in an open-set. Results show that the earlier the implantation is undertaken, the better the performance outcome. Children implanted outside of the auditory critical period demonstrated significantly poorer performance, suggesting the occurrence of irreversible changes in the central auditory system. In conclusion, eligible children should receive a CI as soon as bilateral profound hearing impairment is diagnosed. This usually permits them to achieve high-performance levels on speech and language measures and potentially integration into an oral communication environment.

Cochlear implantation in radical cavities of mastoidectomy

In recent years, cochlear implants have been found to be effective in the treatment of bilateral profound hearing loss. Their use has been extended progressively to different populations, including prelingually and postlingually deaf children and adults as well as patients with associated handicaps. Cochlear implants have also been used in patients with anatomic variations of the cochlea and the middle ear, such as cochlear ossification, congenital malformations of the ear, and previous middle ear surgery.

Cochlear wall erosion after cochlear implantation

Objectives: Cochlear implantation is a clinically satisfactory procedure, but it is associated with a variable degree of histologic intracochlear trauma. We report a new histologic finding in a cochlear implant specimen from the House Ear Institute collection. Methods: An analysis of 34 temporal bones with single-channel (n = 23) or multichannel (n = 11) cochlear implants was performed. All temporal bones had been fixed for a month in 10% buffered formalin, progressively decalcified in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and embedded in celloidin. After electrode removal, the bones were cut into 20-μm sections and stained. Results: In 1 specimen, the implanted electrode had caused erosion of the bone through the endosteum into the marrow spaces, at the superior-anterior portion of the basal turn. This area showed an intense lymphocytic infiltration surrounded by some new bone formation. Conclusions: Trauma may provoke an inflammatory reaction due to the presence of the foreign body after violation of the endosteum.

Auditory brainstem implants: past, present and future prospects

The purpose of the auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is to directly stimulate the cochlear nucleus complex and offer restoration of hearing in patients suffering from profound retrocochlear sensorineural hearing loss. Electrical stimulation of the auditory pathway via an ABI has been proven to be a safe and effective procedure. The function of current ABIs is similar to that of cochlear implants in terms of device hardware with the exception of the electrode array and the sound-signal processing mechanism. The main limitation of ABI is that electrical stimulation is performed on the surface of the cochlear nuclei, thereby making impractical the selective activation of deeper layers by corresponding optimal frequencies. In this article, we review the anatomical, and experimental basis of ABIs and the indications, and surgical technique for their implantation. To the best of our knowledge, we describe the first pathology images of the cochlear nucleus in a patient who had received an ABI.

Morphometry of the human cochlear wall and implications for cochlear surgery

Objective—To study the lateral wall of the cochlea in human temporal bones (TBs), in order to evaluate the feasibility of performing micro-dissection of the spiral ligament and an endosteal electrode implantation. Material and Methods—We reviewed the database of the TB bank of The House Ear Institute in search of bones that did not distort the otic capsule or spiral ligament, and selected 36 horizontally sectioned TBs. All bones had been removed using the en bloc technique, fixed in formalin, decalcified in EDTA, embedded in celloidin and cut into 20-μm serial sections. We evaluated sections stained with hematoxylin–eosin under a microscope, and made several measurements of the lateral wall of the cochlea using optical appliances. A total of 20 measurements were made at 3 levels: midmodiolar sections; sections at the round window niche; and sections containing the anterior border of the stapes footplate. Results—The selected sections provide useful data when applied during surgery. All the numerical data were analyzed statistically and, although individual variability occurred, most of the measurements seemed to be quite homogeneous. Conclusions—A greater understanding of the microscopic anatomy and dimensions of the human TB will help to understand the surgical relationships at the lateral wall of the cochlea. Our study provides some numerical references for the dimensions of the cochlea that may help in cochlear surgery. These dimensions would be of particular interest in cochlear implantation, especially in the design of endosteal electrodes.

Experimental study following inactive implantation of an auditory brain stem implant in nonhuman primates

We report changes in the cochlear nuclei (CNs) after 3 months of bilateral auditory deafferentation and simultaneous unilateral implantation of a dummy auditory brain stem implant (ABI) in 6 nonhuman primates (Macaca fascicularis). These specimens were compared to CNs of 9 controls and 7 bilaterally deafferented animals without implantation. The ABI array consists of 3 platinum electrodes mounted on a silicone pad with the back side covered with Dacron. No migration of the ABI was observed. All deafferented animals showed astrocytic reorganization in the CNs. Histologic changes consisted of superficial reactions around the implant, with formation of fibrillar bundles of fusiform cells, and the presence of giant cells close to the Dacron. Other findings were related to surgical trauma. The dummy ABI did not itself provoke serious adverse reactions in the CNs. Our observations support the possibility of ABI reimplantation surgery.

Atraumatic surgical approach to the cochlea with a micromanipulator

Conclusions. Our design and preliminary results show that the the micromanipulator could be a great help to the surgeon in the atraumatic surgical approach to the lateral wall of the cochlea at the promontory. Objectives. Hearing preservation in cochlear implant opens new frontiers in the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. To preserve the membranous labyrinth intact, new surgical tools are needed, either for cochlear implantation or for other applications. The objectives of this study were to design and test a micromanipulator coupled to a drilling tool for the atraumatic exposure of the spiral ligament. The micromanipulator is designed to increase precision when drilling the otic capsule bone. Materials and methods. A group from the University of Navarra worked on the device design – based on a compliant mechanism – and in vitro test. The components and functioning of the micromanipulator are described. It was tested in 10 formalinized temporal bones after a mastoidectomy, a posterior tympanotomy, and a transcanal tympanotomy were performed. The micromanipulator was placed over the cranial surface, and used to expose the endostium, anteriorly to the round window niche. Results. A combined approach through the external auditory canal was feasible, together with a posterior tympanotomy to visually control the work and make complementary manoeuvres. Drilling was easy, and visual control through the posterior tympanotomy was excellent. A high degree of drilling precision was achieved. A little disruption of the membranous labyrinth was found only in the first bone of the series.

A model for auditory brain stem implants: bilateral surgical deafferentation of the cochlear nuclei in the macaque monkey.

Background: Patients with extensive bilateral lesions of the auditory nerve have a profound and irreversible sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), which can only be overcome with individually-fitted auditory brain stem implants that directly stimulate the cochlear nuclei. Despite the enormous potential of this increasingly applied treatment, the auditory performance of many implanted patients is limited, and the variability between cases hinders a complete understanding of the role played by the multiple parameters related to the efficacy of the implant. Objectives: To mimic the condition of patients who have bilateral lesions of the auditory nerve, we developed an experimental model of bilateral deafferentation of the cochlear nuclei by surgical transection of the cochlear nerves of adult primates. Materials and Methods: We performed bilateral transection of the cochlear nerves of six adult, healthy, male captive-bred macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Before surgery, brain stem auditory evoked potentials were recorded. The histological material obtained from these animals was compared with similarly processed sections from seven macaques with intact cochlear nerves. The surgical technique, similar to that used in human neuro-otology, combined a labyrinthectomy and a neurectomy of the cochlear nerves, and caused deafness. We analyzed immunocytochemically the expression in cochlear nerve fibers of neurofilaments (SMI-32), and cytosolic calcium binding proteins calretinin, parvalbumin and calbindin, and also applied a histochemical reaction for acetylcholinesterase. Results: None of the primates had any major complications due to the surgical procedure. The lesions produced massive anterograde degeneration of the cochlear nerves, evidenced by marked gliosis and by loss of both type I fibers (which in this species are immunoreactive for calretinin, parvalbumin and neurofilaments) and type II fibers (which are acetylcholinesterase positive). The model of surgical transection described herein causes extensive damage to the cochlear nerves while leaving the cochlea intact, thus mimicking the condition of patients with profound SNHL due to bilateral cochlear nerve degeneration. Conclusions: The phylogenetic proximity of primates to humans, and the paramount advantage of close anatomical and physiological similarities, allowed us to use the same surgical technique applied to human patients, and to perform a thorough evaluation of the consequences of neurectomy. Thus, bilateral surgical deafferentation of the macaque cochlear nuclei may constitute an advantageous model for study of auditory brain stem implants.