Franziska Klein

RNA polyadenylation in Archaea : not observed in Haloferax while the exosome polynucleotidylates RNA in Sulfolobus

The addition of poly(A) tails to RNA is a phenomenon common to all organisms examined so far. No homologues of the known polyadenylating enzymes are found in Archaea and little is known concerning the mechanisms of messenger RNA degradation in these organisms. Hyperthermophiles of the genus Sulfolobus contain a protein complex with high similarity to the exosome, which is known to degrade RNA in eukaryotes. Halophilic Archaea, however, do not encode homologues of these eukaryotic exosome components. In this work, we analysed RNA polyadenylation and degradation in the archaea Sulfolobus solfataricus and Haloferax volcanii. No RNA polyadenylation was detected in the halophilic archaeon H. volcanii. However, RNA polynucleotidylation occurred in hyperthermophiles of the genus Sulfolobus and was mediated by the archaea exosome complex. Together, our results identify the first organism without RNA polyadenylation and show a polyadenylation activity of the archaea exosome.

Characterization of native and reconstituted exosome complexes from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus

The eukaryotic exosome is a protein complex with essential functions in processing and degradation of RNA. Exosome‐like complexes were recently found in Archaea. Here we characterize the exosome of Sulfolobus solfataricus. Two exosome fractions can be discriminated by density gradient centrifugation. We show that the Cdc48 protein is associated with the exosome from the 30S−50S fraction but not with the exosome of the 11.3S fraction. While only some complexes contain Cdc48, the archaeal DnaG‐like protein was found to be a core exosome subunit in addition to Rrp4, Rrp41, Rrp42 and Csl4. Assays with depleted extracts revealed that the exosome is responsible for major ribonucleolytic activity in S. solfataricus. Various complexes consisting of the Rrp41‐Rrp42 hexameric ring and Rrp4, Csl4 and DnaG were reconstituted. Dependent on their composition, different complexes showed variations in RNase activity indicating functional interdependence of the subunits. The catalytic activity of these complexes and of the native exosome can be ascribed to the Rrp41‐Rrp42 ring, which degrades RNA phosphorolytically. Rrp4 and Csl4 do not exhibit any hydrolytic RNase activity, either when assayed alone or in context of the complex, but influence the activity of the archaeal exosome.

RNase E is involved in 5′-end 23S rRNA processing in α-Proteobacteria

In Rhodobacter capsulatus and Rhizobium leguminosarum, an internal transcribed spacer consisting of helices 9 and 10 is removed during 23S rRNA processing, which leads to the occurrence of a 5.8S-like rRNA. The particular rRNA maturation steps are not known, with exception of the initial RNase III cleavage in helix 9. We found that GC-rich stem-loop structures of helix 9, which are released by RNase III, are immediately degraded. The degradation of helix 10 is slower and its kinetics differs in both species. Nevertheless, the helix 10 processing mechanism is conserved and includes cleavages by RNase E.