Joep H.M. van Esch

Hypertension Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Alterations

Blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), that is, renin inhibitors, angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, Ang II type 1 receptor antagonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, are a cornerstone in the treatment of hypertension. How exactly they exert their effect, in particular in patients with low circulating RAAS activity, also taking into consideration the so-called Ang II/aldosterone escape that often occurs after initial blockade, is still incompletely understood. Multiple studies have tried to find parameters that predict the response to RAAS blockade, allowing a personalized treatment approach. Consequently, the question should now be answered on what basis (eg, sex, ethnicity, age, salt intake, baseline renin, ACE or aldosterone, and genetic variance) a RAAS blocker can be chosen to treat an individual patient. Are all blockers equal? Does optimal blockade imply maximum RAAS blockade, for example, by combining ≥2 RAAS blockers or by simply increasing the dose of 1 blocker? Exciting recent investigations reveal a range of unanticipated extrarenal effects of aldosterone, as well as a detailed insight in the genetic causes of primary aldosteronism, and mineralocorticoid receptor blockers have now become an important treatment option for resistant hypertension. Finally, apart from the deleterious ACE-Ang II-Ang II type 1 receptor arm, animal studies support the existence of protective aminopeptidase A-Ang III-Ang II type 2 receptor and ACE2-Ang-(1 to 7)-Mas receptor arms, paving the way for multiple new treatment options. This review provides an update about all these aspects, critically discussing the many controversies and allowing the reader to obtain a full understanding of what we currently know about RAAS alterations in hypertension.

Hypertension Induced by the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Sunitinib Is Associated With Increased Circulating Endothelin-1 Levels

Angiogenesis inhibition with sunitinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, is associated with hypertension and cardiac toxicity, of which the underlying pathophysiological mechanism is unknown. We investigated the effects of sunitinib on blood pressure (BP), its circadian rhythm, and potential mechanisms involved, including the endothelin-1 system, in 15 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma or gastrointestinal stromal tumors. In addition, we investigated in rats the effect of sunitinib on BP, serum endothelin-1 levels, coronary microvascular function, cardiac structure, and cardiac mitochondrial function. In patients, BP increased by ≈15 mm Hg, whereas heart rate decreased after 4 weeks of treatment. Furthermore, the nocturnal dipping of BP diminished. Plasma endothelin-1 concentration increased 2-fold (P<0.05) and plasma renin decreased (P<0.05), whereas plasma catecholamines and renal function remained unchanged. In rats, 8 days of sunitinib administration induced an ≈30-mm Hg rise in BP, an attenuation of the circadian BP rhythm, and a 3-fold rise in serum endothelin-1 and creatinine, of which all but the rise in creatinine reversed after sunitinib withdrawal. Coronary microvascular function studies after 8 days of sunitinib administration showed decreased responses to bradykinin, angiotensin II, and sodium nitroprusside, all normalizing after sunitinib withdrawal. Cardiac structure and cardiac mitochondrial function did not change. In conclusion, sunitinib induces a reversible rise in BP in patients and in rats associated with activation of the endothelin-1 system, suppression of the renin-angiotensin system, and generalized microvascular dysfunction.

The Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Sunitinib Causes a Preeclampsia-Like Syndrome With Activation of the Endothelin System

Angiogenesis inhibition is an established treatment for several tumor types. Unfortunately, this therapy is associated with adverse effects, including hypertension and renal toxicity, referred to as “preeclampsia.” Recently, we demonstrated in patients and in rats that the multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib induces a rise in blood pressure (BP), renal dysfunction, and proteinuria associated with activation of the endothelin system. In the current study we investigated the effects of sunitinib on rat renal histology, including the resemblance with preeclampsia, as well as the roles of endothelin 1, decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, and increased oxidative stress in the development of sunitinib-induced hypertension and renal toxicity. In rats on sunitinib, light and electron microscopic examination revealed marked glomerular endotheliosis, a characteristic histological feature of preeclampsia, which was partly reversible after sunitinib discontinuation. The histological abnormalities were accompanied by an increase in urinary excretion of endothelin 1 and diminished NO metabolite excretion. In rats on sunitinib alone, BP increased (&Dgr;BP: 31.6±0.9 mm Hg). This rise could largely be prevented with the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan (&Dgr;BP: 12.3±1.5 mm Hg) and only mildly with Tempol, a superoxide dismutase mimetic (&Dgr;BP: 25.9±2.3 mm Hg). Both compounds could not prevent the sunitinib-induced rise in serum creatinine or renal histological abnormalities and had no effect on urine nitrates but decreased proteinuria and urinary endothelin 1 excretion. Our findings indicate that both the endothelin system and oxidative stress play important roles in the development of sunitinib-induced proteinuria and that the endothelin system rather than oxidative stress is important for the development of sunitinib-induced hypertension.

Cardiovascular and renal toxicity during angiogenesis inhibition: clinical and mechanistic aspects

Inhibition of angiogenesis with humanized monoclonal antibodies to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting VEGF receptors has become an established treatment for various tumor types. Contrary to expectations, angiogenesis inhibition by blocking VEGF-mediated signaling is associated with serious side effects including hypertension and renal and cardiac toxicity in a substantial proportion of patients. Fortunately, most of these side effects as discussed in this paper seem to be manageable, but likely become more problematic when survival increases. Although several hypotheses regarding the etiology of angiogenesis inhibition-related cardiovascular and renal side effects have been postulated, many of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This may lead to the development of more specific angiogenesis inhibitors, better management of their side effects and may potentially provide new insights into the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in general.

Effects of Angiotensin Metabolites in the Coronary Vascular Bed of the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat. Loss of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor–Mediated Vasodilation

Because angiotensin (Ang) metabolites mediate functions independent of Ang II, we investigated their effects on coronary flow in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Results were compared with those in the iliac artery and abdominal aorta and the coronary circulation of the Wistar rat. Ang II, III, and IV decreased coronary flow in SHRs and Wistar rats, with Ang III and IV being ≈10 and ≈1000 times less potent than Ang II. Ang-(1-7) decreased coronary flow at concentrations >1 &mgr;mol/L in SHRs. The Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist irbesartan blocked the effects of Ang II, III, and IV, whereas the Ang II type 2 receptor antagonist PD123319 blocked the effects of Ang-(1-7). The maximal Ang II- and III-induced decreases in coronary flow in SHRs were twice as large as those in Wistar rats. PD123319 enhanced the constrictor effects of Ang II and III in Wistar rats so that, in the presence of this drug, their effects were comparable to those in SHRs. In contrast, PD123319 did not alter the Ang II- and III-induced responses in SHRs and blocked the constrictor effect of Ang II in iliac arteries. Ang II type 2 receptor-mediated relaxation did not occur in iliac arteries and abdominal aortas, and the constrictor effects of Ang metabolites in these vessels were identical in Wistar rats and SHRs. In conclusion, coronary constriction induced by Ang II, Ang III, and Ang-(1-7) is enhanced in SHRs as compared with Wistar rats. This is attributable to the absence of counterregulatory Ang II type 2 receptor-mediated relaxation and/or a change of the Ang II type 2 receptor phenotype from relaxant to constrictor.

AT2 receptor-mediated vasodilation in the mouse heart depends on AT1A receptor activation

1 Angiotensin (Ang) II type 2 (AT2) receptors are believed to counteract Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor‐mediated effects. Here, we investigated AT2 receptor‐mediated effects on coronary and cardiac contractility in C57BL/6 mice. 2 Hearts were perfused according to Langendorff. Baseline coronary flow (CF) and left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) were 2.7±0.1 ml min−1 and 111±3 mmHg (n=50), respectively. 3 Ang II (n=14) concentration dependently decreased CF and LVSP, by maximally 41±4 and 25±3%, respectively (pEC50s 7.41±0.12 and 7.65±0.12). The AT1 receptor antagonist irbesartan (n=4) abolished all Ang II‐induced changes, whereas the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 (n=6) enhanced (P<0.05) the effect of Ang II on CF (to 59±1%) and LVSP (to 44±2%), without altering its potency. A similar enhancement was observed in the presence of nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor Nω‐nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester HCl (L‐NAME; n=4). On top of L‐NAME, PD123319 no longer affected the response to Ang II (n=4). 4 The AT2 receptor agonist CGP42112A (n=4) did not affect CF or LVSP, nor did CGP42112A (n=4) alter the constrictor response to the α1‐adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine. Furthermore, Ang II exerted no effects in hearts of AT1A−/− mice (n=5), whereas its effects in hearts of AT1A+/+ wild‐type control mice (n=7) were indistinguishable from those in hearts of C57BL/6 mice. 5 In conclusion, Ang II exerts opposite effects on coronary and cardiac contractility in the mouse heart via activation of AT1A and AT2 receptors. AT2 receptor‐mediated effects depend on NO and occur only in conjunction with AT1A receptor activation.

Cardiac phenotype and angiotensin II levels in AT1a, AT1b, and AT2 receptor single, double, and triple knockouts

AIMS Our aim was to determine the contribution of the three angiotensin (Ang) II receptor subtypes (AT(1a), AT(1b), AT(2)) to coronary responsiveness, cardiac histopathology, and tissue Ang II levels using mice deficient for one, two, or all three Ang II receptors. METHODS AND RESULTS Hearts of knockout mice and their wild-type controls were collected for histochemistry or perfused according to Langendorff, and kidneys were removed to measure tissue Ang II. Ang II dose-dependently decreased coronary flow (CF) and left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), and these effects were absent in all genotypes deficient for AT(1a), independently of AT(1b) and AT(2). The deletion of Ang II receptors had an effect neither on the morphology of medium-sized vessels in the heart nor on the development of fibrosis. However, the lack of both AT(1) subtypes was associated with atrophic changes in the myocardium, a reduced CF and a reduced LVSP. AT(1a) deletion alone, independently of the presence or absence of AT(1b) and/or AT(2), reduced renal Ang II by 50% despite a five-fold rise of plasma Ang II. AT(1b) deletion, on top of AT(1a) deletion (but not alone), further decreased tissue Ang II, while increasing plasma Ang II. In mice deficient for all three Ang II receptors, renal Ang II was located only extracellularly. CONCLUSION The lack of both AT(1) subtypes led to a baseline reduction of CF and LVSP, and the effects of Ang II on CF and LVSP were found to be exclusively mediated via AT(1a). The lack of AT(1a) or AT(1b) does not influence the development or maintenance of normal cardiac morphology, whereas deficiency for both receptors led to atrophic changes in the heart. Renal Ang II levels largely depend on AT(1) binding of extracellularly generated Ang II, and in the absence of all three Ang II receptors, renal Ang II is only located extracellularly.

Selective Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme C-Domain Inhibition Is Sufficient to Prevent Angiotensin I–Induced Vasoconstriction

Somatic angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) contains 2 domains (C-domain and N-domain) capable of hydrolyzing angiotensin I (Ang I) and bradykinin. Here we investigated the effect of the selective C-domain and N-domain inhibitors RXPA380 and RXP407 on Ang I–induced vasoconstriction of porcine femoral arteries (PFAs) and bradykinin-induced vasodilation of preconstricted porcine coronary microarteries (PCMAs). Ang I concentration-dependently constricted PFAs. RXPA380, at concentrations >1 &mgr;mol/L, shifted the Ang I concentration-response curve (CRC) 10-fold to the right. This was comparable to the maximal shift observed with the ACE inhibitors (ACEi) quinaprilat and captopril. RXP407 did not affect Ang I at concentrations ≤0.1 mmol/L. Bradykinin concentration-dependently relaxed PCMAs. RXPA380 (10 &mgr;mol/L) and RXP407 (0.1 mmol/L) potentiated bradykinin, both inducing a leftward shift of the bradykinin CRC that equaled ≈50% of the maximal shift observed with quinaprilat. Ang I added to blood plasma disappeared with a half life (t1/2) of 42±3 minutes. Quinaprilat increased the t1/2 ≈4-fold, indicating that 71±6% of Ang I metabolism was attributable to ACE. RXPA380 (10 &mgr;mol/L) and RXP407 (0.1 mmol/L) increased the t1/2 ≈2-fold, thereby suggesting that both domains contribute to conversion in plasma. In conclusion, tissue Ang I–II conversion depends exclusively on the ACE C-domain, whereas both domains contribute to conversion by soluble ACE and to bradykinin degradation at tissue sites. Because tissue ACE (and not plasma ACE) determines the hypertensive effects of Ang I, these data not only explain why N-domain inhibition does not affect Ang I–induced vasoconstriction in vivo but also why ACEi exert blood pressure–independent effects at low (C-domain–blocking) doses.

Cardiovascular phenotype of mice lacking all three subtypes of angiotensin II receptors

Angiotensin II activates two distinct receptors, the angiotensin II receptors type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2). In rodents, two AT1 subtypes were identified (AT1a and AT1b). To determine receptor‐specific functions and possible angiotensin II effects independent of its three known receptors we generated mice deficient in either one of the angiotensin II receptors, in two, or in all three (triple knockouts). Triple knockouts were vital and fertile, but survival was impaired. Hypotension and renal histological abnormalities in triple knockouts were comparable to those in mice lacking both AT1 subtypes. All combinations lacking AT1a were distinguished by reduced heart rate. AT1a deletion impaired the in vivo pressor response to angiotensin II bolus injection, whereas deficiency for AT1b and/or AT2 had no effect. However, the additional lack of AT1b in AT1a‐deficient mice further impaired the vasoconstrictive capacity of angiotensin II. Although general vasoconstrictor properties were not changed, angiotensin II failed to alter blood pressure in triple knockouts, indicating that there are no other receptors involved in direct angiotensin II pressor effects. Our data identify mice deficient in all three angiotensin II receptors as an ideal tool to better understand the structure and function of the reninangiotensin system and to search for angiotensin II effects independent of AT1 and AT2.—Gembardt, F., Heringer‐Walther, S., van Esch, J. H. M., Sterner‐Kock, A., van Veghel, R., Le, T. H., Garrelds, I. M., Coffman, T. M., Danser, A. H. J., Schultheiss, H.‐P., and Walther, T. Cardiovascular phenotype of mice lacking all three subtypes of angiotensin II receptors. FASEB J. 22, 3068–3077 (2008)

Handle Region Peptide Counteracts the Beneficial Effects of the Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

To investigate whether the putative (pro)renin receptor blocker, the handle region peptide (HRP), exerts effects on top of the blood pressure–lowering and cardioprotective effects of the renin inhibitor aliskiren, spontaneously hypertensive rats were implanted with telemetry transmitters to monitor heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP). After a 2-week recovery period, vehicle, aliskiren, HRP (100 and 1 mg/kg per day, respectively), and HRP+aliskiren were infused for 3 weeks using osmotic minipumps. Subsequently, the heart was removed to study coronary function according to Langendorff. Baseline MAP and heart rate in vehicle-treated rats were 146±3 mm Hg and 326±4 bpm. HRP did not affect MAP, whereas aliskiren and HRP+aliskiren lowered MAP (by maximally 29±2 and 20±1 mm Hg, respectively) without affecting heart rate. Aliskiren significantly reduced MAP throughout the 3-week infusion period, whereas the blood pressure–lowering effect of HRP+aliskiren returned to baseline within 2 weeks of treatment. In comparison with vehicle, aliskiren increased the endothelium-dependent response to bradykinin and decreased the response to angiotensin II in the coronary circulation, whereas these responses were not altered after treatment with HRP or HRP+aliskiren. HRP did not alter plasma renin activity, plasma angiotensin levels, or the renal angiotensin content, either alone or on top of aliskiren, nor did it alter the aliskiren-induced decrease in renal Ang II type 1 receptor expression. Yet, it did reverse the aliskiren-induced reduction in cardiomyocyte area, without affecting this area when given alone. In conclusion, HRP counteracts the beneficial effects of aliskiren on blood pressure, coronary function, and cardiac hypertrophy in an angiotensin-independent manner.