Franco Nolè

Trastuzumab-Induced Cardiotoxicity: Clinical and Prognostic Implications of Troponin I Evaluation

PURPOSE Treatment of breast cancer with trastuzumab is complicated by cardiotoxicity in up to 34% of the patients. In most patients, trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (TIC) is reversible: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improves after trastuzumab withdrawal and with, or sometimes without, initiation of heart failure (HF) therapy. The reversibility of TIC, however, is not foreseeable, and identification of patients at risk and of those who will not recover from cardiac dysfunction is crucial. The usefulness of troponin I (TNI) in the identification of patients at risk for TIC and in the prediction of LVEF recovery has never been investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 251 women were enrolled. TNI was measured before and after each trastuzumab cycle. LVEF was evaluated at baseline, every 3 months during trastuzumab therapy, and every 6 months afterward. In case of TIC, trastuzumab was discontinued, and HF treatment with enalapril and carvedilol was initiated. TIC was defined as LVEF decrease of > 10 units and below 50%. Recovery from TIC was defined as LVEF increase above 50%. RESULTS TIC occurred in 42 patients (17%) and was more frequent in patients with TNI elevation (TNI+; 62% v 5%; P < .001). Twenty-five patients (60%) recovered from TIC. LVEF recovery occurred less frequently in TNI+ patients (35% v 100%; P < .001). At multivariate analysis, TNI+ was the only independent predictor of TIC (hazard ratio [HR], 22.9; 95% CI, 11.6 to 45.5; P < .001) and of lack of LVEF recovery (HR, 2.88; 95% CI,1.78 to 4.65; P < .001). CONCLUSION TNI+ identifies trastuzumab-treated patients who are at risk for cardiotoxicity and are unlikely to recover from cardiac dysfunction despite HF therapy.

Chemotherapy Is More Effective in Patients with Breast Cancer Not Expressing Steroid Hormone Receptors A Study of Preoperative Treatment

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to identify factors predicting response to preoperative chemotherapy. Experimental Design: In a large volume laboratory using standard immunohistochemical methods, we reviewed the pretreatment biopsies and histologic specimens at final surgery of 399 patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer (cT2-T4, N0–2, M0) who were treated with preoperative chemotherapy. The incidence of pathological complete remission and the incidence of node-negative status at final surgery were assessed with respect to initial pathological and clinical findings. Menopausal status, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status [absent (0% of the cells positive) versus expressed], clinical tumor size, histologic grade, Ki-67, Her-2/neu expression, and type and route of chemotherapy were considered. Results: High rates of pathological complete remission were associated with absence of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression (P < 0.0001), and grade 3 (P = 0.001). Significant predictors of node-negative status at surgery were absence of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression (P < 0.0001), clinical tumor size <5 cm (P < 0.001), and use of infusional regimens (P = 0.003). The chance of obtaining pathological complete remission or node-negative status for patients with endocrine nonresponsive tumors compared with those having some estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor expression was 4.22 (95% confidence interval, 2.20–8.09, 33.3% versus 7.5%) and 3.47 (95% confidence interval, 2.09–5.76, 42.9% versus 21.7%), respectively. Despite the significantly higher incidence of pathological complete remission and node-negative status achieved by preoperative chemotherapy for patients with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor absent disease, the disease-free survival was significantly worse for this cohort compared with the low/positive expression cohort (4-year disease-free survival %: 41% versus 74%; hazard ratio 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 2.28–4.54; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Response to preoperative chemotherapy is significantly higher for patients with endocrine nonresponsive tumors. New chemotherapy regimens or combinations should be explored in this cohort of patients with poor outcome. For patients with endocrine responsive disease, the role of preoperative endocrine therapies should be studied.

Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients With Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To assess the prognostic role of HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with node-negative, pT1a-b breast cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were identified among a population of 2,130 patients whose diseases were staged as pT1a-b, pN0 and who underwent surgery at the European Institute of Oncology from 1999 to 2006. A matched cohort was selected by using variables of hormone receptor status, age, and year of surgery. We estimated rates of local and distant recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in the two groups. RESULTS We identified 150 consecutive patients with pT1a-b, pN0, HER2-positive tumors. No patient received adjuvant trastuzumab. The median follow-up was 4.6 years (range, 1.0 to 9.0 years). In the hormone receptor-positive group, 5-year DFS rates were 99% (95% CI, 96% to 100%) for HER2-negative disease and 92% (95% CI, 86% to 99%) for HER2-positive disease. In the hormone receptor-negative group, 5-year DFS rates were 92% (95% CI, 84% to 100%) for HER2-negative disease and 91% (95% CI, 84% to 99%) for HER2-positive disease. Overall, the hazard ratio (HR) associated with HER2 overexpression was 2.4 (95% CI, 0.9 to 6.5; P = .09). After analysis was adjusted for pT1 stage, hormone receptor-positive disease with HER2-positive status was associated with a worse prognosis (HR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 25.7). OS in HER2-positive, pT1a-b, pN0 breast cancer was similar irrespective of the hormone receptor status (P = .93). CONCLUSION Patients with node-negative, HER2 positive, pT1a-b breast cancer have a low risk of recurrence at 5 years of follow-up. In patients with hormone receptor-positive disease and pT1a-b, N0 tumors, HER2 overexpression was associated with a worse DFS.

Prediction of response to primary chemotherapy for operable breast cancer

The use of primary systemic cytotoxics leads to a high remission rate in patients with breast cancer. Response was identified as an important variable associated with survival. Thus, features which predict response, are potentially relevant for planning treatments and improving survival. Retrospectively, we investigated several histopathological features (expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors, Mib1, bcl-2, c-erbB-2, and p53) prior to two programmes of either sequential preoperative chemotherapy (doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide) and radiotherapy (Group A), or preoperative chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and vinorelbine) alone (Group B) in patients with operable breast cancer. After three courses, patients with a partial or complete response were given a further three courses, which was followed for patients in Group A by radiotherapy 50 Gy plus a boost of 10 Gy. All patients were submitted to surgery after completion of preoperative treatment and pathology material from 73 patients (median age, 49 years, range, 30-70; performance status, 0-1; 68 T2, 5 T3) was obtained. The overall response rate according to radiological and clinical evaluation was 59% (68% for Group A and 49% for Group B). 12 of 14 patients with p53-positive tumours and 31 of 59 with p53-negative tumours responded (P = 0.04). 6 of 7 patients with elevated c-erbB-2 had a response compared with 37 of 66 patients in the group with c-erbB-2 negative tumours (P = 0.03). Mib1 expression decreased substantially (> or = 50%) in 25 patients during treatment, of whom 20 responded compared with 21 of 48 patients with a lower decrease (P = 0.04). Response was observed in 28 of 37 patients with high baseline Mib1 (> 20%) and in 15 of 36 patients in the low Mib1 group (P = 0.05). Finally, 32 of 44 tumours with low expression of progesterone receptors responded compared with 11 of 29 tumours with high receptors expression (P = 0.05). These markers might be useful for tailoring primary and postsurgical systemic treatments.

Double-blind, randomised, controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for 1 day with or without dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND To reduce side-effects of corticosteroid-containing antiemetic regimens, tailoring antiemetic schedules to specific requirements of different patients could be of benefit. We evaluated the possibility to reduce the total dose of corticosteroids when palonosetron, a long-acting second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonist, is used. MATERIALS AND METHODS Double-blind, multicentre, noninferiority study of chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients receiving 0.25 mg palonosetron and 8 mg dexamethasone on day 1, randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 151) or 4 mg b.i.d. dexamethasone (n = 149) on days 2 and 3. Primary end point was complete response (CR) rate (no emesis, no rescue medication) in the overall (days 1-5) period. Secondary end points were CR rates in the acute (day 1) and delayed (days 2-5) periods, rates of no emesis and no nausea and impact on daily functioning (Functional Living Index-Emesis). RESULTS Noninferiority between the two treatments was demonstrated by similar CR rates (P = 0.487) in the overall period. Most parameters showed that palonosetron and dexamethasone on day 1 only offer chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting protection similar to multiple-day dexamethasone administration. CONCLUSION In patients treated with a single injection of palonosetron on day 1, reducing dexamethasone is an option that is not associated with significant reduction in antiemetic control during the 5-day period or an impact on patient functioning.

Response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with tumors not expressing estrogen and progesterone receptors

BACKGROUND We recently demonstrated that in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptors (ER)-absent tumors, early initiation of systemic chemotherapy after primary surgery might improve outcome. These data indicate a different responsiveness to chemotherapy for tumors not expressing hormone receptors. To test this hypothesis we evaluated the responsiveness to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with ER and progesterone receptors (PgR)-absent tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with biopsy-proven T2-T3, N0-2 breast cancer treated at a single institution from January 1995 to August 1999 with preoperative chemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. ER and PgR were determined immunohistochemically and classified for this purpose as absent (0% of the cells positive) or positive (> or = 1% of the cells). RESULTS On 117 evaluable patients 72 had an objective response (61%). A significant difference in response was observed for patients with ER and PgR absent compared with those with ER and/or PgR-positive tumors (82% vs. 57%, P = 0.03 Fisherss exact test). Pathological complete remission rates were also significantly different in the two groups (23% vs. 7%, respectively; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The different degree of response according to hormone receptors expression supports the hypothesis that tumors not expressing both ER and PgR might represent a different clinical entity in terms of chemotherapy responsiveness.

A meta-analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases.

BACKGROUND The discordance in oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between primary and recurrent breast cancer is being intensively investigated and a large amount of data have been produced. However, results from different studies are heterogeneous and often conflicting. To highlight this issue, a meta-analysis of published data was performed. METHODS A literature search was performed using Medline, and all the studies published from 1983 to 2011 comparing changes in ER, PgR and/or HER2 status in patients with matched breast primary and recurrent tumours were included. We used random-effects models to estimate pooled discordance proportions. RESULTS We selected 48 articles, mostly reporting retrospective studies. Thirty-three, 24 and 31 articles were focused on ER, PgR and HER2 changes, respectively. A total of 4200, 2739 and 2987 tumours were evaluated for ER, PgR and HER2 discordance, respectively. The heterogeneity between study-specific discordance proportions was high for ER (I(2)=91%, p<0.0001), PgR (I(2)=79%, p<0.0001) and HER2 (I(2)=77%, p<0.0001). Pooled discordance proportions were 20% (95% confidence interval (CI): 16-35%) for ER, 33% (95% CI: 29-38%) for PgR and 8% (95% CI: 6-10%) for HER2. Pooled proportions of tumours shifting from positive to negative and from negative to positive were 24% and 14% for ER (p=0.0183), respectively. The same figures were 46% and 15% for PgR (p<0.0001), and 13% and 5% for HER2 (p=0.0004). CONCLUSION Our findings strengthen the concept that changes in receptor expression may occur during the natural history of breast cancer, suggesting clinical implications and a possible impact on treatment choice.

Should liver metastases of breast cancer be biopsied to improve treatment choice

BACKGROUND Currently, the acquisition of tissue from metastatic deposits is not recommended as a routine practice. Our aim was to evaluate the discordance rate of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor status between primary tumor and liver metastases and its potential impact on treatment choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a database including 1250 ultrasound-guided liver biopsies carried out at the European Institute of Oncology from August 1999 to March 2009. ER, PgR, and HER2 status were determined by immunohistochemistry and/or FISH. Differences between proportions were evaluated using Fishers exact test. RESULTS We identified 255 consecutive patients with matched primary and liver tissue samples. Changes in ER status were observed in 37 of 255 patients (14.5%). Changes in PgR status were observed in 124 of 255 patients (48.6%). Changes in HER2 status were observed in 24 of 172 assessable patients (13.9%). We observed a discordance in receptor status (ER, PgR, and HER2) between primary tumor and liver metastases, which led to change in therapy for 31 of 255 of patients (12.1%). CONCLUSIONS Biopsy of metastases for reassessment of biological features should be considered in all patients, when safe and easy to carry out, since it is likely to impact treatment choice.

Changes of HER2 Status in Circulating Tumor Cells Compared With the Primary Tumor During Treatment for Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND HER2/neu status of tumor cells at metastatic sites in patients with advanced disease may differ from that of the primary tumor. Assessing the presence of target antigens on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) might affect treatment choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS From June 2007 to October 2008, we collected 23 mL of blood from each of the 76 consecutive patients before and during chemotherapy to determine CTC numbers and HER2 overexpression. CTCs were isolated with the CellSearch System® (Veridex, LLC; Raritan, NJ) and fluorescently stained with the Epithelial Cell Kit®. Tumor Phenotyping Reagent® was used to investigate HER2/neu overexpression. RESULTS Concordance of HER2 status between the primary tumor and CTCs was 86% (49 out of 57 patients) at baseline and 82% (50 out of 61 patients) in the treatment samples. HER2 overexpression in CTCs was acquired in 8 out of 45 patients (18%) and lost in 3 out of 16 patients (19%) during a treatment containing trastuzumab. The overall discordance rate between the primary tumor and CTCs was 18% (11 out of 61 patients). Patients with HER2 overexpression in CTCs had poorer progression-free survival compared with those without CTCs or with HER2- CTCs (log-rank P =.036). CONCLUSION Information on the presence or absence of HER2 overexpression can be obtained in CTCs. Larger trials are needed to evaluate the activity of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with acquired HER2 overexpression in CTCs.

Reverting estrogen-receptor-negative phenotype in HER-2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer patients exposed to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy

IntroductionThe amounts of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) in a primary tumor are predictive of the response to endocrine therapies of breast cancer. Several patients with ER-positive primary tumors relapse after adjuvant endocrine therapy with no ER expression in the recurrent tissue; much fewer with a recurrent disease after an ER-negative primary tumor may become endocrine responsive. These sequences of events indicate that a phenotype based on ER expression may not be a permanent feature of breast cancer.MethodsTen patients with advanced breast cancer whose tumors overexpressed HER-2, but not ER or PgR, were treated with weekly trastuzumab at standard doses with or without chemotherapy.ResultsThree out of 10 patients showed overexpression of ERs first appearing after 9, 12 and 37 weeks, respectively, from the initiation of trastuzumab. Two of these patients were subsequently treated with endocrine therapy alone: one of them received letrozole for 3 years without evidence of progression.ConclusionTherapeutic targets enabling the appearance of an endocrine responsive disease may increase treatment options for patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, these clinical data suggest that an ER-negative phenotype is a multi-step process with a reversible repression modality, and that some ER-negative tumors may either revert to an ER-positive phenotype, allowing an endocrine treatment to be effective.