François Philippon

Incidence, predictive factors, and prognostic value of new-onset atrial fibrillation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the incidence, predictive factors, and prognostic value of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND Very few data exist on the occurrence of NOAF following TAVI. METHODS A total of 138 consecutive patients with no prior history of atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve. Patients were on continuous electrocardiogram monitoring until hospital discharge, and NOAF was defined as any episode of AF lasting >30 s. All clinical, echocardiographic, procedural, and follow-up data were prospectively collected. RESULTS NOAF occurred in 44 patients (31.9%) at a median time of 48 h (interquartile range: 0 to 72 h) following TAVI. The predictive factors of NOAF were left atrial (LA) size (odds ratio [OR]: 1.21 for each increase in 1 mm/m(2), 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.34, p < 0.0001) and transapical approach (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 1.35 to 12.31, p = 0.019). At 30-day follow-up, NOAF was associated with a higher rate of stroke/systemic embolism (13.6% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.021, p = 0.047 after adjustment for baseline differences between groups), with no differences in mortality rate between groups (NOAF: 9.1%, no-NOAF: 6.4%, p = 0.57). At a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range: 5 to 20 months), a total of 27 patients (19.6%) had died, with no differences between the NOAF (15.9%) and no-NOAF (21.3%) groups, p = 0.58. The cumulative rate of stroke and stroke/systemic embolism at follow-up were 13.6% and 15.9%, respectively, in the NOAF group versus 3.2% in the no-NOAF group (p = 0.039, adjusted p = 0.037 for stroke; p = 0.020, adjusted p = 0.023 for stroke/systemic embolism). CONCLUSIONS NOAF occurred in about one-third of the patients with no prior history of AF undergoing TAVI and its incidence was increased in patients with larger LA size and those undergoing transapical TAVI. NOAF was associated with a higher rate of stroke/systemic embolism, but not a higher mortality, at 30 days and at 1-year follow-up.

Usefulness of fluorine-18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography for identification of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections.

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the usefulness of fluorodesoxyglucose marked by fluorine-18 ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. BACKGROUND CIED infection is sometimes challenging to diagnose. Because extraction is associated with significant morbidity/mortality, new imaging modalities to confirm the infection and its dissemination would be of clinical value. METHODS Three groups were compared. In Group A, 42 patients with suspected CIED infection underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Positive PET/CT was defined as abnormal uptake along cardiac devices. Group B included 12 patients without infection who underwent PET/CT 4 to 8 weeks post-implant. Group C included 12 patients implanted for >6 months without infection who underwent PET/CT for another indication. Semi-quantitative ratio (SQR) was obtained from the ratio between maximal uptake and lung parenchyma uptake. RESULTS In Group A, 32 of 42 patients with suspected CIED infection had positive PET/CT. Twenty-four patients with positive PET/CT underwent extraction with excellent correlation. In 7 patients with positive PET/CT, 6 were treated as superficial infection with clinical resolution. One patient with positive PET/CT but negative leukocyte scan was considered false positive due to Dacron pouch. Ten patients with negative-PET/CT were treated with antibiotics and none has relapsed at 12.9 ± 1.9 months. In Group B, patients had mild uptake seen at the level of the connector. There was no abnormal uptake in Group C patients. Median SQR was significantly higher in Group A (A = 2.02 vs. B = 1.08 vs. C = 0.57; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS PET/CT is useful in differentiating between CIED infection and recent post-implant changes. It may guide appropriate therapy.

Complications associated with defibrillation threshold testing: The Canadian experience

BACKGROUND Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing has traditionally been a routine part of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, despite a lack of compelling evidence that it predicts or improves outcomes. In the past, when devices were much less reliable, DFT testing seemed prudent; however, modern ICD systems have such a high rate of successful defibrillation that many electrophysiologists now question whether DFT testing is still worthwhile, particularly since DFT testing may now be the highest acute risk component of ICD implantation. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to systematically document complications directly attributable to intraoperative DFT testing. METHODS We obtained data on DFT-related complications from all 21 adult ICD implant centers in Canada, covering the period from January 1, 2000, to September 30, 2006. RESULTS There were a total of 19,067 ICD implants in Canada during the study period. There were three DFT testing-related deaths, five DFT testing-related strokes, and 27 episodes that required prolonged resuscitation. Two patients had significant clinical sequelae after prolonged resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS The risk of severe complications from intraoperative DFT testing appears small, even allowing for the underestimation of its true rate with the current study methodology. These slight but measurable risks must be considered when assessing the risk-benefit ratio of the procedure. Additional data from ongoing prospective ICD registries and/or clinical trials are required.

Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome Are Independent Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Background— Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a highly prevalent complication after cardiac surgery with substantial effects on outcomes. Previous studies have reported that obesity is a risk factor for POAF after cardiac surgery. However, it is unknown whether the metabolic syndrome (MS) also increases the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results— We retrospectively analyzed the association between obesity and MS and the incidence of new-onset POAF in a total of 5085 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with no concomitant valvular surgery. Of these patients, 1468 (29%) were obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) and 2320 (46%) had a MS as defined by the NCEP-ATPIII. POAF occurred in 1374 (27%) of the patients. Obesity was associated (P<0.001) with increased incidence of POAF in the whole cohort as well as in patients >50 years old but not in patients ≤50 years old. In these patients, MS was the only metabolic factor to be significantly associated with higher incidence of POAF (12% versus 6%, P=0.01). In >50-year-old patients, mild (30 ≤ body mass index <35 kg/m2) and moderate–severe (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2) obesity were independently associated with a 1.4-fold (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.71; P=0.004) and 2.3-fold (95% CI: 1.71 to 3.13; P<0.0001) increase in the risk of POAF, respectively. In ≤50-year-old patients, MS (relative risk [RR]: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.10 to 5.12; P=0.02) but not obesity was independently associated with POAF. Conclusion— This study demonstrates that obesity is a powerful risk factor for the occurrence of POAF after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients older than 50 years. However, in the younger population, this association is not observed and MS is the only metabolic risk factor to be independently associated with POAF.

Predictive factors and long-term clinical consequences of persistent left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the predictive factors and prognostic value of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with a balloon-expandable valve. BACKGROUND The predictors of persistent (vs. transient or absent) LBBB after TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve and its clinical consequences are unknown. METHODS A total of 202 consecutive patients with no baseline ventricular conduction disturbances or previous permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) who underwent TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve were included. Patients were on continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring during hospitalization and 12-lead ECG was performed daily until hospital discharge. No patient was lost at a median follow-up of 12 (range: 6 to 24) months, and ECG tracing was available in 97% of patients. The criteria for PPI were limited to the occurrence of high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) or severe symptomatic bradycardia. RESULTS New-onset LBBB was observed in 61 patients (30.2%) after TAVI, and had resolved in 37.7% and 57.3% at hospital discharge and 6- to 12-month follow-up, respectively. Baseline QRS duration (p = 0.037) and ventricular depth of the prosthesis (p = 0.017) were independent predictors of persistent LBBB. Persistent LBBB at hospital discharge was associated with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.001) and poorer functional status (p = 0.034) at 1-year follow-up. Patients with persistent LBBB and no PPI at hospital discharge had a higher incidence of syncope (16.0% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.001) and complete AVB requiring PPI (20.0% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.001), but not of global mortality or cardiac mortality during the follow-up period (all, p > 0.20). New-onset LBBB was the only factor associated with PPI following TAVI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Up to 30% of patients with no prior conduction disturbances developed new LBBB following TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve, although it was transient in more than one third. Longer baseline QRS duration and a more ventricular positioning of the prosthesis were associated with a higher rate of persistent LBBB, which in turn determined higher risks for complete AVB and PPI, but not mortality, at 1-year follow-up.

Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Background— Very few data exist on the clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of PPI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on late outcomes in a large cohort of patients. Methods and Results— A total of 1556 consecutive patients without prior PPI undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included. Of them, 239 patients (15.4%) required a PPI within the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. At a mean follow-up of 22±17 months, no association was observed between the need for 30-day PPI and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.30; P=0.871), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–1.17; P=0.270), and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.30; P=0.980). A lower rate of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death was observed in patients with PPI (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.85; P=0.023). Patients with new PPI showed a poorer evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction over time (P=0.017), and new PPI was an independent predictor of left ventricular ejection fraction decrease at the 6- to 12-month follow-up (estimated coefficient, −2.26; 95% confidence interval, −4.07 to −0.44; P=0.013; R2=0.121). Conclusions— The need for PPI was a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but it was not associated with any increase in overall or cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure after a mean follow-up of ≈2 years. Indeed, 30-day PPI was a protective factor for the occurrence of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death. However, new PPI did have a negative effect on left ventricular function over time.Background— Very few data exist on the clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of PPI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on late outcomes in a large cohort of patients. Methods and Results— A total of 1556 consecutive patients without prior PPI undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included. Of them, 239 patients (15.4%) required a PPI within the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. At a mean follow-up of 22±17 months, no association was observed between the need for 30-day PPI and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.30; P =0.871), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–1.17; P =0.270), and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.30; P =0.980). A lower rate of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death was observed in patients with PPI (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.85; P =0.023). Patients with new PPI showed a poorer evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction over time ( P =0.017), and new PPI was an independent predictor of left ventricular ejection fraction decrease at the 6- to 12-month follow-up (estimated coefficient, −2.26; 95% confidence interval, −4.07 to −0.44; P =0.013; R 2=0.121). Conclusions— The need for PPI was a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but it was not associated with any increase in overall or cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure after a mean follow-up of ≈2 years. Indeed, 30-day PPI was a protective factor for the occurrence of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death. However, new PPI did have a negative effect on left ventricular function over time. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-43}

Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Impact on Late Clinical Outcomes and Left Ventricular Function

Background— Very few data exist on the clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of PPI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on late outcomes in a large cohort of patients. Methods and Results— A total of 1556 consecutive patients without prior PPI undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included. Of them, 239 patients (15.4%) required a PPI within the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. At a mean follow-up of 22±17 months, no association was observed between the need for 30-day PPI and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.30; P=0.871), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–1.17; P=0.270), and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.30; P=0.980). A lower rate of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death was observed in patients with PPI (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.85; P=0.023). Patients with new PPI showed a poorer evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction over time (P=0.017), and new PPI was an independent predictor of left ventricular ejection fraction decrease at the 6- to 12-month follow-up (estimated coefficient, −2.26; 95% confidence interval, −4.07 to −0.44; P=0.013; R2=0.121). Conclusions— The need for PPI was a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but it was not associated with any increase in overall or cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure after a mean follow-up of ≈2 years. Indeed, 30-day PPI was a protective factor for the occurrence of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death. However, new PPI did have a negative effect on left ventricular function over time.Background— Very few data exist on the clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of PPI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on late outcomes in a large cohort of patients. Methods and Results— A total of 1556 consecutive patients without prior PPI undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included. Of them, 239 patients (15.4%) required a PPI within the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. At a mean follow-up of 22±17 months, no association was observed between the need for 30-day PPI and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.30; P =0.871), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–1.17; P =0.270), and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.30; P =0.980). A lower rate of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death was observed in patients with PPI (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.85; P =0.023). Patients with new PPI showed a poorer evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction over time ( P =0.017), and new PPI was an independent predictor of left ventricular ejection fraction decrease at the 6- to 12-month follow-up (estimated coefficient, −2.26; 95% confidence interval, −4.07 to −0.44; P =0.013; R 2=0.121). Conclusions— The need for PPI was a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but it was not associated with any increase in overall or cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure after a mean follow-up of ≈2 years. Indeed, 30-day PPI was a protective factor for the occurrence of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death. However, new PPI did have a negative effect on left ventricular function over time. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-43}

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and a QRS Complex <120 Milliseconds The Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (LESSER-EARTH) Trial

Background— Although the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy are well established in selected patients with heart failure and a prolonged QRS duration, salutary effects in patients with narrow QRS complexes remain to be demonstrated. Methods and Results— The Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (LESSER-EARTH) trial is a randomized, double-blind, 12-center study that was designed to compare the effects of active and inactive cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and a QRS duration <120 milliseconds. The trial was interrupted prematurely by the Data Safety and Monitoring Board because of futility and safety concerns after 85 patients were randomized. Changes in exercise duration after 12 months were no different in patients with and without active cardiac resynchronization therapy (−0.7 minutes [95% confidence interval (CI), −2.9 to 1.5] versus 0.8 minutes [95% CI, −1.2 to 2.9]; P=0.31]. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in left ventricular end-systolic volumes (−6.4 mL [95% CI, −18.8 to 5.9] versus 3.1 mL [95% CI, −9.2 to 15.5]; P=0.28) and ejection fraction (3.3% [95% CI, 0.7–6.0] versus 2.1% [95% CI, −0.5 to 4.8]; P=0.52). Moreover, cardiac resynchronization therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the 6-minute walk distance (−11.3 m [95% CI, −31.7 to 9.7] versus 25.3 m [95% CI, 6.1–44.5]; P=0.01), an increase in QRS duration (40.2 milliseconds [95% CI, 34.2–46.2] versus 3.4 milliseconds [95% CI, 0.6–6.2]; P<0.0001), and a nonsignificant trend toward an increase in heart failure–related hospitalizations (15 hospitalizations in 5 patients versus 4 hospitalizations in 4 patients). Conclusions— In patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽35%, symptoms of heart failure, and a QRS duration <120 milliseconds, cardiac resynchronization therapy did not improve clinical outcomes or left ventricular remodeling and was associated with potential harm. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00900549.Background —While the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are well established in selected patients with heart failure and a prolonged QRS duration, salutary effects in patients with narrow QRS complexes remain to be demonstrated. Methods and Results —The LESSER-EARTH trial is a randomized, double-blind, 12-center study that was designed to compare the effects of active versus inactive CRT therapy in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and a QRS duration <120 ms. The trial was prematurely interrupted by the Data Safety and Monitoring Board due to futility and safety concerns after 85 patients were randomized. Changes in exercise duration after 12 months were no different in patients with and without active CRT [-0.7 (-2.9, 1.5) minutes versus +0.8 (-1.2, 2.9) minutes, P =0.31]. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in left ventricular end-systolic volumes [-6.4 (-18.8, 5.9) mL versus +3.1 (-9.2, 15.5) mL, P =0.28] and ejection fraction [+3.3% (0.7%, 6.0%) versus +2.1% (-0.5%, 4.8%), P =0.52]. Moreover, CRT was associated with a significant reduction in the 6-minute walk distance [-11.3 (-31.7, 9.7) meters versus +25.3 (6.1, 44.5) meters, P =0.01], an increase in QRS duration [40.2 (34.2, 46.2) ms versus 3.4 (0.6, 6.2) ms, P <0.0001], and a non-significant trend towards an increase in heart failure-related hospitalizations (15 hospitalizations in 5 patients versus 4 hospitalizations in 4 patients). Conclusions —In patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, symptoms of heart failure, and a QRS duration <120 ms, CRT did not improve clinical outcomes or left ventricular remodelling, and was associated with potential harm. Clinical Trial Registration Information —ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: [NCT00900549][1]. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00900549&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2Fearly%2F2013%2F02%2F05%2FCIRCULATIONAHA.112.001239.atom

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: Results from the Resynchronization for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT)

Background—Cardiac resynchronization (CRT) prolongs survival in patients with systolic heart failure and QRS prolongation. However, most trials excluded patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results—The Resynchronization for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT) randomized patients to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or ICD+CRT, stratified by the presence of permanent atrial fibrillation. Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation were randomized to CRT-ICD (n=114) or ICD (n=115). Patients receiving a CRT-ICD were similar to those receiving an ICD: age (71.6±7.3 versus 70.4±7.7 years), left ventricular ejection fraction (22.9±5.3% versus 22.3±5.1%), and QRS duration (151.0±23.6 versus 153.4±24.7 ms). There was no difference in the primary outcome of death or heart failure hospitalization between those assigned to CRT-ICD versus ICD (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.65–1.41; P=0.82). Cardiovascular death was similar between treatment arms (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.55–1.71; P=0.91); however, there was a trend for fewer heart failure hospitalizations with CRT-ICD (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38–1.01; P=0.052). The change in 6-minute hall walk duration between baseline and 12 months was not different between treatment arms (CRT-ICD: 19±84 m versus ICD: 16±76 m; P=0.88). Patients treated with CRT-ICD showed a trend for a greater improvement in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score between baseline and 6 months (CRT-ICD: 41±21 to 31±21; ICD: 33±20 to 28±20; P=0.057). Conclusions—Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation who are otherwise CRT candidates appear to gain minimal benefit from CRT-ICD compared with a standard ICD. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00251251.Background— Cardiac resynchronization (CRT) prolongs survival in patients with systolic heart failure and QRS prolongation. However, most trials excluded patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results— The Resynchronization for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT) randomized patients to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or ICD+CRT, stratified by the presence of permanent atrial fibrillation. Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation were randomized to CRT-ICD (n=114) or ICD (n=115). Patients receiving a CRT-ICD were similar to those receiving an ICD: age (71.6±7.3 versus 70.4±7.7 years), left ventricular ejection fraction (22.9±5.3% versus 22.3±5.1%), and QRS duration (151.0±23.6 versus 153.4±24.7 ms). There was no difference in the primary outcome of death or heart failure hospitalization between those assigned to CRT-ICD versus ICD (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.65–1.41; P =0.82). Cardiovascular death was similar between treatment arms (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.55–1.71; P =0.91); however, there was a trend for fewer heart failure hospitalizations with CRT-ICD (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38–1.01; P =0.052). The change in 6-minute hall walk duration between baseline and 12 months was not different between treatment arms (CRT-ICD: 19±84 m versus ICD: 16±76 m; P =0.88). Patients treated with CRT-ICD showed a trend for a greater improvement in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score between baseline and 6 months (CRT-ICD: 41±21 to 31±21; ICD: 33±20 to 28±20; P =0.057). Conclusions— Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation who are otherwise CRT candidates appear to gain minimal benefit from CRT-ICD compared with a standard ICD. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT00251251][1]. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00251251&atom=%2Fcirchf%2F5%2F5%2F566.atom

Late Cardiac Death in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Incidence and Predictors of Advanced Heart Failure and Sudden Cardiac Death

BACKGROUND Little evidence exists of the burden and predictors of cardiac death after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and predictors of cardiac death from advanced heart failure (HF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a large patient cohort undergoing TAVR. METHODS The study included a total of 3,726 patients who underwent TAVR using balloon (57%) or self-expandable (43%) valves. Causes of death were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. RESULTS At a mean follow-up of 22 ± 18 months, 155 patients had died due to advanced HF (15.2% of total deaths, 46.1% of deaths from cardiac causes) and 57 had died due to SCD (5.6% of deaths, 16.9% of cardiac deaths). Baseline comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, lower mean transaortic gradient, pulmonary artery systolic pressure >60 mm Hg; p < 0.05 for all) and 2 procedural factors (transapical approach, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60 to 3.54; p < 0.001; presence of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation after TAVR, HR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.82 to 4.27; p < 0.001) independently predicted death from advanced HF. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.55; p = 0.033) and new-onset persistent left bundle-branch block following TAVR (HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.23 to 4.14; p = 0.009) were independently associated with an increased risk of SCD. Patients with new-onset persistent left bundle-branch block and a QRS duration >160 ms had a greater SCD risk (HR: 4.78, 95% CI: 1.56 to 14.63; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Advanced HF and SCD accounted for two-thirds of cardiac deaths in patients after TAVR. Potentially modifiable or treatable factors leading to increased risk of mortality for HF and SCD were identified. Future studies should determine whether targeting these factors decreases the risk of cardiac death.