Franco Barbazza

Infrahepatic Terminolateral Cavo–Cavostomy as a Rescue Technique in Complicated “Modified” Piggyback Liver Transplantation

Orthotopic liver transplantation is a well-known and widely applied codified procedure. Milestones of the standard technique are the use of the veno– venous bypass (1, 2), and the resection, en bloc with the liver, of the retrohepatic vena cava (3–5). Since its original description by Starzl (3–4), many modifications of the original technique have been suggested to reduce risks and time and to make the technique more flexible. Also, the graft caval implant has undergone gradual evolution through the introduction of variants that render the surgical procedure more adaptable toward problems. These techniques apply the dissection of the recipient liver from the vena cava during hepatectomy (6); then the graft implant may be performed preserving the recipient vena cava, according to the piggyback procedure (7, 8), anastomosing the donor’s suprahepatic vena cava and a “cuff” made out of the recipient’s suprahepatic veins, or, as described by some authors (9), using a side-to-side cavo–caval anastomosis after stitching the donor’s suprahepatic caval stumps. In both cases, the remnant of the donor’s infrahepatic vena cava must be ligated. Since 1992 we have used a modified piggyback technique, by performing an end-to-side cavo– caval anastomosis between the suprahepatic donor’s vena cava and the recipient’s vena cava, using the caudally enlarged hole of the common left and middle suprahepatic veins stump, after stitching the recipient’s right suprahepatic vein (10). Also by this technique, the remnant of the donor’s infrahepatic vena cava must be ligated. A drawback of these techniques may be either hepatic venous outflow obstruction because of stenosis or kinking of the caval anastomosis, or obstruction of the recipient’s inferior vena cava (11). We report a case of hepatic venous outflow obstruction at liver reperfusion because of kinking of the caval anastomosis. The stenosis was overcome performing an end-to-side cavo–caval anastomosis using the infrahepatic stump of the donor’s vena cava.

Arteroportal fistulas between the accessory right hepatic, gastroduodenal and superior mesenteric arteries and portal vein: a difficult technical problem to overcome in liver transplantation.

Background. Fistulous communications between the accessory right hepatic (ARHA), gastroduodenal (GD), and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries and the portal vein (PV) may represent a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT). Material. A patient with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and progressive liver decompensation underwent preoperative LT work-up. Doppler ultrasound (DU), Angiography and MRI revealed arteroportal fistulas (APF) and diversion of mesenteric-splenoportal flow through spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SSRS) in the systemic circulation. The patient was transplanted and the ARHA and GDA were distally sectioned; the HA was anastomosed to the donor HA; the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) was detached from the splenopancreatic venous bed by sectioning and ligating the Henle trunk, by ligating an posterior-inferior pancreatic vein and, finally, by positioning an iliac vein interposition graft between the SMV and the donor PV. The postanastomotic SMV trunk and recipient PV were ligated below and above the pancreatic head, respectively. Results. Reperfusion and late liver function were good. DU and MRI studies showed an effective portal flow and the maintenance of a normal splenopancreatic vein outflow through the SSRS. Discussion. APF represent a serious clinical problem, particularly in patients who need LT. The persistence of arterial flow into the PV is dangerous for the long-term liver function. A particular surgical strategy, strictly tailored to the hemodynamic conditions, has to be planned. Conclusions. Extrahepatic multiple APF would no longer to represent a contraindication to LT, although this claim needs to be confirmed in the light of further experience and a longer-term follow-up.