Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Frank J. Lagerwaard is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Frank J. Lagerwaard.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1999

Identification of prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases: a review of 1292 patients.

Frank J. Lagerwaard; Peter C. Levendag; Peter J.C.M. Nowak; Wilhelmina M.H. Eijkenboom; Patrick Hanssens; Paul I.M. Schmitz

PURPOSE Prognostic factors in 1292 patients with brain metastases, treated in a single institution were identified in order to determine subgroups of patients suitable for selection in future trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 1981 through December 1990, 1292 patients with CT-diagnosed brain metastases were referred to the Department of Radiation Oncology, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam. The majority of patients were treated with whole brain radiotherapy (84%), the remainder were treated with steroids only or surgery and radiotherapy. Information on potential prognostic factors (age, sex, performance status, number and distribution of brain metastases, site of primary tumor, histology, interval between primary tumor and brain metastases, systemic tumor activity, serum lactate dehydrogenase, response to steroid treatment, and treatment modality) was collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine significant prognostic factors. Results were compared with literature findings using a review of prognostic factors in 18 published reports. RESULTS Overall median survival was 3.4 months, with 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival percentages of 36%, 12%, and 4% respectively. Survival was statistically significantly different between treatment modalities, with median survival of 1.3 months in patients treated with steroids only, 3.6 months in patients treated with radiotherapy, and 8.9 months in patients treated with neurosurgery followed by radiotherapy (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed literature findings of the major prognostic value of treatment modality on survival of patients with brain metastases. Performance status, response to steroid treatment, systemic tumor activity, and serum lactate dehydrogenase were independent prognostic factors with the strongest impact on survival, second only to treatment modality. Site of primary tumor, age, and number of brain metastases were also identified as prognostic factors in our material, although with lesser importance. In patients with lung primaries, sex was found to have significant impact on survival. In patients with breast primaries, interval between primary tumor and development of brain metastases appeared to be a statistically significant prognostic factor. Histology in patients with lung primaries and distribution of brain metastases were not found to be statistically significant in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS In this large database, the value of established prognostic factors was confirmed and, furthermore, some less well-recognized parameters such as response to steroid treatment, serum lactate dehydrogenase, age, sex in lung primaries, and site of primary tumor were established. From the three strongest prognostic factors--performance status, response to steroids, and evidence of systemic disease--simple identification of favorable and unfavorable subgroups of patients with brain metastases can be constructed.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010

Impact of Introducing Stereotactic Lung Radiotherapy for Elderly Patients With Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Time-Trend Analysis

David A. Palma; Otto Visser; Frank J. Lagerwaard; J. Belderbos; Ben J. Slotman; Suresh Senan

PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with high local control rates. The impact of introducing SBRT in patients 75 years of age or older was studied using a population-based cancer registry. METHODS The Amsterdam Cancer Registry was assessed in three eras: 1999 to 2001 (period A, pre-SBRT); 2002 to 2004 (period B, some availability of SBRT), and 2005 to 2007 (period C, full access to SBRT). χ(2), Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used to compare treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in three treatment groups: surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or neither. RESULTS A total of 875 elderly patients were diagnosed with stage I NSCLC in the study period. Median follow-up was 54 months. Primary treatment was surgery in 299 patients (34%), RT in 299 patients (34%), and neither in 277 patients (32%). RT use increased between periods A and C (26% v 42%, P < .01), corresponding to a decrease in untreated patients. The percentage of RT patients undergoing SBRT in periods B and C was 23% and 55%, respectively. Median survival for all patients increased from 16 months in period A to 21 months in period C (log-rank P < .01; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.80). The improvement in OS was confined to RT patients (HR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99), whereas no significant survival improvements were seen in the other groups. CONCLUSION SBRT introduction was associated with a 16% absolute increase in RT use, a decline in the proportion of untreated elderly patients, and an improvement in OS.


Lancet Oncology | 2012

Patterns of disease recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Sashendra Senthi; Frank J. Lagerwaard; Cornelis J.A. Haasbeek; Ben J. Slotman; Suresh Senan

BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly used in the treatment of medically inoperable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because patterns of late disease recurrence after SABR are not well characterised, we aimed to assess these outcomes in a cohort of patients with NSCLC. METHODS Patients with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG)-PET confirmed stage 1-2 NSCLC who were treated with SABR at the VU University Medical Center (Amsterdam, Netherlands) were identified from an institutional database. SABR doses were 54-60 Gy, delivered in three to eight once-daily fractions, depending on tumour size and location. Clinical follow-up and CT scans were done at 3, 6, and 12 months, then yearly thereafter. (18)F-FDG-PET restaging was only done when clinically indicated. Initial sites of recurrence were classified as local, regional, and distant, and were differentiated from second primary tumours in the lung at multidisciplinary tumour board review. FINDINGS Between April 4, 2003, and Dec 5, 2011, 676 patients were treated with SABR and were eligible for assessment of recurrence. The median follow-up was 32·9 months (IQR 14·9-50·9 months). 124 (18%) of 676 patients had disease recurrence. Actuarial 2-year rates of local, regional, and distant recurrence were 4·9% (95% CI 2·7-7·1), 7·8% (5·3-10·3), and 14·7% (11·4-18·0), respectively. Corresponding 5-year rates were 10·5% (95% CI 6·4-14·6), 12·7% (8·4-17·0), and 19·9% (14·9-24·6), respectively. Of the 124 recurrences, 82 (66%) were distant recurrences and 57 (46%) were isolated distant recurrences. Isolated locoregional recurrences occurred in the remaining 42 patients with disease recurrence (34%), 35 (83%) of whom did not develop subsequent distant recurrence. The median times to local, regional, and distant recurrence were 14·9 months (95% CI 11·4-18·4), 13·1 months (7·9-18·3), and 9·6 months (6·8-12·4), respectively. New pulmonary lesions characterised as second primary tumours in the lung developed in 42 (6%) of 676 patients at a median of 18·0 months (95% CI 12·5-23·5) after SABR. INTERPRETATION Late recurrences after SABR are infrequent and two distinct patterns account for most cases. The predominant pattern is out-of-field, isolated distant recurrence presenting early, despite initial PET staging. A third of patients develop isolated locoregional recurrence; for these patients standardised follow-up is important to ensure that appropriate salvage treatments are considered. FUNDING None.


Radiation Oncology | 2009

Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study

C.W. Hurkmans; Johan P. Cuijpers; Frank J. Lagerwaard; Joachim Widder; Uulke A. van der Heide; D. Schuring; Suresh Senan

BackgroundA phase III multi-centre randomised trial (ROSEL) has been initiated to establish the role of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with operable stage IA lung cancer. Due to rapid changes in radiotherapy technology and evolving techniques for image-guided delivery, guidelines had to be developed in order to ensure uniformity in implementation of stereotactic radiotherapy in this multi-centre study.Methods/DesignA Quality Assurance Working Party was formed by radiation oncologists and clinical physicists from both academic as well as non-academic hospitals that had already implemented stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer. A literature survey was conducted and consensus meetings were held in which both the knowledge from the literature and clinical experience were pooled. In addition, a planning study was performed in 26 stage I patients, of which 22 were stage 1A, in order to develop and evaluate the planning guidelines. Plans were optimised according to parameters adopted from RTOG trials using both an algorithm with a simple homogeneity correction (Type A) and a more advanced algorithm (Type B). Dose conformity requirements were then formulated based on these results.ConclusionBased on current literature and expert experience, guidelines were formulated for this phase III study of stereotactic radiotherapy versus surgery. These guidelines can serve to facilitate the design of future multi-centre clinical trials of stereotactic radiotherapy in other patient groups and aid a more uniform implementation of this technique outside clinical trials.


Annals of Oncology | 2013

Stage I–II non-small-cell lung cancer treated using either stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) or lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): outcomes of a propensity score-matched analysis

Naomi E. Verstegen; J.W. Oosterhuis; David A. Palma; George Rodrigues; Frank J. Lagerwaard; A. van der Elst; R. Mollema; W. Van Tets; Andrew Warner; J.J.A. Joosten; M. I. Amir; Cornelis J.A. Haasbeek; Egbert F. Smit; B.J. Slotman; S. Senan

BACKGROUND Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are both used for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. We carried out a propensity score-matched analysis to compare locoregional control (LRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS VATS lobectomy data from six hospitals were retrospectively accessed; SABR data were obtained from a single institution database. Patients were matched using propensity scores based on cTNM stage, age, gender, Charlson comorbidity score, lung function and performance score. Eighty-six VATS and 527 SABR patients were matched blinded to outcome (1:1 ratio, caliper distance 0.025). Locoregional failure was defined as recurrence in/adjacent to the planning target volume/surgical margins, ipsilateral hilum or mediastinum. Recurrences were either biopsy-confirmed or had to be PET-positive and reviewed by a tumor board. RESULTS The matched cohort consisted of 64 SABR and 64 VATS patients with the median follow-up of 30 and 16 months, respectively. Post-SABR LRC rates were superior at 1 and 3 years (96.8% and 93.3% versus 86.9% and 82.6%, respectively, P = 0.04). Distant recurrences and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different. CONCLUSION This retrospective analysis found a superior LRC after SABR compared with VATS lobectomy, but OS did not differ. Our findings support the need to compare both treatments in a randomized, controlled trial.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 1999

Evaluation of a target contouring protocol for 3D conformal radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Suresh Senan; John R. van Sörnsen de Koste; M.J. Samson; Hans Tankink; Peter P. Jansen; Peter J.C.M. Nowak; Augustinus D.G. Krol; Paul I.M. Schmitz; Frank J. Lagerwaard

BACKGROUND A protocol for the contouring of target volumes in lung cancer was implemented. Subsequently, a study was performed in order to determine the intra and inter-clinician variations in contoured volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six radiation oncologists (RO) contoured the gross tumour volume (GTV) and/or clinical target volume (CTV), and planning target volume (PTV) for three patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), on two separate occasions. These were, respectively, a well-circumscribed T1N0M0 lesion, an irregularly shaped T2N0M0 lesion, and a T2N2M0 tumour. Detailed diagnostic radiology reports were provided and contours were entered into a 3D planning system. The target volumes were calculated and beams-eye view (BEV) plots were generated to visualise differences in contouring. A software tool was used to expand the GTV and CTV in three dimensions for an automatically derived PTV. RESULTS Significant inter-RO variations in contoured target volumes were observed for all patients, and these were greater than intra-RO differences. The ratio of the largest to smallest contoured volume ranged from 1.6 for the GTV in the T1N0 lesion, to 2.0 for the PTV in the T2N2 lesion. The BEV plots revealed significant inter-RO variations in contouring the mediastinal CTV. The PTVs derived using a 3D margin programme were larger than manually contoured PTVs. These variations did not correlate with the experience of ROs. CONCLUSIONS Despite the use of an institutional contouring protocol, significant interclinician variations persist in contouring target volumes in NSCLC. Additional measures to decrease such variations should be incorporated into clinical trials.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2009

Rapid delivery of stereotactic radiotherapy for peripheral lung tumors using volumetric intensity-modulated arcs

Wilko F.A.R. Verbakel; Suresh Senan; Johan P. Cuijpers; Ben J. Slotman; Frank J. Lagerwaard

The delivery of high dose conventional stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with stage I lung tumors generally takes 30-45min per fraction. The novel volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (RA) for planning and delivery enabled much faster treatment for three patients with different fractionation schemes. This reduces the risk of intrafraction motion and is more patient friendly. In addition, in comparison to the conventional plans using 10 static non-coplanar fields, RA plans achieved superior dose conformity around the PTV and reduced chest wall doses.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2011

Outcomes of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Early-Stage Lung Cancer

Cornelis J.A. Haasbeek; Frank J. Lagerwaard; Ben J. Slotman; Suresh Senan

Introduction: The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in centrally located early-stage lung tumors has been associated with increased toxicity. We studied outcomes after delivery of risk-adapted SABR of central tumors. Methods: SABR was delivered in eight fractions of 7.5 Gy to 63 such patients between 2003 and 2009. Of these, 37 patients had a tumor at a central hilar location, whereas 26 patients had tumors abutting the pericardium or mediastinal structures. Survival outcomes were compared with patients with peripheral tumors treated during the same time period using fewer fractions of SABR. Results: Median follow-up was 35 months. Late grade III toxicity was limited to chest wall pain (n = 2) and increased dyspnoea (n = 2). No grade IV/V toxicity was observed, but grade V toxicity could not be excluded with certainty in nine patients who died of cardiopulmonary causes. Distant metastases were the predominant cause of death; cardiovascular deaths were not associated with a paracardial tumor location. No significant differences in outcomes were observed between these 63 patients and 445 other SABR patients treated for peripheral early-stage lung tumors. Three-year local control rates were 92.6% and 90.2% (p = 0.9). Three-year overall survival rates were 64.3% and 51.1% with median survival rates of 47 and 36 months, in favor of the group of patients with central tumors (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Use of risk-adapted SABR delivered in eight fractions of 7.5 Gy did not result in excess toxicity for centrally located early-stage lung tumors, and clinical outcomes were comparable with those seen for peripheral lesions.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1999

A three-dimensional CT-based target definition for elective irradiation of the neck

Peter J.C.M. Nowak; Oda B. Wijers; Frank J. Lagerwaard; Peter C. Levendag

INTRODUCTION Elective treatment of the clinically node-negative neck by radiation results in excellent control rates. However, radiation therapy with its organ-preserving properties is not without morbidity. Side effects of elective neck irradiation are mainly due to damage of the major and minor salivary glands, resulting in the dry mouth syndrome. Given that RT is the preferred treatment modality in case of elective treatment of the neck in many institutions, it is of utmost importance to try and reduce the associated sequelae of RT. MATERIAL AND METHODS With the introduction of CT-planning systems and the development of 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) techniques, it has become feasible to deliver adequate doses of radiation to the target (neck) and at the same time saving (parts of) the salivary glands from doses beyond tolerance. A prerequisite for these techniques is that they require a precise knowledge of the target (i.e., of the elective neck) on CT. To be able to correlate borders of the surgical levels in the neck (I-VI) with structures seen on CT, an anatomical study, using two fixed (phenol, formaldehyde) human cadavers, was performed. Subsequently, the 6 potential lymph node regions in the neck on CT were defined. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The reference for the current 3D CT-based definition of the lymph node regions in the neck is the official report of the American Academy of Otolaryngology, describing, based on surgical anatomy, the lymph node groups in the neck by Levels I-VI. The present investigation depicts reproducible landmarks on transversal CT images, corresponding to anatomical reference structures known from surgical levels (I-VI) and, this way, CT-based lymph node regions (1-6) were constructed.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2010

Stereotactic radiotherapy for peripheral lung tumors: A comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with 3 other delivery techniques

C.L. Ong; Wilko F.A.R. Verbakel; Johan P. Cuijpers; Ben J. Slotman; Frank J. Lagerwaard; Suresh Senan

PURPOSE Volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) allows for fast delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivery in stage I lung tumors. We compared dose distributions and delivery times between RapidArc and common delivery techniques in small tumors. METHODS In 18 patients who completed RapidArc SBRT for tumors measuring <70 cm(3), new treatment plans were generated using non-coplanar 3D conformal fields (conf-SBRT) and dynamic conformal arc radiotherapy (DCA). For 9 patients with tumors adjacent to the chest wall, co-planar intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were also generated. PTV dose coverage, organs at risk (OAR) doses and treatment delivery times were assessed. RESULTS RapidArc plans achieved a superior conformity index (CI) and lower V(45 Gy) to chest wall (p<0.05) compared to all other techniques. RapidArc led to a small increase in V(5 Gy) to contralateral lung compared to conf-SBRT (4.4±4% versus 1.2±1.8%, p=0.011). For other OAR, RapidArc and conf-SBRT plans were comparable, and both were superior to DCA plans. Delivery of a 7.5 Gy-fraction required 3.9 min (RapidArc), 11.6 min (conf-SBRT), and 12 min (IMRT). CONCLUSIONS In stage I lung tumors measuring <70 cm(3), RapidArc plans achieved both the highest dose conformity and shortest delivery times.

Collaboration


Dive into the Frank J. Lagerwaard's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suresh Senan

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B.J. Slotman

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ben J. Slotman

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Senan

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johan P. Cuijpers

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Bruynzeel

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Egbert F. Smit

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George Rodrigues

University of Western Ontario

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge