Laura Adamoli

A meta-analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases.

BACKGROUND The discordance in oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between primary and recurrent breast cancer is being intensively investigated and a large amount of data have been produced. However, results from different studies are heterogeneous and often conflicting. To highlight this issue, a meta-analysis of published data was performed. METHODS A literature search was performed using Medline, and all the studies published from 1983 to 2011 comparing changes in ER, PgR and/or HER2 status in patients with matched breast primary and recurrent tumours were included. We used random-effects models to estimate pooled discordance proportions. RESULTS We selected 48 articles, mostly reporting retrospective studies. Thirty-three, 24 and 31 articles were focused on ER, PgR and HER2 changes, respectively. A total of 4200, 2739 and 2987 tumours were evaluated for ER, PgR and HER2 discordance, respectively. The heterogeneity between study-specific discordance proportions was high for ER (I(2)=91%, p<0.0001), PgR (I(2)=79%, p<0.0001) and HER2 (I(2)=77%, p<0.0001). Pooled discordance proportions were 20% (95% confidence interval (CI): 16-35%) for ER, 33% (95% CI: 29-38%) for PgR and 8% (95% CI: 6-10%) for HER2. Pooled proportions of tumours shifting from positive to negative and from negative to positive were 24% and 14% for ER (p=0.0183), respectively. The same figures were 46% and 15% for PgR (p<0.0001), and 13% and 5% for HER2 (p=0.0004). CONCLUSION Our findings strengthen the concept that changes in receptor expression may occur during the natural history of breast cancer, suggesting clinical implications and a possible impact on treatment choice.

Changes of HER2 Status in Circulating Tumor Cells Compared With the Primary Tumor During Treatment for Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND HER2/neu status of tumor cells at metastatic sites in patients with advanced disease may differ from that of the primary tumor. Assessing the presence of target antigens on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) might affect treatment choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS From June 2007 to October 2008, we collected 23 mL of blood from each of the 76 consecutive patients before and during chemotherapy to determine CTC numbers and HER2 overexpression. CTCs were isolated with the CellSearch System® (Veridex, LLC; Raritan, NJ) and fluorescently stained with the Epithelial Cell Kit®. Tumor Phenotyping Reagent® was used to investigate HER2/neu overexpression. RESULTS Concordance of HER2 status between the primary tumor and CTCs was 86% (49 out of 57 patients) at baseline and 82% (50 out of 61 patients) in the treatment samples. HER2 overexpression in CTCs was acquired in 8 out of 45 patients (18%) and lost in 3 out of 16 patients (19%) during a treatment containing trastuzumab. The overall discordance rate between the primary tumor and CTCs was 18% (11 out of 61 patients). Patients with HER2 overexpression in CTCs had poorer progression-free survival compared with those without CTCs or with HER2- CTCs (log-rank P =.036). CONCLUSION Information on the presence or absence of HER2 overexpression can be obtained in CTCs. Larger trials are needed to evaluate the activity of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with acquired HER2 overexpression in CTCs.

Hormone-receptor expression and activity of trastuzumab with chemotherapy in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients

The relationship between quantitative immunohistochemical hormone receptor expression and response to the combination of trastuzumab with chemotherapy in HER2‐positive advanced breast cancer is currently unknown.

Participation in Clinical Trials as Viewed by the Patient: Understanding Cultural and Emotional Aspects Which Influence Choice

Background: Patients invited to take part in a clinical trial may evoke an archetype on which they may base their decision of adherence to participation, instead of on the study itself. Methods: A 17-item, multiple choice questionnaire was developed, tested and then administered to 102 Italian-speaking patients with advanced lung or breast cancers who had never been exposed to participation in a trial. Results: The questionnaire was answered by all patients. Eighty-five percent were positive about trial participation. Demographic factors did not influence patients’ willingness to participate. Trust in the investigator (76%) or in the institute (64%) and hope of receiving a new chance for cure (78%) were cited as reasons to accept participation. A minority was concerned by potential conflicts of interest (31%) or the thought of being ‘guinea pigs’ (36%), and feared that doctors were interested in advancing their own research, even though there were more efficient drugs available (28%). Fifty percent feared receiving a little-known medicine, and 76% considered that a thorough explanation of toxicity/safety of the proposed treatment helped them decide. Conclusion: Several prejudices, fears and some hopes have been captured by the questionnaire. Understanding such specifics will improve patient information leading patients to a more conscious motivation in deciding whether to participate in a clinical trial.

Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells According to Immunohistochemically Defined Molecular Subtypes in Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration might be useful to identify different risk categories within each molecular subtype. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 203 consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer with baseline CTC enumeration performed with CellSearch (Veridex Corp, Warren, NJ) between March 2005 and July 2011. Patients were categorized into 3 prognostic groups based on the number of CTCs (0, 1-4, and ≥ 5) and into 5 categories based on tumor biological characteristics: luminal-A (estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR] > 1%, grade 1/2, human epidermal growth factor 2 [HER2]-negative [HER2(-)], Ki67 value < 14%); luminal-B (ER and/or PR > 1%, grade 3, HER2(-), Ki67 value > 14%); luminal-B HER2-positive [HER2(+)] (ER and/or PR > 1%, any grade, HER2(+), Ki-67 value any); HER2(+) (HER2 overexpressed/fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH] amplified, ER and PR absent); triple negative (TN) (ER and PR 0%, HER2 not overexpressed/FISH not amplified). RESULTS Median age was 57 years (range 31-78 years). Twenty-seven patients (13.3%) had luminal-A category, 105 (51.7%) patients had luminal-B, 29 (14.3%) patients had luminal-B HER2(+), 24 patients (11.8%) had HER2(+), and 18 patients (8.9%) had TN. CTCs were mostly found in patients with luminal-A/luminal-B HER2(-) subtype. At multivariable analysis, CTC count was a significant predictive factor for overall survival (OS) in all molecular subtypes (log-rank P < .01). Patients with 0 CTCs/7.5 mL blood and all subtypes, except HER2(+), seem to perform better compared with other categories. CONCLUSION These findings confirm CTCs as an important prognostic factor for metastatic breast cancer in all molecular subtypes. Larger studies could help identify metastatic breast cancer subgroups in which CTC analysis would be particularly useful.

Metronomic administration of pegylated liposomal-doxorubicin in extensively pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: A mono-institutional case-series report

BACKGROUND Metronomic chemotherapy has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Pegylated liposomal-doxorubicin (PLD) pharmacokinetic characteristics support the rationale for using the drug in a metronomic fashion, potentially able to combine anthracyclines efficacy to a low toxicity profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a case-series report carried out in both anthracycline-naive and pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients, we tested feasibility, clinical efficacy and tolerability of PLD administered with a novel metronomic schedule of 20mg/m(2) i.v. every two weeks. RESULTS 52 patients were enrolled and 45 were evaluated. Forty-four patients were assessed for either response or toxicity. Eight patients (18%) had partial responses (PR) and 17 (39%) stable disease (SD), with a clinical benefit (CB) of 45% (95% CI: 30.3%-59.7%). Nineteen patients (43%) had progressive disease (PD). Neither grade 3 nor grade 4 haematological or clinical side effects were recorded, except for 2 patients with grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). No cardiac toxicity was recorded. CONCLUSION Metronomic administration of PLD is a feasible and active treatment for extensively pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients, alternative to classic anthracyclines, balancing clinical efficacy with a good quality of life in terms of reduced side effects and low personal costs for the patient.

Immune approaches to the treatment of breast cancer, around the corner?

Immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer can be categorized as either (a) specific stimulation of the immune system by active immunization, with cancer vaccines, or (b) passive immunization, such as tumor-specific antibodies (including immune modulators) or adoptive cell therapy that inhibit the function of, or directly kill, tumor cells. We will present the current information and the future perspectives of immunotherapy in patients with breast cancer, including the prognostic role of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, immune signatures, targeted therapies modulating the immune system, and tumor antigen cancer vaccines. Active immunotherapy in breast cancer and its implementation into clinical trials have been largely a frustrating experience in the last decades. The concept that the immune system regulates cancer development is experiencing a new era of interest. It is clear that the cancer immunosurveillance process indeed exists and potentially acts as an extrinsic tumor suppressor. Also, the immune system can facilitate tumor progression by sculpting the immunogenic phenotype of tumors as they develop. Cancer immunoediting represents a refinement of the cancer immunosurveillance hypothesis and resumes the complex interaction between tumor and immune system into three phases: elimination, equilibrium, and escape. Major topics in the field of immunology deserve a response: what do we know about tumor immunogenicity, and how might we therapeutically improve tumor immunogenicity? How can we modulate response of the immune system? Is there any gene signature predictive of response to immune modulators? The success of future immunotherapy strategies will depend on the identification of additional immunogenic antigens that can serve as the best tumor-rejection targets. Therapeutic success will depend on developing the best antigen delivery systems and on the elucidation of the entire network of immune signaling pathways that regulate immune responses in the tumor microenvironment.

Oral Metronomic Cyclophosphamide and Methotrexate Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: A Mono‐Institutional Case‐Cohort Report

Abstract:  Fulvestrant is effective in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor‐positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). So far, no published data exist on fulvestrant combined with chemotherapy. We retrospectively assessed the role of combining oral metronomic cyclophosphamide and methotrexate (CM) to fulvestrant in two cohorts (A and B) of heavily pre‐treated estrogen receptor‐positive advanced ABC patients. From October 2006 to September 2009, 33 postmenopausal patients received fulvestrant 250 mg via i.m. injection q28 days. In A, 20 patients added metronomic cyclophosphamide (50 mg p.o. daily) and methotrexate (2.5 mg p.o. twice daily on day 1 and day 4 weekly) after disease progression, continuing fulvestrant at the same dose. In B, 13 patients started fulvestrant plus metronomic CM upfront. Thirty‐two patients were evaluable for response. Clinical benefit (partial response + stable disease >24 months) for A + B was 56% (95% CI 38–74%). The addition of metronomic CM did not determine relevant toxicities. Treatment with fulvestrant plus metronomic CM was effective in advanced ABC and was minimally toxic providing long‐term disease control in a high proportion of patients. The prolonged clinical benefit, often desirable in such patients, supports this regimen as an additional and useful therapeutic tool.

Erlotinib-Induced Breast Cancer Regression

Objective: To report a case of erlotinib-induced breast cancer regression. Case Summary: A 38-year-old woman developed bilateral locoregional malignant cutaneous lymphangitis following a right subcutaneous mastectomy and 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. After several systemic chemotherapy regimens, the lymphangitis worsened rapidly, with progressive skin ulceration. Morphine and dexamethasone were given, with suboptimal pain control. A chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine and vinorelbine was started. After 2 full-dose administrations, while lymphangitis continued to worsen, erlotinib 150 mg/day was added to the regimen. After 10 weeks of treatment, pain subsided and analgesics were discontinued. Physical examination revealed a partial regression of malignant cutaneous lymphangitis and pulmonary metastases, with resolution of ulceration. Discussion: There has been increased interest in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer. Gefitinib has shown a low level of efficacy, while preliminary clinical data on erlotinib were not conclusive and suggested lack of clinical activity. Molecular analysis of the tumor in our patient revealed a profile predictive of response to EGFR selective inhibitors in some patients with lung cancer. Conclusions: The addition of erlotinib to our patients chemotherapy regimen resulted in antitumor activity in breast cancer in which an activated EGFR pathway was demonstrated. This finding is consistent with available preclinical and clinical data on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors across tumor types and supports the efforts to optimize EGFR selective inhibitors in treating breast cancer and other malignancies.

The choice of whether to participate in a phase I clinical trial: increasing the awareness of patients with cancer. An exploratory study.

In a previous study, we found that patients who were offered the possibility of participation in a clinical trial had unexpressed concerns and fears that prevented them from making free or fully knowledgeable choices about their trial participation. In a selected population of patients who were offered participation in a phase I trial, we prospectively investigated whether a face‐to‐face discussion about their unexpressed fears might lead to a more conscious decision about whether to accept/refuse participation in the trial.