Frank W. Beltman
University Medical Center Groningen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Frank W. Beltman.
Hypertension | 2007
Willem J. Verberk; Abraham A. Kroon; Jacques W. M. Lenders; Alfons G. H. Kessels; Gert A. van Montfrans; Andries J. Smit; Paul-Hugo M. van der Kuy; Patricia J. Nelemans; Roger J. M. W. Rennenberg; Diederick E. Grobbee; Frank W. Beltman; Manuela A. Joore; Daniëlle E.M. Brunenberg; Carmen D. Dirksen; Theo Thien; Peter W. de Leeuw
It is still uncertain whether one can safely base treatment decisions on self-measurement of blood pressure. In the present study, we investigated whether antihypertensive treatment based on self-measurement of blood pressure leads to the use of less medication without the loss of blood pressure control. We randomly assigned 430 hypertensive patients to receive treatment either on the basis of self-measured pressures (n=216) or office pressures (OPs; n=214). During 1-year follow-up, blood pressure was measured by office measurement (10 visits), ambulatory monitoring (start and end), and self-measurement (8 times, self-pressure group only). In addition, drug use, associated costs, and degree of target organ damage (echocardiography and microalbuminuria) were assessed. The self-pressure group used less medication than the OP group (1.47 versus 2.48 drug steps; P<0.001) with lower costs (
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2009
Nancy C. W. ter Bogt; Wanda J. E. Bemelmans; Frank W. Beltman; Jan Broer; Andries J. Smit; Klaas van der Meer
3222 versus
JAMA Internal Medicine | 2011
Nancy C. W. ter Bogt; Wanda J. E. Bemelmans; Frank W. Beltman; Jan Broer; Andries J. Smit; Klaas van der Meer
4420 per 100 patients per month; P<0.001) but without significant differences in systolic and diastolic OP values (1.6/1.0 mm Hg; P=0.25/0.20), in changes in left ventricular mass index (-6.5 g/m(2) versus -5.6 g/m(2); P=0.72), or in median urinary microalbumin concentration (-1.7 versus -1.5 mg per 24 hours; P=0.87). Nevertheless, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure values at the end of the trial were higher in the self-pressure than in the OP group: 125.9 versus 123.8 mm Hg (P<0.05) for systolic and 77.2 versus 76.1 mm Hg (P<0.05) for diastolic blood pressure. These data show that self-measurement leads to less medication use than office blood pressure measurement without leading to significant differences in OP values or target organ damage. Ambulatory values, however, remain slightly elevated for the self-pressure group.
Public Health Nutrition | 2011
Nancy C. W. ter Bogt; Ivon Ej Milder; Wanda J. E. Bemelmans; Frank W. Beltman; Jan Broer; Andries J. Smit; Klaas van der Meer
BACKGROUND Lifestyle interventions targeting prevention of weight gain may have better long-term success than when aimed at weight loss. Limited evidence exists about such an approach in the primary care setting. DESIGN An RTC was conducted. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Participants were 457 overweight or obese patients (BMI=25-40 kg/m(2), mean age 56 years, 52% women) with either hypertension or dyslipidemia, or both, from 11 general practice locations in The Netherlands. INTERVENTION In the intervention group, four individual visits to a nurse practitioner (NP) and one feedback session by telephone were scheduled for lifestyle counseling with guidance of the NP using a standardized computerized software program. The control group received usual care from their general practitioner (GP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Changes in body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, and blood lipids after 1 year (dropout <10%). Data were collected in 2006 and 2007. Statistical analyses were conducted in 2007 and 2008. RESULTS There were more weight losers and stabilizers in the NP group than in the general practitioner usual care (GP-UC) group (77% vs 65%; p<0.05). In men, mean weight losses were 2.3% for the NP group and 0.1% for the GP-UC group (p<0.05). Significant reductions occurred also in waist circumference but not in blood pressure, blood lipids, and fasting glucose. In women, mean weight losses were in both groups 1.6%. In the NP group, obese people lost more weight (-3.0%) than the non-obese (-1.3%; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Standardized computer-guided counseling by NPs may be an effective strategy to support weight-gain prevention and weight loss in primary care, in the current trial, particularly among men. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), www.trialregister.nl, study no. TC 1365.
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology | 2001
Wilfred F. Heesen; Frank W. Beltman; Andries J. Smit; Jf May; Pieter A. de Graeff; Jaap H. J. Muntinga; T.K. Havinga; F. H. Schuurman; Enno van der Veur; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Kong I. Lie
BACKGROUND Weight regain after initial loss of weight is common, which indicates a need for lifestyle counseling aimed at preventing weight gain instead of weight loss. This study was conducted to determine whether structured lifestyle counseling by nurse practitioners (NPs) group compared with usual care by general practitioners (GP-UC) in overweight and obese patients can prevent (further) weight gain. METHODS A randomized controlled trial in 11 general practice locations in the Netherlands of 457 patients (body mass index, 25-40 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]; mean age, 56 years; 52% female) with either hypertension or dyslipidemia or both. The NP group received lifestyle counseling with guidance of the NP using a standardized software program. The GP-UC group received usual care from their GP. Main outcome measures were changes in body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, and fasting glucose and blood lipid levels after 3 years. RESULTS In both groups, approximately 60% of the participants achieved weight maintenance after 3 years. There was no significant difference in mean (SD) weight change and change of waist circumference between the NP and GP-UC groups (weight change: NP group, -1.2% [5.8%], and GP-UC group, -0.6% [5.6%] [P = .37]; and change of waist circumference: NP group, -0.8 [7.1] cm, and GP-UC group, 0.4 [7.2] cm [P = .11]). A significant difference occurred for mean (SD) fasting glucose levels (NP group, -0.02 [0.49] mmol/L, and GP-UC group, 0.10 [0.53] mmol/L [P = .02]) (to convert to milligrams per deciliter, divide by 0.0555) but not for lipid levels and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS Lifestyle counseling by NPs did not lead to significantly better prevention of weight gain compared with GPs. In the majority in both groups, lifestyle counseling succeeded in preventing (further) weight gain. TRIAL REGISTRATION trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR1365.
Journal of Hypertension | 2004
Jp Greving; Petra Denig; Wj van der Veen; Frank W. Beltman; Mcjm Sturkenboom; de Dick Zeeuw; Flora Haaijer-Ruskamp
OBJECTIVES The Groningen Overweight and Lifestyle (GOAL) study primarily aims at preventing weight gain by nurse practitioners (NP) guided by a standardized computerized software program. Since favourable changes in physical activity (PA) and diet may improve health independently of weight (loss), insight into effects on lifestyle habits is essential. We examined the 1-year effects of lifestyle counselling by NP on PA and diet, compared with usual care from the general practitioner (GP-UC). DESIGN A randomized controlled trial. SETTING Eleven general practice locations in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS A total of 341 GOAL participants with overweight or obesity and either hypertension or dyslipidaemia, or both, who completed an FFQ and Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (SQUASH) at baseline and after 1 year. RESULTS After 1 year, the NP group spent 33 min/week more on walking compared with the GP-UC group who spent -5 min/week on walking (P = 0.05). No significant differences were found between the NP and GP-UC groups on the percentage of persons complying with the PA guidelines. In both groups, nutrient intake changed in a favourable direction and participants complied more often with dietary guidelines, but without overall difference between the NP and GP-UC groups. CONCLUSIONS With the exception of an increase in walking (based on self-reported data) in the NP group, no intervention effects on PA and diet occurred. Positive changes in nutrient intake were seen in both groups.
eLife | 2016
Magda Grudniewska; Stijn Mouton; Daniil Simanov; Frank W. Beltman; Margriet Grelling; Katrien De Mulder; Wibowo Arindrarto; Philipp M. Weissert; Stefan van der Elst; Eugene Berezikov
The purpose of this study was to evaluate in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study the effect of long-term (2-year) lisinopril treatment on cardiovascular end-organ damage in patients with previously untreated isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). All patients with ISH were derived from a population screening program. End-organ damage measurements, done initially and after 6 and 24 months of treatment, included measurements of aortic distensibility and echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and diastolic function. Blood pressure was measured by office and ambulatory measurements. Of the 97 subjects with ISH selected from the screening, 62 (30 lisinopril) completed the study according to protocol. Office blood pressure decreased in both groups, but ambulatory results significantly decreased with lisinopril-treatment only. Aortic distensibility increased significantly with lisinopril, as opposed to a decrease in placebo-treated subjects. The main effect of increased distensibility occurred between 6 and 24 months, whereas ambulatory blood pressure changed mainly in the first 6 months of treatment. LVMI decreased in both treatment groups, with a significantly higher reduction in lisinopril-treated subjects. Left ventricular diastolic function showed no significant changes in either group. The vascular pathophysiologic alterations of ISH—a decreased aortic distensibility—can be improved with long-term lisinopril treatment, whereas values deteriorate further in placebo-treated subjects. These results, in one of the first studies including subjects with previously untreated ISH only, indicate that lisinopril treatment might favorably influence the cardiovascular risk of ISH.
Patient Education and Counseling | 2012
Femke Driehuis; Jeroen C.M. Barte; Nancy C. W. ter Bogt; Frank W. Beltman; Andries J. Smit; Klaas van der Meer; Wanda J. E. Bemelmans
Objective Concerns exist about heavily prescribing of new drugs when the evidence on hard outcomes is still limited. This has been the case for the newer classes of antihypertensives, especially in hypertensive patients without additional comorbidity. The association between comorbidity and trends in prescribing of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) was examined for the period 1996–2000. Design and methods Data were obtained from the Integrated Primary Care Information database, which contains medical records from more than 100 general practitioners in the Netherlands. Prevalent drug use in hypertensive patients was determined per calendar year. As initial treatment, the first antihypertensive drug prescribed within 1 year after diagnosis of hypertension was considered. Logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of receiving either ACE-I or ARBs. Results The overall prevalent ACE-I use remained stable (31%), but it increased from 33 to 41% in hypertensive patients with diabetes, heart failure, proteinuria and/or renal insufficiency. ARB use increased significantly from 2 to 12%; this trend did not differ between patients with or without specific comorbidities. Initial ACE-I use slightly decreased (from 29% to 24%), whereas initial ARB use significantly increased (from 4% to 12%). ACE-I were more likely to be the first treatment in patients with diabetes [odds ratio (OR) = 3.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2–4.9] or hypercholesterolemia (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.1–1.8). ARBs were more likely to be the initial treatment in patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 1.6; 1.2–2.3), diabetes (OR = 2.1; 1.5–2.9) or hypercholesterolemia (OR = 1.7; 1.2–2.4). Conclusions The increased use of ACE-I is mostly restricted to hypertensive patients with comorbidities for which their use has been recommended. Trends in prescribing of ARBs are not related to relevant comorbidities.
BMJ | 1996
Frank W. Beltman; Wilfred F. Heesen; R.H. Kok; Andries J. Smit; Jf May; P. A. De Graeff; T.K. Havinga; F. H. Schuurman; E. van der Veur; K. I. Lie; B. Meyboom-de Jong
The regeneration-capable flatworm Macrostomum lignano is a powerful model organism to study the biology of stem cells in vivo. As a flatworm amenable to transgenesis, it complements the historically used planarian flatworm models, such as Schmidtea mediterranea. However, information on the transcriptome and markers of stem cells in M. lignano is limited. We generated a de novo transcriptome assembly and performed the first comprehensive characterization of gene expression in the proliferating cells of M. lignano, represented by somatic stem cells, called neoblasts, and germline cells. Knockdown of a selected set of neoblast genes, including Mlig-ddx39, Mlig-rrm1, Mlig-rpa3, Mlig-cdk1, and Mlig-h2a, confirmed their crucial role for the functionality of somatic neoblasts during homeostasis and regeneration. The generated M. lignano transcriptome assembly and gene expression signatures of somatic neoblasts and germline cells will be a valuable resource for future molecular studies in M. lignano. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20607.001
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | 2011
Andrea Fokkens; P. Auke Wiegersma; Frank W. Beltman; Sijmen A. Reijneveld
OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the three-year effect of lifestyle counseling by a nurse practitioner (NP) on physical activity (PA) and dietary intake compared with usual care by a general practitioner (GP). METHODS At baseline, subjects were randomly allocated to the NP group (n = 225) or to the GP group (n = 232). The NP group received a low-intensive lifestyle intervention for three years by the NP and the GP group received one consultation by the GP and thereafter usual care. PA and dietary intake were assessed with questionnaires at baseline, 1 year follow-up and 3 year follow-up. RESULTS After three years, leisure-time activity increased and favorable improvements towards a healthy diet were made for both groups. These three-year changes in PA and diet did not differ significantly between groups. Changes in PA and dietary habits after one year were practically maintained after 3 years, because only small relapses were found. CONCLUSION After three years, subjects were more physically active and had a healthier diet compared to baseline. Lifestyle counseling by NP resulted in similar lifestyle changes compared to GP consultation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS NPs could also advice patients at cardiovascular risk by lifestyle counseling, to possibly reduce GP barriers.