Frank P.J. Leijten

The Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Sunitinib Causes a Preeclampsia-Like Syndrome With Activation of the Endothelin System

Angiogenesis inhibition is an established treatment for several tumor types. Unfortunately, this therapy is associated with adverse effects, including hypertension and renal toxicity, referred to as “preeclampsia.” Recently, we demonstrated in patients and in rats that the multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib induces a rise in blood pressure (BP), renal dysfunction, and proteinuria associated with activation of the endothelin system. In the current study we investigated the effects of sunitinib on rat renal histology, including the resemblance with preeclampsia, as well as the roles of endothelin 1, decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, and increased oxidative stress in the development of sunitinib-induced hypertension and renal toxicity. In rats on sunitinib, light and electron microscopic examination revealed marked glomerular endotheliosis, a characteristic histological feature of preeclampsia, which was partly reversible after sunitinib discontinuation. The histological abnormalities were accompanied by an increase in urinary excretion of endothelin 1 and diminished NO metabolite excretion. In rats on sunitinib alone, BP increased (&Dgr;BP: 31.6±0.9 mm Hg). This rise could largely be prevented with the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan (&Dgr;BP: 12.3±1.5 mm Hg) and only mildly with Tempol, a superoxide dismutase mimetic (&Dgr;BP: 25.9±2.3 mm Hg). Both compounds could not prevent the sunitinib-induced rise in serum creatinine or renal histological abnormalities and had no effect on urine nitrates but decreased proteinuria and urinary endothelin 1 excretion. Our findings indicate that both the endothelin system and oxidative stress play important roles in the development of sunitinib-induced proteinuria and that the endothelin system rather than oxidative stress is important for the development of sunitinib-induced hypertension.

Nucleotide Excision DNA Repair Is Associated With Age-Related Vascular Dysfunction

Background Vascular dysfunction in atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus, as observed in the aging population of developed societies, is associated with vascular DNA damage and cell senescence. We hypothesized that cumulative DNA damage during aging contributes to vascular dysfunction. Methods and Results In mice with genomic instability resulting from the defective nucleotide excision repair genes ERCC1 and XPD (Ercc1d/− and XpdTTD mice), we explored age-dependent vascular function compared with that in wild-type mice. Ercc1d/− mice showed increased vascular cell senescence, accelerated development of vasodilator dysfunction, increased vascular stiffness, and elevated blood pressure at a very young age. The vasodilator dysfunction was due to decreased endothelial nitric oxide synthase levels and impaired smooth muscle cell function, which involved phosphodiesterase activity. Similar to Ercc1d/− mice, age-related endothelium-dependent vasodilator dysfunction in XpdTTD animals was increased. To investigate the implications for human vascular disease, we explored associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms of selected nucleotide excision repair genes and arterial stiffness within the AortaGen Consortium and found a significant association of a single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs2029298) in the putative promoter region of DDB2 gene with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Conclusions Mice with genomic instability recapitulate age-dependent vascular dysfunction as observed in animal models and in humans but with an accelerated progression compared with wild-type mice. In addition, we found associations between variations in human DNA repair genes and markers for vascular stiffness, which is associated with aging. Our study supports the concept that genomic instability contributes importantly to the development of cardiovascular disease.

Renin- and Prorenin-Induced Effects in Rat Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Overexpressing the Human (Pro)Renin Receptor: Does (Pro)Renin-(Pro)Renin Receptor Interaction Actually Occur?

Renin/prorenin binding to the (pro)renin receptor ([P]RR) results in direct (angiotensin-independent) second-messenger activation in vitro, whereas in vivo studies in rodents overexpressing prorenin (≈400-fold) or the (P)RR do not support such activation. To solve this discrepancy, DNA synthesis, extracellular signal–regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation, and plasminogen-activator inhibitor 1 release were evaluated in wild-type and human (P)RR-overexpressing vascular smooth muscle cells after their incubation with 1 to 80 nmol/L of (pro)renin. Human prorenin (4 nmol/L, ie, ≈800-fold above normal) + angiotensinogen increased DNA synthesis in human (P)RR cells only in an angiotensin II type 1 receptor–dependent manner. Prorenin at this concentration also increased plasminogen-activator inhibitor 1 release via angiotensin. Prorenin alone at 4 nmol/L was without effect, but at 20 nmol/L (≈4000-fold above normal) it activated extracellular signal–regulated kinase 1/2 directly (ie, independent of angiotensin). Renin at concentrations of 1 nmol/L (≈2000-fold above normal) and higher directly stimulated DNA synthesis, extracellular signal–regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation, and plasminogen-activator inhibitor 1 release in wild-type and human (P)RR cells, and similar effects were seen for rat renin, indicating that they were mediated via the rat (P)RR. In conclusion, angiotensin generation depending on prorenin-(P)RR interaction may occur in transgenic rodents overexpressing prorenin several 100-fold. Direct (pro)renin-induced effects via the (P)RR require agonist concentrations that are far above the levels in wild-type and transgenic rats. Therefore, only prorenin (and not [P]RR) overexpression will result in an angiotensin-dependent phenotype, and direct renin-(P)RR interaction is unlikely to ever occur in nonrenin-synthesizing organs.

Handle Region Peptide Counteracts the Beneficial Effects of the Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

To investigate whether the putative (pro)renin receptor blocker, the handle region peptide (HRP), exerts effects on top of the blood pressure–lowering and cardioprotective effects of the renin inhibitor aliskiren, spontaneously hypertensive rats were implanted with telemetry transmitters to monitor heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP). After a 2-week recovery period, vehicle, aliskiren, HRP (100 and 1 mg/kg per day, respectively), and HRP+aliskiren were infused for 3 weeks using osmotic minipumps. Subsequently, the heart was removed to study coronary function according to Langendorff. Baseline MAP and heart rate in vehicle-treated rats were 146±3 mm Hg and 326±4 bpm. HRP did not affect MAP, whereas aliskiren and HRP+aliskiren lowered MAP (by maximally 29±2 and 20±1 mm Hg, respectively) without affecting heart rate. Aliskiren significantly reduced MAP throughout the 3-week infusion period, whereas the blood pressure–lowering effect of HRP+aliskiren returned to baseline within 2 weeks of treatment. In comparison with vehicle, aliskiren increased the endothelium-dependent response to bradykinin and decreased the response to angiotensin II in the coronary circulation, whereas these responses were not altered after treatment with HRP or HRP+aliskiren. HRP did not alter plasma renin activity, plasma angiotensin levels, or the renal angiotensin content, either alone or on top of aliskiren, nor did it alter the aliskiren-induced decrease in renal Ang II type 1 receptor expression. Yet, it did reverse the aliskiren-induced reduction in cardiomyocyte area, without affecting this area when given alone. In conclusion, HRP counteracts the beneficial effects of aliskiren on blood pressure, coronary function, and cardiac hypertrophy in an angiotensin-independent manner.

Functional characterization of contractions to tegaserod in human isolated proximal and distal coronary arteries.

Tegaserod, a 5-HT(4) receptor agonist, has been used to treat idiopathic constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel disease. It has recently been suggested that tegaserod has an affinity for 5-HT(1B) receptors, which mediate vasoconstriction. As some patients have experienced cardiac ischemia during treatment with tegaserod, we assessed contractions to tegaserod in healthy and diseased human isolated coronary arteries and compared the results with those obtained using sumatriptan, an established 5-HT(1B) receptor agonist. Proximal and distal human coronary arteries were divided into sets of healthy and diseased tissues based on functional endothelial responses. Concentration-response curves to tegaserod and sumatriptan were constructed to assess their contractile potential. Tegaserods antagonist properties at 5-HT(1B) receptors were studied by constructing concentration-response curves to sumatriptan in the absence or presence of tegaserod (1 microM). Sumatriptan induced concentration-dependent contractions, which were greater in distal than in proximal coronary artery segments. In the proximal segments, tegaserod induced contractions only at concentrations of 10 microM or higher, while in distal segments contractions were generally absent. Tegaserod did not antagonize sumatriptan-induced contractions. There was no difference between the results obtained in healthy and diseased coronary arteries. In conclusion, tegaserod induced contractions in human proximal coronary arteries at concentrations 1000 times higher than C(max) (6 mg bid). Hence, tegaserod does not exhibit a relevant vasoconstrictor potential in the human coronary artery. Further, tegaserod did not behave as an antagonist at 5-HT(1B) receptors. Additional studies may be warranted to investigate the use of 5-HT(4) agonists in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

The (pro)renin receptor blocker handle region peptide upregulates endothelium-derived contractile factors in aliskiren-treated diabetic transgenic (mREN2)27 rats.

Background: Elevated prorenin levels associate with microvascular complications in patients with diabetes mellitus, possibly because prorenin affects vascular function in diabetes mellitus, for example by generating angiotensins following its binding to the (pro)renin receptor [(P)RR]. Here we evaluated whether the renin inhibitor aliskiren, with or without the putative (P)RR antagonist handle region peptide (HRP) improved the disturbed vascular function in diabetic TGR(mREN2)27 rats, a high-prorenin, high-(P)RR hypertensive model. Methods: Telemetry transmitters were implanted to monitor blood pressure. After 3 weeks of treatment, rats were sacrificed, and iliac and mesenteric arteries were removed to evaluate vascular reactivity. Results: Diabetes mellitus enhanced the contractile response to nitric oxide synthase (NOS) blockade, potentiated the response to phenylephrine, diminished the effectiveness of endothelin type A (ETA) receptor blockade and allowed acetylcholine to display constrictor, cyclo-oxygenase-2 mediated, endothelium-dependent responses in the presence of NOS inhibition and blockers of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors. Aliskiren normalized blood pressure, suppressed renin activity, and reversed the above vascular effects, with the exception of the altered effectiveness of ETA receptor blockade. Remarkably, when adding HRP on top of aliskiren, its beneficial vascular effects either disappeared or were greatly diminished, although HRP did not alter the effect of aliskiren on blood pressure and renin activity. Conclusions: Renin inhibition improves vascular dysfunction in diabetic hypertensive rats, and HRP counteracts this effect independently of blood pressure and angiotensin. (P)RR blockade therefore is unlikely to be a new tool to further suppress the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) on top of existing RAS blockers.

Optimum AT1 receptor-neprilysin inhibition has superior cardioprotective effects compared with AT1 receptor blockade alone in hypertensive rats

Neprilysin inhibitors prevent the breakdown of bradykinin and natriuretic peptides, promoting vasodilation and natriuresis. However, they also increase angiotensin II and endothelin-1. Here we studied the effects of a low and a high dose of the neprilysin inhibitor thiorphan on top of AT1 receptor blockade with irbesartan versus vehicle in TGR(mREN2)27 rats with high renin hypertension. Mean arterial blood pressure was unaffected by vehicle or thiorphan alone. Irbesartan lowered blood pressure, but after 7 days pressure started to increase again. Low- but not high-dose thiorphan prevented this rise. Only during exposure to low-dose thiorphan plus irbesartan did heart weight/body weight ratio, cardiac atrial natriuretic peptide expression, and myocyte size decrease significantly. Circulating endothelin-1 was not affected by low-dose thiorphan with or without irbesartan, but increased after treatment with high-dose thiorphan plus irbesartan. This endothelin-1 rise was accompanied by an increase in renal sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3 protein abundance, and an upregulation of constrictor vascular endothelin type B receptors. Consequently, the endothelin type B receptor antagonist BQ788 no longer enhanced endothelin-1-induced vasoconstriction (indicative of endothelin type B receptor-mediated vasodilation), but prevented it. Thus, optimal neprilysin inhibitor dosing reveals additional cardioprotective effects on top of AT1 receptor blockade in renin-dependent hypertension.

Brain Renin–Angiotensin SystemNovelty and Significance: Does It Exist?

Because of the presence of the blood–brain barrier, brain renin–angiotensin system activity should depend on local (pro)renin synthesis. Indeed, an intracellular form of renin has been described in the brain, but whether it displays angiotensin (Ang) I–generating activity (AGA) is unknown. Here, we quantified brain (pro)renin, before and after buffer perfusion of the brain, in wild-type mice, renin knockout mice, deoxycorticosterone acetate salt–treated mice, and Ang II–infused mice. Brain regions were homogenized and incubated with excess angiotensinogen to detect AGA, before and after prorenin activation, using a renin inhibitor to correct for nonrenin-mediated AGA. Renin-dependent AGA was readily detectable in brain regions, the highest AGA being present in brain stem (>thalamus=cerebellum=striatum=midbrain>hippocampus=cortex). Brain AGA increased marginally after prorenin activation, suggesting that brain prorenin is low. Buffer perfusion reduced AGA in all brain areas by >60%. Plasma renin (per mL) was 40× to 800× higher than brain renin (per gram). Renin was undetectable in plasma and brain of renin knockout mice. Deoxycorticosterone acetate salt and Ang II suppressed plasma renin and brain renin in parallel, without upregulating brain prorenin. Finally, Ang I was undetectable in brains of spontaneously hypertensive rats, while their brain/plasma Ang II concentration ratio decreased by 80% after Ang II type 1 receptor blockade. In conclusion, brain renin levels (per gram) correspond with the amount of renin present in 1 to 20 &mgr;L of plasma. Brain renin disappears after buffer perfusion and varies in association with plasma renin. This indicates that brain renin represents trapped plasma renin. Brain Ang II represents Ang II taken up from blood rather than locally synthesized Ang II.

Deterioration of kidney function by the (pro)renin receptor blocker handle region peptide in aliskiren-treated diabetic transgenic (mRen2)27 rats

Dual renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade in diabetic nephropathy is no longer feasible because of the profit/side effect imbalance. (Pro)renin receptor [(P)RR] blockade with handle region peptide (HRP) has been reported to exert beneficial effects in various diabetic models in a RAS-independent manner. To what degree (P)RR blockade adds benefits on top of RAS blockade is still unknown. In the present study, we treated diabetic TGR(mREN2)27 rats, a well-established nephropathy model with high prorenin levels [allowing continuous (P)RR stimulation in vivo], with HRP on top of renin inhibition with aliskiren. Aliskiren alone lowered blood pressure and exerted renoprotective effects, as evidenced by reduced glomerulosclerosis, diuresis, proteinuria, albuminuria, and urinary aldosterone levels as well as diminished renal (P)RR and ANG II type 1 receptor expression. It also suppressed plasma and tissue RAS activity and suppressed cardiac atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide expression. HRP, when given on top of aliskiren, did not alter the effects of renin inhibition on blood pressure, RAS activity, or aldosterone. However, it counteracted the beneficial effects of aliskiren in the kidney, induced hyperkalemia, and increased plasma plasminogen activator-inhibitor 1, renal cyclooxygenase-2, and cardiac collagen content. All these effects have been linked to (P)RR stimulation, suggesting that HRP might, in fact, act as a partial agonist. Therefore, the use of HRP on top of RAS blockade in diabetic nephropathy is not advisable.

Creatine kinase inhibition lowers systemic arterial blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: Creatine kinase is reported to be a main predictor of blood pressure (BP) in the general population, with a strong correlation between resistance artery creatine kinase expression and clinical BP in humans. The enzyme rapidly regenerates ATP near cytoplasmic ATPases involved in pressor responses, including resistance artery contractility and renal sodium retention. Therefore, we assessed whether creatine kinase inhibition reduces BP. Methods: We implemented the ‘Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments’ guideline. In a 4-week randomized controlled trial, male 16-week-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (N = 16) were randomly assigned to the specific competitive creatine kinase inhibitor beta-guanidinopropionic acid (3%)-supplemented chow vs. standard chow. BP measured by the tail-cuff method was the main outcome. Other outcomes included vasodilation in isolated arteries and renal renin expression. Results: Creatine kinase inhibition reduced BP safely and reversibly. Mean baseline BP of, respectively, 191.5 (standard error 4.3) mmHg SBP and 143.1 (4.1) mmHg DBP was reduced by, respectively, 42.7 (5.5) mmHg SBP and 35.6 (5.0) mmHg DBP (P < 0.001) compared with controls, with evidence of enhanced vasodilation and a diuretic effect. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first report on the BP-lowering effect of creatine kinase inhibition. Our data indicate that modulation of the creatine kinase system is a potential novel treatment target for hypertension.