Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Fred Fox is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Fred Fox.


Transactions of the ASABE | 2013

Application of the Wind Erosion Prediction System in the AIRPACT Regional Air Quality Modeling Framework

Serena H. Chung; F. L. Herron-Thorpe; Brian K. Lamb; Timothy M. VanReken; Joseph K. Vaughan; Jincheng Gao; Larry E. Wagner; Fred Fox

Abstract. Wind erosion of soil is a major concern of the agricultural community, as it removes the most fertile part of the soil and thus degrades soil productivity. Furthermore, dust emissions due to wind erosion degrade air quality, reduce visibility, and cause perturbations to regional radiation budgets. PM 10 emitted from the soil surface can travel hundreds of kilometers downwind before being deposited back to the surface. Thus, it is necessary to address agricultural air pollutant sources within a regional air quality modeling system in order to forecast regional dust storms and to understand the impact of agricultural activities and land-management practices on air quality in a changing climate. The Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS) is a new tool in regional air quality modeling for simulating erosion from agricultural fields. WEPS represents a significant improvement, in comparison to existing empirical windblown dust modeling algorithms used for air quality simulations, by using a more process-based modeling approach. This is in contrast with the empirical approaches used in previous models, which could only be used reliably when soil, surface, and ambient conditions are similar to those from which the parameterizations were derived. WEPS was originally intended for soil conservation applications and designed to simulate conditions of a single field over multiple years. In this work, we used the EROSION submodel from WEPS as a PM 10 emission module for regional modeling by extending it to cover a large region divided into Euclidean grid cells. The new PM 10 emission module was then employed within a regional weather and chemical transport modeling framework commonly used for comprehensive simulations of a wide range of pollutants to evaluate overall air quality conditions. This framework employs the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) weather model along with the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to treat ozone, particulate matter, and other air pollutants. To demonstrate the capabilities of the WRF/EROSION/CMAQ dust modeling framework, we present here results from simulations of dust storms that occurred in central and eastern Washington during 4 October 2009 and 26 August 2010. Comparison of model results with observations indicates that the modeling framework performs well in predicting the onset and timing of the dust storms and the spatial extent of their dust plumes. The regional dust modeling framework is able to predict elevated PM 10 concentrations hundreds of kilometers downwind of erosion source regions associated with the windblown dust, although the magnitude of the PM 10 concentrations are extremely sensitive to the assumption of surface soil moisture and model wind speeds. Future work will include incorporating the full WEPS model into the regional modeling framework and targeting field measurements to evaluate the modeling framework more extensively.


Transactions of the ASABE | 2013

Spatial Application of WEPS for Estimating Wind Erosion in the Pacific Northwest

Jincheng Gao; Larry E. Wagner; Fred Fox; Serena H. Chung; Joseph K. Vaughan; Brian K. Lamb

Abstract. The Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS) is used to simulate soil erosion by wind on cropland and was originally designed to run simulations on a field scale. This study extended WEPS to run on multiple fields (grid cells) independently to cover a large region and conducted an initial investigation to assess how well WEPS performed in that environment by comparing simulations for two historical dust events with field observations and satellite images in the Columbia Plateau region of Washington. We modified the WEPS source code to allow it not only to run on multiple grid cells but also to save the state of the simulation so that it can be re-initiated from that state in future runs, allowing the model to be started and then stepped through time incrementally under various future climate or forecast weather scenarios. We initially ran WEPS on the entire state of Washington, with the entire Pacific Northwest region as our ultimate target area, to provide PM 10 and eventually PM 2.5 emissions from wind erosion events as input to the chemical transport model CMAQ, which is used by the AIRPACT regional air quality modeling system for the Pacific Northwest. Three principal inputs to WEPS are meteorological data, soil data, and crop management practices. These data, at a 1 km A— 1 km grid cell resolution, are the basic input data for running the spatially distributed model. The climatic data from a three-year period were stochastically generated based on statistical representations of past meteorological measurements from stations in the region and were used for initializing WEPS, and then a three-day set of meteorological data corresponding with historical dust storm events were selected for simulation by WEPS of wind erosion of cropland in the state of Washington. The crop management data were selected based on the land use and USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) crop management zones, and the soil data were derived from the NRCS SSURGO database. We aggregated the outputs from 1 km A— 1 km grid cells into 12 km A— 12 km grid cells for easier visualization and then mapped the total surface soil erosion, suspension, and PM 10 emissions for each 12 km A— 12 km grid cell. This study shows that WEPS can be successfully extended to run from one field grid cell to multiple field grid cells, and the model can identify regions with high potential for soil erosion by wind. It also demonstrates that WEPS can be used for real-time monitoring of soil erosion and air quality in a large region if actual and forecast weather inputs are available.


International Symposium on Erosion and Landscape Evolution (ISELE), 18-21 September 2011, Anchorage, Alaska | 2011

Integrating WEPP into the WEPS Infrastructure

Fred Fox; James R Frankenberger; Dennis C. Flanagan; Larry E. Wagner

WEPP Hydrology in WEPS WEPP hydrology routines were previously integrated into WEPS to reduce the computational requirements for WEPS simulations. Testing has shown that the runoff, infiltration, evaporation, and winter hydrology between this code and the original WEPP code are significantly different. Using a fallow soil test scenario, the factors causing these differences have been isolated to include random roughness, hydraulic conductivity, soil matric potential, reference evapotranspiration, soil layering, snowfall and snow melt processes. It is expected that test scenarios with growing crops will lead to an additional set of difference factors.


International Symposium on Erosion and Landscape Evolution (ISELE), 18-21 September 2011, Anchorage, Alaska | 2011

CLIGEN: Addressing Deficiencies in the Generator and its Databases

William Rust; Fred Fox; Larry E. Wagner

CLIGEN is a stochastic generator that estimates daily temperatures, precipitation and other weather related phenomena. It is an intermediate model used by the Water Erosion Prediction Program (WEPP), the Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS), and other models that require daily weather data. Sub-models of these programs use CLIGEN’s output to calculate plant growth and decomposition, soil surface changes and movement of water through soil layers. Over the years, changes to CLIGEN have been made without being adequately documented. This paper documents those changes and discusses needed changes to CLIGEN. Issues in the existing program include improving the quality of the input meteorological datasets and documenting their source, improving the correlation, both cross and serial, between generated data, making the data more accurately reflect seasonal variations, making the generated distributions correspond better to the observed distributions, changing how the random number variate sets are created and tested, moving to a histogram based precipitation model, changing how interpolations are performed to better reflect seasonality and converting from FORTRAN to Java to improve code readability and maintainability. In addition, new features are being added to produce break-point precipitation for downstream models in addition to the current intensity, duration and time to peak data and to parametrically change inputs to facilitate climate change studies. These issues are discussed and the solutions being implemented are described.


Aeolian Research | 2016

The National Wind Erosion Research Network: Building a standardized long-term data resource for aeolian research, modeling and land management

Nicholas P. Webb; Jeffrey E. Herrick; Justin W. Van Zee; Ericha M. Courtright; Christopher H. Hugenholtz; Ted M. Zobeck; Gregory S. Okin; Thomas E. Barchyn; Benjamin J. Billings; Robert C. Boyd; Scott D. Clingan; Brad F. Cooper; Michael C. Duniway; Justin D. Derner; Fred Fox; Kris M. Havstad; Philip Heilman; Valerie LaPlante; Noel A. Ludwig; Loretta J. Metz; M. A. Nearing; M. Lee Norfleet; Frederick B. Pierson; Matt A. Sanderson; Brenton Sharratt; Jean L. Steiner; John Tatarko; Negussie H. Tedela; David Toledo; Robert S. Unnasch


Weather and climate extremes | 2015

Implications of climate change on wind erosion of agricultural lands in the Columbia plateau

Brenton Sharratt; John Tatarko; John T. Abatzoglou; Fred Fox; David R. Huggins


Environmental Modeling & Assessment | 2014

Simulating Unstressed Crop Development and Growth Using the Unified Plant Growth Model (UPGM)

Gregory S. McMaster; James C. Ascough; Debora A. Edmunds; Larry E. Wagner; Fred Fox; Kendall C. DeJonge; Neil C. Hansen


Applied Engineering in Agriculture | 2013

The Management Submodel of the Wind Erosion Prediction System

Larry E. Wagner; Fred Fox


Archive | 2014

Linking a Modified EPIC-Based Plant Growth Model (UPGM) with a Component-Based Watershed Model (AgES-W)

Gregory S. McMaster; James C. Ascough; Debora A. Edmunds; Olaf David; Larry E. Wagner; Fred Fox; Robert H. Erskine; Holm Kipka; Timothy R. Green


Archive | 2006

Multi-Crop Plant Growth Modeling from Field to Watershed for Water Quality and Management

Gregory S. McMaster; James C. Ascough Ii; Debora A. Edmunds; Larry E. Wagner; Fred Fox

Collaboration


Dive into the Fred Fox's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Larry E. Wagner

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Debora A. Edmunds

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory S. McMaster

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brenton Sharratt

Washington State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian K. Lamb

Washington State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James C. Ascough

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Tatarko

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph K. Vaughan

Washington State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Serena H. Chung

Washington State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge